Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Theoretical background: This article addresses issues related to the possibilities of using crowdfunding by newly-founded enterprises in Poland. Previous research results have shown that even small amounts obtained at a vital moment may be of key importance for an enterprise's development. Crowdfunding is a form of financing where decisions on providing the funds are made voluntarily, predominantly by individuals, and there are no traditional intermediaries engaged in the funding process or the project evaluation. Therefore, what matters in fundraising is the business concept itself, which the enterprise wants to implement.
Purpose of the article: The main objective of this article is to find out whether crowdfunding is an adequate form of funding for opportunity- or necessity-based enterprises newly founded in Poland. Hence, this article starts with distinguishing between opportunity-based enterprises and necessity-based enterprises, using different criteria. Furthermore, an attempt is made to modify the criteria for classification of newly-founded business entities as opportunity- and necessity-based enterprises, to reflect the specific conditions prevailing in Poland.
Research methods: The research study involved a representative sample of newly-founded enterprises based in the West Pomerania Voivodeship in Poland. Based on public statistical records, a group of newly-founded entities was identified, a research sample was selected, and a survey was carried out using a questionnaire as a tool. The CATI method was used in the research, which made it possible to reach entrepreneurs rather than random employees to answer the questions. In the survey the main characteristic were studied like: the financing structure and innovativeness of the newly-founded enterprises, but also the knowledge about crowdfunding and the assessment of this form of financing.
Main findings: The completed research study has shown that although crowdfunding is seen as an adequate form of funding for newly-founded enterprises, especially opportunity-based ones, the potential for using this form of funding by the surveyed enterprises in Poland is still low, which may result from the enterprises' low awareness of possibilities offered by crowdfunding, as well as low innovativeness.(original abstract)
Purpose of the article: The main objective of this article is to find out whether crowdfunding is an adequate form of funding for opportunity- or necessity-based enterprises newly founded in Poland. Hence, this article starts with distinguishing between opportunity-based enterprises and necessity-based enterprises, using different criteria. Furthermore, an attempt is made to modify the criteria for classification of newly-founded business entities as opportunity- and necessity-based enterprises, to reflect the specific conditions prevailing in Poland.
Research methods: The research study involved a representative sample of newly-founded enterprises based in the West Pomerania Voivodeship in Poland. Based on public statistical records, a group of newly-founded entities was identified, a research sample was selected, and a survey was carried out using a questionnaire as a tool. The CATI method was used in the research, which made it possible to reach entrepreneurs rather than random employees to answer the questions. In the survey the main characteristic were studied like: the financing structure and innovativeness of the newly-founded enterprises, but also the knowledge about crowdfunding and the assessment of this form of financing.
Main findings: The completed research study has shown that although crowdfunding is seen as an adequate form of funding for newly-founded enterprises, especially opportunity-based ones, the potential for using this form of funding by the surveyed enterprises in Poland is still low, which may result from the enterprises' low awareness of possibilities offered by crowdfunding, as well as low innovativeness.(original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
Numer
Strony
59--75
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
- University of Szczecin
Bibliografia
- Adamek, J. (2010). Mikrofinanse islamskie. Założenia, produkty, praktyka. Warszawa: CeDeWu.
- Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2011). The geography of crowdfunding. NBER Working Paper. Series 16820. National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w16820
- Angulo-Guerrero, M.J., Perez-Moreno, S., & Abad-Guerrero, I.M. (2017). How economic freedom affects opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship in the OECD countries. Journal of Business Research, 73(4), 30-37. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.017
- Baker, T. (2007). Resources in play: Bricolage in the toy store(y). Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5), 694-711. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.10.008
- Baker, T., Miner, A.S., & Eesley, D.T. (2003). Improvising fims: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, 32(2), 255-276. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00099-9
- Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2005). Financial and legal constraints to growth: Does firm size matter? The Journal of Finance, 60(1), 137-177. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00727.x
- Berger, A.N., & Udell, G.F. (1998). The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in financial growth cycle. Journal of Finance, 22(6-8), 613-673. doi:10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00038-7
- Bhide, A. (1992). Bootstrap fiance: The art of start-ups. Harvard Business Review, 70(6), 109.
- Broadbent, R., & Papadopoulos, T. (2013). Impact and benefis of digital inclusion for social housing residents. Community Development, 44(1), 1-13. doi:10.1080/15575330.2012.662990
- Brown, R., Mawson, S., Rowe, A., & Mason, C. (2018). Working the crowd: improvisational entrepreneurship and equity crowdfunding in nascent entrepreneurial venture. International Small Business Journal, 36(2). doi:10.1177/0266242617729743
- Carsrud, A., & Brännback, M. (2011). Entrepreneurial motivations: What do we still need to know? Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 9-26. doi:10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00312.x
- Dau, L.A., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2014). To formalize or not to formalize: Entrepreneurship and pro-market institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 668-686. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.05.002
- Fairlie, R.W., & Fossen, F.M. (2019). Defining opportunity versus necessity entrepreneurship: Two components of business creation. NBER Working Paper, No. 26377.
- Flebbe, M. (2016). Crowdfunding als alternative Finanzierungsform. Durch die Methode der Schwarmfinanzierung von der Idee zum Massenprodukt. Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag.
- Gierczak, M., Bretschneider, U., Haas, P., Blohm, I., & Leimeister, J.M. (2015). Crowdfunding - outlining the new era of fundraising. In O. Gajda & D. Brüntje (Eds.), Crowdfunding in Europe. State of the Art in Theory and Practice (pp. 7-23). FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Springer Science + Business Media.
- GUS. (2021). Przedsiębiorstwa niefinansowe powstałe w latach 2016-2020. Warszawa.
- He, J., Nazari, M., Zhang, y., & Cai, N. (2020). Opportunity-based entrepreneurship and environmental quality of sustainable development: A resource and institutional perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120390
- Hernández-Trillo, F., Pagán, J.A., & Paxton, J. (2005). Start-up capital, microenterprises and technical efficiency in Mexico. Review of Development Economics, 9(3), 434-447. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9361.2005.00286.x
- Hinz, T., & Jungbauer-Gans, D. (1999). Starting a business after unemployment: Characteristics and chances of success (empirical evidence from a regional German labour market). Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 11(4), 317-333. doi:10.1080/089856299283137
- Kariv, D., & Coleman, S. (2015). Toward a theory of fiancial bricolage: The impact of small loans on new businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 22(2), 196-224. doi:10.1108/JSBED-02-2013-0020
- Kirby, E., & Worner, S. (2014). Crowd-funding: An infant industry growing fast. Staff Working Paper of the IOSCO Research Department, DWP3/2014.
- Lee, N., Sameen, H., & Cowling, M. (2015). Access to finance for innovative SMEs since the financial crisis. Research Policy, 44(2), 370-380.
- Lukkarinen, A., Teich, J.E., Wallenius, H., & Wallenius, J. (2016). Success drivers of online equity crowdfunding campaigns. Decision Support Systems, 87, 26-38. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2016.04.006
- Reisdorf, B., & Rhinesmith, C. (2020). Digital inclusion as a core component of social inclusion. Social Inclusion, 8(2), 132-137. doi:10.17645/si.v8i2.3184
- Richard, B., Lata, J., Groce, J., Walzer, N., Harger, B., & Blanke, A. (2014). Sustainable Funding for Early Stage Small Businesses in the State of Ingenuity: An Analysis of Business Readiness for Capitalization. Report to the United States Economic Development Agency, Northern Illinois University, Center for Governmental Studies.
- Shane, S., Locke, E.A., & Collins, C.J. (2003). Entrepreneurial motivation. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 257-279. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00017-2
- Senyard, J.M., Baker, T., Steffens, P., & Davidsson, P. (2014). Bricolage as a path to innovation for resource-constrained new firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 211-230. doi:10.1111/jpim.12091
- Startup Poland. (2021). Polskie Startupy 2021.Warszawa: Fundacja Startup Poland.
- Trzebiński, A. (2022). Crowdfunding udziałowy 3.0. 2021. Gdańsk: Związek Przedsiębiorstw Finansowych w Polsce.
- Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and Social Inclusion. Rethinking the Digital Divide. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Wasilczuk, J. (2009). Motywacje założycielskie właścicieli mikro i małych przedsiębiorstw a rozwój firm. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, 540. Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług, 34, 460-467.
- Zawadzka, D., & Kudryś-Kujawska, A. (2016). Przeżywalność nowo powstałych przedsiębiorstw w Polsce w latach 2003-2014. Marketing i Zarządzanie, 2(43).
- Zawadzka, D., Kudryś-Kujawska, A., & Sempolska-Rzechuła, A. (2017). Finansowanie nakładów inwestycyjnych nowo powstałych przedsiębiorstw w początkowej fazie rozwoju i kolejnych latach działalności gospodarczej w ujęciu branżowym w Polsce. In S. Wieteska & D. Burzyńska (Eds.), Granice finansów XXI wieku. Finanse publiczne. Rynek finansowy. Finanse przedsiębiorstw (pp. 249-268). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. doi:10.18778/8088-792-3.20
- Zawadzka, D., & Kudryś-Kujawska, A. (2018). Znaczenie barier popytowych i podażowych w działalności nowo powstałych przedsiębiorstw w Polsce. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 1(91), 125-135. doi:10.18276/frfu.2018.91-11
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171663560