Resilient Chains and Chain Shortening - Trade Exchange Perspective

• Autorzy: Anna Maryniak , Paweł Kliber
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: One of the fundamental ways to strengthen supply chains is by shortening them. This can be reflected in the degree of utilization of chains for exports and imports. This is crucial for efficient supply chain management as it enables simpler and faster logistics operations. However, on the other hand, comparative advantages, resource localization, and cost considerations may lead management decisions to refrain from significant supply chain shortening on a larger scale. Additionally, the increasing level of digitalization in the logistics industry, which supports supply chains, also contributes to this perspective. The purpose of this study is, therefore to examine the extent to which recent crisis situations have influenced the exchange of exports and imports, categorized by short, medium, and long supply chains. The Polish economy has been chosen as a reference for this analysis. Design/methodology/approach: Statistical methods based on time-series analysis were employed in this research. Findings: Despite the crises, supply chains have not been shortened. It can be observed that in the long term, as well as in the post-pandemic period, there has been a shift in the structure of supply chains towards longer chains, particularly noticeable in import dynamics. The reason why supply chain shortening for the purpose of enhancing resilience is not evident in the data, despite many declarative statements about this approach in empirical research, has been indicated. Research limitations/implications: The formulated arguments in favor of supply chain lengthening should be confirmed through research in various economies. Practical implications: The importance of this article lies in providing management decision-making suggestions, particularly regarding supply sources. Social implications: The establishment of shorter supply chains is crucial for environmental sustainability and meeting customer needs. Originality/value: Research in this field is often conducted in an aggregated form, without differentiating between various supply chain lengths. In this article, we have taken these factors into account. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Supply Chain Management (SCM); International trade; Reshoring; Supply chain

PL

Zarządzanie łańcuchem dostaw; Handel międzynarodowy; Reshoring; Łańcuch dostaw

• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2023
• Numer: z. 178 Współczesne zarządzanie = Contemporary Management
• Strony: 431--447

Twórcy

autor

Anna Maryniak

• Poznań University of Economics and Business

autor

Paweł Kliber

• Poznań University of Economics and Business

Bibliografia

• 1. Abdelal, R. (2020). Of Learning and Forgetting: Centrism, Populism, and the Legitimacy Crisis of Globalization In: P.J. Katzenstein, J.Kirshner (eds.), The Downfall of the American Order? (pp. 105-123). Cornell University Press, https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/255/ oa_monograph/chapter/3151819, https://10.1353/book.97929.
• 2. Acquaye, A., Feng, K., Oppon, E., Salhi, S., Ibn-Mohammed, T., Genovese, A., Hubacek, K. (2017). Measuring the environmental sustainability performance of global supply chains: A multi-regional input-output analysis for carbon, sulphur oxide and water footprints. Journal of environmental management, 187, 571-585, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jenvman.2016.10.059.
• 3. Ambroziak, Ł., Kopiński, D., Maj, M., Markiewicz, J., Sierocińska, K., Strzelecki, J. (2023). Nowe oblicze globalnego handlu. Czy mamy do czynienia z reshoringiem? Warszawa: Polski Instytut Ekonomiczny.
• 4. Amighini, A., Andreas, M., Elitsa, G., Jan, H., Peter-Tobias, S.T.O.L.L., Marcus, D.I.E.T.R.I.C.H., Davide, T. (2023). Global value chains: Potential synergies between external trade policy and internal economic initiatives to address the strategic dependencies of the EU. European Union, Policy Department for External Relations Directorate General for External Policies of the Union, PE 702.582, https://iris.uniupo.it/bitstream/11579/156222/1/GVC%20study%20final.pdf; https://doi.org/: 10.2861/767821.
• 5. Anukoonwattaka, W., Mikic, M. (2020). Beyond the COVID-19 pandemic: coping with the new normal in supply chains. Retrieved from: https://repository.unescap.org/ bitstream/handle/20.500.12870/805/ESCAP-2020-PB-Beyond-COVID19-pandemic-coping-with-new-normal-supply-chains.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
• 6. Arriola, C., Kowalski, P., van Tongeren, F. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on directions and structure of international trade. OECD Trade Policy Paper, 139, https://doi.org/10.1787/18166873.
• 7. Aviv, Y. (2002). Gaining benefits from joint forecasting and replenishment processes: The case of auto-correlated demand. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 4(1), 55-74, http://doi:10.1287/msom.4.1.55.285.
• 8. BCI (2023). BSC Supply Chain Resilience Report 2023, https://www.sgs.com/en/-/media/sgscorp/documents/corporate/white-papers/sgs-kn-supply-chain-resilience-report-2023-en.cdn.en.pdf.
• 9. Bricongne, J.C., Carluccio, J., Fontagné, L., Gaulier, G., Stumpner, S. (2021). From macro to micro: Heterogeneous exporters in the pandemic. CESifo Working Paper Series, 9857. CESifo.
• 10. Caldara, D., Iacoviello, M. (2022). Measuring Geopolitical Risk. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1194-1225. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20191823.
• 11. Contractor, F.J. (2022). The world economy will need even more globalization in the post-pandemic 2021 decade. Journal of International Business Studies, 53, 156-171, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00394-y.
• 12. Coquidé, C., Lages, J., Ermann, L., Shepelyansky, D.L. (2022). COVID-19's impact on international trade. Entropy, 24(3), 327, https://doi.org/10.3390/e24030327.
• 13. Deppermann, A., Havlík, P., Valin, H., Boere, E., Herrero, M., Vervoort, J., Mathijs, E. (2018). The market impacts of shortening feed supply chains in Europe. Food Security, 10, 1401-1410, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0868-2.
• 14. Du, R., Dong, G., Tian, L., Wang, Y., Zhao, L., Zhang, X., Stanley, H.E. (2019). Identifyng the peak point of systemic risk in international crude oil importing trade. Energy, 176, 281-291; DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.127.
• 15. EBRD (2022). Transition Report 2022-23. Business Unusual, https://euneighbourseast.eu/news/publications/ebrd-transition-report-2022-23-business-unusual/.
• 16. Fattah, J., Ezzine, L., Aman, Z., El Moussami, H., Lachhab, A. (2018). Forecasting of demand using ARIMA model. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 10, 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979018808673.
• 17. Gilbert, K. (2005). An ARIMA supply chain model. Management Science, 51(2), 305-310, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0308.
• 18. Hayakawa, K., Mukunoki, H. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on international trade: Evidence from the first shock. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 60, doi: 10.1016/j.jjie.2021.101135.
• 19. Hertz, S. (2001). Dynamics of alliances in highly integrated supply chain networks. International Journal of Logistics, 4(2), 237-256, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13675560110060009.
• 20. Jomthanachai, S., Wong, W.P., Soh, K.L., Lim, C.P. (2022). A global trade supply chain vulnerability in COVID-19 pandemic: An assessment metric of risk and resilience-based efficiency of CoDEA method. Research in Transportation Economics, 93, 101166, https://doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2021.101166.
• 21. Kamakura, N. (2022). From globalising to regionalising to reshoring value chains? The case of Japan's semiconductor industry. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 15(2), 261-277, https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsac010.
• 22. Kamalahmadi, M., Parast, M.M. (2016). A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research. International journal of production economics, 171, 116-133.
• 23. Lee, S. (2022). Changes in Interdependence, US-China Strategic Competition, and the New Dynamics of the East Asian Regional Order. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding Vol, 10(2), 333-353, https://doi: 10.18588/202211.00a317.
• 24. Maryniak, A., Bulhakova, Lewoniewski, W. (2021). Resilient supply chains 4.0-a research review. 26th IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (APCC), 99-104, https://doi:10.1109/APCC49754.2021.9609916.
• 25. Nguyen, H.D., Tran, K.P., Thomassey, S., Hamad, M. (2021). Forecasting and Anomaly Detection approaches using LSTM and LSTM Autoencoder techniques with the applications in supply chain management. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 102282, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102282.
• 26. Norris, G.A. (2006). Social impacts in product life cycles-towards life cycle attribute assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11, 97-104, http://dx.doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.04.017.
• 27. PKO Bank Polski (22 grudnia, 2022). Analizy Makroekonomiczne. Kwartalnik Ekonomiczny, 4q22.
• 28. PKO Bank Polski (29 marca, 2023). Analizy Makroekonomiczne. Kwartalnik Ekonomiczny, 1q23.
• 29. Polat, E.G., Yücesan, M., Gül, M. (2023). A comparative framework for criticality assessment of strategic raw materials in Turkey. Resources Policy, 82, 103511, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103511.
• 30. Polska Organizacja Przemysłu i Handlu Naftowego (2023). Rynek transportu w Polsce i na świecie, https://pfr.pl/dam/jcr:112f36e8-88f5-4e99-916c-3b3f5a6edf6a/PFR_ Transport_202305.pdf.
• 31. Ruta, M. (2022). The impact of the war in Ukraine on global trade and investment. Washington: World Bank Group.
• 32. Sardesai, S., Klingebiel, K. (2023). Maintaining viability by rapid supply chain adaptation using a process capability index. Omega, 115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega. 2022.102778.
• 33. Shishodia, A., Sharma, R., Rajesh, R., Munim, Z.H. (2023). Supply chain resilience: A review, conceptual framework and future research. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(4), 879-908, https://doi 10.1108/IJLM-03-2021-0169.
• 34. Shivajee, V., Singh, R.K., Rastogi, S. (2023). Procurement system for resilient supply chain amid the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic literature review. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 397-429. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-04-2022-0029.
• 35. The White House (2021). Building Resilient Supply Chains, Revitalizing American Manufacturing, and Fostering Broad-based Growth: 100-day Reviews Under Executive Order 14017, www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/100-day-supply-chain-review-report.pdf.
• 36. Willemain, T.R., Smart, C.N., Schwarz, H.F. (2004). A new approach to forecasting intermittent demand for service parts inventories. International Journal of forecasting, 20(3), 375-387, https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.4.1.55.285.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2023.178.24