PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2023 | 18 | nr 1 | 185--219
Tytuł artykułu

Equivalence Scales for Continuous Distributions of Expenditure

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Research background: In the actual sizable populations of households, the standard microeconomic concept of equivalence scales is intractable since its necessary condition of equality of household welfare levels is unlikely to be fulfilled. Purpose of the article: This paper aims to develop a concept of an equivalence scale, which can be suitable for continuous distributions of expenditures in the population. Methods: Using household welfare intervals, we get the random equivalence scale (RES) as the ratio of expenditure distributions of the compared populations of households. Findings & value added: We derive the parametric distribution of RES for the lognormal distributions of expenditures. The truncated distribution of RES is applied to account for possible economies of scale in the household size. A society?s inequality aversion can be helpful when selecting a single equivalence scale. We estimate RES for Poland using microdata on expenditures and subjective assessments of household welfare intervals. The estimated equivalence scales turned out to be very flat and dependent on welfare.(original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
18
Numer
Strony
185--219
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Gdansk University of Technology, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Ahuja, J. C. (1969). On certain properties of the generalised Gompertz distribution. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B, 541-544.
  • Airth, A. (1985). The progression of wage distributions. Eurostat News, Special issue, 139-161.
  • Aitchison, J., & Brown, J. A. (1957). The lognormal distribution with special reference to its uses in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 244?263. doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(70)90039-6.
  • Bali, F. (2012). Are traditional equivalence scales still useful? A review and a possible answer. Department of Economics University of Siena Working Paper, 656.
  • Balli, F., & Tiezzi, S. (2010). Equivalence scales, the cost of children and household consumption patterns in Italy. Review of Economics of the Household, 8(4), 527?549. doi: 10.1007/s11150-009-9068-3.
  • Bartels, C. P., & Van Metelen, H. (1975). Alternative probability density functions of income: a comparison of the lognormal, Gamma and Weibull distribution with Dutch data. Vrije Universiteit, Economische Faculteit.
  • Barten, A. P. (1964). Family composition, prices, and expenditure patterns. In P. Hart, L. Mills & J. K. Whitaker (Eds.). Econometric analysis for national economic planning: 16th symposium of the Colston Society. London: Butterworth.
  • Battistin, E., Blundell, R., & Lewbel, A. (2009). Why is consumption more log normal than income? Gibrat's law revisited. Journal of Political Economy, 117(6), 1140-1154.
  • Bellemare, C., Melenberg, B., & Van Soest, A. (2002). Semi-parametric models for satisfaction with income. Portuguese Economic Journal, 1(2), 181?203. doi: 10.1007/ s10258-002-0006-z.
  • Biewen, M., & Juhasz, A. (2017). Direct estimation of equivalence scales and more evidence on independence of base. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 79(5), 875-905. doi: 10.1111/obes.12166.
  • Blackorby, C., & Donaldson, D. (1993). Adult-equivalence scales and the economic implementation of interpersonal comparisons of wellbeing. Social Choice and Welfare, 10(4), 335-361. doi: 10.1007/BF00182510.
  • Blundell, R., & Lewbel, A. (1991). The information content of equivalence scales. Journal of Econometrics, 50(1-2), 49-68. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(91)90089-V.
  • Bollinger, C. R., Nicoletti, C., & Pudney, S. (2012). Two can live as cheaply as one? but three's a crowd. ISER Discussion, University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research, 2012-10.
  • Bresson, F. (2009). On the estimation of growth and inequality elasticities of poverty with grouped data. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(2), 266-302. doi: 10.1111/j.147 5-4991.2009.00311.x
  • Browning, M., P. A. Chiappori, & A. Lewbel (2013). Estimating consumption economies of scale, adult equivalence scales, and household bargaining power. Review of Economic Studies, 80(4), 1267?303. doi: 10.1093/restud/rdt019.
  • Chiappori (1992). Collective labor supply and welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 100(3), 437-67.
  • Chiappori, P. A. (2016). Equivalence versus indifference scales. Economic Journal, 126(592), 523?545. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12371.
  • Crow, E. L., & Shimizu, K. (1988). Lognormal distribution. New York and Basel: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
  • Coulter, F. A., Cowell, F. A., & Jenkins, S. P. (1992a). Differences in needs and assessment of income distributions. Bulletin of Economic Research, 44(2), 77-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8586.1992.tb00538.x.
  • Coulter, F. A., Cowell, F. A., & Jenkins, S. P. (1992b). Equivalence scale relativities and the extent of inequality and poverty. Economic Journal, 102(414), 1067?1082. doi: 10.2307/2234376.
  • Cowell, F. (1977). Measuring inequality. Oxford: Phillip Allen.
  • Dagum, C. (1977). New model of persodoinal income-distribution-specification and estimation. Economie Appliquée, 30(3), 413-437.
  • Deaton, A., & Muellbauer, J. (1980). Economics and consumer behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511805653.
  • Donaldson, D., & Pendakur, K. (2004). Equivalent-expenditure functions and expenditure-dependent equivalence scales. Journal of Public Economics, 88(1-2), 175-208. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00134-2.
  • Donaldson, D., & Pendakur, K. (2006). The identification of fixed costs from consumer behavior. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 24(3), 255-265. doi: 10.1198/073500106000000035.
  • Dunbar, G. R., A. Lewbel, & K. Pendakur (2013). Children's resources in collective households: Identification, estimation, and an application to child poverty in Malawi. American Economic Review, 103(1), 438?71. doi: 10.1257/aer.103.1.438.
  • Dunbar, G. R., Lewbel, A., & Pendakur, K. (2021). Identification of random resource shares in collective households without preference similarity restrictions. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 39(2), 402-421. doi: 10.1080/07350015.2019.1665 532.
  • Engel, E. (1895). Die Lebenskosten belgischer Arbeiter-Familien fruher and jetzt. International Statistical Institute Bulletin, 9, 1-74.
  • Fisz, M. (1967). Probability theory and mathematical statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  • Gibrat, R. (1931). Les egalitiéseconomiques. Paris: Libraire du Recueil Sirey.
  • Goedhart, T., Halberstadt, V., Kapteyn, S., & van Praag, B. M. S. (1977). The poverty line: Concept and measurement. Journal of Human Resources, 12(4), 503?520. doi: 10.2307/145372.
  • Hill, T. (1959). An analysis of the distribution of wages and salaries in Great Britain. Econometrica, 27(3), 355-381. doi: 10.2307/1909467.
  • Jackson, C. A. (1968). Revised equivalence scale for estimating equivalent incomes or budget costs by family type. (No. 1570-1572). US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
  • Johnson, N. L., & Kotz, S. (1970). Distributions in statistics: Continuous univariate distributions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Balakrishnan, N. (1994). Univariate continuous distributions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kalecki, M. (1945). On the Gibrat distribution. Econometrica, 13(2), 161-170. doi: 10.2307/1907013.
  • Kapteyn, J. C. (1903). Skew frequency curves in biology and statistics. Astronomical Laboratory. Groningen: Noordhoff.
  • Kapteyn, A., & Van Praag, B. (1978). A new approach to the construction of family equivalence scales. European Economic Review, 7(4), 313-335. doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(78)90009-0.
  • Kleiber, C., & Kotz, S. (2003). Statistical size distributions in economics and actuarial sciences. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/0471457175.
  • Kot, S. M. (2020). Estimating the parameter of inequality aversion on the basis of a parametric distribution of incomes. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 15(3), 391?417. doi: 10.24136/eq.2020.018.
  • Koulovatianos, C., Schröder, C., & Schmidt, U. (2005). On the income dependence of equivalence scales. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5-6), 967?996. doi: 10.2139/ ssrn.419982.
  • Koulovatianos, C., Schröder, C., & Schmidt, U. (2019). Do demographics prevent consumption aggregates from reflecting microlevel preferences? European Economic Review, 111, 166-190. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.04.006.
  • Lambert, P. J. (2001). The distribution and redistribution of income. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
  • Lewbel, A. (1989). Household equivalence scales and welfare comparisons. Journal of Public Economics, 39(3), 377?391. doi: 10.1016/0047-2727(89)90035-2.
  • Lewbel, A. (1999). Consumer demand systems and household equivalence scales. In M. H. Pesaran & P. Schmidt (Eds.). Handbook of applied econometrics, Vol. 2: Miscroeconomics (pp. 155?185). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
  • Lewbel, A., & Pendakur K. (2008). Equivalence scales. In The new Palgrave dictionary of economics (pp. 26-29). London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/978-1-349-951 21-5_2056-1.
  • Lewbel, A., & Weckstein, R. (1995). Equivalence scales, costs of children and wrongful death laws. Journal of Income Distribution, 4(2), 191-208. doi: 10.25071/1874-6322.699.
  • Lopez, J. H., & Servén, L. (2006). A normal relationship?: poverty, growth, and inequality (Vol. 3814). World Bank Publications.
  • McDonald, J. B., & Xu, Y. J. (1995). A generalisation of the beta distribution with applications. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1-2), 133?152. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)0 1680-X
  • Malik, H. J. (1967). Exact distribution of the quotient of independent generalised gamma variables. Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, 10(3), 463-465.
  • Melenberg, B., & van Soest, A. (1995). Semiparametric estimation of equivalence scales using subjective information. Tilburg: Tilburg University.
  • Mielke, P. W., & Flueck, J. A. (1976). Distributions of ratios for some selected biva-riate probability functions. American Statistical Association, Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, 608-613.
  • Majumder, A., & Chakrabarty, M. (2010). Estimating equivalence scales through Engel curve analysis. In Econophysics and economics of games, social choices and quantitative techniques (pp. 241-251). Milano: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-88-470-1501-2_25.
  • Pendakur, K. (2018). Welfare analysis when people are different. Canadian Journal of Economics, 51(2), 321-360. doi: 10.1111/caje.12335.
  • Pollastri, A., & Zambruno, G. (2010). The distribution of the ratio of two independent Dagum random variables. Operations Research and Decisions, 20(3-4), 95-102.
  • Prais, S. J., & Houthakker, H. S. (1955). The analysis of family budgets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rothbarth, E. (1943). Note on a method of determining equivalent income for families of different composition. In C. Madge (Ed.). Wartime pattern of saving and spending, appendix 4 (pp. 123?30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Salem, A. B., & Mount, T. D. (1974). A convenient descriptive model of income distribution: the gamma density. Econometrica, 42(6), 1115?1127.
  • Schwarze, J. (2003). Using panel data on income satisfaction to estimate equivalence scale elasticity. Review of Income and Wealth, 49(3), 359-372. doi: 10.1111/1475-4991.00092.
  • Sydenstricker, E., & King, W. I. (1921). The measurement of the relative economic status of families. Quarterly Publication of the American Statistical Association, 17, 842?57. doi: 10.2307/2965186.
  • Szulc, A. (2009). A matching estimator of household equivalence scales. Economics Letters, 103(2), 81-83. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2009.01.027.
  • Thomopoulos, N. T. (2017). Statistical distributions. Applications and parameter esti-mates. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Tinbergen, J. (1991). On the measurement of welfare. Journal of Econometrics, 50(1-2), 7-13. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(91)90086-S.
  • Van Praag, B. M. (1968). Individual welfare functions and consumer behavior: A theory of rational irrationality (Vol. 57). North-Holland Publishing Company.
  • Van Praag, B. M. (1991). Ordinal and cardinal utility: An integration of the two dimensions of the welfare concept. Journal of Econometrics, 50(1-2), 69-89. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511598968.004.
  • Van Praag, B. M. S., & van der Sar, N. L. (1988). Household cost functions and equivalence scales. Journal of Human Resources, 23(2), 193-210. doi: 10.2307/145 775.
  • Wang, Y., Dong, W., Zhang, L., Chin, D., Papageorgiou, M., Rose, G., & Young, W. (2012). Speed modeling and travel time estimation based on truncated normal and lognormal distributions. Transportation Research Record, 2315(1), 66_72. doi: 10.3141/2315-07.
  • Zaidi, A., & T. Burchardt (2005). Comparing incomes when needs differ: Equivalization for the extra costs of disability in the U.K. Review of Income and Wealth, 51(1), 89-114. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.2005.00146.x.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171668861

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.