Entropy-Based Waspas Approach for Financial Performance in the Covid-19 Era: Evidence from Islamic Countries

• Autorzy: Hilal H. Erdogan
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of this study is to compare financial performance of the Islamic banks in the COVID - 19 Era. The performance evaluation was conducted on seven Islamic countries between 2017 and 2021. Entropy Method was utilized to choose the best performance evaluation criteria affecting the Islamic banks' performance and Waspas Method was used to determine the best performing Islamic country. The results indicate that 'liquid assets to short-term liabilities' is the best performance criteria for Islamic banks during the 'whole period', 'no pandemic period' and 'pandemic period'. Additionally, while the Islamic country with the best performance was Bangladesh during 'no pandemic period', Turkey was the leading Islamic country for both 'whole period' and 'pandemic period'. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Financial performance; Islamic banking; COVID-19; Entropy

PL

Wynik finansowy; Bankowość islamska; COVID-19; Entropia

• Czasopismo: e-Finanse
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: 19
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 48--61

Twórcy

autor

Hilal H. Erdogan

• Montpellier Business School, France

Bibliografia

• Akyüz, F., Soba, A. §. & Ye§il, T. (2020). Evaluation of Financial Performance of Participation Banks with Camels Analysis Method. The Journal of Accounting and Finance, 87, 145-166.
• Alsu, E., Ta§demir, A., & Kallo, Z. (2018). Evaluation of Performances of Participation Banks: International Comparison with TOPSIS Method. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 17(1), 303-316.
• Altan, M. (2004). Türkiye'de Banka Gruplarinin Bilanço Di§i ï§lemleri ve Bu ï§lemlerin Bankalarin Karlilik, Sermaye Yeterliligi, Aktif Kalitesi ve Likiditesi Üzerinde Yarattgi Etki. SÜ iiBF Sosyal ve Ekonomik Ara§tirmalar Dergisi, 4(7), 19-37.
• Batir, T. E., Volkman, D. A. & Gungor, B. (2017). Determinants of Bank Efficiency in Turkey: Participation Banks versus Conventional Banks. Borsa Istanbul Review, 17(2), 86-96.
• Benli, Y. K., Karaca, S. S. & Bozdan, N. (2018). Measuring of Performance of Participation Banks with Camels Analysis in Turkey. Journal of Current Researches on Business and Economics, 8(2), 197-210.
• Cecchetti, S. G., Flores-Lagunes, A. & Krause, S. (2006). Has Monetary Policy Become More Efficient? A Cross-Country Analysis. The Economic Journal, 116(511), 408-433.
• Chakraborty, S. & Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). Applicatons of Waspas Method in Manufacturing Decision Making. Informatica, 25(1), 1-20.
• Chakraborty, S., Zavadskas, E. K. & Antucheviciene, J. (2014). Applications of Waspas Method as a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tool. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research. Academy of Economic Studies, 49(1), 5-22.
• ęetin, A. C. & Bitirak, i. A. (2010). Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach in Bank Performance Evaluation: An Application in the Commercial Banks and Participation Banks. Alanya i§letme Fakultesi Dergisi, 2(2), 75 -92.
• Demirguę-Kunt, A., Pedraza, A. & Ruiz-Ortega, C. (2021). Banking sector performance during the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 133(2021), 1-22.
• Elmas, B. & Yetim, A. (2021). Katilim Bankalarinin Finansal Performanslarinin TOPSiS Yontemi ile Uluslararasi Boyutta Degerlendirilmesi. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 7(3), 230-263.
• Elsayed, E. A., Dawood, A. K. S. & Karthikeyan, R. (2017). Evaluating Alternatives through the Application of TOPSIS Method with Entropy Weight. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 46(2), 60-66.
• Erdogan, H. H. (2022). A Multicriteria Decision Framework for Bank Performance Evaluation in Turkey. Suleyman Demirel Universitesi iktisadi ve idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi, 27(1), 98-109.
• Gumrah, A. (2016). Measuring the Performance of Participation Banks by TOPSIS Method: Turkey and Malaysia cases. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 5(1), 211-218.
• Hassan, M. K. & Bashir, A. H. M. (2006). Determinants of Islamic Banking Profitability. Book Chapter in Islamic Perspectives on Wealth Creation, Edinburgh University Press New York: Columbia University Press.
• Haseeb, M. (2018). Emerging Issues in Islamic Banking & Finance: Challenges and Solutions. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 22(Special Issue), 1-5.
• Husna, N. & Desiyanti, R. (2016). The Analysis of Financial Performance on Net Profit Margin at the Coal Company. International Journal of Management and Applied Science, 2(4), 105-108.
• Hwang, C. L. & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attributes Decision Making: Methods and Applications. New York: Springer -Verlag.
• Khan, A. Q. & Bhatti, A. A. (2018). Islamic Banking and Finance: A New Paradigm in International Relations. Journal of Islamic Business and Management, 8(1), 85-101.
• Lai, Y. L., Liu, T. Y. & Hwang, C. L. (1994). TOPSIS for MODM. European Journal of Operational Research, 76(3), 486 -500.
• Mahdi, M. & Khaddafi, M. (2020). The Influence of Gross Profit Margin, Operating Profit Margin and Net Profit Margin on the Stock Price of Consumer Good Industry in the Indonesia Stock Exchange on 2012-2014. International Journal of Business Economics and Social Development, 1(3), 34-55.
• Moin, M. S. (2018). Performance of Islamic Banking and Conventional Banking in Pakistan: A comparative study. School of Technology and Society, University of Skovde.
• Nayman Hamamci, H. & Karkacier, A. (2022). Evaluation of Financial Performance of Participation Banks in Turkey and GCC with TOPSIS Method. Uluslararasi Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, 8(1), 55-78.
• Obeidat, M., Tarawneh, A., Khataibeh, M. & Ghassan, O. (2021). The Performance of Banks in a Developing Country: Has COVID-19 Made Any Difference? Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 8(2), 102-108.
• Ozkan, T. (2019). Performance Measurement of Participation Banks in Turkey: An Application based on Analysis of Camels. Turkish Studies Economics, Finance, Politics, 14(3), 903 -920.
• Saleh, I., Afifa, M. A. & Murray, L. (2020). The Effect of Credit Risk, Liquidity Risk and Bank Capital on Bank Profitability: Evidence from an Emerging Market. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1-13.
• Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379 -423.
• Spathis, Ch., Kosmidou, K. & Doumpos, M. (2002). Assessing Profitability Factors in the Greek Banking System: A Mul-ticriteria Methodology. International Transactions in Operational Research, 9(5), 517-530.
• Viverita, V., Bustaman, Y. & Danarsari, D. N. (2023). Liquidity Creation by Islamic and Conventional Banks during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Heliyon, 9(4), 1-14.
• Vodova, P. (2013). Determinants of Commercial Bank Liquidity in Hungary. e-Finanse, 9(3), 64-71.
• Wang, T. C. & Lee, H. D. (2009). Developing a Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach based on Subjective Weights and Objective Weights. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 8980-8985.
• Wu, J., Sun, J., Liang, L. & Zha, Y. (2011). Determination of Weights for Ultimate Cross Efficiency using Shannon Entropy. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 5162-5165.
• Yagli, i. (2020). Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks. Alanya Academic Review Journal, 4(3), 861-873.
• Yayar, R. & Baykara, H. V. (2012). An Implementation upon Efficiency and Productivity of Participation Banks with TOPSIS Method. Business and Economics Research Journal, 3(4), 21-42.
• Yildiz, S. B. (2020). Performance Analysis of Turkey's Participation and Conventional Indices using TOPSIS Method. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(7), 1403-1416.
• Yilmaz, B. O., Tozan, H. & Karadayi, M. A. (2020). Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Applications in Military Healthcare Field. Journal of Health Systems and Policies, 2(2), 149-181.
• Yoon, K. & Hwang, C. L. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. & Antucheviciene, J. (2012). Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment. Electronics and Electrical Enginering, 122(6), 3-6.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/fiqf-2023-0018