Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Theoretical background: Intellectual capital is perceived as a global economy driving factor. Many researchers highlight that it is an ingredient improving the functional gear of almost any organisation. Some voices have simultaneously appeared in scientific discussions claiming that the concept of intellectual capital management may not be fully applicable, either in conditions of economic downturn or during turbulent changes. A whole spectrum of external factors then come to the floor, affecting the situation of a company, while the periods of economic perturbations discourage investments in human resources and hamper HR initiatives. Therefore, in these changing economic conditions, a question arises about the rationale for and the directions of the development on the research on intellectual capital, and the concept itself undergoes a practical verification of suitability and usefulness. This is a particularly interesting field of research because the transformations, which take place in the environment of enterprises, create specific expectations, which should be met within the framework of ongoing research projects on the intellectual capital.
Purpose of the article: The aim of this article is to identify the dominant topical trends and networks of research directions in the subject of intellectual capital and their changes over time. The study attempts to illustrate these changes.
Research methods: Having employed the text mining method, nearly 5,000 scientific articles on intellectual capital were analysed. Consequently, this extensive literature review enabled mapping of the network of links among the research directions in this area.
Main findings: The results of the study have provided a fairly deep insight into the trends in the research on intellectual capital over the years. The results also reflect the vastness of the subject and the scope of the issues addressed over the past and present years. The interest in the concept of intellectual capital management continues and the dynamics of changes in the environment of the modern enterprise is not at all insignificant. The clusters, identified in the research on intellectual capital, have been opening new theoretical, pragmatic and methodological horizons. The analysis, carried out within the study network, confirmed the multifaceted nature of the network of research directions in the area of intellectual capital. In addition, the new research trends, which have been emerging in this area, clearly respond both to the dynamic changes in the business environment and to the doubts about the scale of activities, undertaken with regard to the intellectual capital management. Thus, in this situation, the periods of crisis and instability appear on one hand as a serious threat to the issue of intellectual capital management, while on the other, they can be perceived as an opportunity to renew the existing management concepts.(original abstract)
Purpose of the article: The aim of this article is to identify the dominant topical trends and networks of research directions in the subject of intellectual capital and their changes over time. The study attempts to illustrate these changes.
Research methods: Having employed the text mining method, nearly 5,000 scientific articles on intellectual capital were analysed. Consequently, this extensive literature review enabled mapping of the network of links among the research directions in this area.
Main findings: The results of the study have provided a fairly deep insight into the trends in the research on intellectual capital over the years. The results also reflect the vastness of the subject and the scope of the issues addressed over the past and present years. The interest in the concept of intellectual capital management continues and the dynamics of changes in the environment of the modern enterprise is not at all insignificant. The clusters, identified in the research on intellectual capital, have been opening new theoretical, pragmatic and methodological horizons. The analysis, carried out within the study network, confirmed the multifaceted nature of the network of research directions in the area of intellectual capital. In addition, the new research trends, which have been emerging in this area, clearly respond both to the dynamic changes in the business environment and to the doubts about the scale of activities, undertaken with regard to the intellectual capital management. Thus, in this situation, the periods of crisis and instability appear on one hand as a serious threat to the issue of intellectual capital management, while on the other, they can be perceived as an opportunity to renew the existing management concepts.(original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
Numer
Strony
113--129
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
- University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
Bibliografia
- Andrikopoulos, A., & Kostaris, K. (2017). Collaboration networks in accounting research. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 28, 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2016.12.001.
- Austen, A., Kremmydas, E., & Szczepanik, M. (2021). HR Activities Amidst COVID-19 Pandemic across Levels of Analysis. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, secio H - Oeconomia, 55 (2), 7-17. doi:10.17951/h.2021.55.2.7-17.
- Bellucci, M., Marzi, G., Ciampi, F., & Orlando, B. (2020). Journal of Intellectual Capital: A review of emerging themes and future trends. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22 (4). doi: 10.1108/jic-10-2019-0239.
- Bontis, N., & Ciambotti, M. (2018). Intellectual capital and financial performance in social cooperative enterprises. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(4), 712-731. doi:10.11.08/jic-03-2017-0049.
- Brooking, A. (1996). Intellectual Capital: Core Asset for the Third Millennium Enterprise. New York: International Thomson Business Press.
- Chaminade, C., & Catasus, B. (2007). Intellectual Capital Revisited: Paradoxes in the Knowledge Intensive Organization. Edward Elgar Publishing, Massachusetts.
- Courtial, J.P., (1994). A co-word analysis of scientometrics. Scientometrics, 31(3), 251-260. doi:10.1007/bf02016875
- Dumay, J., & Garanina, T. (2013). Intellectual capital research: a critical examination of the third stage. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(1), 10-25. doi:10.1108/14691931311288995
- Dumay, J., & Guthrie, J. (2019). Reflection on interdisciplinary critical intellectual capital accounting research: Multidisciplinary proposition for a new future. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2282-2306. doi:10.1108/aaaj-08-2018-3636
- Edvinsson, L., & Malone M. (1997). Intellectual Capital. Harper Collins Publishers, New York.
- Fazlagić, J., (2013). Negatywny kapitał intelektualny. Transformacje, 1, 383-397.
- Ferreira, J.J.M., Fernandes, C., & Veiga, P. (2021). Multilevel approaches to advancing the measurement of intellectual capital research field - what can we learn from the literature? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(6), 971-999. doi:10.1108/jic-07-2020-0221
- Ghosh, A., & Haque, S. (2022). Can the components of green intellectual capital influence employee green behaviour? An empirical analysis on Indian energy sector using the partial least squares method. Journal of Intellectual Capital, doi: 10.1108/jic-10-2021-0284.
- Harrison, S., & Sullivan, P.H. (2000). Profiting from intellectual capital. Learning from leading companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital 1(1), 33-46. doi:10.1108/00197850010372232
- Itami, H. (1987). Mobilizing Invisible Assets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kasiewicz, S., & Rogowski, W. (2006). Stan obecny i kierunki badań w zakresie kapitału intelektualnego - studia literaturowe. E-mentor, 3(15).
- Kaufmann, L., & Schneider, Y. (2004). Intangibles: A synthesis of current research. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(3), 366-388. doi:10.1108/14691930410550354
- Klincewicz, K., Żemigała, M., & Mijal, M. (2012). Bibliometria w zarządzaniu technologiami i badaniami naukowymi. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego.
- Markoulli, M., Lee, C.I.S.G., Byington, E., & Felps, W.A. (2017). Mapping Human Resource Management: Reviewing the field and charting future directions. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 367-396. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.10.001
- Marr, B., & Chatzkel, J. (2004). Intellectual capital at the crossroads: managing, measuring and reporting of IC. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(2), 224-229. doi:10.1108/14691930410533650
- Martin-de Castro, G., Diez-Vail, I., & Delgado-Verde, M. (2019). Intellectual capital and the firm: Evolution and research trends. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20(4), 555-580. doi:10.1108/jic-12-2018-0221
- Mingers J., Lipitakis E.A.E.C.G. (2010), Counting the Citations: A Comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the Field of Business and Management. Scientometrics, 85, 613-625. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0270-0
- Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7), e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097
- Mouritsen, J., (2003). Intellectual capital and the capital market: The circulability of intellectual capital. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(1), 18-30. doi:10.1108/09513570310464246
- Mouritsen, J., (2006). Problematising intellectual capital research: Ostensive versus performative IC. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(6), 820-841. doi:10.1108/09513570610709881
- Pulić, A. (2000). VAIC - an accounting tool for IC management. International Journal of Technology Management, 20(5), 702-714. doi:10.1504/ijtm.2000.002891
- Roos, G., Pike, S., & Fernstrom, L., (2005). Managing Intellectual Capital in Practice. New York: Butterworth - Heinemann.
- Stewart, T.A. (1997). Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, London: Nicholas Brealey.
- Sveiby, T. A. (1997). The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measurement Knowledge-Based Assets. San Francisco Berrett-Koehler.
- Teixeira, A.A.C., & Sequeira, J., (2009). Determinants of the international influence of a R&D organisation: a bibliometric approach. FEP Working Papers. Universidad do Porto.
- Vogel, R., & Güttel, W. (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic management: a bibiometric review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), 426-446. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12000
- Yu, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Gu, Z., Zhong, H., Zha, Q., Yang, L., Zhu, C., & Chen, E. (2020). A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer of publications on COVID-19. Annals of translational medicine, 8(13), 816. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4235.
- Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. doi:10.1177/1094428114562629
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171663566
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.