PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2023 | 31 | nr 1 | 82--101
Tytuł artykułu

Getting the Measure of the Fourth Industrial Revolution : Advantages and Challenges of Industry 4.0 in the Turkish white Goods Industry

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN

Purpose: Industry 4.0 (I40) is an open window of opportunity for Turkey, a developed country, to eliminate technological dependence and produce with maximum productivity. However, I40, which corresponds to the fourth wave of industrial revolutions, brings both opportunities and challenges. In this context, this study aims to reveal the foresight of managers in the Turkish white goods industry (TWGI) regarding the advantages and challenges of I40 and compare them with the literature.

Design/methodology/approach: The Delphi method was used for the study. Data were collected from managers of companies that are members of the White Goods Suppliers Association (BEYSAD). Seventy managers from 55 companies participated in the first round, and 19 managers participated in the second round of Delphi.

Findings: The results show that the most frequently cited advantages are productivity/resource efficiency, data and information-enabled effectiveness/productivity, quality 4.0 and competitiveness/strategy. The most frequently mentioned challenges are financial resources/investment, employee qualification/training, technical/processual challenges and organizational transformation/leadership.

Research limitations/implications: The sample was limited to the managers of the TWGI.

Practical implications: Players in similar ecosystems and policymakers should consider the advantages and respond to potential challenges when creating roadmaps, taking the necessary steps and positioning themselves in the marketplace. In particular, the TWGI - Turkey's showcase in international markets - should consider the undeniable benefits of the I40 transition to increase innovation.

Originality/value: The findings for the first time highlight the advantages and challenges of I40 in an industry in Turkey, and they will benefit the TWGI, which is among the leaders in Turkey in terms of digital maturity and innovation in its journey to I40.
(original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
31
Numer
Strony
82--101
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Gümüşhane University, Gümüşhane, Turkey
  • Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
Bibliografia
  • Ahuett-Garza, H., & Kurfess, T. (2018). A brief discussion on the trends of habilitating technologies for Industry 4.0 and smart manufacturing. Manufacturing Letters, 15, 60-63. doi: 10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.02.011.
  • Arnold, C., Kiel, D., & Voigt, K. I. (2016). How the industrial internet of things changes business models in different manufacturing industries. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20, 1640015. doi: 10.1142/9781786347602_0006.
  • Atik, H., & Ünlü, F. (2019). The measurement of industry 4.0 performance through industry 4.0 index: An empirical investigation for Turkey and European countries. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 852-860. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.123.
  • Avcıoğlu, C., Özata, F., Nirun, H., & Gürel, Ö.S. (2018). Sektörel görünüm: Beyaz eşya, türkiye sınai kalkınma bankası (TSKB). Available from: http://www.tskb.com.tr/i/assets/document/pdf/beyaz-esya-sektorel-gorunum-subat-2018.pdf (accessed 19 March 2020).
  • Barbieri, P., Ciabuschi, F., Fratocchi, L., & Vignoli, M. (2018). What do we know about manufacturing reshoring? Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 11(1), 79-122. doi: 10.1108/JGOSS-02-2017-0004.
  • Bíba, O. (2018). Towards measurability and identification of key benchmarks of Industry 4.0. Trendy V podnikáaní - Business Trends, 8(2), 39-47. doi: 10.24132/jbt.2018.8.2.39_47.
  • Boyce, W., Gowland, C., Russell, D., & Goldsmith, C. (1993). Consensus methodology in the development and content validation of a gross motor performance measure. Physiotherapy Canada, 45, 94-100.
  • Brinkman, D., Disselhorst, G., Jansen, B., Tichelaar, J., van Agtmael, M., de Vries, T., & Richir, M. (2016). What should junior doctors know about the drugs they frequently prescribe? A Delphi study among physicians in The Netherlands. Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, 118(6), 456-461. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12508.
  • Campbell, S. M., & Cantrill, J. A. (2001). Consensus methods in prescribing research. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 26(1), 5-14. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.2001.00331.x.
  • Custer, R. L., Scarcella, J. A., & Stewart, B. R. (1999). The modified Delphi technique - a rotational modification. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 15(2), 50-58. doi: 10.21061/jcte.v15i2.702.
  • Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458.
  • Davies, R. (2015). Industry 4.0: Digitalisation for productivity and growth. European Parliamentary Research Service, Document No. PE 568.337.
  • de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., Foropon, C., & Godinho Filho, M. (2018). When titans meet-can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.017.
  • Demirgil, K. (2019). TÜRKBESD 2018 yılı verilerini açıkladı, Dağıtım Kanalı. Available from: https://www.dagitimkanali.com.tr/2019/01/18/turkbesd-2018-yili-verilerini-acikladi/ (accessed 18 March 2020).
  • Durana, P., Kral, P., Stehel, V., Lazaroiu, G., & Sroka, W. (2019). Quality culture of manufacturing enterprises: A possible way to adaptation to industry 4.0. Social Sciences, 8(4), 124. doi: 10.3390/socsci8040124.
  • Fırat, S. Ü. (2016). Sanayi 4.0 Dönüşümü Nedir? Belirlemeler ve beklentiler. Global sanayici Dergisi. Available from: http://www.sanayicidergisi.com.tr/sanayi-40-donusumu-nedir-belirlemeler-ve-beklentiler-makale,585.html (accessed: 10 October 2018).
  • Fonseca, L.M. (2018). Industry 4.0 and the digital society: Concepts, dimensions and envisioned benefits. In Proceedings of the international conference on business excellence (Vol. 12 1, pp. 386-397). doi: 10.2478/picbe-2018-0034.
  • Fonseca, L., Amaral, A., & Oliveira, J. (2021). Quality 4.0: The EFQM 2020 model and Industry 4.0 relationships and implications. Sustainability, 13(6), 3107. doi: 10.3390/su13063107.
  • Fülbert, G. (2014). Kapitalizmin Kısa Tarihi (S. Usta, Çev.). Istanbul: Yordam.
  • Germany Trade, & Invest (2018). Industrie 4.0 - Germany market report and outlook. Available from: https://www.gtai.de/GTAI/Content/EN/Invest/_SharedDocs/Downloads/GTAI/Industry-overviews/industrie4.0-germany-market-outlookprogress-report-en.pdf?v512 (accessed 10 November 2019).
  • Glas, A. H., & Kleemann, F. C. (2016). The impact of industry 4.0 on procurement and supply management: A conceptual and qualitative analysis. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 5(6), 55-66.
  • Götz, M., & Jankowska, B. (2017). Clusters and Industry 4.0-do they fit together? European Planning Studies, 25(9), 1633-1653. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1327037.
  • Gür, N., Ünay, S., & Dilek, S¸. (2017). Sanayiyi Yeniden Düs¸ ünmek: Küresel Teknolojik Dönüsşümün Dünya Ve Türkiye Ekonomisine Yansımaları. Istanbul: SETA.
  • Hofmann, E., & Rüsch, M. (2017). Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Computers in Industry, 89, 23-34. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2017.04.002.
  • Horváth, D., & Szabó, R.Z. (2019). Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4.0: Do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 119-132. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.021.
  • Hsu, C., & Sandford, B. A. (2010). Delphi technique. In Sankind, N. J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design. SAGE Reference Online.
  • Huchler, N. (2017). Grenzen der Digitalisierung von Arbeit-Die Nicht-Digitalisierbarkeit und Notwendigkeit impliziten Erfahrungswissens und informellen Handelns. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 71(4), 215-223. doi: 10.1007/s41449-017-0076-5.
  • Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Acatech-national academy of science and engineering. Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Available from: https://en.acatech.de/publication/recommendations-for-implementing-the-strategic-initiative-industrie-4-0-final-report-of-the-industrie-4-0-working-group/ (accessed 11 April 2018).
  • Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Gawankar, S. A. (2018). Sustainable industry 4.0 framework: A systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 408-425. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009.
  • Karre, H., Hammer, M., Kleindienst, M., & Ramsauer, C. (2017). Transition towards an industry 4.0 state of the LeanLab at Graz university of technology. Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 206-213. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.006.
  • Keeney, S., McKenna, H., & Hasson, F. (2011). The Delphi technique in nursing and health research. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Kergroach, S. (2017). Industry 4.0: New challenges and opportunities for the labour market. Foresight and STI Governance, 11(4), 6-8. doi: 10.17323/2500-2597.2017.4.6.8.
  • Khan, A., & Turowski, K. (2016). A survey of current challenges in manufacturing industry and preparation for Industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the first international scientific conference 'intelligent information technologies for industry' (IITI'16). Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-33609-1_2.
  • Kheyfets, B., & Chernova, V. (2019). Government programs for smart re-industrialization: Justification of strategic choice for Russia. Revista Espacios, 40(18), 30-37.
  • Kiel, D., Müller, J. M., Arnold, C., & Voigt, K. I. (2017). Sustainable industrial value creation: Benefits and challenges of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(8), 1-34. doi: 10.1142/9781786347602_0009.
  • Küsters, D., Praß, N., & Gloy, Y. S. (2017). Textile learning factory 4.0-preparing Germany's textile industry for the digital future. Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 214-221. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.035.
  • Lakke, S. E., Wittink, H., Geertzen, J. H., van der Schans, C. P., & Reneman, M. F. (2012). Factors that affect functional capacity in patients with musculoskeletal pain: A Delphi study among scientists, clinicians, and patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(3), 446-457. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.10.016.
  • Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239-242. doi: 10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4.
  • Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005.
  • Ludwig, B. (1997). Predicting the future: Have you considered using the Delphi methodology. Journal of Extension, 35(5), 1-4.
  • Luthra, S., & Mangla, S. K. (2018). Evaluating challenges to Industry 4.0 initiatives for supply chain sustainability in emerging economies. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 168-179. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.04.018.
  • MacLennan, S., Kirkham, J., Lam, T. B., & Williamson, P. R. (2018). A randomized trial comparing three Delphi feedback strategies found no evidence of a difference in a setting with high initial agreement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 93, 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.024.
  • McKenna, H. P. (1994). The Delphi technique: A worthwhile approach for nursing? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 1221-1225. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01207.x.
  • McKenna, H., Hasson, F., & Smith, M. (2002). A Delphi survey of midwives and midwifery students to identify non-midwifery duties. Midwifery, 18(4), 314-322. doi: 10.1054/midw.2002.0327.
  • McKinsey&Company (2016). Industry 4.0 after the initial hype: Where manufacturers are finding value and how they can best capture it, McKinsey Digital. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/∼/media/mckinsey/business functions/mckinsey digital/our insights/getting the most out of industry 4 0/mckinsey_industry_40_2016.ashx (accessed 22 April 2020).
  • MediaCat (2019). Türkiye'nin Lovemark'ları. Available from: https://mediacat.com/mediacat-lovemarks-2019-tum-liste/4/ (accessed 20 April 2020).
  • Mohamed, M. (2018). Challenges and benefits of industry 4.0: An overview. International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, 5(3), 256-265. doi: 10.22034/2018.3.7.
  • Müller, J. M., Kiel, D., & Voigt, K. I. (2018). What drives the implementation of industry 4.0? The role of opportunities and challenges in the context of sustainability. Sustainability, 10(1), 247. doi: 10.3390/su10010247.
  • Nayyar, B., Yasmeen, R., & Khan, R. A. (2019). Using language of entrustable professional activities to define learning objectives of radiology clerkship: A modified Delphi study. Medical Teacher, 41(12), 1419-1426. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1645951.
  • Nogalski, B., Niewiadomski, P., & Szpitter, A. (2020). Agility versus flexibility? The perception of business model maturity in agricultural machinery sector manufacturing companies. Central European Management Journal, 28(3), 57-97. doi: 10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.27.
  • Oettmeier, K., & Hofmann, E. (2017). Additive manufacturing technology adoption: An empirical analysis of general and supply chain-related determinants. Journal of Business Economics, 87, 97-124. doi: 10.1007/s11573-016-0806-8.
  • Özden, A., Seheri, Ö., & Ersan, Ö. (2019). Beyaz eşya sektörü. A&T bank ekonomik Araştırmalar Departmanı, Ekim 2019. Available from: https://www.atbank.com.tr/documents/BEYAZ ESYA SEKTORU_EKIM 2019.PDF (accessed 10 April 2020).
  • Rescher, R. (1998). Predicting the Future: An introduction to the theory of forecasting. Pittsburg: State University of New York (SUNY) Press.
  • Rowe, G., Wright, G., & McColl, A. (2005). Judgment change during Delphi-like procedures: The role of majority influence, expertise, and confidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(4), 377-399. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2004.03.004.
  • Sanayi Gazetesi (2021). Türkiye'nin Örnek ve Öncü Sektörü Beyaz Eşya. Available from: https://www.sanayigazetesi.com.tr/sanayi/turkiyenin-ornek-ve-oncu-sektoru-beyaz-esya-h25915.html (accessed 6 Decmber 2021).
  • Schröder, C. (2016). The challenges of Industry 4.0 for small and medium-sized enterprises. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Available from: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/wiso/12683.pdf (accessed 22 April 2020).
  • Sinha, I. P., Smyth, R. L., & Williamson, P. R. (2011). Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: Recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies. PLoS Medicine, 8(1), e1000393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000393.
  • Stock, T., & Seliger, G. (2016). Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Procedia Cirp, 40, 536-541. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.129.
  • Thames, L., & Schaefer, D. (2017). Industry 4.0: An overview of key benefits, technologies, and challenges. In Cybersecurity for Industry 4.0 (pp. 1-33). Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-50660-9_1.
  • Trade Map (2020). Trade statistics for international business development. Available from: https://www.trademap.org/Index.aspx (accessed 13 March 2020).
  • TÜBİTAK (2017). Yeni Sanayi Devrimi Akıllı Ü retim Sistemleri Teknoloji yol Haritası. v2. TÜBİTAK. Available from: http://www.tubitak.gov.tr/sites/default/files/akilli_uretim_sistemleri_tyh_v2-03ocak2017.pdf (accessed 10 October 2018).
  • TÜRKBESD (2020). About the white goods industry. Available from: http://www.turkbesd.org/bilgiler.php?P53 (accessed 12 March 2020).
  • Ünay, S., Karahan, H., Gür, N., & Dilek, S¸. (2017). Yunanistan Krizinin Anatomisi. Istanbul: SETA. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (2018). Industry 4.0 - the opportunities behind the challenge. Available from: https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/files/2018-11/UNIDO_GC17_Industry40.pdf (accessed 11 August 2021).
  • Vaidya, S., Ambad, P., & Bhosle, S. (2018). Industry 4.0-a glimpse. Procedia Manufacturing, 20, 233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.034.
  • von Leipzig, T., Gamp, M., Manz, D., Shöttle, K., Ohlhausen, P., Oosthuizen, G., . . . von Leipzig, K. (2017). Initialising customer-orientated digital transformation in enterprises. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 517-524. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.066.
  • Vorzhakova, Y., & Boiarynova, K. (2020). The application of Digitalization in enterprises on the basis of multiple criteria selection design. Central European Management Journal, 28(3), 127-148. doi: 10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.29.
  • Waibel, M. W., Steenkamp, L. P., Moloko, N., & Oosthuizen, G. A. (2017). Investigating the effects of smart production systems on sustainability elements. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 731-737. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.094.
  • Walendowski, J., Kroll, H., & Schnabl, E. (2016). Industry 4.0. Advanced materials (Nanotechnology). Brussels: Technopolis.
  • Wang, L., Törngren, M., & Onori, M. (2015). Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, 517-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.04.008.
  • Wang, S., Wan, J., Li, D., & Zhang, C. (2016). Implementing smart factory of industrie 4.0: An outlook. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 12(1), 3159805. doi: 10.1155/2016/3159805.
  • Wijnen-Meijer, M., van der Schaaf, M., Nillesen, K., Harendza, S., & ten Cate, O. (2013). Essential facets of competence that enable trust in graduates: A Delphi study among physician educators in The Netherlands. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(1), 46-53. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-11-00324.1.
  • Yıldırım, N., & Demirbağ, K. S¸. (2019). From chaos to calm: Industry 4.0 practices of Turkish white goods companies. In Proceedings of the International Symposium for Production Research 2019 (pp. 278-287). Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-31343-2_24.
  • Zhou, K., Liu, T., & Zhou, L. (2015). Industry 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges. In 12th International conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD) (pp. 2147-2152), Zhangjiajie, China, 15-17 August 2015. IEEE. doi: 10.1109/FSKD.2015.7382284.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171667903

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.