Czasopismo
Tytuł artykułu
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Objective: The research aimed to examine the strength and nature of the UK's relations with China under new circumstances caused by Brexit. Specifically, this article attempts to answer what was the impact of Brexit on economic and political relations between the UK and its significant economic partner, China. In pursuance of the goal, the authors discuss the economic and political implications of a new status quo in bilateral cooperation in the field of trade and investment and the political aspects of Brexit for both partners. Research Design & Methods: We explored the UK-China relationship in the context of Brexit implications using a literature analysis and examined the strength and nature of economic relations between countries mentioned above using the trade orientation and intensity indicators. Findings: Brexit created a new landscape for bilateral cooperation between the UK and its partners worldwide. The long-term consequences of Brexit will continue to unfold in years to come, but we may already recognize some early trends in bilateral relations. The analysis of the UK's trade orientation based on the historical data for the period 2013-2022 revealed the decreasing significance of Germany and the increasing position of China and the United States as the UK's trading partners. Moreover, the analysis of trade intensity revealed the lowest trade intensity between the UK and China post-2012 compared with Germany and the US. Nevertheless, the values of the trade intensity index with China indicate that there is still potential to increase exports to China. Implications & Recommendations: The proposed set of indicators can serve to question the major tendencies of bilateral trade. Together, the indicators portray a comprehensive picture of interdependence and the strength of existing connections between two countries and help examine whether cooperation is strengthening or weakening. The orientation index identifies the strength and importance of the relationship with the trading partner relative to other trade relations' significance and monitors the progress of the cooperation, while the trade intensity index can be used to determine whether the value of trade between two countries is greater or smaller than expected based on their importance in world trade. The analysis results will allow scholars to determine possible actions that should be undertaken by the UK and - possibly - the EU to develop trade and investment cooperation with China in a more balanced way. Contribution & Value Added: The article extends the knowledge of Brexit's economic and political implications for UK-China bilateral cooperation. Furthermore, the article presents a comprehensive analysis and evaluation of the current UK-China relations in the context of Brexit. We examined economic relations between the countries mentioned by means of trade orientation and intensity indicators. (original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Numer
Strony
7--19
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
- University of Bialystok
autor
- Warsaw School of Economics, Poland
Bibliografia
- 1. Baier, S.L., & Bergstrand, J.H. (2009). Estimating the effects of free trade agreements on international trade flows using matching econometrics. Journal of International Economics, 77 (1), 63-76. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.09.006 on April 25, 2023.
- 2. BBC News. (2015, October 23). UK now China's best partner in West. BBC News. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-34621254 on April 25, 2023.
- 3. Begg, I. (2017). Making Sense of the Costs and Benefits of Brexit: Challenges for Economists. Atlantic Economic Journal, 45 (3), 299-315.
- 4. British Chamber of Commerce in China (BCCC). (2020). British Business in China: Sentiment Survey 2019-2020. Retrieved from https://www.britishchamber.cn/en/business-sentiment-survey/ on April 6, 2022.
- 5. British Chamber of Commerce in China (BCCC). (2021). British Business in China: Position Paper 2021 Retrieved from https://www.britishchamber.cn/en/british-business-in-china-position-paper/ on July 6, 2022.
- 6. British Chamber of Commerce in China (BCCC). (2022a). British Business in China: Position Paper 2022 Retrieved from https://www.britishchamber.cn/en/british-business-in-china-position-paper/ on June 12, 2023.
- 7. British Chamber of Commerce in China (BCCC). (2022b). British Business in China: Sentiment Survey 2021-2022 Retrieved from https://www.britishchamber.cn/en/business-sentiment-survey/ on August 25, 2022.
- 8. British Chamber of Commerce in China (BCCC). (2023). British Business in China: Sentiment Survey 2022-2023 Retrieved from https://www.britishchamber.cn/en/business-sentiment-survey/ on April 25, 2023.
- 9. Brown, K. (2016, June 25). What China Thinks About Brexit. The Diplomat. Retrieved from https://thediplo-mat.com/2016/06/what-china-thinks-about-brexit/ on April 6, 2022.
- 10. Cameron irritates Brussels by pushing EU-China trade deal. (2013, December 3). Euractiv. Retrieved from https://www.euractiv.com/section/uk-europe/news/cameron-irritates-brussels-by-pushing-eu-china-trade-deal/ on April 25, 2023.
- 11. Carrington, D. (2015, October 20). China to take one-third stake in GBP24bn Hinkley nuclear power station. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/oct/20/china-to-take-one-third-stake-in-24bn-hinkley-nuclear-power-station] on April 25, 2023.
- 12. Courea, E. (2022a, April 1). UK ministers quietly approve Chinese microchip factory takeover. Politico. Retrieved from https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-minister-quietly-approve-chinese-microchip-factory-takeover/ on April 25, 2023.
- 13. Courea, E. (2022b, April 5). Boris Johnson's China problem. Politico. Retrieved from https://www.politico.eu/article/boris-johnson-china-ukraine-putin-war-invasion/ on April 6, 2022.
- 14. Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G.I.P., Sampson, T., & Van Reenen, J. (2016). The impact of Brexit on foreign investment in the UK. CEP Brexit analysis, 3. Retrieved from https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/abstract.asp?index=5014 on April 6, 2022.
- 15. Djankov, S., & Freund, C. (2002). Trade Flows in the Former Soviet Union, 1987 to 1996. Journal of Comparative Economics, 30(1), 76-90. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.2001.1752 on April 6, 2022.
- 16. Freund, C.L., & McLaren, J. (1999). On the dynamics of trade diversion: evidence from four trade blocs. International Finance Discussion Papers. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US), 637. Retrieved from https://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/1999/637/default.htm on April 6, 2022.
- 17. Gao, X., Hu, Y., Wang, H., & Wang, X. (2022). Brexit and global equity fund capital reallocation. Journal of International Money and Finance, 125. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102639 on April 6, 2022.
- 18. Graziano, A., Handley, K., & Limão, N. (2018). Brexit Uncertainty and Trade Disintegration. NBER WP 25334
- 19. Hallett, A.H. (2019). Throwing the baby out with the bathwater: Brexit and the economics of disengaging from a free trade association. Economic Analysis and Policy, 62, 91-96. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2019.01.004 on April 25, 2023.
- 20. Haynes, D. (2020, June 4). UK prepared to sacrifice free trade deal with China to protect people of Hong Kong. Sky News. Retrieved from https://news.sky.com/story/uk-prepared-to-sacrifice-free-trade-deal-with-china-to-protect-people-of-hong-kong-raab-says-11999873 on April 6, 2022.
- 21. Head, K., Mayer, T., & Ries, J. (2010). The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence. Journal of International Economics, 81 (1), 1-14. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.01.002 on April 6, 2022.
- 22. HM Department for International Trade. (2023). Trade and investment factsheets. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/trade-and-investment-factsheets on June 15, 2023.
- 23. HM Government. (2017). New phase in Golden Era for UK-China relations. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-phase-in-golden-era-for-uk-china-relations on April 25, 2023.
- 24. HM Government. (2021). Global Britain in a Competitive Age: The Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/global-britain-in-a-competitive-age-the-integrated-review-of-security-defence-development-and-foreign-policy/global-britain-in-a-competitive-age-the-integrated-review-of-security-defence-development-and-foreign-policy on April 25, 2023.
- 25. HM Government. (2023). Our position on China: Foreign Secretary's 2023 Mansion House speech. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/our-position-on-china-speech-by-the-foreign-secretary on June 16, 2023.
- 26. HM Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs. (2022). Six-monthly report on Hong Kong: July to December 2021. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/six-monthly-report-on-hong-kong-1-july-to-31-december-2021 on April 6, 2022.
- 27. HM Treasury. (2016). China chooses London for its first ever sovereign renminbi (RMB) bond issued outside of China. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/china-chooses-london-for-its-first-ever-sovereign-renminbi-rmb-bond-issued-outside-of-china on April 25, 2023.
- 28. Hoekman, B. (1999). Free Trade and Deep Integration: Antidumping and Antitrust in Regional Agreements. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-1950
- 29. International Trade Centre (ITC). (2023). Trade Map. Retrieved from https://www.trademap.org/ on June 7, 2023.
- 30. Jackson, K., & Shepotylo, O. (2018). Post-Brexit trade survival: Looking beyond the European Union. Economic Modelling, 73, 317-328. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.04.010] on April 6, 2022.
- 31. Jones, E. (2018). Towards a theory of disintegration. Journal of European Public Policy, 25 (3), 440-451. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1411381] on June 15, 2023.
- 32. Kirk-Wade, E., & Gower, M. (2022). Hong Kong British National (Overseas) visa. Retrieved from https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-8939 on April 25, 2023.
- 33. Kleinmam, Z. (2021, May 17). Why is Huawei still in the U.K.? BBC News. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-57146140] on April 6, 2022.
- 34. Kojima, K. (1964). The Pattern of International Trade among Advanced Countries. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 5 (1), 16-36. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.15057/8091 on April 6, 2022.
- 35. Kostecka-Tomaszewska, L., & Krukowska, M., (2020). Europe between China and the United States: Geoeconomic Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative. European Research Studies Journal, 23 (1), 271-291. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1549 on April 25, 2023.
- 36. Kuo, M.A. (2018, September 27). Post-Brexit UK-China Relations: Impact on the US. The Diplomat. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/post-brexit-uk-china-relations-impact-on-the-us/ on April 6, 2022.
- 37. Leavenworth, S. (2016, June 25). Britons showed losing mindset, say Chinese media in swipe at leave vote. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/25/britons-showed-losing-mind-set-say-chinese-media-in-swipe-at-leave-vote on April 25, 2023.
- 38. Limão, N., & Maggi, G. (2015). Uncertainty and Trade Agreements. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 7 (4), 1-42. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20130163 on April 6, 2022.
- 39. Lu, Z. (2019, July 24). Pro-China Boris Johnson enthusiastic about belt and road plan. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3019884/pro-china-boris-johnson-enthusiastic-about-belt-and-road-plan on June 6, 2022.
- 40. Martina, M. (2022, April 6). U.S. says China could face sanctions if it supports Russia's war in Ukraine. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/us-says-china-could-face-sanctions-if-it-supports-russias-war-ukraine-2022-04-06 on April 6, 2023.
- 41. Mason, R. (2016, April 12). Steel crisis: U.K. blocked tougher E.U. rules amid shoe price rise fears, The Guardian, Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/apr/12/sajid-javid-uk-blocked-higher-eu-steel-tariffs-fearing-shoe-price-rises on April 6, 2022.
- 42. Mazhikeyev, A., & Edwards, T.H. (2021). Post-colonial trade between Russia and former Soviet republics: back to big brother?. Economic Change and Restructuring, 54. 877-918. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-020-09302-8 on April 6, 2022.
- 43. McGrattan, E., & Waddle, A. (2019). The Impact of Brexit on Foreign Investment and Production. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics.
- 44. Mearsheimer, J.J. (1990). 'Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War'. International Security, 15 (1), 5-56.
- 45. Miller, W. (2021). Where do British businesses stand after Brexit and the EU-China investment deal? Retrieved from https://www.britishchamber.cn/en/policy-insights-where-do-british-businesses-stand-after-brexit-and-the-eu-china-investment-deal/ on April 6, 2023.
- 46. National Cyber Security Centre. (NCSC). (2020). NCSC advice on the use of equipment from high risk vendors in UK telecoms networks. Retrieved from https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/ncsc-advice-on-the-use-of-equipment-from-high-risk-vendors-in-uk-telecoms-networks on June 6, 2022.
- 47. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit and Authoritarian-populism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- 48. Oliver, T. (2017). Theory and Brexit. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/31860197/Theory_and_Brexit on May 20, 2023.
- 49. Osnago, A., Piermartini, R., & Rocha, N. (2015). Trade policy uncertainty as barrier to trade, WTO Staff Working Papers. Economic Research and Statistics Division, No. 5 on April 6, 2023.
- 50. Patel, A., & Xu, S. (2021). A breakdown of UK-China trade relations in 2020. Retrieved from https://www.britishchamber.cn/en/position-paper-preview-a-breakdown-of-uk-china-trade-relations-in-2020/ on April 6, 2022.
- 51. Percy, J. (2019, April 29). China's FDI into the UK After the Brexit Vote. China Briefing News. Retrieved from https://www.china-briefing.com/news/chinas-fdi-uk-brexit-vote/ on April 8, 2022.
- 52. Phillips, T. (2016, June 30). China, Britain and Brexit: Vote to leave EU robs 'golden relationship' of its lustre. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/30/china-britain-and-brexit-vote-to-leave-eu-robs-golden-relationship-of-its-lustre on April 6, 2022.
- 53. Plakandaras, V., Gupta, R., & Wohar, M. (2017). The Depreciation of the Pound Post-Brexit: Could it Have Been Predicted? Finance Research Letters 21(3). 206-213.
- 54. Rosamond, B. (2016). Brexit and the Problem of European Disintegration. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 12, 864-871. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v12i4.807 on June 4, 2023.
- 55. Srivastava, R.K., & Green, R.T. (1986). Determinants of Bilateral Trade Flows. The Journal of Business, 59 (4), 623-640. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2353012 on April 12, 2022.
- 56. Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. The Twentieth Century Fund.
- 57. Topham, G. (2015, September 23). HS2 bidding process to be opened up to Chinese companies. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/sep/24/hs2-bidding-process-opened-up-chinese-companies on April 6, 2022.
- 58. Wang, O. (2021, December 10). UK, China agree to resume annual economic dialogue in same week London confirms Winter Olympic boycott. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/economy/global-economy/article/3159255/uk-china-agree-resume-annual-economic-dialogue-same-week on April 6, 2022.
- 59. Vandenbussche, H., Connell, W., & Simons, W. (2017). Global Value Chains, Trade Shocks and Jobs: An Application to Brexit. CEPR DP 1230
- 60. Yang, Y., & Mitchell, T. (2020, June 9). UK businesses in China say opening measures have little impact. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/d50c3df4-6bd5-4f70-92d6-5bddc91ea3b92020 on April 6, 2022.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171673825