Evaluation of the Electronic Port Right of Way Payment Information System

• Autorzy: Chafik Bensfia , Ahmed Bouklata
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In a connected and uncertain world, where almost two thirds of the world's population are now online, the integration of digital tools in the social and economic context is becoming a priority and an imposed choice for any organization. As a result, the strategic position of the Information System (IS) in these organizations is necessarily linked to performance. The creation of added value or net benefits through the use of these platforms becomes an ultimate and strategic objective for any organization. This study evaluates the success of the information system (IS) for electronic payment of port fees. From a quantitative approach of a hypothetico-deductive nature and using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), we found that the success of the IS implies a quality of the electronic payment system, as well as the information produced influences the use and satisfaction of the users and finally these last two findings impact the individual and organizational performance of the organizations. (Net benefits). (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Information system; Evaluation criteria; Electronic payments

PL

System informacyjny; Kryteria oceny; Elektroniczne płatności

• Czasopismo: Management Systems in Production Engineering
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: 31
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 254--262

Twórcy

autor

Chafik Bensfia

• Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco

autor

Ahmed Bouklata

• Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco

Bibliografia

• [1] F. Bélanger, M. Cefaratti, T. Carte, S.E. Markham, «Multilevel research in information systems: Concepts, strategies, problems, and pitfalls», Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 15, n 9, pp. 614-650, 2014, doi: 10.17705/1jais.00371.
• [2] G.L. Porter, «Davis and Olson," Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure, and Development", (Book Review)», The Accounting Review, vol. 61, n 2, p. 353, 1986.
• [3] S. Hamilton et N.L. Chervany, «Evaluating information system effectiveness-Part I: Comparing evaluation approaches», MIS quarterly, pp. 55-69, 1981.
• [4] S. Michel, «Contribution à l'évaluation du système d'information bancaire», 2011.
• [5] X. Gong, C.M.K. Cheung, S. Liu, K.Z.K. Zhang, M.K.O. Lee, «Battles of mobile payment networks: The impacts of network structures, technology complementarities and institutional mechanisms on consumer loyalty», Information Systems Journal, vol. 32, n 4, pp. 696-728, 2022, doi: 10.1111/isj.12366.
• [6] R. Reix, B. Fallery, M. Kalika, F. Rowe, «Systèmes d'Information et Management des Organisations-7ème édition», 2016.
• [7] E. Lamarque, Gouvernance et prise de décision: Les questions qui dérangent. Editions Eyrolles, 2011.
• [8] R.P. Bostrom J.S. Heinen, «MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective. Part I: The causes», MIS quarterly, pp. 17-32, 1977.
• [9] S. Michel F. Cocula, «L'évaluation des systèmes d'information: un état de l'art à la lumière des approches de la variance et processuelles», Management Avenir, n 8, pp. 33-51, 2014.
• [10] H. Jomaa, «Contribution de l'usage des systèmes d'information à la performance des organisations», 2009.
• [11] J. Żywiołek, J. Rosak-Szyrocka, B. Jereb, «Barriers to Knowledge Sharing in the Field of Information Security», Management Systems in Production Engineering, vol. 29, n 2, pp. 114-119, juin 2021, doi: 10.2478/mspe-2021-0015.
• [12] J.E. Triplett, «The Solow Productivity Paradox: What do Computers do to Productivity?», The Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'Economique, vol. 32, n 2, pp. 309-334, 1999, doi: 10.2307/136425.
• [13] J. Yannis Bakos C.F. Kemerer, «Recent applications of economic theory in information Technology research»,Decision Support Systems, vol. 8, n 5, pp. 365-386, sept. 1992, doi: 10.1016/0167-9236(92)90024-J.
• [14] W.H. DeLone E.R. McLean, «The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update», Journal of management information systems, vol. 19, n 4, pp. 9-30, 2003.
• [15] S. Michel F. Cocula, «Impact of the Three IS Qualities On User Satisfaction in an Information-Intensive Sector», Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, vol. 20, n 2, p. pp. 85-101, 2017.
• [16] F.D. Davis V. Venkatesh, «A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments», International journal of human-computer studies, vol. 45, n 1, pp. 19-45, 1996.
• [17] G.C. Moore I. Benbasat, «Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation», Information systems research, vol. 2, n 3, pp. 192-222, 1991.
• [18] W.J. Doll, W. Xia, et G. Torkzadeh, «A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument», MIS quarterly, pp. 453-461, 1994.
• [19] A. Martín-Navarro, M.P.L. Sancho, J.A. Medina-Garrido, «Business process management systems in port processes: a systematic literature review», International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, vol. 13, n 3, pp. 258-278, janv. 2020, doi: 10.1504/IJASM.2020.109245.
• [20] K.T. Dac, «Systèmes d'information communautaires. Cas du transport international de fret», 1996.
• [21] J. Broadbent R. Laughlin, «Performance management systems: A conceptual model», Management Accounting Research, vol. 20, n 4, pp. 283-295, déc. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2009.07.004.
• [22] W.W. Chin, «Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling», MIS quarterly, pp. vii-xvi, 1998.
• [23] G.A. Marcoulides C. Saunders, «Editor's comments: PLS: a silver bullet?», MIS quarterly, pp. iii-ix, 2006.
• [24] V. Albert, M.-F. Coutu, M.-J. Durand, «Structure factorielle et cohérence interne de l'Échelle de mesure du sentiment d'efficacité personnelle», Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 78, n 5, pp. 311-317, 2011.
• [25] O. Plaisant, R. Courtois, C. Réveillère, G. Mendelsohn, O.P. John, «Validation par analyse factorielle du Big Five Inventory français (BFI-Fr). Analyse convergente avec le NEO-PI-R», présenté à Annales Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique, 2010, vol. 168, n 2, pp. 97-106.
• [26] L. Ding, W. F. Velicer, L. L. Harlow, «Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices», Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 2, n 2, p. 119-143, 1995.
• [27] A. Perego D. Bodega, «Les Systemes de Gestion des Performances du Systeme d'information: La Perspective d'une Recherche-Action».
• [28] A. Bouklata C. Bensfia, «Digitalization of port passage procedures: Focus on the transit time of Goods», présenté à 2020 IEEE 13th International Colloquium of Logistics and Supply Chain Management (Logistiqua), 2020, pp. 1-6.
• [29] K. Mbaye, «Les facteurs d'adoption de l'Open Banking par les jeunes utilisateurs», 2021.
• [30] A. Amzil, «Place des ERP dans le suivi de la performance des filiales par la maison-mère», 2016.
• [31] N. Shniekat, W. Al abdallat, M. Al-Hussein, et B. Ali, «Influence of Management Information System Dimensions on Institutional Performance», Information Sciences Letters, vol. 11, n 5, pp. 1435-1443, 2022, doi: 10.18576/isl/110512.
• [32] T. Gościniak K. Wodarski, «Effectiveness of Using the Method of Artificial Intelligence in Maintenance of Ict Systems», Management Systems in Production Engineering, vol. 27, n 1, pp. 40-45, mars 2019, doi: 10.1515/mspe-2019-0007.
• [33] T.M. Brill, L. Munoz, R.J. Miller, «Siri, Alexa, and other digital assistants: a study of customer satisfaction with artificial intelligence applications», Journal of Marketing Management, vol. 35, n 15-16, pp. 1401-1436, 2019, doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2019.1687571.
• [34] C. Elie-Dit-Cosaque J. Pallud, «User adaptation and IS success: an empirical investigation among French workers», 2010.
• [35] S. Mardiana, J.H. Tjakraatmadja, A. Aprianingsih, «De-Lone-McLean information system success model revisited: The separation of intention to use-use and the integration of technology acceptance models», International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, vol. 5, n 1, pp. 172-182, 2015.
• [36] D. Pal, C. Arpnikanondt, S. Funilkul, M.A. Razzaque, «Analyzing the adoption and diffusion of voice-enabled smart-home systems: empirical evidence from Thailand», Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 20, n 4, pp. 797-815, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10209-020-00754-3.
• [37] G. Bressolles, «La qualité de service électronique: NetQu@ l Proposition d'une échelle de mesure appliquée aux sites marchands et effets modérateurs», Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition), vol. 21, n 3, pp. 19-45, 2006.
• [38] M. Masrom, «Technology acceptance model and e-learning», Technology, vol. 21, n 24, p. 81, 2007.
• [39] C. Bensfia A. Bouklata, «Apport de la Digitalisation des Procédures de Transit portuaire dans la connectivité du Maroc à la chaîne de valeur Mondiale: focus sur le délai de passage portuaire».
• [40] M. Blut, A.Y.L. Chong, Z. Tsigna, V. Venkatesh, «Meta-Analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Challenging its Validity and Charting a Research Agenda in the Red Ocean», Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 23, n 1, pp. 13-95, 2022, doi: 10.17705/1jais.00719.
• [41] G. McLean K. Osei-Frimpong, «Hey Alexa ... examine the variables influencing the use of artificial intelligent in-home voice assistants», Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 99, pp. 28-37, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.009.
• [42] A. Addo, «Information technology and public administration modernization in a developing country: Pursuing paperless clearance at Ghana customs», Information Systems Journal, vol. 32, n 4, pp. 819-855, 2022, doi: 10.1111/isj.12371.
• [43] B.H. Wixom P.A. Todd, «A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance», Information Systems Research, vol. 16, n 1, pp. 85-102, 2005, doi: 10.1287/isre.1050.0042.
• [44] W. Cruz-Torres, A. Alvarez-Risco, S. Del-Aguila-Arcentales, «Impact of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) implementation on performance of an education enterprise: a Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)», 2021.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/mspe-2023-0028