Formulary Apportionment in the European Union - Future Research Agenda

• Autorzy: Markéta Mlčúchová
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper is focused on the Formulary Apportionment, to be used within the European Union, hence, to replace the Separate Accounting and arm's length principle. Reflecting upon the announced European Commission's Proposal for new framework for business taxation and the foreseeable upswing of the academic discussion focused on the Formulary Apportionment methodology, this paper represents the first systematic literature review on this topic. The main aim of the paper is to identify the relevant prior research, explore the current literature and develop directions for future research. The study identifies eight main thematic clusters, provides an interpretative framework, and suggests valuable future research directions within each thematic cluster as well as general future research agenda. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Taxation; Corporate income tax; Literature review

PL

Opodatkowanie; Podatek dochodowy od osób prawnych; Przegląd literatury

• Czasopismo: Economics and Business Review
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: 9 (23)
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 124--152

Twórcy

autor

Markéta Mlčúchová

• Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• Almendral, V.R. (2010). An ever-distant union: The cross-border loss relief conundrum in EU law. Intertax, 38(10), 476-501.
• Altshuler, R., & Grubert, H. (2010). Formula apportionment: Is it better than the current system and are there better alternatives? National Tax Journal, 63(4), 1145-1184. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2010.4S.13
• Anand, B.N., & Sansing, R. (2000). The weighting game: Formula apportionment as an instrument of public policy. National Tax Journal, 53(2), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2000.2.01
• Ancillai, Ch., Sabatini, A., Gatti, M., & Perna, A. (2023). Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 188, 122307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122307
• Arel-Bundock, V., & Parinandi, S. (2018). Conditional tax competition in American states. Journal of Public Policy, 38(2), 191-220. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X17000071
• Barrios S., d'Andria D., & Gesualdo M. (2020). Reducing tax compliance costs through corporate tax base harmonization in the European Union. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2020.100355
• Becker, J., & Fuest, C. (2010). Tax enforcement and tax havens under formula apportionment. International Tax and Public Finance, 17(3), 217-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-009-9121-4
• Becker, J., & Runkel, M. (2013). Corporate tax regime and international allocation of ownership. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.11.002
• Bettendorf, L., Devereux, M.P., van der Horst, A., Loretz, S., & de Mooij, R.A. (2010). Corporate tax harmonization in the EU. Economic Policy, 63, 537-590.
• Bettendorf, L., van der Horst, A., de Mooij, R.A., & Vrijburg, H. (2010). Corporate Tax Consolidation and Enhanced Cooperation in the European Union. Fiscal Studies, 31(4), 453-479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2010.00121.x
• Bloch, F., & Demange, G. (2021). Profit-splitting rules and the taxation of multinational digital platforms. International Tax and Public Finance, 28(4), 855-889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-020-09643-0
• Bogerd, H. (2007). The attraction and feasibility of formula apportionment for the European Union. EC Tax Review, 16(6), 274-282. https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2007045
• Borg, J.C. (2013). The tax treatment of losses under the proposed Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base Directive. Intertax, 41(11), 581-587.
• Buettner, T., Riedel, N., & Runkel, M. (2011). Strategic consolidation under formula apportionment. National Tax Journal, 64(2), 225-254. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2011.2.01
• Ceipek, R., Hautz, J., Mayer, M.C.J., & Matzler, K. (2019). Technological diversification: A systematic review of antecedents, outcomes and moderating effects. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 21(4), 466-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12205
• Cerioni, L. (2015). The never-ending ıssue of cross-border loss compensation within the EU: Reconciling balanced allocation of taxing rights and cross-border ability-to-pay. EC Tax Review, 24(5), 268-280.
• Cerioni, L. (2016). The quest for a new corporate taxation model and for an effective fight against ınternational tax avoidance within the EU. Intertax, 44(6-7), 463-480.
• Cerioni, L. (2018). The European Commission proposal for a 3% 'Call Rate' as a new suggestion for a EUCIT: An assessment against the criteria for a fair taxation. EC Tax Review, 27(5), 237-249.
• Cobham A., Janský P., Jones C., & Temouri Y. (2021). An evaluation of the effects of the European Commission's proposals for the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base. Transnational Corporations, 28(1), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.18356/2076099x-28-1-2
• Conrad, R.F. (2006). Interjurisdictional taxation and attribution rules. Public Finance Review, 34(5), 505-526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142106289029
• Cottani, G. (2016). Formulary apportionment: A revamp in the post-base erosion and profit shifting era? Intertax, 44(10), 755-760.
• d'Andria, D., Pontikakis, D., & Skonieczna, A. (2018). Towards a European R&D incentive? An assessment of R&D provisions under a common corporate tax base. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 27(5-6), 531-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2017.1376168
• de Groot, I. (2017). Group provisions in the Common (Consolidated) Corporate Tax Base. Intertax, 45(11), 742-749.
• de Mooij, R., Liu, L., & Prihardini. D. (2021). An assessment of global formula apportionment. National Tax Journal, 74(2), 431-465. https://doi.org/10.1086/714112
• de Wilde, M. (2020). On the future of business income taxation in Europe. World Tax Journal, 12(1), 79-128.
• Devereux, M.P., & Fuest, C. (2010). Corporate income tax coordination in the European Union. Transfer-European Review of Labour and Research, 16(1), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258909357699
• Devereux, M.P., & Loretz, S. (2008). The effects of EU formula apportionment on corporate tax revenues. Fiscal Studies, 29(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2008.00067.x
• Domonkos, T., Domonkos Š., Dolinajcová, M., & Grisáková, N. (2013). The effect of the formula apportionment of the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base on tax revenue in the Slovak Republic. Ekonomický Časopis, 61(5), 453-467.
• Eberhartinger, E., & Petutschnig, M. (2017). CCCTB: The employment factor game. European Journal of Law and Economics, 43(2), 333-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-015-9505-0
• Edmiston, K.D. (2002). Strategic apportionment of the state corporate income tax - An applied general equilibrium analysis. National Tax Journal, 55(2), 239-262. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2002.2.03
• Edmiston, K.D., & del Granado, F.J.A. (2006). Economic effects of apportionment formula changes results from a panel of corporate income tax returns. Public Finance Review, 34(5), 483-504. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142106289016
• Eggert, W., & Haufler, A. (2006). Fiscal policy in action - Company-tax coordination cum tax-rate competition in the European Union. Finanzarchiv, 62(4), 579-601. https://doi.org/10.1628/001522106X172706
• Eichfelder, S., Hechtner, F., & Hundsdoerfer, J. (2018) Formula apportionment: Factor allocation and tax avoidance. European Accounting Review, 27(4), 649-681. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2017.1364165
• Eichner, T., & Runkel, M. (2008). Why the European Union should adopt formula apportionment with a sales factor. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110(3), 567-589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2008.00551.x
• Eichner, T., & Runkel, M. (2009). Corporate income taxation of multinationals and unemployment. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(5), 610-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.04.001
• Eichner, T., & Runkel, M. (2011). Corporate income taxation of multinationals in a general equilibrium model. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7-8), 723-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.12.004
• Eichner, T., & Runkel, M. (2012). Efficient tax competition under formula apportionment without the sales factor. Economics Bulletin, 32(4), 2828-2838.
• Faccio, T., & Fitzgerald, V. (2018). Sharing the corporate tax base: Equitable taxing of multinationals and the choice of formulary apportionment. Transnational Corporations, 25(2), 67-89. https://doi.org/10.18356/7b2c8305-en
• Fernandez, M.J.G.T. (2012). Corporate tax harmonization: Key issues for ensuring an efficient ımplementation of the CCCTB. Intertax, 40(11), 598-605.
• Fox, W.F., Murray, M.N., & Luna, L. (2005). How should a subnational corporate income tax on multistate businesses be structured? National Tax Journal, 58(1), 139-159. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2005.1.07
• Fuest, C. (2008). The European Commission's proposal for a common consolidated corporate tax base. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(4), 720-739. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grn032
• Fuest, C., Hemmelgarn, T., & Ramb, F. (2007). How would the introduction of an EU-wide formula apportionment affect the distribution and size of the corporate tax base? An analysis based on German multinationals. International Tax and Public Finance, 14(5), 605-626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-9008-6
• Garbarino, C. (2014). Tax design ıssues in respect to foreign branches and controlled companies and the feasibility of a consolidation area in the EU. EC Tax Review, 23(1), 16-29.
• Goolsbee, A., & Maydew, E.L. (2000). Coveting thy neighbor's manufacturing: the dilemma of state income apportionment. Journal of Public Economics, 75(1), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00036-5
• Gordon, B. (2014). Tax competition and harmonisation under EU law: Economic realities and legal rules. European Law Review, 39(6), 790-811.
• Gordon, R., & Wilson, J.D. (1986). An examination of multijurisdictional corporate-ıncome taxation under formula apportionment. Econometrica, 54(6), 1357-1373. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914303
• Greil, S., Müller R., & Olbert, M. (2019). Transfer pricing for digital business models: Early evidence of challenges and options for reform. World Tax Journal, 11(4), 557-588.
• Gresik, T.A. (2016). Allowing firms to choose between separate accounting and formula apportionment taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 138, 32-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.04.002
• Gupta, S., Moore, J., Gramlich, J., & Hofmann, M.A. (2009). Empirical evidence on the revenue effects of state corporate income tax policies. National Tax Journal, 62(2), 237-267. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2009.2.03
• Gutmann, D., & de la Bletiere, E.R. (2017). CC(C)TB and international taxation. EC Tax Review, 26(5), 233-245.
• Hellerstein, W., & McLure, C.E. (2004). The European Commission's report on company income taxation: What the EU can learn from the experience of the US states. International Tax and Public Finance, 11(2), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1023/ B:ITAX.0000011400.45314.57
• Herzig, N., Teschke, M., & Joisten, C. (2010). Between extremes: Merging the advantages of separate accounting and unitary taxation. Intertax, 38(6-7), 334-349. https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2010037
• Hodzic, S. (2015). The ımpacts of the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base in Croatia. Ekonomski Vjesnik, 28(2), 327-338.
• Hundsdoerfer, J., & Wagner, J. (2020). How accurately does the CCCTB apportionment formula allocate profits? An evaluation of the European Commission proposal. Journal of Business Economics, 90(4), 495-536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-019-00962-1
• Jarass, L., & Obermair, G.M. (2008). Tax on earnings before interest and taxes instead of profit-fair, simple and competitive: A conceivable initiative of EU Member States for a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base. EC Tax Review, 17(3), 111-117.
• Khan Niazi, S.U. (2017). Re-launch of the proposal for a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) in the EU: A shift in paradigm. Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 44(3), 293-314.
• Kiesewetter, D., Steigenberger, T., & Stier M. (2018). Can formula apportionment really prevent multinational enterprises from profit shifting? The role of asset valuation, intragroup debt, and leases. Journal of Business Economics, 88(9), 1029-1060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-018-0891-y
• Kind, H.J., Midelfart, K.H., & Schjelderup, G. (2005). Corporate tax systems, multinational enterprises, and economic integration. Journal of International Economics, 65(2), 507-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2004.06.002
• Krchnivá, K., & Nerudová, D. (2018). The CCCTB allocation formula game: The performance of economic sectors. Prague Economic Papers, 27(4), 427-448. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.660
• Kudrle, R.T. (2009). Ending the tax haven scandals. Global Economy Journal, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.2202/1524-5861.1520
• Lacova, Z., & Hunady, J. (2018). The consequences of tax base rules on enterprise ınnovation in the European Union. Modeling Innovation Sustainability and Technologies, 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67101-7_3
• Lehoux, L., Duck, H., Akhmadeev, R., Morozova, T., & Bykanova, O. (2019). Sustainable development facets: Taxation solutions for the energy industry. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 9(2), 457-472. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2019.9.2(8)
• Liesegang, C., & Runkel, M. (2019). Equalizing tax bases or tax revenues under tax competition? The role of formula apportionment. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 21(1), 98-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12319
• Llopis, E.L. (2017). Formulary apportionment in the European Union. Intertax, 45(10), 631-641.
• Mardan, M., & Stimmelmayr, M. (2018). Tax revenue losses through cross-border loss offset: An insurmountable hurdle for formula apportionment? European Economic Review, 102, 188-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.12.007
• Martini, J.T., Niemann, R., & Simons, D. (2012). Transfer pricing or formula apportionment? Tax-induced distortions of multinationals' investment and production decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2012.01140.x
• Martini, J.T., Niemann, R., & Simons, D. (2016). Tax-induced distortions of effort and compensation in a principal-agent setting. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 27, 26-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2016.07.002
• Martins, A., & Taborda, D. (2022). BEFIT and formulary apportionment: Should ıntangibles be ıncluded in the formula? EC Tax Review, 31(3), 131-139.
• Matsumoto, M. (2016). Public-input provision under formula apportionment. Finanzarchiv, 72(1), 74-95. https://doi.org/10.1628/001522116X14557023949256
• Mayer, S. (2009). Formulary apportionment for the internal market. IBFD Doctoral Series.
• McGaughey, S.L., & Raimondos, P. (2019). Shifting MNE taxation from national to global profits: A radical reform long overdue. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(9), 1668-1683. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00233-9
• McLure, C.E., Jr. (1981). The elusive ıncidence of the corporate ıncome tax: The state case. Public Finance Review, 9(4), 395-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/109114218100900402
• McLure, C.E., Jr. (2000). Implementing state corporate income taxes in the digital age. National Tax Journal, 53(4, part 3), 1287-1305. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2000.4s2.02
• Merriman, D. (2015). A replication of coveting thy neighbor's manufacturing: The dilemma of state income apportionment. Public Finance Review, 43(2), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142114537892
• Mitroyanni, I., & Putzolu, C. (2009). CCCTB and business reorganizations the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base and business reorganizations. Intertax, 37(8-9), 436-448.
• Munnell, A.H. (1992, September). Taxation of capital ıncome in a global economy - An overview. New England Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, 33-52.
• Musgrave, P. (1972). International tax base division and the multinational corporation. Public Finance, 27, 394-413.
• Nerudová, D., & Krchnivá, K. (2016). Tax sharing under the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base: Measurement of the profit generating factors in the agriculture sector. Agricultural Economics, 62(8), 363-377. https://doi.org/10.17221/222/2015-AGRICECON
• Nerudová, D., & Solilová, V. (2015). The ımpact of the CCCTB ıntroduction on the distribution of the group tax bases across the EU: The study for the Czech Republic. Prague Economic Papers, 24(6), 621-637. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.514
• Nerudová, D., & Solilová, V. (2017). Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base system re-launching: Simulation of the impact on the Slovak budget revenues. Ekonomický Časopis, 65(6), 559-578.
• Nerudová, D., & Solilová, V. (2018). Mandatory CCCTB implementation in the Eurozone and its impact on corporate tax revenues in the Czech Republic. E & M Ekonomie a Management, 21(1), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2018-1-001
• Nerudová D., & Solilová V. (2019). The impact of the introduction of a CCCTB in the EU. Intereconomics, 54(3), 160-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-019-0815-2
• Nerudová D., Solilová V., Litzman M., & Janský P. (2020). International tax planning within the structure of corporate entities owned by the shareholder-individuals through Panama Papers destinations. Development Policy Review, 38(1), 124-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12403
• Nerudová, D., Solilová, V., & Litzman, M. (2021). Is there a real chance to adopt the CCCTB without UK participation in the EU? Ekonomický Časopis, 69(6), 582-603. https://doi.org/10.31577/ekoncas.2021.06.02
• Nielsen, S.B., Raimondos-Møller, P., & Schjelderup G. (2003). Formula apportionment and transfer pricing under oligopolistic competition. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 5(2), 419-437. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9779.00140
• Oestreicher, A., & Koch, R. (2011). The revenue consequences of using a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base to determine taxable ıncome in the EU Member States. Finanzarchiv, 67(1), 64-102. https://doi.org/10.1628/001522111X574191
• Ortmann, R., & Sureth-Sloane, C. (2016). Can the CCCTB alleviate tax discrimination against loss-making European multinational groups? Journal of Business Economics, 86(5), 441-475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-015-0780-6
• Perotto, G. (2021). How to cope with harmful tax competition in the EU legal order: Going beyond the elusive Quest for a definition and the misplaced reliance on state aid law. European Journal of Legal Studies, 13(1), 309-340. https://doi.org/10.2924/EJLS.2019.052
• Pethig, R., & Wagener, A. (2007). Profit tax competition and formula apportionment. International Tax and Public Finance, 14(6), 631-655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-9017-5
• Petkova, K., & Weichenrieder, A.J. (2020). The relevance of depreciation allowances as a fiscal policy instrument: A hybrid approach to CCCTB? Empirica, 47(3), 579-610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-019-09441-w
• Pinto, S.M. (2007). Corporate profit tax, capital mobility, and formula apportionment. Journal of Urban Economics, 62(1), 76-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2006.08.008
• Pirvu, D., Banica L., & Hagiu, A. (2011). Implications of the common consolidated corporate tax base introduction on tax revenues (case study on Romania). Romanian Journal of Political Science, 11(1), 91-102.
• Polezharova, L.V., & Krasnobaeva, A.M. (2020). E-commerce taxation in Russia: Problems and approaches. Journal of Tax Reform, 6(2), 104-123. https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2020.6.2.077
• Quentin, D. (2017). Corporate tax reform and "value creation": Towards unfettered diagonal re-allocation across the global inequality chain. Accounting, Economics and Law, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2016-0020
• Riedel, N. (2010). The downside of formula apportionment: Evidence on factor demand distortions. International Tax and Public Finance, 17(3), 236-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-009-9116-1
• Riedel, N. (2011). Taxing multi-nationals under union wage bargaining. International Tax and Public Finance, 18(4), 399-421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-011-9164-1
• Riedel, N., & Runkel, M. (2007). Company tax reform with a water's edge. Journal of Public Economics, 91(7-8), 1533-1554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.11.001
• Roggeman, A., Verleyen, I., Van Cauwenberge, P., & Coppens, C. (2012). An empirical investigation into the design of an EU apportionment formula related to profit generating factors. Transformations in Business & Economics, 11(3), 36-56.
• Roggeman, A., Verleyen, I., Van Cauwenberge, P., & Coppens, C. (2013). The EU apportionment formula: Insights from a business case. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 14(2), 235-251. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3846/16111699.2011.638668
• Roggeman, A., Verleyen, I., Van Cauwenberge, P., & Coppens, C. (2014). Impact of a Common Corporate Tax Base on the effective tax burden in Belgium. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 15(3), 530-543. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2013.807869
• Runkel, M., & Schjelderup, G. (2011). The choice of apportionment factors under formula apportionment. International Economic Review, 52(3), 913-934. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2011.00654.x
• Russo, A. (2005). Formulary apportionment for Europe: An analysis and a proposal. Intertax, 33(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2005001
• Sadiq, K. (2015). The case for unitary taxation with formulary apportionment in the finance sector and the effect on developing nations. Australian Tax Review, 44(2), 75-98.
• Schaltegger, S., Christ, K.L., Wenzig, J., & Burritt, R.L. (2021). Corporate sustainability management accounting and multi-level links for sustainability - A systematic review. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 24(4), 480-500. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12288
• Schreiber, U., & Fuhrich, G. (2009). European group taxation-the role of exit taxes. European Journal of Law and Economics, 27(3), 257-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-008-9090-6
• Shackelford, D., & Slemrod, J. (1998). The revenue consequences of using formula apportionment to calculate US and foreign-source income: A firm-level analysis. International Tax and Public Finance, 5, 41-59. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008664408465
• Solilová, V., Nerudová, D., & Litzman, M. (2016). Implementation of Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base and its ımplications for non-participating country: A case study for the Czech Republic. Ekonomickýy Časopis, 64(3), 282-298.
• Sørensen, P.B. (2004). Company tax reform in the European Union. International Tax and Public Finance, 11(1), 91-115. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ITAX.0000004778.63592.96
• Sosnowski M. (2014). Dilemmas of tax-inducted location decisions. Journal of International Studies, 7(2), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2014/7- 2/7
• Spinosa, L., & Chand, V. (2018). A long-term solution for taxing digitalized business models: Should the permanent establishment definition be modified to resolve the issue or should the focus be on a shared taxing rights mechanism? Intertax, 46(6-7), 476-494.
• Swenson, C.W. (2015). The cash flow and behavioral effects of switching to a single sales factor on state taxation. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 37(2), 75-107. https://doi.org/10.2308/atax-51203
• van de Streek, J. (2012). The CCCTB concept of consolidation and the rules on entering a group. Intertax, 40(1), 24-32.
• Weiner, J.M. (2006). Company tax reform in the European Union: Guidance from the United States and Canada on ımplementing formulary apportionment in the EU. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29487-2
• Wetzler, J.W. (1995). Should the us adopt formula apportionment? National Tax Journal, 48(3), 357-362.
• Wrede, M. (2013). Multinational financial structure and tax competition. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 149(3), 381-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399396
• Wrede, M. (2014). Asymmetric tax competition with formula apportionment. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 7(1), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-013-0100-0

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2023.3.798