Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Theoretical background: Participatory budgets (PBs) have become a widely known innovation used to engage citizens in policymaking. Since 2011, citizens in Polish municipalities can decide on how a portion of local budget can be spent. In Germany, PBs originally served the purpose of getting feedback from citizens in the context of fiscal strains. However, since about 2015, German PBs are increasingly taking after the model established in Poland, establishing fixed pools of funds. Does it present a case of between-country convergence in the functionalities of PBs and their quality? So far, such comparative questions remained mostly unanswered in the field of PB-related studies.
Purpose of the article: The aim of the paper was to investigate this possibility of convergence in PB-quality by comparing the state of and changes in the quality of PBs with fixed funds between Poland and Germany. To evaluate the quality and scope of functionality of PBs, the amount of planned PB-funds per capita and participation rates (voter turnout levels) were inspected. Two research hypotheses were formulated. The first one stipulates a higher performance level of Polish PBs by the two criteria, across a variety of municipality types. The second hypothesis posits that the differences in the quality of PBs tend to diminish over time, as the latest to innovate launch their first experiments.
Research methods: Works on the diffusion of PBs in both countries were reviewed to provide background for the study. Two datasets were constructed containing data on the two measures of PB-quality, the population size, and the status of innovator. The data were first compared graphically. In a later step, statistical methods were applied, including variance analysis for the two dependent variables related to PB-quality at once (MANOVA) and for each of them separately (ANOVA). Results of the study were presented and discussed in the context of interactions between innovators and potential adopters in social networks, as well as political agendas in the two countries of interest.
Main findings: Research findings allowed to confirm the research hypotheses. PBs in both countries have been mostly simple innovations of limited quality, but those in Poland tended to perform better, judged by the two chosen criteria. The gap, especially for PB-funds, is closing, but that does not mean that in the course of innovators' and regulators' actions a unified innovation model has emerged. PBs in both countries utilize their functionalities in diverse ways, based on specific experiences and traditions in policymaking. Thus, PBs in Poland and Germany have different trajectories of development with fixed pools of funds as the simplistic innovation core that makes them highly adaptable in different policy contexts.(original abstract)
Purpose of the article: The aim of the paper was to investigate this possibility of convergence in PB-quality by comparing the state of and changes in the quality of PBs with fixed funds between Poland and Germany. To evaluate the quality and scope of functionality of PBs, the amount of planned PB-funds per capita and participation rates (voter turnout levels) were inspected. Two research hypotheses were formulated. The first one stipulates a higher performance level of Polish PBs by the two criteria, across a variety of municipality types. The second hypothesis posits that the differences in the quality of PBs tend to diminish over time, as the latest to innovate launch their first experiments.
Research methods: Works on the diffusion of PBs in both countries were reviewed to provide background for the study. Two datasets were constructed containing data on the two measures of PB-quality, the population size, and the status of innovator. The data were first compared graphically. In a later step, statistical methods were applied, including variance analysis for the two dependent variables related to PB-quality at once (MANOVA) and for each of them separately (ANOVA). Results of the study were presented and discussed in the context of interactions between innovators and potential adopters in social networks, as well as political agendas in the two countries of interest.
Main findings: Research findings allowed to confirm the research hypotheses. PBs in both countries have been mostly simple innovations of limited quality, but those in Poland tended to perform better, judged by the two chosen criteria. The gap, especially for PB-funds, is closing, but that does not mean that in the course of innovators' and regulators' actions a unified innovation model has emerged. PBs in both countries utilize their functionalities in diverse ways, based on specific experiences and traditions in policymaking. Thus, PBs in Poland and Germany have different trajectories of development with fixed pools of funds as the simplistic innovation core that makes them highly adaptable in different policy contexts.(original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
Numer
Strony
207--224
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
- Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Poland
Bibliografia
- Bednarska-Olejniczak, D., & Olejniczak, J. (2018). Participatory budgeting in Poland in 2013-2018 - six years of experiences and directions of changes. In N. Dias (Ed.), Hope for Democracy: 30 Years of Participatory Budgeting Worldwide (pp. 337-354). Portugal: Epopeia Records/Oficina.
- Berlin Institut für Partizipation. (2021). Bürgerbudgets in Deutschland. Formen, Bedeutung Und Potenziale Zur Förderung Politischer Teilhabe Und Bürgerschaftlichen Engagements. Berlin. Retrieved from https://www.bipar.de/?smd_process_download=1&download_id=20616
- Busse, S., & Schneider, S.H. (2015). Die Evaluation von Bürgerbeteiligung Als Politikberatung: Praxis, Herausforderungen und Empfehlungen Am Beispiel Bürgerhaushalt. Zeitschrift für Politikberatung, 7(1-2), 3-13. doi:10.5771/1865-4789-2015-1-2-3
- Cabannes, Y., & Lipietz, B. (2018). Revisiting the democratic promise of participatory budgeting in light of competing political, good governance and technocratic logics. Environment and Urbanization, 30(1), 67-84. doi:10.1177/0956247817746279
- Curato, N., Sass, J., Ercan, S., & Niemeyer, S. (2022). Deliberative democracy in the age of serial crisis. International Political Science Review, 43(1), 55-56. doi:10.1177/0192512120941882
- Daniel, K. (2019). Budżet obywatelski - analiza porównawcza Gorzowa Wielkopolskiego i Opola. Kwartalnik Prawo - Społeczeństwo - Ekonomia, 4, 5-21.
- Dias, N., Enriquez, S., & Júlio, S. (2019). Participatory Budgeting World Atlas. Faro: Epopeia/Oficina.
- Džinic, J., Svidronová, M., & Markowska-Bzducha, E. (2016). Participatory budgeting: A comparative study of Croatia, Poland and Slovakia. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 9(1), 31-56. doi:10.1515/nispa-2016-0002
- Eurostat. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/purchasing-power-parities/data/database
- Francés, F., Carratalá, L., & Ganuza, E. (2018). 20 years of participatory budgeting in Spain. In N. Dias (Ed.), Hope for Democracy: 30 Years of Participatory Budgeting Worldwide (pp. 275-287). Portugal: Epopeia Records/Oficina.
- French, A., Macedo, M., Poulsen, J., Waterson, T., & Yu, A. (2008). Multivariate Analysis of Variance. San Francisco: San Francisco State University.
- Ganuza, E., & Baiocchi, G. (2012). The power of ambiguity: How participatory budgeting travels the globe. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 8(2). doi:10.16997/jdd.142
- Herzberg, C. (2018). Bürgerbudgets Zur Stärkung Einer Lebendigen Ländlichen Gesellschaft ? Neue Ansätze Für Die Dorf- Und Regionalentwicklung. Ländlicher Raum, 3, 16-18.
- Herzberg, C., Rumpel, M., & Poplawski, R.(2020). Studie Bürgerbudgets in Brandenburg - Perspektiven Für Jugendbeteiligung. Potsdam: mitMachen e. V./JUBU - Jugendbeteiligung bei Bürgerbudgets.
- Holtkamp, L., & Bathge, T. (2012). Lokale Bürgerbeteiligung in der Haushaltskrise. dms - der moderne staat - Zeitschrift Für Public Policy, Recht Und Management, 5(1), 47-64. doi:10.3224/dms.v5i1.04
- Kersting, N., Gasparikova, J., & Iglesias, A. (2016). Local democratic renewal by deliberative participatory instruments: Participatory budgeting in comparative study. In S. Kuhlmann & G. Bouckaer (Eds.), Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis. National Trajectories and International Comparisons (pp. 317-331). Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-52548-2_18
- Kassambara, A. (2021). rstatix: Pipe-friendly framework for basic statistical tests (0.7. 0) [computer software].
- Kurdyś-Kujawska, A., Zawadzka, D., Kwiatkowski, G., & Rosiński, R. (2017). Participatory budgeting in Polish cities: Funds' allocation mechanism. In A. Bem, K. Daszyńska-Żygadło, T. Hajdíková, & P. Juhász (Eds.), Finance and Sustainability. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics (pp. 107-120). Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92228-7_10
- Lehtonen, P. (2021). Policy on the move: The enabling settings of participation in participatory budgeting. Policy Studies, 43(5), 1036-1054. doi:10.1080/01442872.2021.1895981
- Leśniewska-Napierała, K. (2019). Participatory budgeting as a new instrument of social participation in Poland's rural areas. Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, 53, 77-93. doi:10.7163/sow.53.6
- Masser, K. (2013). Participatory budgeting as its critics see it. Retrieved from https://www.buergerhaushalt.org/en/article/participatory-budgeting-its-critics-see-it/
- Masser, K., Pistoia, A., & Nitsche, P. (2013). Bürgerbeteiligung und Web 2.0. Potentiale und Risiken webgestützter Bürgerhaushalte. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
- Mærøe, A., Nort, A., Tsap, V., & Pappel, I. (2021). Increasing citizen participation in e-participatory budgeting processes. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 18(2), 125-147. doi:10.1080/19331681.2020.1821421
- Mączka, K., Jeran, A., Matczak, P., Milewicz, M., & Allegretti, G. (2021). Models of participatory budgeting. Analysis of participatory budgeting procedures in Poland. Polish Sociological Review, 216(4), 473-492. doi:10.26412/psr216.03
- Märker, O. (2015). Die Neuerfindung der Bürgerhaushalte. Retrieved from https://gutvertreten.boell.de/2015/05/14/die-neuerfindung-der-buergerhaushalte
- Miasto 2077. (2019). Raport: Budżet obywatelski w polskich miastach. Retrieved from https://www.miasto2077.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Raport-Budz ety-Obywatelskie-w-polskich-miastach.pdf
- Ministry of Internal Affairs of North Rhine-Westphalia in collaboration with Bertelsmann Foundation. (2003). Kommunaler Bürgerhaushalt in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Zweiter Zwischenbericht. Retrieved from: https://www.buergerhaushalt.org/sites/default/files/downloads/zwischenberich-nrw-2.pdf
- Neunecker, M. (2016). Kein Geld, geht nicht, machen wir schon. vhw FWS 5, 233-238. Retrieved from https://www.vhw.de/fileadmin/user_upload/08_publikationen/verbandszeitschrift/FWS/2016/5_2016/FWS_5_16_Neunecker.pdf
- NIK (Najwyższa Izba Kontroli). (2019). Funkcjonowanie budżetów partycypacyjnych (obywatelskich). Retrieved from https://www.nik.gov.pl/plik/id,21186,vp,23818.pdf
- Novy, A., & Leubolt, B.(2005). Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: Social innovation and the dialectical relationship of state and civil society. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2023-2036. doi:10.1080/00420980500279828
- Olson, M. (1971). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard: Harvard University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvjsf3ts
- ORBIT. (2010). Bürgerhaushalte in Ostdeutschland. Entwicklungsstand Und Handlungsempfehlungen. Retrieved from https://www.weiterdenken.de/sites/default/files/buergerhaushalte_ostdeutschland_hbs_studie.pdf
- Parvin, P. (2018). Democracy without participation: A new politics for a disengaged era. Res Publica, 24(1), 31-52. doi:10.1007/s11158-017-9382-1
- Rahman, S., & Tewari, A. (2014). Case Study of E-Participatory Budgeting. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anurag-Tewari-2/publication/260892513_Case_Study_of_E-Participatory_Budgeting/links/004635329b70fe8096000000/Case-Study-of-E-Participatory-Budgeting.pdf?origin=publication_detail; doi: 10.13140/2.1.3469.0889
- Ruesch, M., & Wagner, M. (2014). Participatory budgeting in Germany - citizens as consultants. In. N Dias (Ed.), Hope for Democracy. 25 Years of Participatory Budgeting Worldwide (pp. 287-298). Portugal: Epopeia Records/Oficina.
- Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovation. London - New York: New Press.
- Oder-Partnerschaft. (2018). Workshop "Bürgerbudget - der bessere Bürgerhaushalt? Ein deutsch-polnischer Vergleich am Beispiel der Europastadt Görlitz/Zgorzelec" zeigt unterschiedliches Vorgehen. Retrieved from http://www.oder-partnerschaft.eu/aktuelles/2018/10869/
- Sgueo, G. (2016). Participatory budgeting: An innovative approach. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2712213
- Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Röcke, A. (2010). Verfahren und Modelle des Bürgerhaushalts und ihre Umsetzung in Deutschland. Internationaler Kongress zu Modellen des Bürgerhaushalts. Berlin, 21 January 2010. Centre Marc Bloch.
- Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Röcke, A.(2008). Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 164-178. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00777.x
- Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Röcke, A. (2012). Transnational models of citizen participation: The case of participatory budgeting. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(2).
- Sześciło, D. (2015). Participatory budget in Poland: Quasi-referendum instead of deliberation. Hrvatska i Komparativna Javna Uprava : Časopis Za Teoriju i Praksu Javne Uprave, 15(2), 373-388. doi:342.573:352/353(438)
- Ustawa z dnia 11 stycznia 2018 r. o zmianie niektórych ustaw w celu zwiększenia udziału obywateli w procesie wybierania, funkcjonowania i kontrolowania niektórych organów publicznych (Dz.U. 2018, nr 130, poz. 1349).
- Vorwerk, V., Gonçalves, M., Stepniak, L., & Schneider, H. (2018). 9. Statusbericht Bürgerhaushalt in Deutschland (2014-2017). Retrieved from https://www.buergerhaushalt.org/sites/default/files/ 9._Statusbericht_Buergerhaushalt.pdf
- Vorwerk, V. (2019). Vom Bürgerhaushalt über das Bürgerbudget zum Finanzreferendum? Was Politik von Stuttgart und Zürich über Bürgerbeteiligung lernen kann. eNewsletter Wegweiser Bürgergesellschaft. Retrieved from https://www.buergergesellschaft.de/fileadmin/pdf/ gastbeitrag_vorwerk_190125.pdf
- Weinfurt, K. (2000). Repeated measures analyses: ANOVA, MANOVA and HLM. In L.G. Grimm & P.R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and Understanding More Multivariate Statistics (pp. 317-361). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
- Zepic, R., Dapp, M., & Krcmar, H. (2017). E-Partizipation und keiner macht mit. HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 54(4), 488-501. doi:10.1365/s40702-017-0328-z
- ZMP (Związek Miast Polskich). (2015). Budżet obywatelski w Polsce. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20160425085846/http://miasta-polskie.pl/zwiazekmp/portal/web/uploads/pub/pages/page_154/text_images/Budzet_partycypacyjny_w_Polsce_ZMP_luty2015.xls
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171665145
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.