Role of Due Diligence in Business Takeover

• Autorzy: Marek Vochozka , Jiří Máška , Vilém Kovač
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Motivation: The topic of the article is of paramount importance in today's ever-evolving business landscape. As companies strive to expand their operations and stay ahead of the competition, mergers and acquisitions have become a popular strategy. However, the risks and complexities associated with these transactions cannot be overlooked. Understanding the role of due diligence is essential for any organization considering a business takeover. It serves as a powerful tool to uncover potential risks, assess the viability of the transaction, and make well-informed decisions. By conducting a thorough due diligence process, companies can identify financial discrepancies, legal liabilities, operational inefficiencies, and hidden risks that may impact the success of the transaction. Aim: The goal of the research was to analyze to what extent is the resulting value of a business is affected by improperly performed due diligence. The method used for data collection was in-debt literature research based on the Web of Science database. Subsequent content analysis was used to identify the 10 most common errors that can occur during the process of due diligence. The following research used the data obtained from answering the first research question with. Ishikawa fishbone diagram was used as a specific method of causal analysis. Results: The main findings include the identification of the most common errors occurring during the performance of due diligence, such as wrong financial analysis, incomplete financial accounts, Incomplete accounting statements, or adjusting entries for receivables. The main causes include excessive work pressure on auditors, past due receivables, poor supplier vetting, or failure to document the application of prices. The research is beneficial for auditors or audited companies so that they could avoid such errors. However, there are also several limitations as it is very time and cost-consuming to deal with due diligence on a company-by-company basis. Also, the application of Ishikawa fishbone diagram and brainstorming prior to diagram depends on the number of experts involve. Another limitation is that the research results applied under current accounting legislation only, and there are different laws and regulations in different countries.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Due diligence analysis; Mergers and acquisitions; Company indebtedness; Ishikawa diagram

PL

Analiza due diligence; Fuzje i przejęcia; Zadłużenie przedsiębiorstwa; Diagram Ishikawy

• Czasopismo: Ekonomia i Prawo
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: 22
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 635--654

Twórcy

autor

Marek Vochozka

• Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice, Czechia

autor

Jiří Máška

• Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice, Czechia

autor

Vilém Kovač

• Technical University of Košice

Bibliografia

• Agarwa, J.P., Krishnatry, R., Panda, G., Pathak, R., Vartak, C., Kinhikar, R.A., James, S., Khobrekar, S., Shriyastaya, K., D'Cru, K., & Deshpande, D.D. (2019). An audit for radiotherapy planning and treatment errors from a low-middle-income country centre. Clinical Oncology, 31(1), E67-E74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2018.09.008.
• Ahmad, F. (2019). A systematic review of the role of big data analytics in reducing the influence of cognitive errors on the audit judgement. Revista De Contabilidad: Spanish Accounting Review, 22(2), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.6018/rcsar.382251.
• Banos-Caballero, S., Garcia-Teruel, P.J., & Martinez-Solano, P. (2020). Net operating working capital and firm value: a cross-country analysis. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 23(3), 234-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420941464
• Basu, S., Krishnan, J., Lee, J.E., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Economic determinants and consequences of the proactive disclosure of internal control weaknesses and remediation progress in IPOs. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(4), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51876.
• Bhaduri, R. (2022). Structural due diligence, operational risks, and the evaluation of managed account platforms. Journal of Alternative Investments, 24(3), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2021.1.149.
• Bi, X., Tang, J., & Tharyan, R. (2020). Switching due diligence auditor in Chinese mergers and acquisitions. Research in International Business and Finance, 54, 101244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101244
• Borochin, P., Ghosh, C., & Huang, D. (2019). Target information asymmetry and takeover strategy: insights from a new perspective. European Financial Management, 25(1), 38-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12199.
• Burgstaller, M., & Risso, G. (2021). Due diligence in international investment law. Journal of International Arbitration, 38(6), 697-922. https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2021033.
• Camoletto, S., Corazza, L., Pizzi, S., & Santini, E. (2022). Corporate social responsibility due diligence among European companies: the results of an interventionist research project with accountability and political implications. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1122-1133. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2258.
• Cavagnaro, D.R., & Wang, Y. (2019). Institutional investors' investments in private equity: the more the better. International Journal of Business, 24(1), 1-24.
• Celik, M.A., Tian, X., & Wang, W. (2022). Acquiring innovation under information frictions. Review of Financial Studies, 35(10), 4474-4517. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhac006.
• Cheng, D., Yu, J., Zhang, D., & Zheng, W. (2020). Is heterogeneous capital depreciation important for estimating firm-level productivity: evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Research in International Business and Finance, 52, 101146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101146.
• Chi, W., & Pan, C.K. (2022). How do auditors respond to accounting restatements: evidence on audit staff allocation. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 58(2), 847-879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-021-01011-1.
• Coleman, M., & Wu, M. (2021). Corporate governance mechanisms and corporate performance of firms in Nigeria and Ghana. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(8), 2319-2351. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2020-0020.
• Crain, N., Parrino, R., & Srinivasan, R. (2021). Uncertainty, prospectus content, and the pricing of initial public. Journal of Empirical Finance, 64, 160-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2021.08.007.
• Dalibor, J., & Tamara, V. (2019). Does optimization of balance sheet indicators can have impact on external financiers. International Review, 3-4, 75-80. https://doi.org/10.5937/intrev1903075J.
• Darrough, M.N., & Deng, M. (2019). The role of accounting information in optimal debt contracts with informed lenders. Accounting Review, 94(6), 165-200. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52313.
• de Lima Amorim, D.P., de Camargos, M.A., & Pinto, B.F. (2021). Analysis of the working capital of the companies listed on B3 in face of the Brazilian economic crisis. Revista Evidenciacao Contabil & Financas, 9(3), 49-70. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2318-1001.2021v9n3.55834.
• Debnath, N.C., Chowdhury, S.P., & Khan, S. (2022). The impact of audit quality on real earnings management: evidence from Bangladesh. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 19(2), 218-231. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-021-00137-x.
• Donado, A. (2021). Why do they just do it: a theory of outsourcing and working conditions. Open Economies Review, 32(3), 559-586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-020-09609-z.
• Gada, V.P., Popli, M., & Malhotra, S. (2021). Time to complete the due diligence phase in mergers and acquisitions: impact of CEO psychological characteristics. Applied Economics, 53(50), 5812-5825. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1931005.
• Gold, A., Detzen, D., van Mourik, O., Wallage, P., & Wright, A. (2022). Walking the talk: managing errors in the audit profession. Contemporary Accounting Research, 39(4), 2696-2729. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12794.
• Guenther, C., Ozcan, S., & Sassmannshausen, D. (2022). Referrals among VCs and the length of due diligence: the effect of relational embeddedness. Journal of Business Venturing, 37(5), 106230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106230.
• Gustafsson, M.-T., Schilling-Vacaflor, A., & Lenschow, A. (2022). Foreign corporate accountability: The contested institutionalization of mandatory due diligence in France and Germany. Regulation & Governance. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12498.
• Hayes, A. (2023). Ishikawa diagram. Retrieved 23.06.2023 from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/ishikawa-diagram.asp.
• Hofmann, H., Schleper, M.C., & Blome, C. (2018). Conflict minerals and supply chain due diligence: an exploratory study of multi-tier supply chains. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(1), 115-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2963-z.
• Kim, S., Connerton, T.P., & Park, C. (2021). Exploring the impact of technological disruptions in the automotive retail: a futures studies and systems thinking approach based on causal layered analysis and causal loop diagram. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121024.
• Lavrenteva, E. (2019). Tax risk management at the enterprise of the energy sector. In V. Murgul, & M. Pasetti (Eds.), International scientific conference energy management of municipal facilities and sustainable energy technologies EMMFT 2018, 983, 146-157). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19868-8_14.
• Levashova, Y. (2020). Fair and equitable treatment and investor's due diligence under international investment law. Netherlands International Law Review, 67(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-020-00170-7.
• Li, Y., & Evans, J. (2019). Analysis of financial events under an assumption of complexity. Annals of Actuarial Science, 13(2), 360-377. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1748499518000337.
• Lianos, I., Countouris, N., & de Stefano, V. (2019). Re-thinking the competition law/labour law interaction: promoting a fairer labour market. European Labour Law Journal, 10(3), 291-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952519872322.
• Macchi, C. (2021). The climate change dimension of business and human rights: the gradual consolidation of a concept of "climate due diligence". Business and Human Rights Journal, 6(1), 93-119. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2020.25.
• Marshall, N.T., Schroeder, J.H., & Yohn, T.L. (2019). An incomplete audit at the earnings announcement: implications for financial reporting quality and the market's response to earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(4), 2035-2068. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12472.
• Martin-Ortega, O. (2018). Public procurement as a tool for the protection and promotion of human rights: a study of collaboration, due diligence and leverage in the electronics industry. Business and Human Rights Journal, 3(1), 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2017.35.
• Matos, S. (2022). Investor due diligence and legitimate expectations. Journal of World Investment & Trade, 23(2), 313-328. https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340231.
• Matuszewski, M. (2020). Kluczowe obszary due diligence w procesach fuzji i przejęć w sektorze górniczym. Inżynieria Mineralna, 1(1), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.29227/IM-2020-01-06.
• McDonald, N. (2019). The role of due diligence in international law. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 68(4), 1041-1054. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589319000344.
• Moore, C.R.K., Moyes, C.P., & Patterson, P.D. (2019). The effect of non-fiscal clauses in host government instruments on the fair market value of upstream opportunities. Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 12(6), 480-501. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwz032.
• Mueller, P.M., Paeuser, P., & Kurzrock, B.-M. (2021). Fundamentals for automating due diligence processes in property transactions. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 39(2), 97-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-09-2019-0130.
• Novikov, O., Dubinina, M., & Kuzoma, V. (2018). Due diligence: essence and possible prospects of development. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(2), 141-146. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-2-141-146.
• Nurmet, M., Lemsalu, K., & Lehtsaar, J. (2021). Working capital in Estonian agricultural companies: analysis by size. In A. Auzina (Ed.), Economic science for rural development 2021 (pp. 487-493). Latvia University of Life Sciences & Technologies. https://doi.org/10.22616/ESRD.2021.55.050.
• Peters, A., Krieger, H., & Kreuzer, L. (2020). Due diligence: the risky risk management tool in international law. Cambridge International Law Journal, 9(2), 121-136. https://doi.org/10.4337/cilj.2020.02.01.
• Pham, N.T., Hoang, H.T., & Phan, Q.P.T. (2020). Green human resource management: a comprehensive review and future research agenda. International Journal of Manpower, 41(7), 845-878. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2019-0350.
• Porsgaard, C.B., Haubjerg, M., & Hansen, Z.N.L. (2018). A framework for operational due diligence. Production Engineering-Research and Development, 12(5), 633-645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-018-0842-z.
• Ren, L., Li, P.-P., & Zhao, Y.-G. (2022). An efficient and effective method for reliability assessment of project duration. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/16843703.2022.2138113.
• Reuer, J.J., & Sakhartov, A. (2021). Economies of scope and optimal due diligence in corporate acquisitions. Organization Science, 32(4), 1100-1119. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1417.
• Rivas-Ramirez, D. (2022). Foreign investors' due diligence: bidimensional concept. Revista Estudios Socio-Juridicos, 24(1), 39-69. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.10518.
• Roegiest, A., & McNulty, A. (2019). Variations in assessor agreement in due diligence. Proceedings of the 2019 conference on human information interaction and retrieval CHIIR'19 (pp. 243-247). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3295750.3298945.
• Roy, V., Desjardins, D., Fertel, C., & Ouellet-Plamondon, C. (2022). Methodology for conducting third-party risk-based due diligence in the construction and civil engineering industry. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 14(4), 03722002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000553.
• Rzepczynski, M.S., & Black, K. (2022). Alternative investment due diligence: a survey on key drivers for manager selection. Journal of Alternative Investments, 24(3), 18-43. https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2021.1.147.
• Schleper, M.C., Blome, C., Stevenson, M., Thuerer, M., & Tusell, I. (2022). When it's the slaves that pay: in search of a fair due diligence cost distribution in conflict mineral supply chains. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 164, 102801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102801.
• Soepriyanto, G., Krisky, P., Indra, Y., & Zudana, A. (2020). Female audit partners and accruals quality: evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 10(2), 305-319. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-03-2019-0054.
• Stafylas, D., Anderson, K., & Uddin, M. (2018). Hedge fund index-engineering methodologies: a comparison and demonstration. Applied Economics, 50(6), 596-612. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1332746.
• Stein, D., Zureck, A., & Jaeger, T. (2018). A call to theorize digital information technology due diligence: analysis of research gaps for the subject of information technology due diligence in mergers and acquisitions. In J. Nesleha, F. Hampl, & M. Svoboda (Eds.), European financial systems 2018: proceedings of the 15th international scientific conference (pp. 697-707). Masarykov University.
• Stuckburger, P.Z. (2018). From grey zone to customary international law: how adopting the precautionary principle may help crystallize the due diligence principle in cyberspace. In T. Minarik, R. Jakschis, & L. Lindstrom (Eds.), 2018 10th International conference on cyber conflict: maximising effects (pp. 245-261). IEEE.
• Suarez-Barraza, M.F., & Rodriguez-Gonzalez, F.G. (2019). Cornerstone root causes through the analysis of the Ishikawa diagram, is it possible to find them: a first research approach. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 11(2), 302-316. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-12-2017-0113.
• Sultan, N., & Mohamed, N. (2022). Challenges for financial institutes in implementing robust customer due diligence in Pakistan. Journal of Money Laundering Control. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-06-2022-0095.
• Tambunan, M.R.U.D. (2020). Transfer mispricing on intra-group trading performed by multinational manufacturing in Indonesia: evidence from Indonesian tax court 2015-2019. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 15(5), 262-271. https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2020035.
• Thompson, E.K., & Kim, C. (2020). Post-M&A performance and failure: implications of time until deal completion. Sustainability, 12(7), 2999. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072999.
• van Kints, R.E.G.A.R., & Spoor, L.L.L. (2019). Leases on balance, a level playing field. Advances in Accounting, 44, 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2018.11.001.
• Weihrauch, D., Carodenuto, S., & Leipold, S. (2022). From voluntary to mandatory corporate accountability: the politics of the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act. Regulation & Governance. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12501.
• Wiejak-Roy, G.A. (2023). Strategic vendor due diligence in real estate transactions. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 16(1), 78-91. https://doi.org/10.1108/JERER-04-2022-0012.
• Will, U., & Manger-Nestler, C. (2021). Due diligence as a secondary rule of general international law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 34(2), 397-420. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156521000078.
• Yuan, S., Lan, H., & Seufert, J.H. (2020). FRC intervention, financial reporting quality and due diligence. Research in International Business and Finance, 52, 101128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101128.

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2023.034