Happiness and Happiness Inequality in Azerbaijan: Results With the Single-Item and Multiple-Item Constructs

• Autorzy: Khatai Aliyev
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper compares the performance of the single-item (a 1-10 scale) and multiple-item constructs (Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), 5-item and 7-item life domain scales) employed to measure happiness and happiness inequality based on the same survey data. Using a cross-sectional dataset of 2208 respondents from Azerbaijan, the study examines the reliability and validity of each scale. Further, it discusses the scales' predicted happiness and happiness inequality indicators within the aggregate sample and sub-samples of specific socio-demographic groups. The research results confirm the reliability and validity of multiple-item constructs. In fact, there is a strong positive correlation between all the examined constructs of happiness. Interestingly, the mean happiness predicted by the single-item, SWLS, 5-item, and 7-item life domain scales does not vary much. The mean happiness percentage of the highest score in each construct varies within [50.8%; 62.1%] for the aggregate sample. SWLS's happiness prediction is lower than that of others by 7-11 percentage points, followed by the 5-item life domain scale and the single-item scale. The happiness prediction difference between the single-item construct and the 7-item life domain scale is negligible. In terms of predicting happiness inequality, the 7-item life domain scale displays the least dispersion as per both standard deviation and coefficient of variation indicators. Conversely, the single-item construct yields the largest variability. Research findings are consistent regardless of age groups, gender identity, educational attainment level, marital status, employment status, and residential area. The overall recommendation is to use a multiple-item life domains scale to measure happiness and happiness inequality in a society, as it offers a broader perspective for using happiness research findings in improving public policy efficiency. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Economics of happines; Public security; Public policy

PL

Ekonomia szczęścia; Bezpieczeństwo publiczne; Polityka publiczna

• Czasopismo: Economics & Sociology
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: 16
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 244--263

Twórcy

autor

Khatai Aliyev

• Azerbaijan State Economic University (UNEC), Baku, Azerbaijan

Bibliografia

• Akaeda, N. (2020). Contextual social trust and well-being inequality: From the perspectives of education and income. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(8), 2957-2979.
• Aknin, L. B., & Whillans, A. V. (2020). Helping and happiness: A review and guide for public policy. Social Issues and Policy Review, 1-32.
• Aliyev, K. (2021). Unemployment and (un) happiness: Life satisfaction approach to enhance policy efficiency for developing countries. Journal of International Studies, 14(4), 220-235.
• Amendola, A., Dell'Anno, R., & Parisi, L. (2019). Happiness and inequality in European countries: is it a matter of peer group comparisons?. Economia Politica, 36(2), 473-508.
• Androniceanu, A., Kinnunen, J., & Georgescu, I. (2021). Circular economy as a strategic option to promote sustainable economic growth and effective human development. Journal of International Studies, 14(1), 60-73. doi:10.14254/2071- 8330.2021/14-1/4
• ASERC. (2021). Social Survey-7. Unpublished dataset.
• Becchetti, L., Massari, R., & Naticchioni, P. (2014). The drivers of happiness inequality: Suggestions for promoting social cohesion. Oxford Economic Papers, 66(2), 419-442.
• Bennett, D. L., & Nikolaev, B. (2017). Economic freedom & happiness inequality: Friends or foes?. Contemporary Economic Policy, 35(2), 373-391.
• Bérenger, V., & Silber, J. (2021). On the Measurement of Happiness and of its Inequality. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1-42.
• Bowling, A. (2005). Just one question: If one question works why ask several? Editorial. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 342-345.
• Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
• Clark, A. E., Flèche, S., & Senik, C. (2014). The great happiness moderation: Well-being inequality during episodes of income growth. Happiness and economic growth: Lessons from developing countries, 32-139.
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
• Cummins, R.A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., van Vugt, J. & Misajon, R. (2003). Development of a national index of subjective well-being: The Australian Unity Well-being Index. Social Indicators Research, 64(2), 159-190.
• Delhey, J., & Kohler, U. (2011). Is happiness inequality immune to income inequality? New evidence through instrument-effect-corrected standard deviations. Social Science Research, 40(3), 742-756.
• Delhey, J., & Kohler, U. (2012). Happiness inequality: Adding meaning to numbers-A reply to Veenhoven and Kalmijn. Social Science Research, 41(3), 731-734.
• Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 434-449
• Diener, E. (2009). Subjective well-being. The science of well-being, 11-58.
• Diener, E., & Tay, L. (2015). Subjective well-being and human welfare around the world as reflected in the Gallup World Poll. International Journal of Psychology, 50, 135-149.
• Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
• Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112, 497-527.
• Dockery, A. (2005). Happiness, life satisfaction and the role of work: Evidence from two Australian surveys. Economic Record, 81(255), 322-335.
• Dutta, I., & Foster, J. (2013). Inequality of happiness in the US: 1972-2010. Review of Income and Wealth, 59(3), 393-415.
• Gandelman, N. (2016). Happiness inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean. In Handbook of Happiness Research in Latin America (pp. 405-414). Springer, Dordrecht.
• Gandelman, N., & Porzecanski, R. (2013). Happiness inequality: How much is reasonable?. Social Indicators Research, 110(1), 257-269.
• Goff, L., Helliwell, J. F., & Mayraz, G. (2016). The welfare costs of well-being inequality. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Goff, L., Helliwell, J. F., & Mayraz, G. (2018). Inequality of subjective well-being as a comprehensive measure of inequality. Economic Inquiry, 56(4), 2177-2194.
• Graafland, J., & Lous, B. (2019). Income inequality, life satisfaction inequality and trust: a cross country panel analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(6), 1717-1737.
• Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano J., M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin & B. Puranen et al. (eds.). (2020). World Values Survey: Round Seven - Country-Pooled Datafile. Madrid, Spain & Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. doi.org/10.14281/18241.13
• Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano J., M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin & B. Puranen et al. (eds.). (2021). World Values Survey Time-Series (1981-2020) Cross-National Data-Set. Madrid, Spain & Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. Data File Version 2.0.0. doi:10.14281/18241.15.
• Hashem, E. A. (2018). Analytical Study of Happiness Inequality in Egypt. Asian Social Science, 14(12).
• Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: a compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1073-1082
• Inglehart, R., C. Haerpfer, A. Moreno, C. Welzel, K. Kizilova, J. Diez-Medrano, M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin & B. Puranen et al. (eds.). (2014). World Values Survey: Round Six-Country-Pooled Datafile Version: www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp. Madrid: JD Systems Institute.
• Isaeva, A., & Salahodjaev, R. (2021). Correlates of life satisfaction inequality in Russia. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 16(5), 2251-2269.
• Jovanović, V., & Lazić, M. (2018). Is longer always better? A comparison of the validity of single-item versus multiple-item measures of life satisfaction. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1-18.
• Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141-151.
• Kalmijn, W. M., & Arends, L. R. (2010). Measures of inequality: Application to happiness in nations. Social Indicators Research, 99(1), 147-162.
• Kang, W. C., Lee, J. S., & Song, B. K. (2020). Envy and Pride: How Economic Inequality Deepens Happiness Inequality in South Korea. Social Indicators Research, 150(2), 617-637.
• Kollamparambil, U. (2020). Happiness, happiness inequality and income dynamics in South Africa. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(1), 201-222.
• Lakshmanasamy, T., & Maya, K. (2020). The effect of income inequality on happiness inequality in India: A recentered influence function regression estimation and life satisfaction inequality decomposition. Indian Journal of Human Development, 14(2), 161-181.
• Ledić, M., & Rubil, I. (2019). Decomposing the Difference Between Well-Being Inequality and Income Inequality: Method and Application. In What Drives Inequality?. Emerald Publishing Limited.
• Lee, S. J. (2022). Public Happiness Policy. Public Happiness, 143-162.
• Lubian, D. (2020). Are virtuous people happier? Evidence from Italy. Economics and Sociology, 13(1), 146-164. doi:10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-1/10
• Margolis, S., Schwitzgebel, E., Ozer, D. J., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2019). A new measure of life satisfaction: The Riverside Life Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(6), 621-630.
• Maruti, R. A. (2021). Public Policy Model That Mainstreams Citizen Happiness, A Literature Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 7(2), 290-305.
• Maya, K., & Kumar, N. (2019). What determines life satisfaction inequality? Evidence from India. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research. 4(8).
• Medvedev, O. N., & Landhuis, C. E. (2018). Exploring constructs of well-being, happiness and quality of life. PeerJ, 6, e4903.
• Mishchuk, H., Samoliuk, N., Bilan, Y. & Streimikiene D. (2018). Income inequality and its consequences within the framework of social justice. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 13(2), 131-138.
• Niimi, Y. (2015). Can Happiness Provide New Insights into Social Inequality? Evidence from Japan (No. 2015-12). Asian Growth Research Institute.
• Niimi, Y. (2018). What affects happiness inequality? Evidence from Japan. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(2), 521-543.
• Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2014). Can and should happiness be a policy goal?. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 195-203.
• Oliinyk, O., Mishchuk, H., Bilan, Y., & Skare, M. (2022). Integrated assessment of the attractiveness of the EU for intellectual immigrants: A taxonomy-based approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121805
• Ott, J. (2005). Level and inequality of happiness in nations: Does greater happiness of a greater number imply greater inequality in happiness?. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(4), 397-420.
• Ovaska, T., & Takashima, R. (2010). Does a rising tide lift all the boats? Explaining the national inequality of happiness. Journal of Economic Issues, 44(1), 205-224.
• Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2009). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. In Assessing well-being (pp. 101-117). Springer, Dordrecht.
• Rojas, M. (2020). Happiness, public policy and the notion of development. Behavioural Public Policy, 4(2), 166-176.
• Shrotryia, V. K., & Singh, S. V. P. (2020). Measuring Progress Beyond GDP: A Theoretical Perspective. Emerging Economy Studies, 6(2), 143-165.
• Stutzer, A. (2020). Happiness and public policy: a procedural perspective. Behavioural Public Policy, 4(2), 210-225.
• The International Wellbeing Group. (2013). Personal Well-being Index - Adult (Manual 5th ed.). Melbourne: Australian Center on Quality of Life, Deakin University.
• Veenhoven, R. (1990). Inequality in happiness: inequality in countries compared across countries (No. 11275). University Library of Munich, Germany.
• Veenhoven, R. (2004). Happiness as a Public Policy Aim: The Greatest Happiness Principle. Positive Psychology in Practice, 658-678.
• Wang, H., Cheng, Z., & Smyth, R. (2019). Wealth, Happiness and Happiness Inequality in China. In Wealth (s) and Subjective Well-Being (pp. 445-461). Springer, Cham.
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063.
• World Health Organization. (2004). The world health organization quality of life (WHOQOL)-BREF (No. WHO/HIS/HSI Rev. 2012.02). World Health Organization.
• Yang, J., Liu, K., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Happiness inequality in China. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(8), 2747-2771.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14254/2071-789X.2023/16-4/12