PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2023 | z. 4 (70) | 379--390
Tytuł artykułu

Poultry Farmers' Preferences for Solar Photovoltaics as a Major Source of Energy in Oyo State, Nigeria

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Amidst rising food insecurity, Nigerians are confronted with the problem of an insufficient grid supply of electricity to support active development of the economy. The problem has lingered as fuel prices have surged following the Nigerian Government's declaration of the cessation of fuel import subsidies. However, solar photovoltaics remain a competitive alternative given their growing popularity; thus, having more insight into farmers' preferences for solar PV will allow suppliers and the government to develop products that can help stimulate business viability as well as energy policy. This study examined poultry farmers' preferences for solar photovoltaics as a major source of energy in Oyo State. Primary data were obtained from 150 poultry farmers using multistage sampling. Results from the choice models show that as the capacity of solar systems increases, the likelihood of choosing an alternative over the status quo also increases. The brand variable was also significant, indicating the relevance of certain brands to farmers' choices. The cost parameter was negative, which means there is an inverse relationship between price and the selection of an alternative. Also, farms with more birds (>1000), higher incomes and educated farmers were more likely to adopt solar PV than other current options. Further implications of the results are discussed.(original abstract)
(abstrakt oryginalny)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
379--390
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • University of Ibadan, Nigeria; Centre for Econometrics and Applied Research, Ibadan, Nigeria
  • University of Ibadan, Nigeria
Bibliografia
  • Adamu, F. (2020). Using Data to Drive Strategy: A Framework for Clean Technology.
  • Aizaki, H., Nakatani, T., Sato, K. (2014). Stated preference methods using R (1st Ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. Retrieved from: https://www.crcpress.com/Stated- -Preference-Methods-Using-R/Aizaki-Nakatani-Sato/p/ book/9781439890479
  • Arora, R.S., Brent, D.A., Jaenicke, E.C. (2020). Is india ready for alt-meat? Preferences and willingness to pay for meat alternatives. Sustainability, 12(11), 4377. https://doi. org/10.3390/su12114377
  • Atilgan, A., Koknaroglu, H. (2006). Cultural energy analysis on broilers reared in different capacity poultry houses. Italian J. Animal Sci., 5, 393-400. https://doi.org/10.4081/ ijas.2006.393
  • Bag, S., Rahman, M.S., Srivastava, G., Chan, H.L., Bryde, D.J. (2022). The role of big data and predictive analytics in developing a resilient supply chain network in the South African mining industry against extreme weather events. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 251, 108541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijpe.2022.108541
  • Bao, Q., Sinitskaya, E., Gomez, K.J., MacDonald, E.F., Yang, M.C. (2020). A human-centered design approach to evaluating factors in residential solar PV adoption: A survey of homeowners in California and Massachusetts. Renew. Energy, 151, 503-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. renene.2019.11.047
  • Bhadauria, P., Kataria, J.M., Majumdar, S., Bhanja, S.K., Kolluri, G. (2014). Impact of hot climate on poultry production system-a review thermoregulatory mechanism of poultry. J. Poult. Sci. Technol., 2(4), 56-63. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/10044750/Impact_of_Hot_Climate_on_Poultry_Production_System-A_Review
  • Byrne, J., Kurdegelashvili, L., Hegedus, S., Zhang, X., Walker, R., Salisbury, M., Hromiko, R., Schreiber, J. (2009). Creating A Solar City. Determining the potential of solar rooftop systems in the City of Newark (Issue August). Retrieved from: http://ceep.udel.edu
  • Campo, J.L., Gil, M.G., Dávila, S.G. (2005). Effects of specific noise and music stimuli on stress and fear levels of laying hens of several breeds. Appl. Anim. Beh. Sci., 91(1-2), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.028
  • Cui, Y., Xue, X., Riffat, S. (2021). Cost Effectiveness of Poultry Production by Sustainable and Renewable Energy Source. Meat Nutr. https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHO- PEN.97543Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2020). Poultry Sector Study Nigeria. Netherlands Enterprise Agency.
  • Elegbede, O., Kerr, J., Richardson, R., Sanou, A. (2021). Using a choice experiment to understand preferences in off-grid solar electricity attributes: The case of Nigerian households. Energy Sustain. Dev., 60, 33-39. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.esd.2020.12.001
  • Emili, S., Ceschin, F., Harrison, D. (2016). Product-Service System applied to Distributed Renewable Energy: A classification system, 15 archetypal models and a strategic design tool. Energy Sustain. Dev., 32, 71-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2016.03.004
  • FAO (2018). Livestock and livelihoods spotlight NIGERIA: cattle and poutry sectors. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1-12. Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/3/CA2149EN/ca2149en.pdf
  • FAO (2022). FAO in Nigeria. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from: https://www.fao.org/nigeria/fao-in-nigeria/nigeria-at-a-glance/en/
  • Fiebig, D.G., Keane, M.P., Louviere, J., Wasi, N. (2010). The generalized multinomial logit model: Accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Market. Sci., 29(3), 393-421. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1090.0508
  • Gerber, P., Opio, C., Steinfeld, H. (2007). Poultry production and the environment-A review. FAO, January, 1-27. Re- trieved from: http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/home/events/ bangkok2007/docs/part2/2_2.pdf
  • Ghijben, P., Lancsar, E., Zavarsek, S. (2014). Preferences for Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: a Best-Best Discrete Choice Experiment. PharmacoEconomics, 32(11), 1115-1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-014-0188-0
  • Guardian, T. (2023). Third of world economy to hit recession in 2023, IMF head warns. International Monetary Fund (IMF). The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.the- guardian.com/business/2023/jan/02/third-of-world-econ- omy-to-hit-recession-in-2023-imf-head-warns
  • Guenette, J.D., Kenworthy, P.G., Wheeler, C.M. (2022). Im- plications of the war in Ukraine for the global economy. https://doi.org/10.1596/37372
  • Heise, H., Crisan, A., Theuvsen, L. (2015). The poultry market in Nigeria: Market structures and potential for investment in the market. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev., 18(Spe- cialIssueA), 197-222.
  • JUMIA Nigeria. (2022). Shop All Products - TVs, Laptops, Fashion Items | Jumia Nigeria. Retrieved from: https:// www.jumia.com.ng/catalog/?q=solar+generators
  • Karekezi, S., Kithyoma, W. (2002). Renewable energy strategies for rural Africa: Is a PV-led renewable energy strategy the right approach for providing modern energy to the rural poor to sub-Saharan Africa? Energ. Pol., 30(11-12), 1071-1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301- 4215(02)00059-9
  • Lancsar, E., Fiebig, D.G., Hole, A.R. (2017). Discrete choice experiments: A guide to model specification, estimation and software. PharmacoEconomics, 35(7), 697-716. htt- ps://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0506-4
  • Liang, C., Umar, M., Ma, F., Huynh, T.L.D. (2022). Climate policy uncertainty and world renewable energy index volatility forecasting. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 182, 121810. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2022.121810
  • Liverpool-Tasie, L.S.O., Sanou, A., Tambo, J.A. (2019). Climate change adaptation among poultry farmers: evidence from Nigeria. Clim. Change, 157(3-4), 527-544. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02574-8
  • McFadden, D., Train, K. (2000). Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J. Appl. Econ., 15(5), 447-470. https:// doi.org/10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5<447::aid- jae570>3.0.co;2-1
  • Monyei, C., Adewumi, A., Obolo, M.O., Sajou, B. (2018). Nigeria's energy poverty: Insights and implications for smart policies and framework towards a smart Nigeria electricity network. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 81, 1, 1582-1601 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2017.05.237
  • Nigeria at a glance | FAO in Nigeria | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (n.d.). Retrieved Jan 4rd 2022 from: https://www.fao.org/nigeria/fao-in-nigeria/ nigeria-at-a-glance/en/
  • Nyoni, N.M.B., Grab, S., Archer, E.R.M. (2019). Heat stress and chickens: climate risk effects on rural poultry farming in low-income countries. In: Clim. Dev., 11, 1, 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2018.1442792
  • O'Connor, E.A., Parker, M.O., Davey, E.L., Grist, H., Owen, R.C., Szladovits, B., Demmers, T. G.M., Wathes, C.M., Abeyesinghe, S.M. (2011). Effect of low light and high noise on behavioural activity, physiological indicators of stress and production in laying hens. Brit. Poult. Sci., 52(6), 666-674. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2011.6 39342
  • Obike, K.C., Amusa, T.A., Olowolafe, H.B. (2018). Risk management and determinants of farm output among small scale poultry farmers in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Agro- Science, 16(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.4314/as.v16i2.2
  • Ohunakin, O.S., Adaramola, M.S., Oyewola, O.M., Fagben- le, R.O. (2014). Solar energy applications and development in Nigeria: Drivers and barriers. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 32, 294-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. rser.2014.01.014
  • Olanrewaju, A., Animashaun, O., Nabinta, R. (2020). Analysis of the Factors Militating Against Broiler Production in Abeokuta North Local Goverment Area of Ogun State, Nigeria. FUDMA J. Agric. Agricult. Technol. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341354254_ANALYSIS_OF_THE_FACTORS_MILITATING_AGAINST_BROILER_PRODUCTION_IN_ABEOKUTA_NORTH_LOCAL_GOV-ERNMENT_AREA_OF_OGUN_STATE_NIGERIA
  • Oyedepo, S.O. (2012). Energy and sustainable development in Nigeria: the way forward. Energy Sustain. Soc., 1-17. https://energsustainsoc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2192-0567-2-15
  • Pishgar-Komleh, S.H., Akram, A., Keyhani, A., van Zelm, R. (2017). Life cycle energy use, costs, and greenhouse gas emission of broiler farms in different production systems in Iran-a case study of Alborz province. Env. Sci. Poll. Res., 24, 16041-16049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356- 017-9255-3
  • Renerworld (2022). Renerworld Products | Solar Energy system, Renerlite, Solar Panels, Inverter, Lithium-Ion Battery. Retrieved from: https://www.renerworld.com/products
  • Rommel, J., Sagebiel, J., Müller, J.R. (2016). Quality uncertainty and the market for renewable energy: Evidence from German consumers. Renew. Energy, 94, 106-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2016.03.049
  • Sagebiel, J. (2017). Preference heterogeneity in energy discrete choice experiments: A review on methods for model selection. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 69, 804-811. htt- ps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.138
  • Sagebiel, J., Rommel, K. (2014). Preferences for electricity supply attributes in emerging megacities - Policy implications from a discrete choice experiment of private house-holds in Hyderabad, India. Energy Sustain. Dev., 21, 89- 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2014.06.002
  • Salisu, S., Salisu, S., Mustafa, M., Olatomiwa, L., Mohammed, O. (2019). Assessment of technical and economic feasibility for a hybrid PV-wind-diesel-battery energy ystem in a remote community of north central Nigeria. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.09.013
  • Štreimikienė, D. (2021). Developmen. United Nations. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.GROW? locations=NG
  • Trotter, P.A. (2016). Rural electrification, electrification inequality and democratic institutions in sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Sustain. Dev., 34, 111-129. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.esd.2016.07.008
  • Trotter, P.A., McManus, M.C., Maconachie, R. (2017). Electricity planning and implementation in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. "Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews", 74(March), 1189-1209. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.001
  • Uzoma, C.C., Ibeto, C.N., Nnaji, C., Okala, N.O. (2010). The role of renewable energy resources in poverty alleviation in Nigeria. Contin. J. Soc. Sci., 3, 31-37. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232282799_ The_Role_of_Renewable_Energy_Resources_in_Poverty_Alleviation_and_Sustainable_Development_in_Ni- geria
  • Yao, L., Sui, B. (2020). Heterogeneous preferences for shale water management: Evidence from a choice experiment in Fuling shale gas field, southwest China. Energy Policy, 147, 111831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111831
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171678891

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.