Public Network Models : a Typology Based on a Systematic Literature Review

• Autorzy: Beata Barczak

Warianty tytułu

Modele sieci publicznych - typologia oparta na systematycznym przeglądzie literatury

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Objective: The article develops, based on a systematic literature review (SLR), a typology of public network models. It interprets the concept and specificity of a public network. Finally, it reviews the typology of organisational network models and indicates the directions for further research.
Research Design & Methods: The methodology of systematic literature review was used, supplemented by snowball sampling. To obtain data, the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) scientific databases were analysed. The results were then synthesised to develop a typology for public networks. Typological analysis was used in addition to SLR and snowball sampling.
Findings: As a result of a systematic review of the literature, a typology of public network models was reviewed and a typology proposed. The theoretical function of the typology is an indication of trends in the development of public network models, while its practical function is as a tool for further analysis.
Implications/Recommendations: The analysis shows that public networks differ from other networks, such as business networks. The breakdown of public network models is multi-layered and may include various criteria. The typology developed for the paper covers four types of public networks: global public networks, networks of public organisations, local government networks, and partnerships.
Contribution: The issues discussed in the paper fill the research and methodological gap in research on public networks. This gap is a stark lack of theory and conceptualisation in studying such networks. The paper defines the role of the network approach as an emerging paradigm in the management of the public sphere, and that is its main contribution. (original abstract)

Cel: Celem artykułu jest opracowanie - na podstawie systematycznego przeglądu literatury (SLR) - propozycji typologii modeli sieci publicznych. Dokonano interpretacji pojęcia sieci publicznej i określenia jej specyfiki, a także przeglądu typologii modeli sieci organizacyjnych. Wskazano również kierunki dalszych badań.
Metodyka badań: Wykorzystano metodykę systematycznego przeglądu literatury, uzupełnionego metodą "kuli śnieżnej". SLR zastosowany został w celu głębszego zrozumienia badanego zjawiska, a także przedstawienia zaleceń dotyczących dalszych badań. Jako źródła danych wybrano bazy Scopus i Web of Science (WoS). Dokonano syntezy analizowanych wyników w celu opracowania typologii sieci publicznych. Oprócz SLR główną metodą badawczą była metoda typologii (analiza typologiczna).
Wyniki badań: Na podstawie systematycznego przeglądu literatury dokonano przeglądu typologii modeli sieci publicznych oraz zaproponowano własną typologię. Pełni ona zarówno funkcję teoretyczną poprzez wskazanie trendów rozwoju modeli sieci publicznych, jak i praktyczną, stanowiąc narzędzie do kolejnych analiz. Wskazano także kierunki dalszych badań.
Wnioski: Z przedstawionych rozważań wynika, że sieci publiczne mają swoją specyfikę i znacząco różnią się od innych rodzajów sieci, np. sieci biznesowych. Podział modeli sieci publicznych jest wielopoziomowy i może obejmować różne kryteria. Opracowana typologia obejmuje cztery rodzaje sieci publicznych: globalne sieci publiczne, sieci organizacji publicznych, sieci samorządowe oraz partnerstwa.
Wkład w rozwój dyscypliny: Podjęta problematyka wypełnia lukę badawczą i metodologiczną w badaniach nad sieciami publicznymi. Obecnie luka ta stanowi poważny niedostatek teorii konsensusu i konceptualizacji w badaniach takich sieci. Wkład w rozwój dyscypliny nauki o zarządzaniu i jakości polega na określeniu roli podejścia sieciowego jako wyłaniającego się paradygmatu w zarządzaniu sferą publiczną. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Typology; Public network; Literature review

PL

Typologia; Sieć publiczna; Przegląd literatury

• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie
• Rocznik: 2023
• Numer: nr 3 (1001)
• Strony: 27--45

Twórcy

autor

Beata Barczak

• Krakow University of Economics

Bibliografia

• Agranoff R., McGuire M. (2001), Big Questions in Public Network Management Research, "Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory", vol. 11(3), https://doi.org/10.1093/ oxfordjournals.jpart.a003504.
• Akkerman A., Torenvlied R., Schalk J. (2012), Two-level Effects of Interorganizational Network Collaboration on Graduate Satisfaction: A Comparison of Five Intercollege Networks in Dutch Higher Education, "American Review of Public Administration", vol. 42(6), https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011425418.
• Austen A. (2014), Efektywność sieci publicznych. Podejście wielopoziomowe, CH. Beck, Warszawa.
• Austen A. (2018), In Search of Network Sustainability: A Multi-level Perspective on the Paradox of Cooperation and Competition in Networks, "Sustainability", vol. 10(7), https:// doi.org/10.3390/su10072466.
• Bianchi P., Trimigno M. (2021), How Does Information System Success Come about in Inter-organizational Networks of Public Services?, "Public Money and Management", vol. 41(3), https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1665361.
• Blanco I., Lowndes V., Pratchett L. (2011), Policy Networks and Governancen: Towards Greater Conceptual Clarity, "Political Studies Review", vol. 3(9), https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1478-9302.2011.00239.x.
• Chen B. (2010), Antecedents or Processes? Determinants of Perceived Effectiveness of Interorganizational Collaboration for Public Service Delivery, "International Public Management Journal", vol. 13(4), https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2010.524836.
• Dudau A. I., Favotto A., Kominis G., Sicilia M. (2020), Building Trust in Public Sector Networks: The Role of Rhetoric and Persuasion, "Financial Accountability and Management", vol. 36(2), https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12229.
• Favoreu C., Carassus D., Maurel C. (2016), Strategic Management in the Public Sector: A Rational, Political or Collaborative Approach?, "International Review of Administrative Sciences", vol. 82(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315578410.
• Feiock R. C., Lee I. W., Park H. J. (2012), Administrators' and Elected Officials' Collaboration Networks: Selecting Partners to Reduce Risk in Economic Development, "Public Administration Review", vol. 72(1), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02659.x.
• Ford R. C., Yoho K. D. (2020), The Government's Role in Creating an Innovation Ecosystem: The Springfield Armory as Hub in the Connecticut River Valley, "Journal of Management History", vol. 26(4), https://doi.org/ 10.1108/JMH-02-2020-0016.
• Forouharfar A., Rowshan S. A., Salarzehi H. (2019), Social Entrepreneurship Strategic Grid: Visualizing Classification, Orientation and Dimensionality in the Strategic Paradigms of Governmental-scale Social Entrepreneurship (A Literature-based Approach), "Cogent Business & Management", vol. 6(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1644714.
• Ha H., Lee I. W., Feiock R. C. (2016), Organizational Network Activities for Local Economic Development, "Economic Development Quarterly", vol. 30(1), http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/0891242415614100.
• Herranz J. (2009), Endogenous Development Dynamics of Multisectoral Networks, "International Public Management Journal", vol. 12(3), https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490 903094145.
• Hudson B. (2004), Analysing Network Partnerships: Benson Re-Visited, "Public Management Review", vol. 6(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675740.
• Isett K. R., Mergel I. A., LeRoux K. Mischen P. A., Rethemeyer R. K. (2011), Networks in Public Administration Scholarship: Understanding Where We Are and Where We Need To Go, "Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory", vol. 21(1), https://doi.org/10.1093/ jopart/muq061.
• Kapucu N., Garayev V. (2013), Designing, Managing, and Sustaining Functionally Collaborative Emergency Management Networks, "American Review of Public Administration", vol. 43(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012444719.
• Kenis P. N., Provan K. G. (2009), Towards an Exogenous Theory of Public Network Performance, "Public Administration", vol. 87(3), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299. 2009.01775.x.
• Kim Y., Lee K., Oh S. S., Park H. (2022), Effectiveness of Emergent Ad Hoc Coordination Groups in Public Health Emergencies, "Risk Analysis", vol. 42(1), https://doi.org/10.1111/ risa.13751.
• Kitchenham B. A., Charters S. (2007), Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering, Keele University and Durham University Joint Report, Retrieved from http://www.cs.ecu.edu/gudivada/research/papers/guidelines-for-se-literature-reviews-summary.pdf (accessed: October 2022).
• Klijn E. H. (2008), Governance and Governance Networks in Europe: An Assessment of 10 Years of Research on the Theme, "Public Management Review", vol. 10(4), https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14719030802263954.
• Klijn E. H., Steijn B., Edelenbos J. (2010), The Impact of Network Management on Outcomes in Governance Networks, "Public Administration", vol. 88(4), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9299.2010.01826.x.
• Kruckenberg L. J. (2015), Renewable Energy Partnerships in Development Cooperation: Towards a Relational Understanding of Technical Assistance, "Energy Policy", vol. 77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.004.
• Mandell M. P., Keast R. L. (2007), Evaluating Network Arrangements: Toward Revised Performance Measures, "Public Performance and Management Review", vol. 30(4), https:// doi.org/10.1080/14719030802423079.
• McGuire M. (2006), Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It, "Public Administration Review", vol. 66(1), https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1540-6210.2006.00664.x.
• McGuire M., Silvia C. (2009), Does Leadership in Networks Matter? Examining the Effect of Leadership Behavior on Managers' Perceptions of Network Effectiveness, "Public Performance and Management Review", vol. 33(1), https://www.jstor.org/stable/40586753.
• Mountford N. (2019), Managing by Proxy: Organizational Networks as Institutional Levers in Evolving Public Good Markets, "Journal of Business Research", vol. 98, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.033.
• Niemczyk J. (2006), Wyróżniki, budowa i zachowania układów outsourcingowych, Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu. Seria: Monografie i Opracowania, nr 1111.
• Oord S. van den, Vanlaer N., Marynissen H., Brugghemans B., Roey J. V, Albers S., Cambré B. (2020), Network of Networks: Preliminary Lessons from the Antwerp Port Authority on Crisis Management and Network Governance to Deal with the COVID-19 Pandemic, "Public Administration Review", vol. 80(5), https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13256.
• Provan K. G., Kenis P. (2008), Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness, "Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory", vol. 18(2), https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015.
• Provan K., Lemaire R. H. (2012), Core Concepts and Key Ideas for Understanding Public Sector Organizational Networks: Using Research to Inform Scholarship and Practice, "Public Administration Review", vol. 72(5), https://doi.org/10.2307/41687977.
• Provan, K. G., Milward H. B. (1995), A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems, "Administrative Science Quarterly", vol. 40(1), https://doi.org/10.2307/2393698.
• Provan K. G., Milward H. B. (2001), Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public Sector Organizational Networks, "Public Administration Review", vol. 61(4), https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00045.
• Sandström A., Carlsson L. (2008), The Performance of Policy Networks: The Relation Between Network Structure and Network Performan, "The Policy Studies Journal", vol. 36(4), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00281.x.
• Sieci międzyorganizacyjne. Współczesne wyzwania dla teorii i praktyki zarządzania (2012), J. Niemczyk, E. Stańczyk-Hugiet, B. Jasiński (eds), C.H. Beck, Warszawa.
• Ujwary-Gil A. (2017), Intra-organizational Two-mode Networks Analysis of a Public Organization, "Economics and Sociology", vol. 10(3), https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X. 2017/10-3/14.
• Van de Ven A. H., Walker G. (1984), The Dynamics of Interorganizational Coordination, "Administrative Science Quarterly", vol. 29(4), https://doi.org/10.2307/2392941.
• Vigolo V., Sallaku R., Testa, F. (2018), Drivers and Barriers to Clean Cooking: A Systematic Literature Review from a Consumer Behavior Perspective, "Sustainability", vol. 10(11), https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114322.
• Voets J., Dooren W., Rynck, F. van (2008), A Framework for Assessing the Performance of Policy Networks, "Public Management Review", vol. 10(6), https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14719030802423129.
• Whitford A. B., Milward H. B., Galaskiewicz J., Khademian A. M. (2020), A Place at the Table: Organization Theory and Public Management, "Perspectives on Public Management and Governance", vol. 3(2), https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvaa008.
• Zhang W., Banerji S. (2017), Challenges of Servitization: A Systematic Literature Review, "Industrial Marketing Management", vol. 65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.06.003.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15678/ZNUEK.2023.1001.0302