Factors Affecting Livelihood Strategies of Smallholder Tobacco and Non-Tobacco Farmers and off-Farm Households Benefittin from Land Reformi in Zimbabwe

• Autorzy: Alexander Mapfumo , Abbissynia Mushunje
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The main objective of this paper was to determine the factors that affect the livelihood strategies of resettled smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe. The study was conducted in Manicaland Province in Zimbabwe, and the respondents were stratified into four groups. These were smallholder farmers resettled under the A1 and A2 models, as well as tobacco and non-tobacco smallholder farmers. The two models differ in how they were implemented and supported, which might lead to them having different livelihood strategies. A total of 300 respondents were surveyed, consisting of 114 tobacco and 149 non-tobacco farmers and 24 off-farm and 13 wageearner households in Manicaland province. The study used a Multinomial Logit model to investigate the factors influencing a household's decision to choose different livelihood strategies. In the model, the dependent variables included four livelihood strategies, while the explanatory variables included various household social-economic and institutional factors. The results obtained from the multinomial logistic regression model established that gender and land size were significant at a level of 1%, and education, household size, access to credit and access to inputs were significant at 5% in the adoption of tobacco farming, access to credit and gender were significant at a 1% level in the adoption of non-tobacco farming, while education was significant at a 10% level in adopting off-farm were found to be significant in determining the adoption of the tobacco farming in the study area up to less than 10% probability level in adopting off-farm activities. Smallholder farmers who did not adopt tobacco farming indicated that limited land size, shortage of labour and access to tobacco inputs were the major impediments to adopting tobacco farming. The government should support the efforts of smallholder farmers to increase their livelihood strategies through unveiling credit lines for farming activities. Access to inputs for smallholder farmers should be made a priority by the government through the provision and fair distribution of adequate agricultural inputs. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Land reform; Labour; Agriculture; Arable farm; Households

PL

Reforma rolna; Praca; Rolnictwo; Gospodarstwa rolne; Gospodarstwa domowe

• Czasopismo: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development
• Rocznik: 2022
• Numer: z. 2 (64)
• Strony: 153--160

Twórcy

autor

Alexander Mapfumo

• Midlands State University, Zimbabwe

autor

Abbissynia Mushunje

• University of Fort Hare, South Afric

Bibliografia

• Adugna, L (2005). The dynamics of livelihood diversification in ethiopia revisited: Evidence from panel data. Department of Economics University of Massachusetts, Boston.
• Ayuya, O.I., Waluse, S.K., Gido, E.O. (2012). Multinomial logit analysis of small-scale farmers' choice of organic soil management practices in Bungoma County, Kenya. Curr. Res. J. Soc. Sci., 4(4), 314-322.
• Balint, B. (2005). Determinants of commercial orientation of individual farms Romania. Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development, Berlin.
• Barrett, C.B., Reardon, T., Webb, P. (2001). Non-farm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in Rural Africa: Concepts, dynamics, and policy implications. Food Policy, 26, 315-331.
• Berehanu, E. (2007). Livelihood strategies of smallholder farmers and income poverty in draught prone areas: The case of Gena-Bosa woreda, SNNPRS. An MSc Thesis Presented to the School of Graduate Studies of Haramaya University.
• Bezemer, D.J., Lerman, Z. (2002). Rural livelihoods in Armenia. The Centre for Agricultural Economic Research, the Department of Agricultural Economics and Management Discussion Paper No. 4.03.
• Brown, D., Stephens, E., Ouma, J., Murithi, F., Barrett, C. (2006). Livelihood strategies in the rural Kenyan highlands. AfJARE, 1(1).
• Chingosho, R., Dare, C., van Walbeek, C. (2021). Tobacco farming and current debt status among smallholder farmers in Manicaland province in Zimbabwe. Tobac. Cont., 30(6), 610-615.
• Demeke, B.L., Haji, J. (2014). Econometric analysis of factors affecting market participation of smallholder farming in Central Ethiopia. J. Agric. Econ. Ext. Rural Dev., 2(6), 94-104.
• Destaw, B (2003). Non-farm employment and farm production of small holder farmers: A study in Edja District of Ethiopia. A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies Alemaya University.
• Galab, S., Fenn, B., Jones, N., Raju, D.S.R., Wilson, I., Reddy, M.G. (2002). Livelihood Diversification in Rural Andhra Pradesh: Household asset portfolios and implications for poverty reduction working paper no. 34.
• Galang, R. (2002). Economic framework for the Chimanimani District. Sponsored by ZOIC, DTC, CBT & CRDC.
• Greene, H.W. (2003). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). New York University Macmillan Publishing Company.
• Holden, S., Bekele, S., Pender, J. (2004). Non-farm income, household welfare, and sustainable land management in a less favoured area in the Ethiopian highlands. Department of Economics and Resource Management Agricultural University of Norway.
• Hollaway, G., Shankar, B., Rahman, S. (2002). Bayesian spatial probit estimation: a primer and an application to HYV rice adoption. Agric. Econ., 27, 383-402.
• Jerie, S., Ndabaningi, T (2011). The impact of rainfall variability on rain-fed tobacco in Manicaland province of Zimbabwe. J. Sust. Dev. Afr., 13(1).
• Kisaka-Lwayo, M. (2012). Risk preferences and consumption decisions in organic production: the case of Kwazulu-natal and Eastern cape provinces of South Africa. Unpublished. PhD Thesis. University of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa.
• Lisa, M.G. (2008). The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA (vol. 2, pp. 697-698).
• Lun, Y., Moucheng, L., Fei, L., Qingwen, M., Canqiang, Z., Heyao, L. (2018). Livelihood assets and strategies among rural households: Comparative analysis of rice and dryland terrace systems in China. Sustainability, 10(7), 2525; doi: 10.3390/su10072525
• Mahelet, G.F. (2007). Factors affecting commercialization of small holder farmers in Ethiopia.
• Mango, L., Kugedera, A.T., Mango, L., Mutenje, M. (2020). Smallholder tobacco farmers and forest conservation in Mutasa District, Zimbabwe. Ecol. Evol. Biol., 5(1), 6-12.
• Moyo, S. (1998). Socio-Economic and political Impacts of Land Acquisition.SAPES Policy Monographs Series No.1, Harare.
• Norusis, M (2004). SPSS 13.0 Statistical Procedures Companion. Upper Saddle-River, N.J.Prentice Hall, Inc.
• Poverty Reduction Forum Trust (2013). Study on Rural Poverty in Manicaland: The Case of Mutare Rural. Harare.
• Rao, J., Niehof, A., Price, L., Moerbeek, H. (2004). Food Security through the Livelihoods Lens: an integrative approach (the case of less favoured areas in the Philippines).
• Scoones, I (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. Bringhton: IDS working paper 72.
• Stifel, D. (2010). The rural non-farm economy, livelihood strategies and household welfare. Afr. J. Agric. Res. Econ., 4(1).
• Takane, T. (2007). Gambling with liberalization: Smallholder livelihoods in contemporary rural Malawi. IDE discussion paper No. 117.
• TIMB (Tobacco Industry and Marketing Board). (2009). Annual statistical report. Harare.
• TIMB (Tobacco Industry and Marketing Board). (2012). Annual statistical report. Harare.
• TIMB (Tobacco Industry and Marketing Board). (2020). Annual statistical report. Harare.
• WFP (World Food Programme) (2009). Crop and food security assessment mission to Zimbabwe 22 June 2009. World Food Programme, Rome.
• Verbeek, M. (2008). A guide to modern econometrics. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
• Yishak, G., Gezahegn, A., Tesfaye, L., Dawit, A. (2014). Rural household livelihood strategies: Options and determinants in the case of Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Soc. Sci., 3(3), 92-104; doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20140303.15
• Zimstat (2013). Statistical yearbook. Harare, Zimbabwe.
• ZimVac (Zimbabwe Vulnerability Assessment Committee) (2013). Rural livelihoods Assessment. Harare.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17306/J.JARD.2022.01542