PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2023 | nr 1 (221) | 27--46
Tytuł artykułu

Rising to the Challenge? The State of the Art and Future Research Directions of Polish Environmental Sociology

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Environmental sociology has been developing since the 1970s; however, it only recently became institutionalized in Poland with the establishment of a respective section in the Polish Sociological Association. We argue that environmental sociology in Poland and the broader area of Central and Eastern Europe has made an important contribution to international research on relations between humanity and nature in the Anthropocene. This paper presents the current state of the art in Polish environmental sociology and discusses future research questions. Our contribution is based on a literature review and the results of a workshop with Polish environmental sociologists. Future research areas discussed in this paper emerge from the following five main thematic domains: (I) social aspects of nature conservation; (II) environmental groups and movements; (III) sustainable development and the participation of local communities in rural and urban areas; (IV) environmental risks and threats and (V) and energy and society. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
27--46
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Jagiellonian University
  • Adam Mickiewicz University
  • Jagiellonian University
  • Poznań University of Life Sciences
  • Polish Academy of Science
Bibliografia
  • Andersson, M. (ed.). 1999. Change and Continuity in Poland's Environmental Policy. 1st ed. Heidelberg: Springer Netherlands.
  • Blicharska, M., Angelstam, P., Giessen, L., Hilszczański, J., Hermanowicz, E., Holeksa, J., Jacobsen, J.B., et al. 2020. Between Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Forest Management-A Multidisciplinary Assessment of the Emblematic Białowieża Forest Case, Biological Conservation 248.
  • Boćkowski, M., Tusznio, J., Rechciński, M., Blicharska, M., and Grodzińska-Jurczak, M. 2022. Ecosystem Services Approach in National Park Planning: Factors Influencing the Inhabitants'Perspectives on Local Natural Resources and Protected Areas, Environmental Management. In Review (April 5). https://www.researchsquare.com.
  • Boćkowski, M.D., Gołębiowska, B., Grodzińska-Jurczak, M., Klekotko, M., Rechciński, M., Szkop, Z., Tusznio, J., and Valasiuk, Ś. 2020. Analiza Społecznych i Ekonomicznych Uwarunkowań Cennych Przyrodniczo Obszarów Pogórza Przemyskiego i Gór Słonnych. Kraków: Fundacja WWF Polska. https://przyrodnicze.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/tupnopracowanie.pdf.
  • Börzel, T.A., ed. 2009. Coping with Accession to the European Union. New Modes of Environmental Governance. Coping with Accession to the European Union. London, New York: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Buttel, F.H. 2002. Environmental Sociology and the Sociology of Natural Resources: Institutional Histories and Intellectual Legacies, Society and Natural Resources 15(3).
  • Buttel, F.H., and Field, D.R. 2002. Environmental and Resource Sociology: Introducing a Debate and Dialogue, Society and Natural Resources 15(3): 201-203.
  • Candau, J., and Deldreve, V. 2015. Environmental Sociology in France ( 1984-2014 ) 1: 17-41.
  • Choryński, A., Pińskwar, I., Graczyk, D., and Krzyżaniak, M. 2022. The Emergence of Different Local Resilience Arrangements Regarding Extreme Weather Events in Small Municipalities- Case Study from the Wielkopolska Region, Poland, Sustainability 14(4) (February 11): 2052. https://www.mdpi.com/1494294.
  • Cynk, K.W. 2020. Environmental Activities of Academic Teachers from Selected Central and Eastern European Countries, Natural Hazards 103(1).
  • Driessen, P.P.J., Hegger, D.L.T., Kundzewicz, Z.W., van Rijswick, H.F.M.W., Crabbé, A.C., Larrue, A., Matczak, P. et al. 2018. Governance Strategies for Improving Flood Resilience in the Face of Climate Change, Water 10(11): 1595. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/11/1595/htm.
  • Dunlap, R.E. 2002. Environmental Sociology: A Personal Perspective on Its First Quarter Century, Organization and Environment.
  • Dunlap, R.E., and Brulle, R.J. (eds.). 2015. Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ferreira, L. da C. 2002. Brazilian Environmental Sociology: A Provisional Review, Ambiente & Sociedade 10.
  • Field, D.R., Luloff, A.E., and Krannich, R.S. 2013. Revisiting the Origins of and Distinctions Between Natural Resource Sociology and Environmental Sociology, Society and Natural Resources 26(2).
  • Giddens, A. 2011. The Politics of Climate Change. 2nd Edition.Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Gliński, P. 1996. Polscy Zieloni: Ruch Społeczny w Okresie Przemian. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.
  • Grodzińska-Jurczak, M., and Cent, J.. 2011. Can Public Participation Increase Nature Conservation Effectiveness? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 24(3).
  • Grodzińska-Jurczak, M., Krawczyk, A., Jurczak, A., and Dybek, W. 2020. Humanistic Environmental Governance: A Novel Paradigm for Addressing Plastic Reduction, Organizacja i Zarządzanie: Kwartalnik Naukowy 2(50): 15-27.
  • Grodzińska-Jurczak, M., Krawczyk, A., Jurczak, A., Strzelecka, M., Rechciński, M., and Boćkowski, M. 2020. Environmental Choices vs. COVID-19 Pandemic Fear-Plastic Governance Re-Assessment, Society Register 4(2).
  • Gross, M., and Heinrichs, H. (eds.). 2010. Environmental Sociology: European Perspectives and Interdisciplinary Challenges. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Hall, P.A. 1993. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain, Comparative Politics 25(3).
  • Hicks, B.E. 1996. Environmental Politics in Poland: A Social Movement between Regime and Opposition. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Iwińska, K., Lis, A., and Mączka, K. 2021. From Framework to Boundary Object? Reviewing Gaps and Critical Trends in Global Energy Justice Research, Energy Research and Social Science 79.
  • Iwińska, K., and Bukowska, X. (eds.). 2022. Gender and Energy Transition. Cham: Springer.
  • Iwińska, K., Jones, M., and Kraszewska, M. (eds.). 2018. Widening Interdisciplinary Sustainability Education. Warszawa: Collegium Civitas.
  • Jucker, T., Wintle, B., Shackelford, G., Bocquillon, P., Geffert, J.L., Kasoar, T., Kovacs, E., et al. 2018. Ten-Year Assessment of the 100 Priority Questions for Global Biodiversity Conservation, Conservation Biology 32(6): 1457-1463.
  • Kabisch, S., Finnveden, G., Kratochvil, P., Sendi, R., Smagacz-Poziemska, M., Matos, R., and Bylund, J. 2019. New Urban Transitions towards Sustainability: Addressing SDG Challenges (Research and Implementation Tasks and Topics from the Perspective of the Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) of the Joint Programming Initiative (JPI) Urban Europe), Sustainability (Switzerland) 11(8).
  • Kaltenberg-Kwiatkowska, E. 1982. Koncepcje Ekologii Społecznej w Socjologii Polskiej, in: Z. Pióro (ed.), Przestrzeń i Społeczństwo. Z Badań Ekologii Społecznej. Warszawa: Polska Akademia Nauk, pp. 133-159.
  • Kasper, D. 2016. Re-Conceptualizing (Environmental) Sociology, Environmental Sociology 2(4).
  • Kennedy, E.H., and Dzialo, L. 2015. Locating Gender in Environmental Sociology, Sociology Compass 9(10).
  • Kluvánková-Oravská, T., Chobotová, V., and Smolková, E. 2013. The Challenges of Policy Convergence: The Europeanization of Biodiversity Governance in an Enlarging EU, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 31(3).
  • Kopczyńska, E. 2020. Are There Local Versions of Sustainability? Food Networks in the Semi-Periphery, Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(7).
  • Koprowska, K., Kronenberg, J., Kuźma, I.B. and Łaszkiewicz, E. 2020. Condemned to green? Accessibility and attractiveness of urban green spaces to people experiencing homelessness, Geoforum 113: 1-13.
  • Kreibich, H., DiBaldassarre, G., Vorogushyn, S., Aerts, J.C.J.H., Apel, H., Aronica, G.T., Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K., et al. 2017. Adaptation to Flood Risk: Results of International Paired Flood Event Studies, Earth's Future 5(10): 953-965.
  • Kronenberg, J., Haase, A., Łaszkiewicz, E., Antal, A., Baravikova, A., Biernacka, M. and Onose, D.A. 2020. Environmental justice in the context of urban green space availability, accessibility, and attractiveness in postsocialist cities, Cities 106: 102862.
  • Kundzewicz, Z.W., Matczak, P., Otto, I.M., and Otto, P.E. 2020. From "Atmosfear" to Climate Action, Environmental Science and Policy 105.
  • Lange, H. 2002. Social Science and Nature. A Review of Environmental Sociology in Germany, Natures Sciences Societes 10(3).
  • Lidskog, R., and Sjödin, D. 2014. Why Do Forest Owners Fail to Heed Warnings? Conflicting Risk Evaluations Made by the Swedish Forest Agency and Forest Owners, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29(3).
  • Lidskog, R., and Waterton, C. 2016. Anthropocene-a Cautious Welcome from Environmental Sociology?, Environmental Sociology 2(4): 395-406.
  • Lis, A. 2018. Politics and Knowledge Production: Between Securitisation and Riskification of the Shale Gas Issue in Poland and Germany, Energy Security in Europe: 93-115. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-64964-1 4.
  • Lis, A. 2021. Energopolitics in Times of Climate Change, in: T. Loloum, S. Abram, and N. Ortar (eds.), Ethnographies of Power. Berhghan: Berghahn Books, pp. 109-132. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv1tbhpzp.9.
  • Lis, A., and Stasik, A.K. 2017. Hybrid Forums, Knowledge Deficits and the Multiple Uncertainties of Resource Extraction: Negotiating the Local Governance of Shale Gas in Poland, Energy Research and Social Science 28.
  • Łoś, I. 2020. Die Polnische Umweltbewegung - Strategien Eines Marginalisierten Akteurs, Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen 33(4).
  • Mączka, K., Chmielewski, P., Jeran, A., Matczak, P., and van Riper, C.J. 2019. The Ecosystem Services Concept as a Tool for Public Participation in Management of Poland's Natura 2000 Network, Ecosystem Services 35.
  • Mączka, K., Matczak, P., Jeran, A., Chmielewski, P.J., and Baker, S. 2021. Conflicts in Ecosystem Services Management: Analysis of Stakeholder Participation in Natura 2000 in Poland, Environmental Science and Policy 117.
  • Matczak, P., Kundzewicz, Z.W., Szwed, M., Choryński, A., and Lewandowski, J. 2017. Doing More While Remaining the Same? Flood Risk Governance in Poland, Journal of Flood Risk Management 11(3): 239-249.
  • Matczak, P., Lewandowski, J., Choryński, A., Szwed, M., and Kundzewicz, Z.W. 2015. Flood Risk Governance Arrangements in Europe, IAHS-AISH Proceedings and Reports, 195-199.
  • Matczak, P., and Hegger, D.L.,T. (eds.). 2020. Flood Risk Governance for More Resilience. Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Water.
  • Mikusiński, G., and Niedziałkowski, K. 2020. Perceived Importance of Ecosystem Services in the Białowieża Forest for Local Communities-Does Proximity Matter?, Land Use Policy 97.
  • Mol, A.P.J. 2006. From Environmental Sociologies to Environmental Sociology?: A Comparison of U.S. and European Environmental Sociology, Organization and Environment 19(1): 5-27.
  • Morawski, L., Okulicz-Kozaryn, A., and Strzelecka, M. 2022. Elderly Volunteering in Europe: The Relationship Between Volunteering and Quality of Life Depends on Volunteering Rates, Voluntas 33(2).
  • Niedziałkowski, K., Jaroszewicz, B., Kowalczyk, R., Kuijper, D.P.J., Mikusiński, G., Selva, N., Walankiewicz, W., and Wesołowski, T. 2019. Effective Mitigation of Conservation Conflicts and Participatory Governance: Reflections on Kuboń et al., Conservation Biology.
  • Niedziałkowski, K., Komar, E., Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, A., Olszańska, A., and Grodzińska-Jurczak, M. 2018. Discourses on Public Participation in Protected Areas Governance: Application of Q Methodology in Poland, Ecological Economics 145.
  • Niedziałkowski, K., and Putkowska-Smoter, R. 2020. What Makes a Major Change of Wildlife Management Policy Possible? Institutional Analysis of Polish Wolf Governance, PLOS ONE 15(4). https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231601.
  • Niedziałkowski, K., and Shkaruba, A. 2018. Governance and Legitimacy of the Forest Stewardship Council Certification in the National Contexts-A Comparative Study of Belarus and Poland, Forest Policy and Economics 97.
  • Niedziałkowski, K., Sidorovich, A., Kireyeu, V., and Shkaruba, A. 2021. Stimuli and Barriers to Innovation in Wildlife Policy-Long-Term Institutional Analysis of Wolf Management in Belarus, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research.
  • Ostrom, E. 1999. Coping With Tragedies of the Commons, Annual Review of Political Science 2(1): 493-535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.493.
  • Pagani, R.N., Kovaleski, J.L., and Resende, L.M. 2015. Methodi Ordinatio: A Proposed Methodology to Select and Rank Relevant Scientific Papers Encompassing the Impact Factor, Number of Citation, and Year of Publication, Scientometrics 105(3) 2109-2135. https://link.springer.com/article/ 10.1007/s11192-015-1744-x.
  • Pellow, D.N., and Nyseth Brehm, H. 2013. An Environmental Sociology for the Twenty-First Century, Annual Review of Sociology 39.
  • Peng, G., Prince, S., and Strzelecka, M. 2020. Neolocalism and Social Sustainability: The Case of Öland's Harvest Festival, Sweden, in: L. Ingram, S.L. Slocum, and C. Cavaliere(eds.), Neolocalism and Tourism: Understanding a Global Movement. Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers Limited, pp. 164-184.
  • Piwowarczyk, J., Matczak, M., Rakowski, M., and Zaucha, J. 2019. Challenges for Integration of the Polish Fishing Sector into Marine Spatial Planning (MSP): Do Fishers and Planners Tell the Same Story?, Ocean and Coastal Management 181.
  • Prokopy, L.S., and Hovardas, T. 2020. Overview of Featured Collection on a Bibliometric Analysis of Environmental and Resource Sociology, Society and Natural Resources.
  • Putkowska-Smoter, R., and Frankowski, J. 2020. Right to the Map? Counter-Mapping Practices of Smog Alerts and Urban Greenery Movements in Poland, Society Register 4(4).
  • Putkowska-Smoter, R., and Niedziałkowski, K. 2021. Street Level Bureaucracy in Response to Environmental Pressure. Insights from Forestry and Urban Green Space Governance in Poland, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 39(5).
  • Qin, H., and Flint, C.G. 2009. A Review of Environmental Sociology and the Sociology of Natural Resources: Insights for the Development of Environmental Sociology in China, Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment 7(4): 25-30.
  • Qin, H., Prasetyo, Y., Bass, M., Sanders, C., Prentice, E., and Nguyen, Q. 2020. Seeing the Forest for the Trees: A Bibliometric Analysis of Environmental and Resource Sociology, Society and Natural Resources 33(9).
  • Rechciński, M., Tusznio, J., and Grodzińska-Jurczak, M. 2019. Protected Area Conflicts: A State-ofthe-Art Review and a Proposed Integrated Conceptual Framework for Reclaiming the Role of Geography Biodiversity and Conservation.
  • Redclift, M.R., and Woodgate, G. (eds.). 2010. The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology, Second Edition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Ruzzenenti, F., and Wagner, A. 2018. Efficiency and the Rebound Effect in the Hegemonic Discourse on Energy, Nature and Culture 13(3).
  • Ryghaug, M., Subotički, I., Von Wirth, T., Smeds, E., Sherrer, A., Foulds, C., Bertolini, L., et al. 2020. 100 Social Sciences and Humanities Priority Research Questions for Transport and Mobility in Horizon Europe. Cambridge: Energy-SHIFTS.
  • Sareen, S., Thomson, H., Tirado Herrero, S., Gouveia, J.P., Lippert, I., and Lis, A. 2020. European Energy Poverty Metrics: Scales, Prospects and Limits, Global Transitions 2.
  • Skórka, P., Banach, A., Banasiak, M., Bokalska-Rajba, J., Bonk, M., Czachura, P., García-Rodríguez, A., et al. 2021. Congruence between the Prioritisation of Conservation Problems at the Local and National Scale: An Evaluation by Environmental Scientists in Poland, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28(27): 35317-35326.
  • Smagacz-Poziemska, M., Gómez, M.V., Pereira, P., Guarino, L., Kurtenbach, S., and Villalón, J.J. 2019a. Cities as the Strategic Terrain of Research on Contemporary Inequalities and Uncertainty, in: M. Smagacz-Poziemska, M.V. Gómez, P. Pereira, L. Guarino, S. Kurtenbach, and J.J. Villalón (eds.), Inequality and Uncertainty: Current Challenges for Cities. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-20.
  • Smagacz-Poziemska, M., Gómez, M.V., Pereira, P., Guarino, L., Kurtenbach, S., and Villalón, J.J.. 2019b. Inequality and Uncertainty: Current Challenges for Cities. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Sokołowski, J., and Frankowski, J. 2020. How to Improve the Quality of Life of the Energy Poor?, IBS Policy Paper.
  • Strzelecka, M., Boley, B.B., and Woosnam, K.M. 2017. Place Attachment and Empowerment: Do Residents Need to Be Attached to Be Empowered?, Annals of Tourism Research 66.
  • Strzelecka, M., Nisbett, G.S., and Woosnam, K.M. 2017. The Hedonic Nature of Conservation Volunteer Travel, Tourism Management 63: 417-425.
  • Strzelecka, M., Rechciński, M., Tusznio, J., Akhshik, A., and Grodzińska-Jurczak, M. 2021. Environmental Justice in Natura 2000 Conservation Conflicts: The Case for Resident Empowerment, Land Use Policy 107.
  • Strzelecka, M., Woosnam, K.M., and Nisbett, G.S. 2018. Self-Efficacy Mechanism at Work: The Context of Environmental Volunteer Travel, Journal of Sustainable Tourism 26(11): 2002-2020. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09669582.2018.1526297.
  • Studholme, M. 2008. Patrick Geddes and the History of Environmental Sociology in Britain: A Cautionary Tale, Journal of Classical Sociology 8(3).
  • Trempała, W. 2016. Geneza, rozwój i status socjologii środowiskowej, Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae 14(1): 165-197.
  • Tusznio, J., Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, A., Rechciński, M., Olszańska, A., and Grodzińska-Jurczak, M. 2020. Application of the Ecosystem Services Concept at the Local Level-Challenges, Opportunities, and Limitations, Ecosystem Services 42: 101077.
  • Ulrich-Schad, J.D., and Givens, J.E.. 2020. The Forest in the Future: A Response to Seeing the Forest for the Trees, Society and Natural Resources 33(9).
  • Urry, J. 2009. Sociology and Climate Change, The Sociological Review 57(2): 84-100. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01887.x.
  • Vintsek, L., Grodzinska-Jurczak, M., and Stanczyk, J. 2020. How Local Communities Perceive Carpathian River Valleys Protected by Natura 2000?-Ecosystem Services and "Home Advisors" Approach, Prace i Studia Geograficzne.
  • Wagner, A., and Gałuszka, D. 2020. Let's Play the Future: Sociotechnical Imaginaries, and Energy Transitions in Serious Digital Games, Energy Research and Social Science 70.
  • Warachowska, W., Alvarez, X., Bezak, N., Gómez-Rúa, M., Janeiro-Otero, A., Matczak, P., Vidal-Puga, J., and Zupanc, V. 2021. A Cooperative Game for Upstream-Downstream River Flooding Risk Prevention in Four European River Basins.
  • Wittmayer, J.M., de Geus, T., Pel, B., Avelino, F., Hielscher, S., Hoppe, T., Mühlemeier, S., et al. 2020. Beyond Instrumentalism: Broadening the Understanding of Social Innovation in Socio-Technical Energy Systems, Energy Research and Social Science.
  • Wódz, J., and Wódz, K. 1998. Environmental Sociology in Poland and the Ecological Consciousness of Polish People, in: A. Tickle and I. Welsh (eds.), Environment and Society in Eastern Europe. Harlow: Addison-Wesley, Longman, pp. 97-113.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171665147

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.