Going Green to Keep Talent: Exploring the Relationship Between Sustainable Business Practices and Turnover Intention

• Autorzy: Anna Florek-Paszkowska , Carlos Arturo Hoyos-Vallejo
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

PURPOSE: This study explores the association between sustainable business practices (SBP) and turnover intention (TI) to understand the role of sustainability initiatives in influencing employee retention and organizational commitment. METHODOLOGY: The present study conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement. From an initial selection of 326 articles, a rigorous double-blind screening process identified 31 key papers for in-depth analysis. FINDINGS: The systematic review provides compelling evidence that SBP have a robust positive association with employee outcomes, especially in reducing TI. This relationship is notably mediated by job satisfaction and organizational commitment and moderated by psychological safety and ethical leadership elements. Further, key gaps were discerned, including the necessity to explore the varied impact of SBP across industries, the enduring effects of SBP on TI, the influence of cultural and contextual facets, and the urgency for methodological advancements in cross-cultural research. In response to these gaps, four hypotheses were conceptualized to provide deeper insights into the complex interplay between SBP, TI, and overarching cultural/contextual variables. IMPLICATIONS: Theoretically, this research adds to the existing literature by empirically validating the relationship between SBP and TI, highlighting critical mediators and moderators, and suggesting avenues for future research. Incorporating the identified gaps and proposed hypotheses provides a structured direction for subsequent investigations. The findings emphasize the importance of integrating SBP into organizational strategies to promote sustainability while enhancing workforce well-being and retention. Organizations can align with sustainability goals and boost employee satisfaction by focusing on organizational commitment, open communication, and leadership grounded in ethical and sustainable principles. ORIGINALITY AND VALUE: This research provides a comprehensive overview of the interplay between SBP and TI, integrating insights from various studies. By emphasizing understudied mediators and moderators, identifying research gaps, and outlining derived hypotheses, the study sets the stage for future inquiries. Its practical recommendations are essential for organizations that balance sustainability goals with workforce stability, benefiting organizational performance and employee satisfaction. (original abstract)

CEL: To badanie bada związek między zrównoważonymi praktykami biznesowymi (SBP) a zamiarem odejścia (TI), aby zrozumieć rolę inicjatyw zrównoważonego rozwoju we wpływaniu na zatrzymanie pracowników i zaangażowanie organizacyjne. METODYKA: W niniejszym badaniu przeprowadzono systematyczny przegląd literatury (SLR) zgodnie z podejściem Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Spośród wstępnej selekcji 326 artykułów, rygorystyczny proces selekcji metodą podwójnie ślepej próby pozwolił zidentyfikować 31 kluczowych artykułów do dogłębnej analizy. WYNIKI: Przegląd systematyczny dostarcza przekonujących dowodów na to, że SBP ma solidny pozytywny związek z wynikami pracowników, zwłaszcza w zmniejszaniu TI. Związek ten jest w szczególności pośredniczony przez satysfakcję z pracy i zaangażowanie organizacyjne oraz moderowany przez elementy bezpieczeństwa psychicznego i etycznego przywództwa. Ponadto dostrzeżono kluczowe luki, w tym konieczność zbadania zróżnicowanego wpływu SBP na różne branże, trwałe skutki SBP na TI, wpływ aspektów kulturowych i kontekstowych oraz pilną potrzebę postępów metodologicznych w badaniach międzykulturowych. W odpowiedzi na te luki sformułowano cztery hipotezy, aby uzyskać głębszy wgląd w złożoną zależność między SBP, TI i nadrzędnymi zmiennymi kulturowymi/kontekstowymi. IMPLIKACJE: Badania te uzupełniają istniejącą literaturę, empirycznie potwierdzając związek między SBP a TI, podkreślając krytycznych mediatorów i moderatorów oraz sugerując kierunki przyszłych badań. Uwzględnienie zidentyfikowanych luk i proponowanych hipotez zapewnia ustrukturyzowany kierunek dla kolejnych badań. Odkrycia podkreślają znaczenie integracji SBP ze strategiami organizacyjnymi w celu promowania zrównoważonego rozwoju przy jednoczesnym zwiększeniu dobrostanu i zatrzymania pracowników. Organizacje mogą dostosować się do celów zrównoważonego rozwoju i zwiększyć satysfakcję pracowników, koncentrując się na zaangażowaniu organizacyjnym, otwartej komunikacji i przywództwie opartym na etycznych i zrównoważonych zasadach. ORYGINALNOŚĆ I WARTOŚĆ: To badanie zapewnia kompleksowy przegląd wzajemnych zależności między SBP i TI, integrując spostrzeżenia z różnych badań. Zwracając uwagę na niedostatecznie zbadanych mediatorów i moderatorów, identyfikując luki badawcze i nakreślając pochodne hipotezy, badanie przygotowuje grunt pod przyszłe badania. Zawarte w nim praktyczne zalecenia są niezbędne dla organizacji, które równoważą cele zrównoważonego rozwoju ze stabilnością siły roboczej, z korzyścią dla wydajności organizacji i zadowolenia pracowników. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Employees' engagement; Organizational commitment; Job satisfaction; Empowerment of employees; Systematic literature review; Well-being

PL

Zaangażowanie pracowników; Zaangażowanie organizacyjne; Zadowolenie z pracy; Upodmiotowienie pracowników; Systematyczny przegląd literatury; Dobrostan

• Czasopismo: Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation (JEMI)
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: 19
• Numer: nr 3 Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Success: Insights from Diverse Ventures
• Strony: 87--128

Twórcy

autor

Anna Florek-Paszkowska

• CENTRUM Católica Graduate Business School; Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Peru

autor

Carlos Arturo Hoyos-Vallejo

• CENTRUM Católica Graduate Business School; Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Peru

Bibliografia

• Abu-Mahfouz, S., Halim, M.S.A., Bahkia, A.S., Alias, N., & Tambi, A.M. (2023). Sustainable human resource management practices in organizational performance: The mediating impacts of knowledge management and work engagement. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Innovation, 19(2), 57-97. https://doi.org/10.7341/20231922
• Adeyefa, A., Mansor, Z., Rasdi, R., Abdullah, A., & Hossan, D. (2021). Mediating role of empowerment on green human resource management practices and employee retention in the Nigerian hotel industry. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 10(3), 932-954. https://doi.org/10.46222/ajhtl.19770720-141.
• Ahmadi-Gh, Z., & Bello-Pintado, A. (2022). Why is manufacturing not more sustainable? The effects of different sustainability practices on sustainability outcomes and competitive advantage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 337, 130392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130392.
• Ali, M.A., Alarifi, G., & Yehia, E.F. (2022). Towards sustainable careers for Saudi employees in tourism and hospitality sector: The impact of career competencies on turnover intention. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(3), 134-149. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2022-0073.
• Andersson, S., Svensson, G., Molina-Castillo, F.J., Otero-Neira, C., Lindgren, J., Karlsson, N.P.E., & Laurell, H. (2022). Sustainable development-Direct and indirect effects between economic, social, and environmental dimensions in business practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1158-1172. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2261.
• Apostu, S.A., & Gigauri, I. (2023). Sustainable development and entrepreneurship in emerging countries: Are sustainable development and entrepreneurship reciprocally reinforcing? Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 19(1), 41-77. https://doi.org/10.7341/20231912.
• Arici, H.E., Arasli, H., Köseoglu, M.A., Sokmen, A., & Arici, N.C. (2023). Job embeddedness in hospitality and tourism scholarship: Past, present, and future research agenda. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 109, 103417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103417.
• Ayodele, O.A., Chang-Richards, Y., & González, V.A. (2022). A framework for addressing construction labour turnover in New Zealand. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(2), 601-618. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2020-0358.
• Barkhuizen, N.E., & Gumede, B. (2021). The relationship between talent management, job satisfaction and voluntary turnover intentions of employees in a selected government institution. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 19. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v19i0.1396.
• Barthauer, L., Kaucher, P., Spurk, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Burnout and career (un)sustainability: Looking into the Blackbox of burnout triggered career turnover intentions, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 117. 103334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103334.
• Benn, S., Teo, S.T., & Martin, A. (2015). Employee participation and engagement in working for the environment. Personnel Review, 44(4), 492-510. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2013-0179.
• Bieńkowska, A., Koszela, A., Ludwikowska, K., & Tworek, K. (2022). Turnover-mitigating effect of servant leadership on job performance. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 14(2), 67-81. doi: 10.2478/emj-2022-0017
• Bonfanti, A., Mion, G., Brunetti, F., & Vargas-Sánchez, A. (2023). The contribution of manufacturing companies to the achievement of sustainable development goals: An empirical analysis of the operationalization of sustainable business models. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 2490-2508. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3260.
• Brychko, M., Bilan, Y., Lyeonov, S., & Streimikiene, D. (2023). Do changes in the business environment and sustainable development really matter for enhancing enterprise development? Sustainable Development, 31(2), 587-599. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2410.
• Caglar, A.E., & Askin, B.E. (2023). A path towards green revolution: How do competitive industrial performance and renewable energy consumption influence environmental quality indicators? Renewable Energy, 205, 273-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.080.
• Chan, R.Y.K. (2021). Do chief information officers matter for sustainable development? Impact of their regulatory focus on green information technology strategies and corporate performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2523-2534. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2761.
• Chen, W., Alharthi, M., Zhang, J., & Khan, I. (2023). The need for energy efficiency and economic prosperity in a sustainable environment. Gondwana Research, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.03.025.
• Cook, K.S. (2015). Exchange: Social. In J.D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 482-488). Oxford: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.32056-6.
• Custodio, H.M., Hadjikakou, M., & Bryan, B.A. (2023). A review of socioeconomic indicators of sustainability and wellbeing building on the social foundations framework. Ecological Economics, 203, 107608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107608.
• De Clercq, D., & Belausteguigoitia, I. (2022). How social interaction can prevent interpersonal conflict from inducing turnover intentions and diminishing championing behaviour. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-07-2022-3350.
• DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101.
• Dragomir, V.D., Dumitru, M., & Perevoznic, F.M. (2023). Carbon reduction and energy transition targets of the largest European companies: An empirical study based on institutional theory. Cleaner Production Letters, 4, 100039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100039.
• Duong, C., Wach, K., Vu, N. X., Ha, S. T., & Nguyen, B. N. (2022). Entrepreneurial education, government policies and programmes, and entrepreneurial behaviour: A serial moderated mediation model. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 10(4), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2022.100403
• Elkington, J. (2004). Enter the triple bottom line. In J. Elkington (Ed.), The Triple Bottom Line: Does It All Add Up? (pp. 1-12). London: Earthscan.
• Emmanuel, A.A., Mansor, Z.D., Rasdi, R.B.M., Abdullah, A.R., & Hossan, D. (2021). Mediating role of empowerment on green human resource management practices and employee retention in the Nigerian hotel industry. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 10(3), 932-954. https://doi.org/10.46222/ajhtl.19770720-141.
• Fischer, M., Foord, D., Frecè, J., Hillebrand, K., Kissling-Näf, I., Meili, R., Peskova, M., Risi, D., Schmidpeter, R., & Stucki, T. (2023). The concept of sustainable development. In M. Fischer, D. Foord, J. Frecè, K. Hillebrand, I. Kissling-Näf, R. Meili, M. Peskova, D. Risi, R. Schmidpeter, & T. Stucki (Eds.), Sustainable Business: Managing the Challenges of the 21st Century (pp. 17-27). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25397-3_2.
• Freeman, R.E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409-421. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857340.
• Galati, A., & Adamashvili, N. (2023). Stakeholder engagement: A strategy to support the transition toward circular economy business models. In G. Mannina, A. Pandey, & R. Sirohi (Eds.), Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering (pp. 413-430). Oxford: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99920-5.00002-0.
• Glover, J.L., Champion, D., Daniels, K.J., & Dainty, A.J.D. (2014). An Institutional Theory perspective on sustainable practices across the dairy supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.027.
• Gomes, D.R., Ribeiro, N., & Santos, M.J. (2023). "Searching for gold" with sustainable human resources management and internal communication: Evaluating the mediating role of employer attractiveness for explaining turnover intention and performance. Administrative Sciences, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13010024.
• Griffeth, R.W., Hom, P., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and researchs implications for the next millenium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463-488. https://doi. org/10.1177/014920630002600305.
• Guerci, M., Decramer, A., Van Waeyenberg, T., & Aust, I. (2019). Moving beyond the link between HRM and economic performance: A study on the individual reactions of HR managers and professionals to sustainable HRM. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(3), 783-800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3879-1.
• Gyepi-Garbrah, T., Preko, A., Mohammed, I., & Mohammed, I. (2023). Using goal-setting theory and expectancy theory to understand career goal implementation in the hospitality industry. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 32, 100425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2023.100425.
• Hoyos, C.A., & Serna, C.A. (2021). Rewards and faculty turnover: An individual differences approach. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1863170. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1863170.
• Huang, I.C., Du, P.L., Wu, L.F., Achyldurdyyeva, J., Wu, L.C., & Lin, C.S. (2021). Leader-member exchange, employee turnover intention and presenteeism: The mediating role of perceived organizational support. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 42(2), 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2020-0094.
• Hussain, M., Khan, M., & Saber, H. (2023). Thematic analysis of circular economy practices across closed-loop supply chains: An institutional theory perspective. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 40, 122-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.06.017.
• Iqbal, Q. (2020). The era of environmental sustainability: Ensuring that sustainability stands on human resource management. Global Business Review, 21(2), 377-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150918778967.
• Jarkovská, P., & Jarkovská, M. (2022). Social responsibility as a solution to sustainable employee retention in the hospitality industry: Empirical evidence from Prague, Czech Republic. Deturope, 14(1), 4-28. https://doi.org/10.32725/det.2022.001.
• Juma, N., & Lee, Y. (2012). The moderating effects of traditionality-modernity on the effects of internal labor market beliefs on employee affective commitment and their turnover intention. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(11), 2315-2332. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.616522
• Kanchana, L., & Jayathilaka, R. (2023). Factors impacting employee turnover intentions among professionals in Sri Lankan startups. PLOS ONE, 18(2), e0281729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281729.
• Kausar Azam, M., Hasan, S. M., & Qureshi, S. M. (2023). Exploring the critical success factors of a resilient supply chain. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 15(1), 41-56. doi: 10.2478/emj-2023-0004
• Kayikci, Y., Kazancoglu, Y., Gozacan-Chase, N., & Lafci, C. (2022). Analyzing the drivers of smart sustainable circular supply chain for sustainable development goals through stakeholder theory. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3335-3353. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3087.
• Khanra, S., Kaur, P., Joseph, R.P., Malik, A., & Dhir, A. (2022). A resource-based view of green innovation as a strategic organization resource: Present status and future directions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1395-1413. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2961.
• Kumar, M., Raut, R.D., Jagtap, S., & Choubey, V.K. (2023). Circular economy adoption challenges in the food supply chain for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1334-1356. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3191.
• Kurtessis, J.N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M.T., Buffardi, L.C., Stewart, K.A., & Adis, C.S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854-1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575554.
• Lamm, E., Tosti-Kharas, J., & King, C.E. (2015). Empowering employee sustainability: Perceived organizational support toward the environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2093-z.
• Li, M., Ahmed, A., Syed, O.R., Khalid, N., & Muñoz, J.E. (2022). Impact of abusive leader behavior on employee job insecurity: A mediating roles of emotional exhaustion and abusive peer behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 947258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.947258.
• Lloyd, K.J., Boer, D., Keller, J.W., & Voelpel, S. (2015). Is my boss really listening to me? The impact of perceived supervisor listening on emotional exhaustion, turnover intention, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(3), 509-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2242-4.
• Lombardi Netto, A., Salomon, V.A.P., Ortiz-Barrios, M.A., Florek-Paszkowska, A.K., Petrillo, A., & De Oliveira, O.J. (2021). Multiple criteria assessment of sustainability programs in the textile industry. International Transactions in Operational Research, 28(3), 1550-1572. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12871.
• Lu, J., Guo, S., Qu, J., Lin, W., & Lev, B. (2023). "Stay" or "Leave": Influence of employee-oriented social responsibility on the turnover intention of new-generation employees. Journal of Business Research, 161, 113814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113814.
• Lu, Y., Zhang, M.M., Yang, M.M., & Wang, Y. (2023). Sustainable human resource management practices, employee resilience, and employee outcomes: Toward common good values. Human Resource Management, 62(3), 331-353. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22153.
• Mahfouz, S., Halim, M.S.A., Bahkia, A.S., & Alias, N. (2022). The impact of organizational justice on intention to stay: The mediating role of organizational commitment. Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 6(1), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv6i1p10.
• Mehrez, A., & Bakri, A. (2019). The impact of human resource practices on job satisfaction and intention to stay in emerging economies: Model development and empirical investigation among high caliber governmental employees in Qatar. Management Science Letters, 9(3), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.12.007.
• Mheiri, S.A., Jabeen, F., & Abdallah, S. (2021). Inhibitors of talent retention in uae public healthcare. International Journal of Business and Society, 22(1), 74-101. https://doi.org/10.33736/IJBS.3163.2021.
• Mustamil, N., & Najam, U. (2020a). The impact of servant leadership on follower turnover intentions: Mediating role of resilience. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 13(2), 125-145. https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol13no2.5.
• Nejati, M., Brown, M.E., Shafaei, A., & Seet, P.S. (2021). Employees' perceptions of corporate social responsibility and ethical leadership: Are they uniquely related to turnover intention? Social Responsibility Journal, 17(2), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2019-0276.
• Newig J. (2007) Symbolic environmental legislation and societal self-deception, Environmental Politics, 16(2), 276-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701211783.
• Ng, Y.N., & Salamzadeh, Y. (2020). The impact of ethical leadership on the intention to stay among the generation-y workforce of MNCs in Penang, Malaysia: Mediating role of employee rewards. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 15(2), 16-37.
• Ning, L., Abbasi, K.R., Hussain, K., Alvarado, R., & Ramzan, M. (2023). Analyzing the role of green innovation and public-private partnerships in achieving sustainable development goals: A novel policy framework. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26414-6.
• Olsen, M.C., Slotegraaf, R.J., & Chandukala, S.R. (2014). Green claims and message frames: How green new products change brand attitude. Journal of Marketing, 78(5), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.13.0387.
• Rehman, S.U., Shahzad, M., Ding, X., & Razzaq, A. (2023). Impact of corporate motives for sustainable sourcing: Key moderating role of regulatory pressure. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(27), 71382-71395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27463-7.
• Ren, S., Cooke, F. L., Stahl, G. K., Fan, D., & Timming, A. R. (2023). Advancing the sustainability agenda through strategic human resource management: Insights and suggestions for future research. Human Resource Management, 62(3), 251-265. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22169.
• Rodrigue, M., Magnan, M. & Cho, C.H. (2013). Is environmental governance substantive or symbolic? An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics 114, 107-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1331-5
• Roscoe, S., Subramanian, N., Jabbour, C.J.C., & Chong, T. (2019). Green human resource management and the enablers of green organisational culture: Enhancing a organization's environmental performance for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 737-749. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2277.
• Silva, P., Moreira, A.C., & Mota, J. (2022). Employees' perception of corporate social responsibility and performance: The mediating roles of job satisfaction, organizational commitment and organizational trust. Journal of Strategy and Management, 16(1), 92-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-10-2021-0213.
• Singh, R. Sharma, P., Foropon, C., & Belal, H.M. (2022), The role of big data and predictive analytics in the employee retention: A resource-based view. International Journal of Manpower, 43(2), 411-447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-03-2021-0197.
• Sobaih, A.E.E., Gharbi, H., & Abu Elnasr, A.E. (2022). Do you feel safe here? The role of psychological safety in the relationship between transformational leadership and turnover intention amid COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15080340.
• Stadler, R., Walters, T., & Jepson, A. (2022). Sustainable humans: A framework for applying sustainable HRM principles to the events industry. Event Management, 26(8), 1817-1832. https://doi.org/10.3727/152599522X16419948694757.
• Tavanti, M. (2023). Developing Sustainability in Organizations. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36907-0_1
• Thai, Q., & Mai, K. (2023). An evolution of entrepreneurial culture studies: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(2), 31-62. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110202
• Tura, N., Keränen, J., & Patala, S. (2019). The darker side of sustainability: Tensions from sustainable business practices in business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 77, 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.09.002.
• Valyte-Zeimiene, D., & Buksnyte-Marmiene, L. (2022). Relationship between employees' attributions of corporate social responsibility, organisational justice and turnover intention: Evidence from a post-Soviet country. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(6), 1051-1067. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-01-2022-0040.
• Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New Jersey: Wiley.
• Wajdi, M.F., Putra, F.I.F.S., Haziroh, A.L., & Purusa, N.A. (2023). Mughas: The integrated green HRM model to improve business performance. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(4), e0771-e0771. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i4.771.
• Wen, D., Yan, D., & Sun, X. (2022). Employee satisfaction, employee engagement and turnover intention: The moderating role of position level. Human Systems Management, 41(3), 407-422. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-211505.
• Westerman, J.W., Acikgoz, Y., Nafees, L., & Westerman, J. (2022). When sustainability managers' greenwash: SDG fit and effects on job performance and attitudes. Business and Society Review, 127(2), 371-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12273.

Identyfikatory

DOI

doi.org/10.7341/20231933