PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2023 | Vol. 42, No 1 | 39--49
Tytuł artykułu

The Concept Pre-Incubation in Theory and Practice

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The concept of business pre-incubation is described in a residual way in the literature. The few articles defining what business pre-incubation is describe it as a service that enables an entrepreneur to test his or her business idea in real market conditions. The aim of this article will be to try to define and structure the concept of pre-incubation by pointing out its basic features, as well as to identify good practices for corporations that would decide to create a corporate incubator along the lines of the one described below. The objectives of the article will be achieved through an analysis of a pre-incubation project carried out at the end of 2021 and the beginning of 2022. The analysis will be carried out from the point of view of its participant, and through information from the organisers of this project in order to maintain a multi-faceted and broad view of the problematic of the concept of pre-incubation. By analysing existing definitions, listing the basic characteristics of pre-incubation and placing them in a real-life example, the conceptual and theoretical gap that exists in the science of about innovation, and the practical features of such a model of cooperation from the point of view of enterprises will be indicated. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Strony
39--49
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Bielicki, M. i Weinert, A. (2021). Corporate Pre-Incubator: New Platform for University-Business Collaboration. Lisbon: 16th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (ECIE2021).
  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston.
  • Grandstand, O. i Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition, Technovation, Volumes 90-91, February-March 2020. Technovation, Elsevier (90-91).
  • Griol Barres, I., Márquez Gómez, M., Giménez Carbó, E. i Gómez Martín, M. (2022). STARTUPV: Different approaches in mentoring and tutorship for entrepreneurs in the three stages of a university entrepreneurial ecosystem.Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.
  • Hunjet, A., Ivetić, E. i Kozina, G. (2018). The role of technology parks in the entrepreneurial process: The case of Technology Park Varaždin. Review of Innovation and Competitivness, IV(1).
  • Johnson, D. J. (2001). Success in innovation implementation. Journal of Communication Management , V(4), 341-359.
  • Massa, L., Tucci, C. L. i Afuah, A. (2016). A Critical Assessment of Business Model Research. Academy of Management Annals, XI(1), 9-10.
  • Mwandosya, G., Apiola, M. i Lahde, K. (2016). Building the Innovation Ecosystem in Tanzania: Four Viewpoints to Technology Business Incubation. 2016 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation/IEEE lnternational Technology Management Conference (ICE/ITMC).
  • Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61-80.
  • Przybył, D. i Grudzień, Ł. (2011). Preinkubacja i inkubacja: usługi wspierające rozwój studenta. Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług(63), 189-197.
  • Ries, E. (2017). Metoda Lean Startup. Gliwice.
  • Rudawska, J. (2020). The incubation programme as an instrument for supporting business ideas at university. An example from Poland. Zeszyty naukowe Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczo-Humanistycznego w Siedlcach, Seria: Administracja i Zarządzanie (52)(125).
  • Yoganandan, G. i Vignesh, T. (2017). Challenges of Young Entrepreneurs. Asia Pacific Journal of Research, I(56), 112-115.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171676343

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.