PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | nr 3 (187) | 351--365
Tytuł artykułu

Alternative Approaches to Public Diplomacy

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The aim of this essay is to discuss the possibility of applying knowledge from the field of sociology and other disciplines into the theory of public diplomacy. Due to changes in the international environment, public diplomacy (a complementary tool of foreign policy) is used for various foreign policy goals including spreading state influence. We identify the need for alternative approaches to public diplomacy especially within the domain of value and norm diffusion. Current prevailing concepts, such as state branding (derived from marketing discipline), do not prove to be effective in the political aspect of this field. This calls for the implementation of new approaches in international relations and diplomacy, particularly from sociology, psychology and communication studies. This article should stress the importance of transferring the knowledge from the above mentioned fields into the theory of public diplomacy-which has been neglected (or only now starting to gain importance) in the theory of international relations. It tries to draw attention especially of sociologists who have much potential to contribute to its development and analysis. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
351--365
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • The University of Economics in Bratislava, Slovakia
Bibliografia
  • Blechman, Barry, M. 2005. Book Review: Nye's Soft power, Political Science Quarterly (119) 4: 680-81.
  • Čech, L'ubomir. 2008. Islam-fakty a suvislosti. Liptovsky Mikulaš: Akademia ozbrojenych sil generala M. R. Štefanika.
  • Čukan, Karol and Šramek, L'udovit. 2013. Verejnamienka (historia, teoria, vyskum). Trnava: UCM, 2013.
  • Dunne, Tim. 2005. Liberalism, in: J. Baylis, S. Smith, P. Owens (eds.), Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Fidrmuc, Jan and Gerxhani, Klarita. 2008. Mind the Gap! Social Capital, East and West, Journal of Comparative Economics 36: 264-286.
  • Gilboa, Eytan. 2008. Searching for a Theory of Public Diplomacy, The Annals of the American Academy 616: 55-77.
  • Gu, Xuewu. Chinas Aufstieg zur Weltmacht. http://www.hgmwien.at/pdf_pool/publikationen/03_jb99_29.pdf (accessed, December, 12, 2012).
  • Henrikson, Alan, K. 2005. Niche Diplomacy in the Public Arena: Canada and Norway, in: J. Melissen (ed.), The New Public Diplomacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Chaiken, Shelly. 2001. Attitude Formation: Function and Structure, in: N. J. Smelser, Paul. B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social &Behavioral Sciences. vol. 2. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
  • Katz, Daniel. 1966. The Functional Approach to the Study of Attitudes. Reader in Public Opinion and Communication. 2nd ed. London: Collier Macmillan Limited.
  • Kunioka, Todd and Woller, Garry, M. 1999. In (a) Democracy we Trust: Social and Economic Determinants of Support for Democratic Procedures in Central and Eastern Europe, Journal of Socio-Economics 28: 577-596.
  • Lamser, Vaclav. 1969. Komunikace a společnost. Praha: Československa akademia vˇed.
  • Lane, Robert, E. and Sears, David, O. 1964. Public Opinion. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  • Leonard, Mark, Stead, Catherine and Smewing, Conrad. 2002. Public Diplomacy. London: The Foreign Policy Center.
  • Melissen, Jan. 2005. Wielding Soft Power: The New Public Diplomacy. Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael.
  • McDowell, Mark. 2008. Public diplomacy at the Crossroads: Definitions and Challenges in an Open Source Era, in: Fletcher Forum of World Affairs (32) 3: 8-14.
  • Nelson, Richard, A. and Izadi, Foad. 2009.Ethics and Social Issues in Public Diplomacy, in:N. Snow and N. P. Taylor (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. New York: Routledge, pp. 334-351.
  • Neidhardt, Friedhelm. 1994. Offentlichkeit, offentlicheMeinung, soziale Bewegungen, in: F. Neidhardt (ed.), Offentlichkeit, offentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen. Opladen: Westdeutscher.
  • Noelle, Elisabeth. 1966. Offentliche Meinung und Soziale Kontrolle. Tubingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  • Nye, Jospeh, Jr. 2008. Public Diplomacy and Soft Power,The Annals of the American Academy 616: 94-109.
  • Paxton, Pamela. 2002. Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependent Relationship, American Sociological Review (67) 2: 254-277.
  • Perthes, Volker and Mair, Stephan. 2011. Ideen und Macht. http://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/medienbeitraege/IP_03-2011_Perthes_Mair_KS.pdf (accessed, December, 13, 2012).
  • Ronfeldt, David and Arquilla, John. 2009. Noopolitik: A New Paradigm for Public Diplomacy, in: Nancy Snow and Philip M. Taylor (eds.), The Routledge handbook of public diplomacy. New York, London: Routledge.
  • Rusiňak, Peter. 2012. Image of the Slovak Republic and the role of diplomacy, Medzinarodne vzt'ahy [Journal of International Relations] (10) 2: 7-28.
  • Schenk, Michael and Rossler, Patrick. (1994). Das unterschatzte Publikum, In Neidhardt. Friedhelm. ed. Offentlichkeit, offentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen. Opladen: Westdeutscher.
  • Szondi, Gyorgy. 2008. Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding. Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael.
  • Yun, Seong-Hun and Toth, Elizabeth, L. 2009. Future Sociological Public Diplomacy and the Role of Public Relations: Evolution of Public Diplomacy, American Behavioral Scientist (53) 4: 493-503.
  • Van Ham, Peter. 2008. Place Branding-the State of the Art, in: Annals of the American Academy (16) 6: 126-149.
  • Vinopal, Jiˇri. 2010. Veˇrejne minˇeni: chvalu nebo opovrženi?, in Hana Maˇrikova, Tomaš Kostelecky, Tomaš Lebeda, Marketa, Škodova (eds.), Jaka je naše Společnost?. Praha: Slon, pp. 35-47.
  • Visser, Penny, S., Holbrook, Allyson, L., Krosnik, Jon, A. 2008. Knowledge and Attitudes, in: W. Donsbach, V. M. Traugott, The SAGE Handbook of Public Opinion Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Wolf, Charles, Jr. and Rosen, Brian. 2004. Public Diplomacy: How to Think about it and Improve it. Santa Monica: Rand Cooperation.
  • Wolf, Charles, Jr. and Rosen, Brian. 2004. Public Diplomacy: How to think about it and improve it. Santa Monica : Rand Cooperation.
  • Woolcock, Michael and Narayan, Deepa. 2000. Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research and Policy. World Bank Research Observer (15) 2.
  • Zatepilina, Olga. 2009. Non-state Ambassadors: NGO's Contribution to America's public diplomacy, Place Branding and Diplomacy (5) 2: 156-168.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171670067

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.