An Heterodox History of Spanish Economy into the Eurozone: Austrian School of Economics Analysis of Boom & Bust.

• Autorzy: Miguel Angel Alonso-Neira , Antonio Sanchez-Bayon , Marcos Castro-Oliva
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This is a heterodox Economic History on Political Economy, Macroeconomics and Applied Economics, based on the Austrian Economics theory of business cy-cles, applied to the case of the Spanish Economy during the boom-bust cycle (2002-2014). Attention is focused on the endemic problem of business cycles, such as successive and distorting periods of boom and bust that modern economies suffer, as with the Spanish economy. This work reviews the analysis of the Austrian School of Economics theory and its development, with attention to the empirical renewal line (into the school), which used econometric support, to help the communication with other economic schools. Consequently, there is a review of the main econometric literature on the Austrian cycle, followed with an illustration of the case of Spain in the Eurozone. In this way, it is possible to better under-stand the cycle of boom and bust by means of new currency emission and how to help econometric tools to illustrate economic principles.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Monetary policy; Macroeconomics; Economy

PL

Polityka pieniężna; Makroekonomia; Gospodarka

• Czasopismo: Forum Scientiae Oeconomia
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: 11
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 9--41

Twórcy

autor

Miguel Angel Alonso-Neira

• University Rey Juan Carlos, Spain

autor

Antonio Sanchez-Bayon

• University Rey Juan Carlos, Spain; University of Malaga

autor

Marcos Castro-Oliva

• University Rey Juan Carlos

Bibliografia

• 1. Almon, S. (1965), The distributed lag between capital appropriations and expenditures. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 33(1), 178-196.
• 2. Alonso, M.A. (2004), Una guía para el estudio de la Macroeconomía del Capital: Existen razones para pensar que los ciclos recesivos responden a errores políticos y empresariales? Procesos de mercado, (1): 113-186.
• 3. Alonso, M.A. (2005), Las teorías monetarias del ciclo en el marco de la literatura sobre ciclos económ-icos. Revista Libertas 13(43), 1-28.
• 4. Alonso, M.A., Bagus, P., Rallo, J.R. (2011), La crisis subprime a la luz de la teoría austriaca del ciclo económico: Expansión crediticia, errores de decisión y riesgo moral. Revista de Economía Mundial, (28), 145-174.
• 5. Alonso, M.A., Bagus, P., Romero, A. (2013), Una ilu-stración empírica de la teoría austriaca del ciclo económico: el caso de Estados Unidos, 1988-2010. Investigación económica 72(285), 41-74.
• 6. Alonso, M.A., Sánchez-Bayón, A., Castro-Oliva, M. (2023), Teoría austriaca del ciclo económico apli-cada al caso español: del inicio del euro a la gran recesión y su recuperación. Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa, 35: 280-310. https://dx.doi.org/10.46661/revmetodoscuanteconempresa.6837
• 7. Bismans, F., Mougeot, C. (2009), Austrian business cycle theory: Empirical evidence. The Review of Austrian Economics 22(3), 241-257.
• 8. Böhm-Bawerk, E. (1884), Geschichie und Kritik der Kapitalzins-Theorieen. Innsbruck: Wagner'schen Universitäts-Buchhandlung.
• 9. Böhm-Bawerk, E. (1888), Positive Theorie des Capitals. Innsbruck: Wagner'schen Universitäts-Buch- handlung.
• 10. Cachanosky, N., Padilla, A. (2016), A Mathematical Version of Garrison's Model. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 19(3), 225-247.
• 11. Cachanosky, N. (2017), Secular Growth in Garrison's Model: A Comment. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 40(5), 354-359.
• 12. Callahan, G., Garrison, R. (2003), Does Austrian business cycle theory help explain the dot-com boom and bust? The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 6(2), 67-98.
• 13. Carilli, A., Dempster, G. (2008), Is the Austrian busi-ness cycle theory still relevant?. The Review of Austrian Economics 21(4), 271-281.
• 14. Ebeling, R. (2001), Austrian Macroeconomics: Review of Time and Money. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Macroeconomics 4(3), 47-66.
• 15. Engelhardt, L. (2009), Comment on 'A Capital-Based Theory of Economic Growth'. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 12(2), 60-62.
• 16. Fisher, E. A. (2013), Monetary policy and capital-based macroeconomics: an empirical examination for the United States (1963-2012), Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics16(1), 45-74.
• 17. Friedman, M., Schwartz, A. (2008), A monetary history of the United States, 1867-1960. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• 18. Friedman, M. (1968), The role of monetary policy. The American Economic Review 58(1), 1-17.
• 19. Friedman, M. (1993), The "plucking model" of business fluctuations revisited. Economic Inquiry 31(2), 171-177.
• 20. Garrison, R. (1978), Austrian macroeconomics: A di-agrammatical exposition. Menlo Park: Institute for Humane Studies.
• 21. Garrison, R. (1989), The Austrian theory of the busi-ness cycle in the light of modern macroeconomics. The Review of Austrian Economics 3(1), 3-29.
• 22. Garrison, R. (2006), Natural and neutral rates of inter-est in theory and policy formulation. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 9(4), 57-68.
• 23. Garrison, R. (2001), Time and Money. London: Routledge.
• 24. Granger, C. (1969), Investigating Causal Relation by Econometric and Cross-sectional Method. Econometrica 37, 424-438.
• 25. Hayek, F. (1929), Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle. London: University of London.
• 26. Hayek, F. (1931), Prices and production. London: Routledge.
• 27. Hayek, F. (1941), The Pure Theory of Capital. London: Macmillan.
• 28. Hodrick, R., Prescott, E. (1997), Postwar U.S. business cycles: an empirical investigation. Journal of Money, credit, and Banking29(1), 1-16.
• 29. Huerta de Soto, J. (1998), Dinero, Crédito Bancario y Ciclos Económicos. Madrid: Unión Editorial.
• 30. Huerta de Soto, J. (2009), The Theory of the dynamic efficiency. London: Routledge.
• 31. Hülsmann, J. G. (2001), Garrisonian macroeconom-ics. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 4(3), 33-41.
• 32. Hutchison, T. (1956), Professor Machlup on Verification in Economics. Southern Economic Journal 17: 476-83.
• 33. Keeler, J. (2001), Empirical evidence on the Austrian business cycle theory. The Review of Austrian Economics 14(4), 331-351.
• 34. Le Roux, P., Levin, M. (1998), The capital structure and the business cycle: some tests of validity of the Austrian business cycle in South Africa. Studies in Economics and Econometrics22(3), 91-109.
• 35. Lester, R. B., Wolff, J. S. (2013), The empirical rel-evance of the Mises-Hayek theory of the trade cycle. The Review of Austrian Economics26(4), 433-461.
• 36. Lucas, R. (1972), Expectations and the Neutrality of Money. Journal of Economic Theory 4(2), 103-124.
• 37. Luther, W., Cohen, M. (2014), An empirical analysis of the Austrian business cycle theory. Atlantic Economic Journal42 (2), 153-169.
• 38. Machlup, F. (1931), The Stock Market, Credit and Capital Formation. London: Hodge.
• 39. Machlup, F. (1936), Why Bother with Methodology? Economica 3(9), 39-45.
• 40. Menger, C. (1883), Untersuchungen über die Methode der Socialwissenschaften, und der Politischen Oekonomie insbesondere. Leipzig: Verlag.
• 41. Mises, L. (1912), Theorie des Geldes und der Umlaufsmittel. Leipzig: Verlag.
• 42. Mises, L. (1949), Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
• 43. Mulligan, R. (2002), A Hayekian analysis of the term structure of production. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 5(2), 17-33.
• 44. Mulligan, R. (2006), An empirical examination of Austrian business cycle theory. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 9(2), 69-93.
• 45. Murphy, R. (2017), Is Garrison ́s notion of "secular growth" compatible with the Solow growth literature? Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 20(4), 336-353.
• 46. Powell, B. (2002), Explaining Japan's recession. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 5(2), 35-50.
• 47. Rothbard, M. (1957), In Defense of "Extreme Apriorism". Southern Economic Journal 18: 314-320.
• 48. Rothbard, M. (1963), America ́s Great Depression.New York: Van Nostrand.
• 49. Salerno, J. (2001), Does the concept of secular growth have a place in capital-based macroeconomics? Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 4(3), 43-61.
• 50. Sánchez-Bayón, A. (2020), Renovación del pensamiento económico-empresarial tras la global-ización. Bajo Palabra 24: 293-318. https://doi.org/10.15366/bp.2020.24.015
• 51. Sánchez-Bayón, A. (2021),The digital economy re-view under the technological singularity: tech-novation in labour relations and entrepreneur culture. Sociologíay Tecnociencia 11(2): 53-80. https://doi.org/10.24197/st.Extra_2.2021.53-80
• 52. Sánchez-Bayón, A. (2022), Crisis económica o economía en crisis? Relaciones ortodox-ia-heterodoxia en la transición digital. Rev. Semestre Económico 11(1): 54-73 http://dx.doi.org/10.26867/se.2022.1.128
• 53. Sánchez-Bayón A, Castro-Oliva M. (2022), Historia de la reciente deflación del capital y los salarios en España: Revisión de los desarrollos de la teoría de ciclos económicos. Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 9(2), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.5209/ijhe.82760
• 54. Sánchez-Bayón A, González-Arnedo E, Andreu-Escario A. (2022), Spanish Healthcare Sector Management in the COVID-19 Crisis Under the Perspective of Austrian Economics and New-Institutional Economics. Frontiers in Public Health 10:801525. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.801525
• 55. Sánchez-Bayón, A., Urbina, D. A., Castro-Oliva, M. (2021), Historia económica heterodoxa de la Escuela de Salamanca: padres de la Economía Política y Hacienda Pública y referentes de otras escuelas, Journal of the Sociology and Theory of Religion, 14 Extra-1 (2022): 65-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24197/jstr.Extra-1.2022.65-102.
• 56. Wainhouse, C. (1984), Empirical evidence for Hayek's theory of economic fluctuations. Money in crisis: The federal reserve, the economy, and monetary reform.
• 57. Wicksell, K. (1898), Geldzins und Güterpreise. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
• 58. Young, A. (2005), Reallocating labor to initiate changes in capital structures: Hayek revisited. Economics letters 89(3), 275-282.
• 59. Young, A. (2009a), A capital-based theory of secular growth. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 12(1), 36-51
• 60. Young, A. (2009b), A Capital-Based Theory of Secular Growth: Reply to Engelhardt. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 12(2), 63-67.
• 61. Young, A. (2011), The time structure of production in the U.S., 2002-2009. The Review of Austrian Economics 25(2), 77-92.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.23762/FSO_VOL11_NO2_1