Axiological and Praxeological Dimensions of Marketing Communication Effectiveness - a Conceptual Framework

• Autorzy: Szymon Kolwas , Jarosław Domański
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Analyzed from the sender's perspective, marketing communications aim to engage audiences and create benefit-oriented relationships. In order to adequately assess the reciprocal efforts of the sender and receiver of the communication process, one cannot limit oneself to its purely economic analysis, but should pay attention to its broader praxeological context - take into account factors such as efficiency, effectiveness, and expediency. It is also crucial to evaluate parameters beyond the purely usability char-acteristics of communication practices used in the marketing aspect. Their ethical evaluation from current and potential customers, the social environment, and other stakeholders poses significant challenges for communicators but should also spur potentially beneficial transformations - toward a new view of so-cially engaged marketing and the ethical dimension of marketing. The purpose of this inquiry is to iden-tify a conceptual framework for measuring the efficiency of marketing communications based on axiological and praxeological dimensions. Five research hypotheses were formulated, which can be verified in the future research. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Marketing; Marketing communication; Effectiveness; Philosophy of Communication

PL

Marketing; Komunikowanie marketingowe; Efektywność; Filozofia komunikowania

• Czasopismo: Foundations of Management
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: 15
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 79--88

Twórcy

autor

Szymon Kolwas

• Warsaw University of Technology, Poland

autor

Jarosław Domański

• Warsaw University of Technology, Poland

Bibliografia

• Beerli, A., Santana, J., 1999. Design and validation of an instrument for measuring advertising effectiveness in the printed media, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 21(2), pp. 11-30.
• Espinas, A., 1890. Les origines de la technologie. Revue Philosophique de La France et de l'Étranger, No. 30, pp. 113-135. Available at: <http://www.jstor.org/stable/41073426>
• Freeman R. E., 2010. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Gatignon, H., Hanssens, D. M., 1987. Modeling Marketing Interactions with Application to Sales Force Effectiveness, Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (August), pp. 247-257.
• Gasparski, W., Lewicka-Strzałecka, A., Rok B., Szulczewski G. (ed.), 2002. Etyka biznesu w zastosowaniach praktycznych: Inicjatywy, programy kodeksy (Business ethics in practical applications: Initiatives, programs, codes), Warsaw: Centrum Etyki Biznesu IFiS PAN and WSPiZ oraz Biuro Stałego Koordynatora ONZ w Polsce.
• Gopalakrishna, S., Lilien, G.L., 1995. A Three-Stage Model of Industrial Trade Show Performance, Marketing Science, No. 14 (Winter), pp. 22-43.
• Hanssens, D. M., Weitz, B. W., 1980. The Effectiveness of Industrial Print Advertisements Across Product Categories, Journal of Marketing Research, No. 17 (August), pp. 294-306.
• Hayek, F.A., 1961. The Non Sequitur of the 'Dependence Effect', Southern Economic Journal Vol. 27, No. 4 1961, pp. 346-348, Available at <https://www.jstor.org/stable/1055533> [Accessed 30 January 2022].
• Jerman, D., Završnik, B., 2012. The model of marketing communications effectiveness: empirical evidence from Slovenian business-to-business practice, Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 705-723.
• Kopaliński, W., 1994. Słownik wyrazów obcych i zwrotów obcojęzycznych (Dictionary of foreign words and foreign phrases), Warsaw: Wiedza Powszechna.
• Kotarbiński, T., 1969. Traktat o dobrej robocie (A treatise on doing good work), Wrocław - Warszawa - Kraków: Ossolineum.
• Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., 2020. Principles of Marketing, Global Edition, London Pearson.
• Kotler, P., Setiawan, I., 2010. Marketing 3.0 From Products to Customers to the Human Spirit, New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
• Low, G. S., 2000. Correlates of Integrated Marketing Communications. Journal of Advertising Research, No. 40, Vol. 1, pp. 27-39.
• Moriarty, J., 2021. Business Ethics, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edition), Edward N. Zalta (eds.), Available at <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/ethics-business/> [Accessed 30 January 2022].
• Rappaport, A., 1986. Creating shareholder value: The new standard for business performance, New York Free Press.
• Rożnowski, B., Fortuna, P., 2020. Psychologia biznesu (The psychology of business), Warsaw: PWN.
• Rust, R.T., Ambler, T., Carpenter, G.S., Kumar, V., Srivastava, R.K., 2004. Measuring Marketing Productivity: Current Knowledge and Future Directions, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68, No. 4, pp. 76-89.
• Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W., 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
• Smith, T.M., Gopalakrishna, S., Chatterjee, R., 2006. A Three-Stage Model of Integrated Marketing Communications at the Marketing-Sales Interface, Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 43(4), pp. 564-579. http://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.4.564. Otwórz DOI
• Visser, W. 2011. The Age of Responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the New DNA of Business, London: Wiley.
• Wiktor, J. W., 2013. Komunikacja marketingowa, Modele, strategie, formy przekazu (Marketing communication, Models, strategies, forms of communication), Warsaw.
• Wojciszke, B., 2006. Człowiek wśród ludzi (A human among humans), Warsaw: Scholar.
• Wolak-Tuzimek, A., 2019. Społeczna odpowiedzialność przedsiębiorstwa a konkurencyjność przedsiębiorstw (Corporate social responsibility and enterprise competitiveness), Warsaw: CeDeWu Sp. z o.o.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/fman-2023-0006