Rejoinder to Dominiak on Bagels and Donuts

• Autorzy: Walter E. Block
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This is but the latest in a series of debates I have been having with my friend and colleague, Łukasz Dominiak. Included are the following texts: Block (2021), Dominiak (2017; 2019; 2021). We have been agreeing and disagreeing with each other concerning the implications of the bagel and donut theory for a while. The present paper continues this tradition: both agreeing and disagreeing with each other in regards to libertarian theory and trespass on private property. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Economic doctrine; Theory of property rights; Private property; Compensation

PL

Doktryny ekonomiczne; Teoria praw własności; Własność prywatna; Odszkodowania

• Czasopismo: Ekonomia - Wroclaw Economic Review
• Rocznik: 2022
• Numer: tom 28, nr 1
• Strony: 97--109

Twórcy

autor

Walter E. Block

• Loyola University New Orleans, United States of America

Bibliografia

• Benson, B. (2005). The mythology of holdout as a justification for eminent domain and public provision of roads. Independent Review, 10(2), 165-194.
• Block, W.E. (1990). Earning happiness through homesteading unowned land: A comment on "Buying misery with federal land" by Stroup. Journal of Social Political and Economic Studies, 15(2), 237-253.
• Block, W.E. (1998). Roads, bridges, sunlight and private property: Reply to Gordon Tullock. Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, 8(2/3), 315-326.
• Block, W.E. (2002A). Homesteading city streets: An exercise in managerial theory. Planning and Markets, 5(1), 18-23.
• Block, W.E. (2002B). On reparations to blacks for slavery. Human Rights Review, 3(4), 53-73.
• Block, W.E. (17.02.2003). The Non Aggression Axiom of Libertarianism. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from http://archive.lewrockwell.com/block/block26.html.
• Block, W.E. (2009A). Toward a libertarian theory of guilt and punishment for the crime of statism. In J.G. Hulsmann, S. Kinsella (eds.), Property, Freedom and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe (137-148). Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
• Block, W.E. (2009B). Libertarian punishment theory: Working for, and donating to, the state. Libertarian Papers, 1, art. 17.
• Block, W.E. (2016A). Russian roulette: Rejoinder to Robins. Acta Economica et Turistica, 1(2), 197-205.
• Block, W.E. (2016B). Forestalling, positive obligations and the Lockean and Blockian provisos: Rejoinder to Stephan Kinsella. Ekonomia. Wroclaw Economic Review, 22(3), 27-41. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from https://wuwr.pl/ekon/article/view/8421/8039.
• Block, W.E. (2018). The case for punishing those responsible for minimum wage laws, rent control and protectionist tariffs. Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado, 18(1), 235-263.
• Block, W.E. (2021). Rejoinder to Dominiak on the necessity of easements. Ekonomia. Wroclaw Economic Review; 27(1), 9-25. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from https://wuwr.pl/ekon/article/view/13542/12208.
• Block, W.E., Block, M. (1996). Roads, bridges, sunlight and private property rights. Journal Des Economistes Humaines Et Des Etudes, 7(2/3), 351-362. Retrieved from http://www.mises.org/story/1911.
• Block, W.E., Edelstein, M.R. (2012). Popsicle sticks and homesteading land for nature preserves. Romanian Economic and Business Review, 7(1), 7-13.
• Block, W.E., Epstein, R. (2005). Debate on eminent domain. NYU Journal of Law & Liberty, 1(3), 1144-1169.
• Block, W.E., Yeatts, G. (1999-2000). The economics and ethics of land reform: A critique of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace's "Toward a better distribution of land: The challenge of agrarian reform". Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Law, 15(1), 37-69.
• Bylund, P. (2005). Man and Matter: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Justification of Ownership in Land from the Basis of Self-Ownership. Master thesis. Lund University. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/1330482.
• Bylund, P. (2012). Man and matter: How the former gains ownership of the latter. Libertarian Papers, 4(1), 73-118. Retrieved from http://libertarianpapers.org/articles/2012/lp-4-1-5.pdf.
• Dominiak, Ł. (2017). The Blockian Proviso and the rationality of property rights. Libertarian Papers, 9(1), 114-128. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from http://libertarianpapers.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/post/2017/05/lp-9-1-6.pdf.
• Dominiak, Ł. (2019). Must right-libertarians embrace easements by necessity? Diametros, 16 (60), 34-51.
• Dominiak, Ł. (2021). Libertarian easements revisited. Ekonomia. Wroclaw Economic Review, 27(1), 27-35. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from https://wuwr.pl/ekon/article/view/13543/12209.
• Epstein, R.A. (1985). Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge, MA-London: Harvard University Press.
• Gordon, D. (27.03.2020). Eminent Domain: Are Holdouts Really a Problem? Mises Institute. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from https://tinyurl.com/2p8hpu7f.
• Gordon, D. (4.09.2020). Rothbard and Double Restitution. Mises Institute. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from https://tinyurl.com/5y6kantv.
• Gregory, A. (5.12.2006). The Trouble with "Just Compensation". Mises Institute. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from http://mises.org/story/2379.
• Grotius, H. (1814 [1625]). Law of War and Peace. Trans. A.C. Campbell. London: Rivington.
• Hazlitt, H. (2008 [1946]). Economics in One Lesson. Auburn, AL: Mises Institute. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from http://mises.org/books/economics_in_one_lesson_hazlitt.pdf.
• Hoppe, H.H. (1993). The Economics and Ethics of Private Property: Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy. Boston: Kluwer.
• Hoppe, H.H. (2011). Of private, common, and public property and the rationale for total privatization. Libertarian Papers, 3(1), 1-13. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from http://libertarianpapers.org/2011/1-hoppe-private-common-and-public-property/.
• Kinsella, S.N. (1996). Punishment and proportionality: The Estoppel approach. The Journal of Libertarian Studies, 12(1), 51-74. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from http://www.mises.org/journals/jls/12_1/12_1_3.pdf.
• Kinsella, S.N. (1997). A libertarian theory of punishment and rights. Loyola Los Angeles Law Review, 30, 607-645.
• Kinsella, S.N. (2003). A libertarian theory of contract: Title transfer, binding promises, and inalienability. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 17(2), 11-37. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from http://www.mises.org/journals/jls/17_2/17_2_2.pdf.
• Kinsella, S.N. (7.09.2006). How We Come to Own Ourselves. Mises Institute. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from https://mises.org/library/how-we-come-own-ourselves.
• Kinsella, S.N. (11.09.2007). The Blockean Proviso. Mises Institute. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from https://mises.org/wire/blockean-proviso.
• Kinsella, S.N. (22.05.2009). Homesteading, Abandonment, and Unowned Land in the Civil Law. Mises Institute. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from https://mises.org/wire/homesteading-abandonment-and-unowned-land-civil-law.
• Kinsella, S.N. (21.08.2009). What Libertarianism Is. Mises Institute. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from https://mises.org/library/what-libertarianism.
• Locke, J. (1948). An essay concerning the true origin, extent and end of civil government. In E. Barker, (ed.), Social Contract (17-19). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Locke, J. (1955). Second Treatise of Civil Government. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
• Loo, A., Block, W.E. (2017-2018). Threats against third parties: A libertarian analysis. Baku State University Law Review, 4(1), 52-64. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from http://lr.bsulawss.org/files/archive/volume4/issue1/4BSULawRev13.pdf.
• Nedzel, N., Block, W.E. (2007). Eminent domain: A legal and economic analysis. Government Law and Policy Journal, 9(1), 70-73. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from http://tinyurl.com/yw47yk.
• Nedzel, N., Block, W.E. (2008). Eminent domain: A legal and economic critique. University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender, and Class, 7(1), art. 9. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1122&context=rrgc.
• Olson, Ch.B. (1979). Law in anarchy. Libertarian Forum, 12(6).
• Paul, E.F. (1987). Property Rights and Eminent Domain. Livingston, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
• Pufendorf, S. (1927 [1673]). Natural Law and the Law of Nations. Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Rothbard, M.N. (1973). For a New Liberty. New York: Macmillan. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from http://mises.org/rothbard/newlibertywhole.asp.
• Rothbard, M.N. (1977). Punishment and proportionality. In R.E. Barnett, J. Hagel (eds.), Assessing the Criminal: Restitution, Retribution, and the Legal Process (259-270). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.
• Rothbard, M.N. (1998). The Ethics of Liberty. New York: New York University Press. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from https://cdn.mises.org/The Ethics of Liberty 20191108.pdf.
• Rozeff , M.S. (1.09.2005). Original Appropriation and Its Critics. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from http://www.lewrockwell.com/rozeff/rozeff18.html.
• Speiser, F. (27.07.2005). Imminent Eminent Domain: Paying Tribute in Collectivist Society. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from http://www.strike-the-root.com/51/speiser/speiser1.html.
• Tullock, G. (1996). Comment on "Roads, bridges, sunlight and private property" by W.E. Block and Matthew Block. Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, 7(4), 589-592.
• Ward, A. (22.11.2012). Won't sell up? Enjoy living in the middle of a motorway! Road is built around a house after elderly Chinese couple refuse to move. Daily Mail. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2236746/Road-built-building-couple-refuse-China.html.
• Watner, C. (1982). The proprietary theory of justice in the libertarian tradition. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 6(3-4), 289-316. Retrieved 16.02.2022 from http://mises.org/journals/jls/6_3/6_3_6.pdf.
• Whitehead, R, Block, W.E. (2003). Taking the assets of the criminal to compensate victims of violence: A legal and philosophical approach. Wayne State University Law School Journal of Law in Society, 5(1), 229-254.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.19195/2658-1310.28.1.6