PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2022 | z. 164 Zarządzanie zasobami ludzkimi: perspektywy, wdrażanie i wyzwania = Human Resource Management : Perspectives, Implementation and Challenges | 437--448
Tytuł artykułu

Remote Workplaces Over the Time of Covid-19 in Poland as a Form of Organisational Space

Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The aim of the study is to analyze and evaluate the massive expansion of organizational spaces resulting from the creation of remote workplaces during the COVID-19 period in employees' homes. Design/methodology/approach: The work uses mixed methods with the use of the spatial trend of Work Design theoretical orientation. A spatial model of work stations was constructed and the correlation between the model and financing, time of use and the results of the tested variant of work organization was statistically verified. Findings: The COVID-19 period is dominated by the transfer of tasks from stationary positions, which mainly have repetitive nature. This is matched by the adaptation of physical space and cyberspace (technology), with various levels of social space features of remote workplaces. Statistical verification shows strong correlations between the features of positions and the determinants of the use of remote work as a variant of work organization. Research limitations/implications: Subjectivity of the analysis due to the use of mixed methods in the part of qualitative research. Future research should focus on (1) work in the context of multifunctionality of the home, (2) creating new work rules, e.g. new time-space patterns of work, and (3) developing criteria for creating remote workplaces at home. Practical implications: The results of the study can be used as input data for the design of remote workplaces in organizations. Originality/value: The work fills the research gap in the design of work forms, showing the need for a modular approach to the development of work systems.(original abstract)
Słowa kluczowe
Twórcy
  • WSB University in Gdańsk, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Georgescu (Crețan), G.C., Gherghina, R., Duca, I., Postole, M.A., Constantinescu, C.M. (2021). Determinants of Employees' Option for Preserving Teleworking After the COVID-19 Pandemic. Amfiteatru Economic, Vol. 23, No. 58, pp. 669-682 doi: 10.24818/EA/2021/58/669.
  • 2. Gschwind, L., Vargas, O. (2019). Telework and its effects in Europe, In: J.C. Messenger (Ed.), Telework in the 21st Century. An Evolutionary Perspective (pp. 36-75). Cheltenham- Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • 3. Jaakson, K., Kallaste, E. (2010). Beyond flexibility: reallocation of responsibilities in the case of telework. New Technology, Work and Employment, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 196-203.
  • 4. Kingma, S.F., Dale, K., Wasserman, V. (2018). Introduction: Henry Lefebvre and organisation studies. In: S.F. Kingma, K., Dale, V. Wasserman (Eds.), Organisational Space and Beyond: The Significance of Henry Lefebvre for Organisation Studies (pp. 1-24). Routledge Studies in Management, Organization and Society. New York: Routledge. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315302430 10.02.2022.
  • 5. Kopertyńska, M.W. (2020), Praca w nowych uwarunkowaniach funkcjonowania organizacji. In: M.W. Kopertyńska (ed.), Zarządzanie pracą w zmieniających się uwarunkowaniach funkcjonowania organizacji (pp. 29-42). Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu.
  • 6. Kreiner, K. (2010). Afterword. Organizational spaces: from 'matters of fact' to 'matters of concern'. In: A. van Marrewijk, D. Yanow (Eds.), Organizational Spaces. Rematerializing the Workaday Work (pp. 200-212). Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar.
  • 7. Kuntz, J.C. (2021). Resilience in times of global pandemic: Steering recovery and thriving trajectories. Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol.70, Iss. 1, pp. 188- 215, doi: 10.1111/apps.12296.
  • 8. Ortiz-Lozano, J.M., Martínez-Morán, P.C., Fernández-Muñoz, I. (2021),.Difficulties for Teleworking of Public Employees in the Spanish Public Administration. Sustainability, 13, 8931. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168931.
  • 9. Pachura, P. (2016). O przestrzeni w zarządzaniu. Studium metodologiczne. Warszawa: PWN.
  • 10. Pachura, P. (2021). Trójprzestrzenie. Modelowanie teorii przestrzeni organizacji. Warszawa: Scholar.
  • 11. Perin, C. (2002). Work, space and time on the threshold of a new century. In: P.J. Jackson, J.M. van der Wielen (Eds.), Teleworking: international perspectives. From telecommuting to the virtual organization (pp. 40-55). London-New York: Routledge. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=0041B02050EDD6AA1A2FBD38428A4632?doi=10.1.1.468.5552&rep=rep1&type=pdf, 10.02.2022.
  • 12. Pot, F., Dhondt, S., de Korte, E., Oeij, P., Vaas, F. (2012). Workplace innovation in the Netherlands. In: I. Houtman (ed.), Work Life in the Netherlands (pp. 173-187). Hoofddorp: TNO Innovation for Live. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman. 2016.06.008.
  • 13. Rymaniak, J., Lis, K. (2021). Praca zdalna w początkowym okresie pandemii - świadomość zmian a relacje organizacyjne. In: W.J. Paluchowski, L. Bakiera (eds.), Psychospołeczny obraz pierwszej fali pandemii COVID-19 w Polsce (pp. 243-250). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
  • 14. Rymaniak, J., Lis, K., Davidavičienė, V., Pérez-Pérez, M., Martínez-Sánchez, Á. (2021). From stationary to remote: Employee risks at pandemic migration of workplaces. Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 13, 7180. doi: 10.3390/ su13137180.
  • 15. Rymaniak, J., Nogalski, B. (2018). Modularity in Seaport Management: Identification of the Research Problem. In: T. Ahram, W. Karwowski, R. Taiar (Eds.), Human Systems Engineering and Design (pp. 763-769). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02053-8_116.
  • 16. Sidor-Rządkowska, M. (2021). Kształtowanie przestrzeni pracy. Praca w biurze, praca zdalna, coworking. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
  • 17. Sostero, M., Milasi, S., Hurley, J., Fernandez-Macías, E., Bisello, M. (2020). Teleworkability and the COVID-19 crisis: a new digital divide? RC Working Papers Series on Labour. Education and Technology, 5. Seville: European Commission. Retrieved from https://euagenda.eu/upload/publications/wpef20020.pdf, 10.02.2022.
  • 18. Spytek-Bandurska, G. (2015). Telepraca jako nietypowa forma zatrudnienia w Polsce. Aspekty prawne i społeczne. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza ASPRA-JR.
  • 19. Taskin, L. (2010). « La déspatialisation » Enjeu de gestion. Revue française de gestion, Vol. 3, No. 202, pp. 61-76. doi: 10.3166/rfg.202.61-76.
  • 20. The Work-life Balance Directive16 (2019/1158/EU). Official Journal of the European Union L 188/79, 12.7.2019
  • 21. Thulin, E., Vilhelmson, B. (2021). Pacesetters in contemporary telework: How smartphones and mediated presence reshape the time-space rhythms of daily work. New Technology, Work and Employment, Special Issue, pp.1-20. doi: org/10.1111/ntwe.12224.
  • 22. Törnroos, J.-A., Halinen, A., Medlin, Ch.J. (2017). Dimensions of space in business network research, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 61. pp. 1-10.
  • 23. Vargas-Llave, O., Weber, T., Avogaro, M. (2020). Industrial relations Right to disconnect in the 27 EU Member States. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFUND).
  • 24. Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., Parker, S.K. (2021). Achieving Effective Remote Working During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Work Design Perspective, Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 70, Iss. 1, pp. 1-44. doi: 10.1111/apps.12290.
  • 25. Yeung, H.W.-C. (2005). Organizational space: a new frontier in international business strategy? Critical perspectives on international business Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 219-240. doi: 10.1108/17422040510629728.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171666667

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.