The Buddhist Pramāṇa-Epistemology, Logic, and Language: with Reference to Vasubandhu, Dignāga, and Dharmakīrti

• Autorzy: Hari Shankar Prasad
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

As the title of the present article shows, it highlights the three philosophically integrated areas - (1) pramāṇa-epistemology (theory of comprehensive knowledge involving both perception and inference), (2) logic (although a part of pramāṇa-epistemology, it has two modes, namely, inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning), and (3) language (or semantics, i.e. the double negation theory of meaning, which falls under inference). These are interconnected as well as overlapping within the Buddhist mainstream tradition of the process philosophy as opposed to the substantialist philosophy. The same is the case with the three celebrated Buddhist thinkers - Vasubandhu, Dignāga (also spelt as Diññāṇa), and Dharmakīrti - who develop their radical and critical views focusing on these areas in historical-cum-philosophical order. It is worth noting that within the same mainstream Buddhist tradition, each one of the three thinkers picks up the problematic issues from their predecessors - from the Buddha to their immediate predecessors respectively - for their solutions against the backdrop of the two conflicting mainstream traditions - Buddhist and non-Buddhist. The central focus of these thinkers is first to identify the crucial issues, doctrinal principles, terminology, and methodology in their own ways and conceptual frameworks, which generate not only the mutual conflicts in the course of dialogues but also strengthen their positions by means of their new radical ideas, innovations, terminologies, methodologies, and doctrinal principles. As a result, the three selected areas and their crucial issues are explained, elaborated, and interpretated for better understanding. All of which are rooted in the Buddha's path of wisdom, ethics, and liberation from the human predicament (duḥkha-nivṛtti). In this grand project of the deepest concerns, the Buddha utilized multiple strategies like understanding and controlling the problematic nature of the mind (Pāli citta, manasa) and its concomitance (Pāli cetasika, dhammā) by means of the concentrative meditation (Pāli jhāna, Sanskrit (hereafter Skt., dhyāna), cultivation of knowledge (Pāli vijjā, Skt. vidyā) and conduct/moral purity (Pāli caraṇa, Skt. ācaraṇa), destruction of afflictions/defilements (Pāli kilesa, Skt. kleśa), critical and logical thinking with valid arguments, and so on. His disciples also treat him as the possessor of valid method, arguments, meaning, practice, and purpose (Skt. pramāṇabhūta, the term used by Dignāga). He believed in the common humanity as the community of sufferers and the autonomy of every human being (Pāli attakāra), but strongly rejected the hierarchy of humanity on the basis of caste, birth, and dogmatic religious identity. For these reasons, following the Buddha and his celebrated followers like Vasubandhu, Dignāga, and Dharmakīrti, my task in this article is how to clearly and elaborately discuss the above identified issues and theories, first to understand them for myself and then logically prove the whole process of knowledge and the designed purpose through communication to those who have the intention to hear and understand the framework of common language for their benefits. I wish the readers like students and young teachers benefit from my research work. Further, since my learning of the Tibetan language is zero, but comfortable in Sanskrit and Pāli, I have been heavily dependent on three great modern thinkers who have widely written independently and also translated the Buddhist Tibetan texts, which were translated from the original Sanskrit texts now lost, into English in the areas of Buddhist epistemology, logic, and semantics. These modern scholars are Masaaki Hattori, Shoryo Katsura, and Richard Hayes. Besides them, I have also little benefitted from some other scholars who have worked in the same areas.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Buddhism; Philosophy; Logic

PL

Buddyzm; Filozofia; Logika

• Czasopismo: Studia Humana
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: 12(1-2)
• Strony: 21--52

Twórcy

autor

Hari Shankar Prasad

• University of Delhi, India

Bibliografia

• Vasubandhu: Abhidharmakośa-kārikā with Bhāṣya of Vasubandhu and Abhidharmakośa Bhāṣya-Vyākhyā of Yaśomitra 1-8 Chapters, (ed.), D. D. Shastri, Varanasi, 1968-1973.
• PS(V): Pramāṇasamuccaya of Dignāga.
• Nyāyabindu of Dharmakīrti with Dharmotta's Ṭīkā, (ed. & tr. into Hindi) Shrinivasa Shastri, Meerut: Sahitya Bhandar, 1975.
• PV: Pramāṇavārttikam with the commentary of Manorathanandin, (ed.) D. D. Shastri, Varanasi: Bauddha Bharati, 1968.
• PVSV: Gnoli, Raniero. The Pramāṇavārttikam of Dharmakīrti: The First Chapter with Autocommentary (Text and Critical Notes), Rome: Instituto Italiano per il Medico ed Estremo Oriente, 1960.
• Hetubindu of Dharmakīrti (A Point of Probans), (ed. & tr.) Pradeep P. Gokhale, Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications, 1997.
• Tattvasaṁgraha of Śāntarakṣita with Kamalaśīla's Pañjikā, Two Volumes, (ed.) D. D. Shastri, Varanasi: Bauddha Bharati, 1968.
• Cardona, G. On Reasoning from Anvaya and Vyatireka in Early Advaita, Studies in Indian Philosophy, Ahmadabad, 1981, pp. 79-104.
• Dreyfus, G. Recognizing Reality: Dharmakirti's Philosophy and Its Tibetan Buddhist Monk, Indian Edition, Delhi: Satguru Publication, 1997.
• Dunne, D. J. Foundations of Dharmakīrti's Philosophy, Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2004.
• Franco, E. Two Circles or Parallel Lines?, In S. Katsura (ed.), Dharmakīrti's Thought and its Impact on Indian and Tibetan Philosophy: Proceedings of the Third International Dharmakīrti Conference, Hiroshima, November 4-6, 1997, Vienna: Osterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1999, pp. 63-72.
• Frauwallner, E. Vasubandhu's Vādavidhi, Wiener Zeitschrift fur die Kunde Sud- und Ostasiens 1, Vienna, 1957, pp. 104-146.
• Frauwallner, E. Dignāga, Sein Werk und seine Entwicklung, Wiener Zeitschrift fur die Kunde des Sud- und Ost-Asiens, Bd III, Vienna, 1959, pp. 83-164.
• Ganeri, J. Dharmakīrti on Inference and Properties, Journal of Indian Philosophy 18, 1990, pp. 237-247.
• Gillon, B. S. The Role of Knowledge of Causation in Dharmakīrti's Theory of Inference: The Pramāṇavārttika, In W. Edelglass and J. L. Garfield (eds.), Buddhist Philosophy: Essential Readings, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 197-204.
• Gillon, B. S. Language and Logic in Indian Buddhist Thought, In S. M. Emmanuel (ed.), A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy, 2013, pp. 307-319.
• Hayes, R. P. Dignāga's Views on Reasoning (svārthānumāna), Journal of Indian Philosophy 8, 1980, pp. 219-277.
• Hayes, R. P. On the Interpretation of Dharmakīrti's Svabhāvahetu, Journal of Indian Philosophy 15, 1987, pp. 319-332.
• Hayes, R. P. Dignāga on the Interpretation of Signs, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988.
• Hayes, R. P. The Question of Doctrinalism in the Buddhist Epistemologists, Journal of the American academy of Religion 52, 1984, pp. 319-332.
• Hayes, R. P., and B. S. Gillon (trs). Introduction to Dharmakīrti's theory of inference as presented in Pramāṇavārttika Svopajñavṛtti 1-10, Journal of Indian Philosophy 19, 1991, pp. 1-73.
• Katsura, S. Dignāga on Trairūpya, Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies 32.1, 1983, pp. 544-538 (15-21).
• Katsura, S. Dharmakīrti's Theory of Truth, Journal of Indian Philosophy 12, 1984, pp. 215-235.
• Katsura, S. Svabhāvapratibandha Revisited, Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 1986, 476- 473.
• Katsura, S. Dignāga and Dharmakīrti on Apoha, E Steinkellner (ed.), Studies in the Buddhist Epistemological Tradition: Proceedings of the Second International Dharmakīrti Connference, Vienna: Osterreichsche Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1991, pp. 129-144.
• Katsura, S. Dignāga on Trairūpya Reconsidered: A Reply to Prof. Oetke, A. Akamatsu(ed.), Indo no bunka to ronri. Tosaki Hiromasa hakase kinen ronbunshu, Fukuoka, 2000, pp. 241-266.
• Katsura, S. How did the Buddhists prove something? - The Nature of Buddhist Logic, Calgary: University of Calgary, (Alberta: First Printing, 1996), 2002, pp. 1-18.
• Katsura, S. The Apoha Theory of Dignāga, IndigakuBukkyogaku Kenkyu 28, 1979, pp. 16-20.
• Katsura, S. The Role of dṛṣṭānta in Dignāga's logic, In S. Katsura, Shoryo and E. Steinkellner (eds.), The Role of the Example (dṛṣṭānta) in Classical Indian Logic, Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien, 2004, pp. 135-174.
• Hattori, M. Dignāga, On Perception, being the Pratyakṣapariccheda of Dignāga's Pramāṇasamuccaya from the Sanskrit fragments and the Tibetan versions, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1968.
• Hattori, M. The Sautrāntika Background of the Apoha Theory, In L. S. Kawamura and K. Scott (eds.), Buddhist Thought and Asian Civilization: Essays in Honour of Herbert V. Guenther on his Sixtieth Birth Day, Emeryville: California, 1977.
• Hattori, M. Dignāga's Theory of Meaning, An Annotated Translation of the Pramāṇasamuccayavṛtti, Chapter V: Anyāpoha-parikṣā (I), In J. A. Silk(ed), Wisdom, Compassion, and the Search for Understanding: The Buddhist Studies Legacy of Gadjin M. Nagao, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2000, pp. 137-146.
• Lasic, H. On the Utilisation of Causality as a basis of Inference: Dharmakīrti's Statements and their Interpretation, Journal of Indian Philosophy 31, 2003, pp. 185-197.
• Oetke, C. Studies on the doctrine of trairūpya, Vienna: Arbeitskreis fur Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien (Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 33), 1994.
• Perrett, R. W. An Introduction to Indian Philosophy, Delhi: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
• Pind, O. Holten (ed.) (trans.). Dignāga's philosophy of language. Pramāṇasamuccayavṛtti V on anyāpoha. Part 1: text; Part 2: translation and annotation, Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, 2015.
• Siderits, M., T. Tillemans, and A. Chakrabarti (eds.), Apoha: Buddhist Nominalism and Human Cognition, New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
• Shastri, D. N. Critique of Indian Realism: A Study of the Conflict between the Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika and the Buddhist Dignāga School, Agra: Agra University, 1964.
• Steinkellner, E. The Spiritual Place of the epistemological Tradition in Buddhism, Nanto Bukkyo (Journal of the Nanto Society for Buddhist Studies) 49, 1982, pp. 1-15.
• Steinkellner, E. The Logic of the Svabhāvahetu in Dharmakīrti's Vādanyāya, In E. Steinkellner (ed.), Studies in the Buddhist Epistemological Tradition: Proceedongs of the Second International Dharmakirti Conference: June 11-16, Vienna: Osterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1991.
• Tillemans, T. J. F. Scripture, Logic, Language: Essays on Dharmakīrti and his Tibetan Successors, Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1999.
• Nagatomi, M. Arthakriyā, The Adyar Library Bulletin 31-32, 1967-1968, pp. 52-72.
• Steinkellner, E. Once More on Circle, Journal of Indian Philosophy 31, 2003, pp. 323-341.
• Steinkellner, E. The Spiritual Place of the Epistemological Tradition in Buddhism, Nanto Bukkyo 49, 1982, 1-18.
• Vetter, T. Erkenntnisprobleme bei Dharmakirti, Vienna: Osterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1964.
• Matilal, B. K. Perception: An Essay on Classical Indian Theories of Knowledge, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/sh-2023-0004