Identyfikacja obszarów cichych w mieście. Studia przypadków Lublina i Radomia

• Autorzy: Sebastian Bernat , Martyna Andrzejewska

Warianty tytułu

Quiet Areas in the City. Planning and Design Challenges

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Ochrona przed hałasem stanowi jedno z ważniejszych wyzwań współczesnego świata. Problem oceny i zarządzania poziomem hałasu w środowisku podejmuje Dyrektywa 2002/49/WE. Jednym z zaproponowanych w niej instrumentów jest tworzenie obszarów cichych na terenie aglomeracji oraz poza aglomeracją. Instrument ten został wprowadzony także do obowiązującej w Polsce ustawy Prawo ochrony środowiska (2001). Wyznaczenie obszarów cichych należy do kompetencji rad powiatów i jest wiążące dla instrumentów planowania i zagospodarowania przestrzennego. Choć identyfikacja obszarów cichych w Europie nadal trwa, to zauważalny jest różny stopień zaawansowania poszczególnych krajów Europy. W Polsce instrument ten jest traktowany marginalnie. Celem badań jest identyfikacja obszarów cichych w dwóch miastach Polski: Lublinie i Radomiu. Dla nich przeprowadzono analizę dokumentów strategiczno-planistycznych oraz badania sondażowe wśród mieszkańców. Na koniec przedstawiono wyzwania planistyczne i projektowe w zakresie wyznaczenia i zagospodarowania obszarów cichych. Odniesiono się też do idei krajobrazu dźwiękowego i projektowania akustycznego. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

Protection from noise is one of the most important challenges of the modern world. The problem of assessing and managing environmental noise is addressed by Directive 2002/49/EC. One of the instruments proposed in it is the identification of quiet areas within agglomerations and outside agglomerations. This instrument was also introduced into the "Environmental Protection Law" (2001) in Poland. The identification of quiet areas is the responsibility of county councils and is binding for planning and zoning instruments. Although the identification of quiet areas in Europe is still in progress, it is noticeable that the degree of progress is different among European countries. In Poland, this instrument is treated marginally. The applicable legal acts do not specify what criteria should be used in the delimitation of quiet areas. Some guidance can be found in scientific publications and manuals prepared, among others, by the European Environmental Agency. The aim of this research is to identify quiet areas in two Polish cities: Lublin and Radom. Environmental noise protection programs and planning documents were analyzed for them. This allowed to recognize whether quiet areas were proposed for the studied cities. The main part of the article is the presentation of the results of surveys conducted among the residents of both cities, which resulted, among other things, in preliminary proposals of quiet areas. The presentation is preceded by a literature review of the identification and functioning of quiet areas in other European cities. The article concludes with an overview of the planning and design challenges in delimiting and developing quiet areas in the city. Reference is also made to the idea of soundscape and acoustic design. An analysis of the environmental noise protection programs for Lublin and Radom showed that no quiet areas were proposed for the first mentioned city, while 25 (in the 2013 program)/4 (in the 2018 program) quiet areas were proposed for the second. However, neither city has designated such areas by resolution. Surveys showed that, according to the majority of respondents, the identification of quiet areas is needed. As quiet areas, they most often indicated green and blue urban infrastructure objects with recreational functions. In the case of Radom, some of them coincide with the areas selected in the current program of environmental protection against noise. However, these indications are less numerous than in the case of Lublin. The vast majority of respondents indicate the important role of close accessibility of quiet areas. Based on a review of the literature and the practices of other cities, it was shown that quiet areas should be the subject of planning and design with the involvement of residents. It is also important to strengthen public education about quiet, noise and soundscapes. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Aglomeracje miejskie; Środowisko miejskie; Planowanie przestrzenne miasta; Postrzeganie miasta; Monitoring hałasu; Badania sondażowe; Studium przypadku

EN

Urban agglomerations; Urban environment; Town spatial planning; City perceive; Noise monitoring; Survey research; Case study

• Czasopismo: Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna / Instytut Geografii Społeczno-Ekonomicznej i Gospodarki Przestrzennej Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Rocznik: 2023
• Numer: nr 64
• Strony: 97--116

Twórcy

autor

Sebastian Bernat

• Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

autor

Martyna Andrzejewska

• Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Bibliografia

• Alvarsson J.J., Wiens S., Nilsson M.E. 2010. Stress recovery during exposure to nature sound and environmental noise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7(3).
• Anastasopoulos C., Bose S., Bristow A., Rowcroft P., Shields P., Skinner C., Woodin S. 2011. The Economic Value of Quiet Areas. URS Scott Wilson Ltd., Defra.
• Berglund B., Lindvall T., Schwela D.H. 1999. Guidelines for community noise. World Health Organization, Geneva.
• Bernat S. 2015. Dźwięk w krajobrazie. Podejście geograficzne. Wyd. UMCS, Lublin.
• Blanes N., Sáinz de la Maza M., Fons-Esteve J., Peris E. 2019. Potential quiet areas in Europe inside urban areas. INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, InterNoise, 19, Madrid, Spain.
• Booi H., van den Berg F. 2012. Quiet Areas and the Need for Quietness in Amsterdam. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9, 4.
• Buxton R.T., Person A.L., Allou C., Fristrup K., Wittemyer G. 2021. A synthesis of health benefits of natural sounds and their distribution in national parks. PNAS, 118, 14: e2013097118.
• Cerwén G. 2017. Sound in Landscape Architecture. A Soundscape Approach to Noise. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management, SLU Alnarp.
• Cerwén G., Mossberg F. 2019. Implementation of Quiet Areas in Sweden. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 1.
• Dymiter M. 2021. Przewodnik dla audiokulturalnych. Wyd. ADAMADA, Gdańsk.
• Dyrektywa 2002/49/WE Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady w sprawie oceny i zarządzania poziomem hałasu w środowisku (Dyrektywa Hałasowa) (http://www.ukie.gov.pl/www/serce.nsf/($PrintView)/DD63587E243729D4C1256F95003D1210?Open; dostęp: 1.12.2022).
• Environmental noise in Europe. 2020 (https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental-noise-in-europe; dostęp: 1.12.2022).
• Frydryczak B. 2020. Zmysły w krajobrazie. Wyd. Officyna, Łódź.
• Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A., Öhrström E. 2007. Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83.
• Good practice guide on quiet areas EEA Technical report. 2014 (http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/good-practice-guide-on-quiet-areas; dostęp: 1.12.2022).
• ISO 12913-1:2014 Acoustics - Soundscape. Pt 1: Definition and Conceptual Framework. 2014. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland (https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.14746/rrpr.2023.64.07