Share of Mechanical-biological Installation of Wste Processing (mbp) in the Level of Recycling and Preparation for re-use of Paper, Metals, Plastics, and Glass Achieved by Municipalities

• Autorzy: Anna Krysztopik , Izabela Anna Tałałaj , Paweł Biedka

Warianty tytułu

Udział Instalacji Do Mechaniczno-Biologicznego przetwarzania Odpadów Komunalnych (Mbp) W Poziomie recyklingu I Przygotowania Do Ponownego Użycia Papieru, Metali, Tworzyw Sztucznych I Szkła Osiągniętym Przez Gminy

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article aims to determine the share of mechanical-biological installation of waste processing (MBP) in the levels of recycling and preparation for the reuse of paper, metals, plastics, and glass (PMPG) achieved by municipalities. Two MBP installations were taken for the analysis - with the highest and the lowest share of municipalities in the Podlaskie Voivodship (Poland), which reached the recycling level required in 2019. In order to determine the share of MBP installations in the level of recycling achieved by communes, the share of the mass of recycled PMPG waste segregated from mixed municipal waste was calculated: in the total mass of generated PMPG waste and in the total mass of recycled PMPG waste from the municipal waste stream. On the basis of the conducted analyses, it should be stated that the MBP installation may have an impact on the achievement by municipalities of the recycling level required by law(original abstract)

Celem artykułu jest określenie udziału instalacji do mechaniczno-biologicznego przetwarzania odpadów komunalnych (MBP) w wysokości osiąganych poziomów recyklingu i przygotowania do ponownego użycia papieru, metali, tworzyw sztucznych i szkła (PMPG) przez gminy w województwie podlaskim (Polska) w 2019 r. Analizie poddano samorządy gminne kierujące zmieszane odpady komunalne do instalacji MBP o największym i najmniejszym udziale gmin, które osiągnęły wymagany poziom recyklingu. Otrzymane wyniki dotyczące udziału masy odpadów PMPG wysegregowanych ze zmieszanych odpadów komunalnych w dwóch analizowanych instalacjach MBP zestawiono z osiągniętymi przez gminy poziomami recyklingu oraz łączną masą odpadów poddanych recyklingowi. Wysoki udział MBP w masie odpadów poddanych recyklingowi nie determinował osiągnięcia przez wszystkie gminy wymaganego poziomu recyklingu, natomiast niski udział nie przesądzał o nieosiągnięciu przez gminę poziomu recyklingu.(abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Recycling; Wastes; Thermal waste neutralisation

PL

Recykling; Odpady; Termiczne unieszkodliwianie odpadów

• Czasopismo: Ekonomia i Środowisko
• Rocznik: 2023
• Numer: nr 1 (84)
• Strony: 210--228

Twórcy

autor

Anna Krysztopik

• PhD student at the Doctoral School of the Białystok University of Technology

autor

Izabela Anna Tałałaj

• Bialystok University of Technology

autor

Paweł Biedka

• Bialystok University of Technology

Bibliografia

• Abbott, A., Nandeibam, S., & O'Shea, L. (2011). Explaining the variation in household recycling rates across the UK. Ecological Economics, 70 (11), 2214-2223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.028
• Act of September 13, 1996, on maintaining cleanliness and order in municipalities, Journal of Laws of 2022, item 1297. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU19961320622/U/D19960622Lj.pdf
• Antonopoulos, I., Faraca, G., & Tonini, D. (2021). Recycling of post-consumer plastic packaging waste in the EU: Recovery rates, material flows, and barriers. Waste Management, 126, 694-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.002
• Brouwer, M. T., Thoden van Velzen, E. U., Augustinus, A., Soethoudt, H., De Meester, S., & Ragaert, K. (2018). Predictive model for the Dutch post-consumer plastic packaging recycling system and implications for the circular economy. Waste Management, 71, 62-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.10.034
• Cerqueira, P. A., & Soukiazis, E. (2022). Socio-economic and political factors affecting the rate of recycling in Portuguese municipalities. Economic Modelling, 108, 105779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105779
• Cimpan, C., Maul, A., Jansen, M., Pretz, T., & Wenzel, H. (2015). Central sorting and recovery of MSW recyclable materials: a review of technological state-of-the-art, cases, practice and implications for materials recycling. Journal of Environmental Management, 156, 181-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.025
• Das, S. K., & Hughes, M. (2006). Improving aluminium can recycling rates: A six sigma study in Kentucky. JOM, 58, 27-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-006-0049-1
• Dijkgraaf, E., & Gradus, R. (2017). An EU Recycling Target: What Does the Dutch Evidence Tell Us? Environmental and Resource Economics, 68, 501-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0027-1
• Eriksen, M. K., & Astrup, T. F. (2019). Characterisation of source-separated, rigid plastic waste and evaluation of recycling initiatives: Effects of product design and source-separation system. Waste Management, 87, 161-172. https://doi.org/10.1016j.wasman.2019.02.006
• Fizaine, F. (2020). The economics of recycling rate: New insights from waste electrical and electronic equipment. Resources Policy, 67, 101675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101675
• Huysman, S., Debaveye, S., Schaubroeck, T., De Meester, S., Ardente, F., Mathieux, F., & Dewulf, J. (2015). The recyclability benefit rate of closed-loop and open-loop systems: A case study on plastic recycling in Flanders. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 101, 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.014
• Luijsterburg, B., & Goossens, H. (2014). Assessment of plastic packaging waste: Material origin, methods, properties. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 85, 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.10.010
• Mastellone, M. L., Cremiato, R., Zaccariello, L., & Lotito, R. (2017). Evaluation of performance indicators applied to a material recovery facility fed by mixed packaging waste. Waste Management, 64, 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.02.030
• Montejo, C., Tonini, D., del Carmen Márquez, M., & Astrup, T. F. (2013). Mechanical-biological treatment: Performance and potentials. An LCA of 8 MBT plants, including waste characterisation. Journal of Environmental management, 128, 661-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.063
• Muñoz, I., Rieradevall, J., Doménech, X., & Milà, L. (2004). LCA application to integrated waste management planning in Gipuzkoa (Spain). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 9, 272. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978603
• Navarotto, P., & Dominguez Llauro, R. (2012). Materials recovery from municipal solid waste: ECOPARC 4 Barcelona a case study. Atti del Convegno Sidisa.
• Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of December 14, 2016, on the recycling levels, preparation for re-use, and recovery by other methods of specific fractions of municipal waste, Journal of Laws of 2016, 2167. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20160002167/O/D20162167.pdf
• Schenk, N.J., Moll, H.C. & Potting, J. (2004). The Nonlinear Relationship between Paper Recycling and Primary Pulp Requirements. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 8, 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1162/1088198042442379
• Schmalbein, N., & Pretz, T. (2011). Economic aspects of the resource recovery from mixed municipal solid waste. Sardinia 2011, Thirteenth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, CISA Publisher, Italy.
• SWANA. (2013). Solid Waste Association of North America. Source-separation and Mixed Waste Recycling Systems: a Comparative Analysis. Silver Spring, MD.
• Tatoutchoup, F. D. (2016). Optimal rate of paper recycling. Forest Policy and Economics, 73, 264-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.09.022
• Thoden van Velzen, E. U., Jansen, M., Brouwer, M. T., Feil, A., Molenveld, K., & Pretz, Th. (2017). Efficiency of recycling post-consumer plastic packages. AIP Conference Proceedings 1914, 170002. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5016785
• Van Velzen, E. T., Brouwer, M. T., Keijsers, E. R. P., Pretz, T., Feil, A., & Jansen, M. (2014). Pilot beverage cartons: extended technical report, 1440. Wageningen UR-Food & Biobased Research.
• Wellacher, M. (2011). MBT Larnaka, Cyprus-Waste Treatment Technology from Komptech. In Waste to Resources 2011, 1-6.
• Wiśniewska, M., & Lelicińska-Serafin, K. (2018). The effectiveness of the mechanical treatment of municipal waste using the example of a selected installation. VI International Conference of Science and Technology INFRAEKO 2018 Modern Cities. Infrastructure and Environment, 45, 00102. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184500102
• WRAP. (2022, August 14). Recovering value from MRFs. A review of key studies relating to the specification, operation and costs of Material Recovery Facilities. Waste & Resources Action Programme 2014. https://slidelegend.com/recovering-value-from-mrfs-wrap_5c1fbd06097c4741188b4576.html
• Zhang, X., Liu, C., Chen, Y., Zheng, G., & Chen, Y. (2022). Source separation, transportation, pretreatment, and valorization of municipal solid waste: a critical review. Environment, Development and Sustainability 24, 11471-11513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01932-w

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.34659/eis.2023.84.1.511