PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2023 | 31 | nr 4 | 495--510
Tytuł artykułu

CSR Initiatives in SMEs: Employee Perception and Their Influence on Employment Decisions

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN

Purpose - Nearly half of the surveyed SMEs in Poland admitted that there is a very strong competition on the market where they operate. Among the neuralgic factors they point to the lack of qualified employees (PARP, 2021). Companies can use CSR policies to attract competent employees and retain valuable ones. Therefore, the purpose of this research paper is to find out whether, according to employees working in SME companies, an active CSR policy influences their employment-related decisions.

Design/methodology/approach - The data were collected through questionnaires received from 618 employees of 29 SMEs in Poland through questionnaires, which were analyzed with the IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 and Microsoft Excel 2019.

Findings - The survey results provide evidence that CSR activities are an important factor in employees' decisions about potential employment and/or continued employment. In particular, the results show that almost all areas of CSR, except cooperation with the local communities, are important to employees. The survey also provides a clear answer as to which CSR initiatives benefiting employees of SME companies are the most important for them.

Originality/value - The conducted research fills a gap in CSR related studies on the SME sector in Poland. This is important, given the significant share of SME sector companies in the market in Poland and around the world.
(original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
31
Numer
Strony
495--510
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • AGH University of Science and Technology Kraków, Poland
  • AGH University of Science and Technology Kraków, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C., & Gananpathi, J. (2007). Putting the back in corporate social responsibility: A multi-level theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836-863.
  • Aguinis, H. & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and do not know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968. doi: 10.1177/0149206311436079.
  • Ahmed, M., Zehou, S., Raza, S. A., Qureshi, M. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2020). Impact of CSR and environmental triggers on employee green behavior: The mediating effect of employee WellBeing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2225-2239. doi: 10.1002/csr.1960.
  • Atakan, M. S., Burnaz, S., & Topcu, Y. I. (2008). An empirical investigation of the ethical perceptions of future managers with a special emphasis on gender - Turkish case. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2008), 573-586. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9577-z.
  • Backhaus, K. B., Stone, B. A., & Heiner, K. (2002). Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business and Society, 41(3), 292-318.
  • Choi, Y. H., Myung, J. K., & Kim, J. D. (2018). The effect of employees' perceptions of CSR activities on employee deviance: The mediating role of anomie. Sustainability, 10(601), 1-20. doi: 10.3390/su10030601.
  • Činčalová, S. & Jeřábková, E. (2021). Employee's perception of corporate social responsibility - evidence from the Czech Republic. Eastern Review, 10, 25-38.
  • Commission Recommendation (2003). Concerning the definition of micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes/business-friendly-environment/sme-definition_en
  • Coppa, M. & Sriramesh, K. (2013). Corporate social responsibility among SMEs in Italy. Public Relations Review, 39(1), 30-39. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.09.009.
  • Dawar, G. & Singh, S. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and gender diversity: A literature review corporate social responsibility and gender diversity. Journal of IMS Group, 13(1), 61-71.
  • Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239-263.
  • EFL (2019). Report: CSR w MŚP pod lupą. 41. Available from: https://efl.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Raport-EFL-o-CSR-2019-1.pdf%0Ahttps://odpowiedzialnybiznes.pl/dobre-praktyki/raport-pod-lupa-csr-w-msp/
  • EFL (2021). Report: Cyfrowa rewolucja. Available from: https://efl.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/efl_cyfrowa_rewolucja.pdf
  • European Commision (2021). Proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council amending directive 2013/34/EU. Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, as regards corporate sustainability reporting, 0104(537). Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri5CELEX: 52021PC0189andfrom5EN
  • European Commission (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for corporate social responsibility. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, 1-15. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri5CELEX: 52011DC0681&from5EN Francusko-Polska Izba Gospodarcza (2021). CSR w praktyce - barometr Francusko-Polskiej Izby Gospodarczej. VI edycja, 1-28. Available from: https://brief.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/CSR-w-praktyce-Barometr-CCIFP_2021_PL_D_S.pdf
  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
  • Furmańska-Maruszak, A. & Sudolska, A. (2017). Relacje z pracownikami jako obszar wdrażania CSR. Organizacja i Kierowanie, 2(176), 253-267.
  • Gazeta, M. S. P. (2023). Czas ułożyć przedsiębiorczość na nowo. Available from: https://biznes2biznes.com/materialy/GazetaMSP_07_2023/GazetaMSP_07-2023.pdf
  • Global Reporting Initiativ. Podręcznik Stosowania Wytycznych (2013). Wytyczne dotyczące raportowania. GRI Emprowering Sustainable Decisions, 1-267.
  • Gorgenyi-Hegyes, E., Nathan, R., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2021). Workplace health promotion, employee wellbeing and loyalty during covid-19 pandemic - large scale empirical evidence from Hungary. Economies, 9(55), 1-22.
  • GUS (2018). Kobiety i mężczyźni na rynku pracy. Warszawa. Available from: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/rynek-pracy/opracowania/kobiety-i-mezczyzni-na-rynku-pracy-2018,1,7.html.
  • Hąbek, P. (2017). CSR reporting practices in Visegrad group countries and the quality of disclosure. Sustainability, 9, 1-18. doi: 10.3390/su9122322.
  • Hajmásy, G. (2021). The evaluation of the CSR activities from the Hungarian hotel managers' point of view. International Journal of Spa and Wellness, 4(1), 17-35.
  • Hansen, S. D. & Dunford, B. B. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and the benefits of employee trust: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 29-45. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0903-0.
  • Hyršlová, J., Tomšík, P., & Vnoučková, L. (2017). Relation between sustainability - related communication and competitiveness in the chemical industry. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 65(1), 283-292. doi: 10.11118/actaun201765010283.
  • Jenkins, H. (2009). A 'business opportunity' model of corporate social responsibility for small and medium sized enterprises. Business Ethics, 18(1), 21-36.
  • Jones, D. A. (2010). Does serving the community also serve the company? Using organizational identification and social exchange theories to understand employee responses to a volunteerism programme.le. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 857-878.
  • Kahreh, M., Babania, A., Tive, M., & Mirmehdi, S. (2014). An examination to effects of gender differences on the corporate social responsibility (CSR). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 664-668. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.525.
  • Kaźmierczak, M. (2018). Ocena działań na rzecz pracowników w ramach w sektorze MSP. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 128, 177-189.
  • Khan, A., Latif, F., Jalal, W., & Rizwan, M. (2014). The impact of rewards and corporate social responsibility (CSR) on employee motivation. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 4(3), 70-86. doi: 10.5296/ijhrs.v4i3.5875.
  • Kim, H., Lee, H., & Kim, N. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and employee - company identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 557-569. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0440-2.
  • Kim, H. L., Rhou, Y., Uysal, M., & Kwon, N. (2017). An examination of the links between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its internal consequences. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 61, 26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.10.011.
  • Knippenberg, D. V. (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology, 49(3), 357-371.
  • Koch, C., Bekmeier-Feuerhahn, S., B€ogel, P. M., & Ulrike, A. (2019). Employees' perceived benefits from participating in CSR activities and implications for increasing employees engagement in CSR. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 1-16. doi: 10.1108/CCIJ-12-2017-0123.
  • Lee, E. M., Park, S., & Lee, H. J. (2012). Employee perception of CSR activities: Its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1716-1724, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.11.008.
  • Leoński, W. (2018). CSR w obszarze pracowniczym na przykładzie CFS. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Poznańskiej. Organizacja i Kierowanie, 76, 159-167. doi: 10.21008/j.0239-9415.2018.076.12.
  • Lin, C., Lyau, N., Tsai, Y., Chen, W., & Chiu, C. (2010). Modeling corporate citizenship and its relationship with organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 357-372. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0364-x.
  • Loor-Zambrano, H. Y., Santos-Roldan, L., & Palacios-Florencio, B. (2022). Relationship CSR and employee commitment: Mediating effects of internal motivation and trust. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28, 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100185.
  • Lu, H., Liu, X., Chen, H., Long, R., & Yue, T. (2017). Who contributed to "corporation green" in China? A view of public- and private-sphere pro-environmental behavior among employees. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 120, 166-175. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.12.008.
  • Maon, F., Swean, V., & De Roeck, K. (2021). Coporate branding and corporate social responsibility: Toward a multi-stakeholder interpretive perspective. Journal of Business Research, 126, 64-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.057.
  • Marić, S., Berber, N., Slavić, A., & Aleksić, M. (2021). The mediating role of employee commitment in the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm performance in Serbia. Sage Journals, 11(3), 1-17, doi: 10.1177/21582440211037668.
  • Metzker, Z. & Zvarikova, K. (2021). The perception of company employees by SMEs with CSR concept implementation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 9(1), 81-96. doi: 10.37335/ijek.v9i1.128.
  • Nazir, O., Ul, J., & Rahman, Z. (2021). Effect of CSR participation on employee sense of purpose and experienced meaningfulness: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 46, 123-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.12.002.
  • Onkila, T. & Sarna, B. (2022). A systematic literature review on employee relations with CSR: State of art and future research agenda. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(2), 435-447. doi: 10.1002/csr.2210.
  • PARP (2021). Raport o stanie sektora małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw w Polsce. Warszawa. Available from: https://www.parp.gov.pl/publications/publication/raport-o-stanie-sektora-malych-i-srednich-przedsiebiorstw-w-polsce
  • Pfajfar, G., Shoham, A., Ma, A., & Zalaznik, M. (2022). Value of corporate social responsibility for multiple stakeholders and social impact - relationship marketing perspective. Journal of Business Research, 143, 46-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.051.
  • Pingle, S. & Sodhi, H. K. (2014). What makes an attractive employer: Significant factors from employee perspective. Anvesha, 4(2), 18-25.
  • Przytuła, S., Formánková, S., Ubrežiová, I., & Dunay, A. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility in Visegrad Countries (Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary) Overall Landscape. In Długopolska-Mikonowicz, A., Przytuła, S., & Stehr, C. (Eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility in Poland. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Cham: Springer.
  • Rangan, K., Chase, L. A., & Karim, S. (2012). Why every company needs a CSR strategy and how to build it (pp. 1-7). Harvard Business School.
  • Remišová, A. & Búciová, Z. (2012). Measuring corporate social responsibility towards employees. Journal for East European Management Studies, 17(3), 273-291.
  • Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis q. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358-384. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005.
  • Rosati, F., Costa, R., Calabrese, A., & Pedersen, E. R. G. (2018). Employee attitudes towards corporate social responsibility: A study on gender, age and educational level differences. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1306-1319. doi: 10.1002/csr.1640.
  • Rupp, D. E. & Mallory, D. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: Psychological, person-centric, and progressing. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 211-238. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111505.
  • Sendlhofer, T. & Tolstoy, D. (2022). How employees shape CSR transparency: A sensemaking perspective. Journal of Business Research, 150, 268-278. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.074
  • Shen, J. & Benson, J. (2016). When CSR is a social norm: How socially responsible human resource management affects employee work behavior. Journal of Management, 42(6), 1723-1746. doi: 10.1177/0149206314522300.
  • Silva, K. M., Sriyani, C., & Lokuwaduge, D. S. (2021). Impact of corporate social responsibility practices on employee commitment. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(1), 1-14. doi: 10.1108/SRJ-01-2019-0027.
  • Sims, R. L. & Keon, T. L. (1997). Ethical work climate as a factor in the development of person-organization fit. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(11), 1095-1105. doi: 10.1023/A:1017914502117.
  • Skudiene, V. & Auruskeviciene, V. (2022). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to internal employee motivation (2012). Baltic Journal of Management, 7(1), 49-67. doi: 10.1108/17465261211197421.
  • Slack, R., Corlett, S., & Moris, R. (2015). Exploring employee engagement with (corporate) social responsibility: A social exchange perspective on organisational participation. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 537-548.
  • Smith, W. J., Wokutch, R. E., Harrington, K. V., & Dennis, B. S. (2001). An examination of the influence of diversity and stakeholder role on corporate social orientation. Business and Society, 40(3), 266-294.
  • Social Accountability International (2016). Guidance Document for social accountability 8000, 1-138. Available from: https://sa-intl.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/SA8000-2014-Guidance-Document.pdf
  • Szelągowska-Rudzka, K. (2016). Actions objected at employees in CSR - report from the study. Management, 20(2), 143-159. doi: 10.1515/manment-2015-0056.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (Eds.), The Social Psychofogy of Intergroirp Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (2004). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings. Psychology Press.
  • Tziner, A. (2013). Corporative social responsibility (CSR) activities in the workplace: A comment on aguinis and Glavas. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(2), 91-93, doi: 10.5093/tr2013a13.
  • Woźniak, J. (2017). Wpływ informacji o działaniach CSR firmy na decyzje jej potencjalnych pracowników różnej płci. Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, 1(114), 118-134.
  • Zastempowski, M. & Cyfert, S. (2021). Social responsibility of SMEs from the perspective of their innovativeness: Evidence from Poland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 317, 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128400.
  • Zieliński, M. (2014). Korzyści z wdrożenia koncepcji CSR w zarządzaniu zasobami ludzkimi. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 74, 653-663
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171677961

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.