Analysis of the Implementation of the Concept of Sustainable Development Using the Indicator Method

• Autorzy: Andrzej Pacana , Karolina Czerwińska , Peter Stolarik
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to perform an analysis of the essence and importance of the idea of sustainable development and an analysis of progress in meeting one of the Sustainable Development Goals in Poland and Slovakia using a system of indicators. The progress in implementing Sustainable Development Goal 9 (industry, innovation and infrastructure) of the document "Transforming Our World: Agenda for Sustainable Development - 2030" was analyzed. Design/methodology/approach: Achieving the purpose of the study required a structured research methodology, which included a diagnostic survey method, comparative analysis, and content analysis and desk research techniques were used as part of data collection. Findings: The realization of the analysis of the level of fulfillment of Goal 9 of the 2030 Agenda made it possible to identify the difficulties that arise from the specifics of the adopted research method. With regard to the level of fulfillment of Goal 9, it was found that Poland and Slovakia are gradually meeting the set objectives. A critical area in relation to Slovakia's development is the aspect of inventive activity, i.e. the country's ability to use knowledge and research results to reap potential economic benefits. Research limitations/implications: Through the implementation of the proposed methodology for analyzing data for Poland and Slovakia in relation to Sustainable Development Goal 9 (industry, innovation and infrastructure), it was found that monitoring progress in meeting the provisions of the 2030 Agenda using the indicator method is fraught with the following difficulties: the need to standardize relevant data for EU countries, lack of access or difficult access to adequate data in individual countries, generalizations and subjectivity due to the specifics of the indicator method. Practical implications: The indicator analysis of the completed research procedure contributes to the accumulation of factual knowledge and the identification of development trends, which is the foundation for determining milestones and strategic plans for the implementation of the concept of sustainable development. Originality/value: The analyses presented here complete the research gap regarding the diagnosis and analysis of the level of fulfillment of one of the goals of sustainable development with its assumptions by Poland and Slovakia against the background of the European Union. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Sustainable development; Agenda 2030

PL

Rozwój zrównoważony; Agenda 2030

• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2023
• Numer: z. 178 Współczesne zarządzanie = Contemporary Management
• Strony: 483--496

Twórcy

autor

Andrzej Pacana

• Rzeszow University of Technology

autor

Karolina Czerwińska

• Rzeszow University of Technology

autor

Peter Stolarik

• Technical University of Technology,Košice, Slovakia

Bibliografia

• 1. Adamowicz, M., Dresler, E. (2006). Zrównoważony rozwój obszarów wiejskich na przykładzie wybranych gmin województwa lubelskiego. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Rolniczej we Wrocławiu, 540, 17-24.
• 2. Astorga, E.M., Valdes, Z.M. (2021). Sustainable development and nonrenewable resources. Conceptual issues. Estudios Del Desarrollo Social-Cuba Y America Latina, Vol. 9, Iss. 3, pp. 348-362.
• 3. Becla, A., Czaja, S. (2022). Principles of management in implementing balanced and sustainable development - selected problems. Economics And Environment, Vol. 83, Iss. 4, pp. 20-34. DOI: 10.34659/eis.2022.83.4.489.
• 4. Bieksa, K., Valiule, V., Simanskiene, L., Silvestri, R. (2022). Assessment of sustainable economic development in the eu countries with reference to the sdgs and environmental footprint indices. Sustainability, Vol. 14, Iss. 8. DOI: 10.3390/su141811265.
• 5. Ceerne, A., Jansson, J. (2019). Projectification of sustainable development: implications from a critical review. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, pp. 356-376. DOI: 10.1108/IJMPB-04-2018-0079.
• 6. Czerwińska, K., Pacana, A., Grebski, M. (2022). Analysis of the fourth industrial revolution in the context of innovation and the idea of technology development. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization & Management, Vol. 166, pp. 167-179. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2022.166.11.
• 7. Czerwińska, K., Pacana, A. (2022). Analysis of the maturity of process monitoring in manufacturing companies. Production Engineering Archives, Vol. 23, Iss. 3, pp. 246-251. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2022.28.30.
• 8. Dagbanja, D.N. (2022). The CAI and Sustainable Development. Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 23, Iss. 4, pp. 572-600. DOI: 10.1163/22119000-12340261.
• 9. Dobrzański, P. (2011). Wzrost zrównoważony a ochrona środowiska. Podstawowe aspekty polityki gospodarczej, Prace Naukowe Wydziału Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, 8, 25-33.
• 10. Grebski, M., Czerwińska, K., Pacana, A. (2022). Swot analysis of individual components within the innovativeness ecosystem. Modern Management Review, Vol. 27, Iss. 2, pp. 57-66.
• 11. Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M. (2014). Znaczenie strategii proekologicznych w kontekście budowania przewagi konkurencyjnej przedsiębiorstw. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, Wyd. 366. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, pp. 152-162.
• 12. Hys, K. (2014). Ewolucja poglądu społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu - okres sensoryczno-motoryczny. Ekonomika i Organizacja Przedsiębiorstwa. Vol. 10, 107-114.
• 13. Kronenberg, J., Bergier, T. (eds.) (2010). Wyzwania zrównoważonego rozwoju w Polsce. Kraków: Fundacja Sendzimira.
• 14. Lazar, S., Potočan, V., Klimecka-Tatar, D., Obrecht, M. (202). Boosting sustainable operations with sustainable supply chain modeling: a case of organizational culture and normative commitment. International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, Vol. 19, Iss. 17. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191711131.
• 15. Manero-Salvador, A. (2022). 2030 Agenda, Global Law, and International Law. Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 11, Iss. 2, pp. 102-125. DOI: 10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.681.
• 16. Mikalauskine, A., Atkociuniene, Z. (2019). Knowledge management impact on sustainable development. Montenegrin Journal Of Economics, Vol. 15, Iss. 4, pp. 149-160. DOI: 10.14254/1800-5845/2019.15-4.11.
• 17. Novovic, G. (2022). Can Agenda 2030 bring about "localization"? Policy limitations of Agenda 2030 in the broader global governance system. Development Policy Review, Vol. 40, Iss. 4. DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12587.
• 18. Olkiewicz, M., Wolniak, R. (2020). Responsible Pro-Environmental Management in an Organization: a Case Study. Rocznik Ochrona Srodowiska, Vol. 2, Iss. 2, pp. 763-780.
• 19. Olkiewicz, M., Wolniak, R., Skotnicka-Zasadzien, B. (2019). Implementation of ISO 14001 Standard in the European Union Countries. Rocznik Ochrona Srodowiska, Vol. 21, Iss. 2, pp. 868-880.
• 20. Pacana, A., Czerwińska, K. (2019). Analysis of the causes of control panel inconsistencies in the gravitational casting process by means of quality management instruments. Production Engineering Archives, Vol. 25, Iss. 25, pp. 12-16. DOI: 10.30657/ pea.2019.25.03.
• 21. Pacana, A., Czerwińska, K., Bednárová, L., Džuková, J. (2020). Analysis of a practical approach to the concept of sustainable development in a manufacturing company in the automotive sector. Waste Forum, Vol. 3, pp. 151-161.
• 22. Pacana, A., Czerwińska, K., Ostasz, G. (2023). Analysis of the Level of Efficiency of Control Methods in the Context of Energy Intensity. Energies, Vol. 16, Iss. 8. No. 3507. DOI: 10.3390/en16083507.
• 23. Prawo ochrony środowiska (2001). Dz.U. 2001.62.627, art. 3, ust. 50.
• 24. Prüfer, P. (2006). Idea rozwoju ludzkiego. Myśl społeczna Kościoła w służbie rozwoju każdego człowieka i wszystkich osób. In: E. Piotrowski (ed.), Wobec Boga i człowieka. Księga pamiątkowa dla ks. prof. Romana Harmacińskiego. Zielona Góra/Gorzów Wielkopolski, p. 204.
• 25. Staniszewska, E., Klimecka-Tatar, D., Obrecht, M. (2020). Eco-design processes in the automotive industry. Production engineering Archives, Vol. 26, Iss. 4, pp. 131-137. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.25.
• 26. Szacka, B. (2008). Wprowadzenie do socjologii. Warszawa, pp. 104-108.
• 27. Ulewicz, R., Blaskova, M. (2018). Sustainable development and knowledge management from the stakeholders' point of view. Polish Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 18, Iss. 2, pp. 363-374. DOI: 10.17512/pjms.2018.18.2.29.
• 28. Ulewicz, R., Czerwińska, K., Pacana, A. (2023). A rank model of casting non-conformity detection methods in the context of Industry 4.0. Materials, Vol. 16, Iss. 2, No. 723. DOI: 10.3390/ma16020723.
• 29. Wolniak, R. (2022). Sustainable engineering. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization & Management, Vol. 160, pp. 565-667.
• 30. Wolniak, R. (2022). The role of the engineering profession in developing and implementing sustainable development principles. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization & Management, Vol. 155, pp. 595-608.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2023.178.27