Peer Effects and the Mechanisms in Corporate Capital Structure : Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

• Autorzy: Jiali Liu , Xinran Xie , Yu Duan , Liang Tang
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Research background: Peer effects, in which individuals learn and imitate their peers' behaviors, have been widely recognized in different contexts. Particularly, with increasingly fierce competition, firms can no longer make financial decisions in isolation when facing terrible external operational environments. In contrast, observing peers' actions in corporate policies can help reveal intentions regarding what peers are doing, which is vital for policymakers and financial managers. Studies on the existence of capital structure peer effects in the Chinese context have been conducted, but the mechanisms of peer effects are still ambiguous at present.
Purpose of the article: This study aims to examine peer effects in capital structure and discover the mechanisms in the Chinese context. Understanding the mechanisms behind peer effects can help scholars and policymakers obtain more insights into the working mechanisms of peer effects. Furthermore, how the industry- and firm-specific characteristics affect peer effects and the selection of mechanisms should be analyzed.
Methods: Using the fixed effects model (industry effect and year effect) and propensity score matching (PSM), as well as market leverage and heterogeneous stock shocks, we investigate peer effects, the mechanisms, and the effects of specific factors from industries and firms based on the sample of Chinese non-financial A-share listed firms on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2014 to 2021.
Findings & value added: Study results show that peer effects exist in the corporate capital structure in the Chinese capital markets. Unlike previous studies, this analysis captures three mechanisms: the industrial average, industrial leaders, and industrial-similar firms. The intensity of peer effects and selection of mechanisms are influenced by both industry-specific characteristics (the degree of industrial competition and financing constraints) and firm-specific characteristics (firm size and market share). (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Company capital structure; Capital market; Stock exchange

PL

Struktura kapitału przedsiębiorstwa; Rynek kapitałowy; Giełda

• Czasopismo: Oeconomia Copernicana
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: 14
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 295--326

Twórcy

autor

Jiali Liu

• Center for China Public Sector Economy Research of KRI, Jilin University, China; School of Economics, Jilin University, China

autor

Xinran Xie

• School of Economics, Jilin University, China

autor

Yu Duan

• School of Business and Management, Jilin University, China

autor

Liang Tang

• Business School, Northeast Normal University, China

Bibliografia

• Adel, C., Hussain, M., Mohamed, E., & Basuony, M. (2019). Is corporate governance relevant to the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure in large European companies? International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 27(2), 301-332. doi: 10.1108/ijaim-10-2017-0118.
• AlHares, A. (2020). Corporate governance and cost of capital in OECD countries. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 28(1), 1-21. doi: 10.1108/ijaim-02-2019-0023.
• AlHares, A., Elamer, A., Alshbili, I., & Moustafa, M. (2020). Board structure and corporate R&D intensity: Evidence from Forbes global 2000. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 28(3), 445-463. doi: 10.1108/IJAIM-11-2019-0127.
• Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797. doi: 10.2307/2118364.
• Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1998). Learning from the behavior of others: conformity, fads and informational cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 151-170. doi: 10.1257/jep.12.3.151.
• Brander, J., & Lewis, T. (1986). Oligopoly and financial structure: the limited liabil- ity effect. American Economic Review, 76(5), 956-970.
• Buchner, A., Mohamed, A., & Schwienbacher, A. (2020). Herd behaviour in buyout investments. Journal of Corporate Finance, 60, 101503. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101503.
• Farrell, K. A., & Whidbee, D. A. (2003). Impact of firm performance expectations on CEO turnover and replacement decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36(1-3), 165. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.09.001.
• Grennan, J. (2019). Dividend payments as a response to peer influence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 549-570. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.01.012.
• Gu, Y., Ben, S. L., & Lv, J. M. (2022). Peer effect in merger and acquisition activities and its impact on corporate sustainable development: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(7), 3891. doi: 10.3390/su14073891.
• Han, S. K. (1994). Mimetic isomorphism and its effect on the audit services market. Social Forces, 73(2), 637-664. doi: 10.2307/2579824.
• Haveman, H. A. (1993). Follow the leader: mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 593-627. doi: 10.2307/2393338.
• He, W., & Wang, Q. (2020). The peer effect of corporate financial decisions around split share structure reform in China. Review of Financial Economics, 38(3), 474-493. doi: 10.1002/rfe.1088.
• Hudson, Y., Yan, M., & Zhang, D. (2020). Herd behaviour & investor sentiment: Evidence from UK mutual funds. International Review of Financial Analysis, 71, 101494. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101494.
• Im, H. J. (2019). Asymmetric peer effects in capital structure dynamics. Economics Letters, 176, 17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.12.019
• Im, H. J. Liu, J., & Park, Y. J. (2021). Policy uncertainty and peer effects: Evidence from corporate investment in China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 77, 101834. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101834.
• Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (1995). Do financing constraints explain why investment is correlated with cash flow? NBER Working Papers, 5267. doi: 10.3386/w5267.
• Kaustia, M., & Rantala, V. (2015). Social learning and corporate peer effects. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(3), 653-669. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.06.006.
• King, B. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2008). Rethinking the relationship between reputation and legitimacy: A social actor conceptualization. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(3), 192-207. doi: 10.1057/crr.2008.16.
• Leary, M., & Roberts, M. (2014). Do peer firms affect corporate financial policy? Journal of Finance, 69(1), 139-178. doi: 10.1111/jofi.12094.
• Machokoto, M., Gyimah, D., & Ntim, C. G. (2021). Do peer firms influence innovation? British Accounting Review, 53(5), 100988. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2021.100988.
• Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531. doi: 10.2307/2298123.
• Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1989). Alternative mechanisms for corporate control. American Economic Review, 79(4), 842. doi: 10.3386/w2532.
• Park, K., Yang, I., & Yang, T. (2017). The peer-firm effect on firm's investment decisions. North American Journal of Economics & Finance, 40, 178-199. doi: 10.1016/j.najef.2017.03.001.
• Patel, J., Zeckhauser, R., & Hendricks, D. (1991). The rationality struggle: Illustrations from financial markets. American Economic Review, 81(2), 232-236. doi: 10.2307/2006860.
• Samo, A., & Murad, H. (2019). Impact of liquidity and financial leverage on firm's profitability-an empirical analysis of the textile industry of Pakistan. Research Journal of Textile Apparel, 23(4), 291-305. doi: 10.1108/RJTA-09-2018-0055.
• Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (1990). Herd behavior and investment. American Economic Review, 80(3), 465-479.
• Seo, H. (2021). Peer effects in corporate disclosure decisions. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 71(1), 101364. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101364.
• Shiller, R. J., Fischer, S., & Friedman, B. M. (1984). Stock prices and social dynamics. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1984(2), 457-510. doi: 10.2307/2534436.
• Stark, W., Weber, M., Roth, G., Wittich, C., & Mitzman, A. (1970). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Sociological Analysis, 31(4), 223. doi: 10.2307/3710095.
• Sumani, S., & Roziq, A. (2020). Reciprocal capital structure and liquidity policy: Implementation of corporate governance toward corporate performance. Journal of Asian Finance Economics and Business, 7(9), 85-93. doi: 10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO9.085.
• Tian, X., Song, Y., Luo, C., Zhou, X., & Lev, B. (2021). Herding behavior in supplier innovation crowdfunding: Evidence from Kickstarter. International Journal of Production Economics, 239, 108184. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108184.
• Williams, G. C., & Zimmerman, D. J. (2003). Peer effects in higher education. Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education, 39(2), 65-77. doi: 10.3386/w9501.
• Yan, Q., & Zhu, H. (2020). Peer influence on dividend policy: Evidence from the Chinese stock market. Economics Letters, 192, 109229. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109229.
• Yang, J. S., Li, J. L., & Cao, Y. J. (2022). Analysis of peer effects on consumption in rural China based on social networks. Applied Economics, 55(6), 617-635. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2092592.
• Zeckhauser, R., Patel, J., & Hendricks, D. (1991). Nonrational actors and financial market behavior. Theory and Decision, 31(2-3), 257-287. doi: 10.1007/BF00132995.
• Zhang, A. C., Fang, J., Jacobsen, B., & Marshall, B. R. (2018). Peer effects, personal characteristics and asset allocation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 90, 76-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.03.001.
• Zhang, J. J., & Liu, P. (2012). Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Science, 58(5), 892-912. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1459.
• Zhong, T. L., & Zhang, T. Y. (2018). "Peer effects" in capital structure decision of Chinese firms-empirical investigation based on Chinese a-share listed firms. Nankai Business Review International, 9(3), 289-315. doi: 10.1108/NBRI-08-2017-0042.
• Zhou, X., Gao, Y., Wang, P., Zhu, B., & Wu, Z. (2022). Does herding behavior exist in China's carbon markets? Applied Energy, 308, 118313. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118313.

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.008