Systemic Business Continuity Management in the Process of Building the Organization's Resilience and Improving Its Security. Experience of the Organization in Poland

• Autorzy: Aneta Wysokińska-Senkus , Krystian Lechański , Jakub Malinowski
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Aim: The article aimed to present the essence of the systemic approach to business continuity management (BCMS - Business Continuity Management System) and to determine the level of maturity of business continuity systems implemented in small and medium-sized enterprises about selected groups of external threats, corresponding to current economic, political and legal conditions. Project/methodology/approach: The subject of this study is an analysis based on the available resources in the literature and the results of the conducted empirical study. Findings: As a result of the literature study, it has been proven that organizations are exposed to many threats that affect business continuity to varying degrees. The fundamental element of organizational prevention at the operational level is the business continuity plan, which defines response mechanisms in the event of an incident or crisis that negatively affects the stability of implemented projects. The analysis of the research results indicated that the primary response mechanism established in modern organizations transfers the burden of the effects of the crisis to employees, as it is related to the performance of professional duties using remote communication methods and techniques. Research limitations/implications: The primary research limitation was the difficulty in obtaining a representative research sample, which is why it was decided to limit the scope of the research and carry it out in enterprises belonging to high-tech industries. Bearing in mind that the scope of the study referred to conditions which, due to the increased uncertainty of the general (intermediate) environment, are subject to changes and improvement of modern management systems, it is recommended to conduct the research again in other economic sectors. Expanding the study's scope will allow the development of a catalogue of good practices, including a more comprehensive catalogue of threats to the continuity of modern business organizations. Originality/value: The article presents previously untested mechanisms ensuring business continuity about current threats - blackout and energy lockdown. The analyses contained therein may be the basis for improving internal crisis response systems, especially in small and medium-sized enterprises. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Operational risk; Business continuity; System management

PL

Ryzyko operacyjne; Ciągłość biznesowa; Zarządzanie systemowe

• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2023
• Numer: z. 175 Contemporary management = Współczesne zarządzanie
• Strony: 671--685

Twórcy

autor

Aneta Wysokińska-Senkus

• War Studies University, Poland

autor

Krystian Lechański

• War Studies University, Poland

autor

Jakub Malinowski

• War Studies University, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2006). International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework, BIS. https://www.bis.org/ publ/bcbs18.htm, 5.02.2023.
• 2. Burtles J. (2014). Crisis Management: A Guide to Incident Management, Continuity Management't and Disaster Recovery. Rothstein Publishing.
• 3. Charoenthammachoke, K., Leelawat, N., Tang, J., Kodaka, A. (2020). Business continuity management: A preliminary systematic literature review based on ScienceDirect database. Journal of Disaster Research, 15(5), 546-555.
• 4. Corrales-Estrada, A.M., Gómez-Santos, L.L., Bernal-Torres, C.A., Rodriguez-López, J.E. (2021). Sustainability and resilience organizational capabilities to enhance business continuity management: A literature review. Sustainability, 13(15), 8196.
• 5. Drescher D. (2018). Blockchain Basics: A Non-Technical Introduction in 25 Steps. Apress.
• 6. Gołąb, P. (2009). Zarządzanie ryzykiem ciągłości działania w firmach ubezpieczeniowych. Warszawa: Polska Izba Ubezpieczeń.
• 7. Goldstein, M., Flynn, S. (2022). Business continuity management lessons learned from COVID-19. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning, 15(4), 360-380.
• 8. Grzesiowski, M. (2000). Zarządzanie przez kryzysy. In: K. Perechuda, K. (ed.), Zarzadzanie Przedsiębiorstwem Przyszłości (p. 203). Warszawa: Agencja Wydawnicza PLACET.
• 9. Herbane, B. (2010). The evolution of business continuity management: A historical review of practices and drivers. Business History, 52(6), 978-1002.
• 10. Kawano, T., Li, Y. (2017). A Study on Smart Business Continuity Management for Near Future Cities. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 16(1), 1-8. doi: 10.3130/jaabe.16.1.
• 11. Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management Metrics, KPIs, and Dashboards: A Guide to Measuring and Monitoring Project Performance. Wiley.
• 12. Krupa, W.L. (2017). Zarządzanie ochroną pracy. In: A. Kowerski (ed.), Meritum bezpieczeństwo i higiena pracy. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
• 13. Krzakiewicz, K. (2008). Podstawowe problemy zarządzania antykryzysowego. In: R. Krupski (ed.), Zarządzanie strategiczne. Podstawowe problemy. Wałbrzych: WWSZiP.
• 14. Kułaga-Boczko, A. (2022). Szok cenowy na europejskim rynku gazowym w 2021 roku - dominacja Rosji i wpływ innych zjawisk globalnych. In: A. Daniluk, P. Stawarz, A. Wierzbicki (eds.), Numer Jubileuszowy Dedykowany Profesorowi Józefowi Tymanowskiemu. Warszawa.
• 15. Labus, M. (2017). E-business Continuity Management in Insurance Sector. 7th International Conference on Information Society and Technology ICIST 2017. https://www.eventiotic.com/eventiotic/files/Papers/URL/f773e45b-4654-47dc-9e82-040ba4e459c6.pdf, 5.05.2023.
• 16. Lindstedt, D., Armour, M. (2018). Adaptive Business Continuity: A New Approach. Rothstein Publishing.
• 17. Niemimaa, M., Järveläinen, J., Heikkilä, M., Heikkilä, J. (2019). Business continuity of business models: Evaluating the resilience of business models for contingencies. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 208-216.
• 18. Nuczyński, A., Jabłoński, S., Kobryń, A. (2017). Zarządzanie ciągłością działania w organizacjach. Warszawa: PWN.
• 19. Pinto, D., Fernandes, A., da Silva, M.M., Pereira, R. (2022). Maturity models for business continuity-A systematic literature review. Maturity models for business continuity - A systematic literature review, 1, 123-136.
• 20. Romanowska, M. (2010). Przełomy strategiczne w przedsiębiorstwie. Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów, z. 98. Szkoła Główna Handlowa, pp. 7-15.
• 21. Rządowe Centrum Bezpieczeństwa (2021). Krajowy plan zarządzania kryzysowego 2021/2022, część A. Warszawa, p. 27. https://www.gov.pl/web/rcb/krajowy-plan-zarzadzania-kryzysowego, 5.02.2023.
• 22. Zapłata, S. (2012). Systemowe zarządzanie ciągłością działania BS 25999 w działalności usługowej. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, nr 722. Szczecin, p. 248.
• 23. Zawiła-Niedźwiecki, J., Gołąb, P. (2010). Zapewnianie ciągłości działania jako ograniczanie ryzyka operacyjnego. In: P. Gołąb, L. Gąsiorkiewicz, J. Monkiewicz (eds.), Zarządzanie ryzykiem działalności organizacji. Warszawa: CH Beck.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2023.175.42