Intellectual and Cognitive Structures of The Agricultural Competitiveness Research under Climate Change and Structural Transformation

• Autorzy: Ana-Isabel García-Agüero , Eduardo Terán-Yépez , Ana Batlles-delaFuente , Luis J. Belmonte-Ureña , Francisco Camacho-Ferre
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Research background: Although agricultural competitiveness is not a new topic, it is worth noting that it has recently come back to the attention of researchers due to various factors such as climate change, food security, price uncertainty, or structural transformation. Consequently, a growing number of articles have emerged on this subject, leading to shifts in overarching research trends and the structure of research within this domain.
Purpose of the article: This study aims to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the research constituents within the field of agricultural competitiveness. Additionally, it seeks to unveil the intellectual and cognitive frameworks spanning the years 1990 to 2022. This explo-ration will enable the identification of thematic clusters that both shape and guide the field, shedding light on current research trends.
Methods: This research employs bibliometric analysis, specifically employing performance analysis and science mapping techniques like bibliographic coupling and co-word analyses. These tools are harnessed to scrutinize the constituents of research and the underlying intel-lectual and cognitive structures inherent to the agricultural competitiveness field. A dataset of 622 articles from the Web of Science database was subjected to analysis using the VOSviewer software.
Findings & value added: The findings prominently illustrate a notable surge in research activity within this domain, with a substantial proportion of articles originating from the United States. The study further identifies six distinct research topics within agricultural competitiveness: (1) energy efficiency and bioenergy, (2) price fluctuation, uncertainty, and market behavior, (3) structural transformation of agriculture, (4) rural development, (5) policy issues, and (6) climate change. Moreover, the research offers insights into potential future research avenues. The uniqueness and value of this work stem from its pioneering approach, being the first to synthesize agricultural competitiveness research through an amalgamation of bibliometric techniques. Furthermore, the study contributes substantially to the theoretical advancement of agricultural competitiveness research. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Agriculture; Sustainable agriculture; Competitiveness

PL

Rolnictwo; Rolnictwo zrównoważone; Konkurencyjność

• Czasopismo: Oeconomia Copernicana
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: 14
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 1175--1209

Twórcy

autor

Ana-Isabel García-Agüero

• University of Almeria, Spain

autor

Eduardo Terán-Yépez

• University of Almeria (ceiA3), CIMEDES Research Center, Spain

autor

Ana Batlles-delaFuente

• niversity of Almeria (ceiA3), Research Centre CIAIMBITAL, Spain

autor

Luis J. Belmonte-Ureña

• University of Almeria (ceiA3), Research Centre CIAIMBITAL, Spain

autor

Francisco Camacho-Ferre

• University of Almeria (ceiA3), Research Centre CIAIMBITAL, Spain

Bibliografia

• Adamchuk, N. (2023). Innovative digital technologies for ensuring financial integration in the Eurasian economic union. In A. Baykov & E. Zinovieva (Eds). Digital international relations (pp. 329-343). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-3467-6_21.
• Anderson, K., & S. Nelgen. (2012). Trade barrier volatility and agricultural price stabilization. World Development, 40(1), 36-48. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.05.018.
• Ariga, J., Mabaya, E., Waithaka, M., & Wanzala-Mlobela, M. (2019). Can improved agricultural technologies spur a green revolution in Africa? A multicountry analysis of seed and fertilizer delivery systems. Agricultural Economics, 50, 63-74. doi: 10.1111/agec.12533.
• Bai, Y., Ouyang, Y., & Pang, J.S. (2012). Biofuel supply chain design under competitive agricultural land use and feedstock market equilibrium. Energy Economics, 34(5), 1623-1633. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.01.003.
• Bellemare, M. F., Lee, Y. N., & Just, D. R. (2020). Producer attitudes toward output price risk: Experimental evidence from the lab and from the field. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 102(3), 806-825. doi: 10.1002/ajae.12004.
• Benjamin, D. (1992). Household composition, labor markets, and labor demand: Testing for separating in agricultural household models. Econometrica, 60(2), 287-322. doi: 10.2307/2951598.
• Bhagat, P. R., Naz, F., & Magda, R. (2022). Artificial intelligence solutions enabling sustainable agriculture: A bibliometric analysis. PloS One, 17(6), e0268989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268989.
• Binswanger-Mkhize, H. P. (2012). Is there too much hype about index-based agricultural insurance? Journal of Development Studies, 48(2), 187-200. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2011.625411.
• Bogetoft, P. (2005). An information economic rationale for cooperatives. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32(2), 191-217. doi: 10.1093/eurrag/jbi010.
• Boix-Fayos, C., & de Vente, J. (2023). Challenges and potential pathways towards sustainable agriculture within the European Green Deal. Agricultural Systems, 207, 103634. doi: doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103634.
• Bojnec, Š., & Papler, D. (2011). Efficient energy use and renewable sources of energy in Slovenia: A survey of public perception. Agricultural Economics-Czech Republic, 57(10), 484-492. doi: 10.17221/83/2010-AGRICECON.
• Bongardt, A., & Torres, F. (2022). The European green deal: More than an exit strategy to the pandemic crisis, a building block of a sustainable European economic model. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(1), 170-185. doi: 10.1111/jcms.13264.
• Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. (2005). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179-255. doi: 10.1002/ARIS.1440370106.
• Boyd, C. M., & Bellemare, M. F. (2022). Why not insure prices? experimental evidence from Peru. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 202, 580-631. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.08.004.
• Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191-235. doi: 10.1177/05390188302200200.
• Campi, M., Dueñas, M., & Fagiolo, G. (2021). Specialization in food production affects global food security and food systems sustainability. World Development, 141, 105411. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105411.
• Castillo-Díaz, F. J., Belmonte-Ureña, L. J., Batlles-delaFuente, A., & Camacho-Ferre, F. (2023). Impact of environmental policies on the profitability of greenhouse agriculture in Southeastern Spain. Sustainable Development. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1002/sd.2616.
• Cavazza, A., Dal Mas, F., Paoloni, P., & Manzo, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence and new business models in agriculture: A structured literature review and future research agenda. British Food Journal, 125(13), 436-461. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-02-2023-0132.
• Čechura, L., Kroupová, Z. Z., & Lekešová, M. (2022). Productivity and efficiency in czech agriculture: Does farm size matter? Agricultural Economics, 68(1), 1-10. doi: 10.17221/384/2021-AGRICECON.
• Cillero, M. M., & Reaños, M. T. (2023). Farm technical and environmental efficiency and subsidy redistribution in Ireland: A simulation approach of possible performance and equity effects. Journal of Agricultural Economics 74(2), 394-412. doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12509.
• Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 146-166. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002.
• Connolly, C., & Klaiber, H. A. (2014). Does organic command a premium when the food is already local? American Journal of Agriculture Economics, 96(4), 1102-1116. doi: 10.1093/ajae/aau030.
• Coomes, O. T. (1996). State credit programs and the peasantry under populist regimes: Lessons from the Apra experience in the Peruvian amazon. World Development, 24(8), 1333-1346. doi 10.1016/0305-750X(96)00039-3.
• Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2009). Trade, tragedy, and the commons. American Economic Review, 99(3), 725-749. doi: 10.1257/aer.99.3.725.
• Crespi, J. M., Saitone, T. L., & Sexton, R. J. (2012). Competition in U.S. farm product markets: Do long-run incentives trump shortrun market power? Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 34(4), 669-695. doi: 10.1093/aepp/pps045.
• Deininger, K., Jin, S., & Ma, M. (2022). Structural transformation of the agricultural sector in low-and middle-income economies. Annual Review of Resource Economies, 14, 221-241. doi: 10.1146/annurev-resource-111820.
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
• Du, X., Lu, L., Reardon, T., & Zilberman, D. (2016). Economics of agricultural supply chain design: A portfolio selection approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 98(5), 1377-1388. doi: 10.1093/ajae/aaw074.
• Duque-Acevedo, M., Belmonte-Ureña, L. J., Terán-Yepez, E., & Camacho-Ferre, F. (2022). Sustainability and circularity in fruit and vegetable production. Perceptions and practices of reduction and valorization of agricultural waste biomass in south-eastern Spain. Journal of Environmental Management, 316, 115270. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115270.
• European Commission (2023). Sustainable development goals. Retrieved from https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/sustainable-development-goals_en.
• Food and Agriculture Organization (2009). How to feed the world in 2050.
• German, L. A., Bonanno, A. M., Foster, L. C., & Cotula, L. (2020). Development review ''inclusive business" in agriculture: Evidence from the evolution of agricultural value chains. World Development, 134. 105018. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105018.
• Han, S., & He, P. (2012). Reforms, WTO, arbitrage efficiency and integration between the China-US soybean markets. China Agricultural Economic Review, 4(3), 318-341. doi: 10.1108/17561371211263356.
• Havlík, P., Veysset, P., Boisson, J. M., Lherm, M., & Jacquet, F. (2005). Joint production under uncertainty and multifunctionality of agriculture: Policy considerations and applied analysis. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32(4), 489-515. doi: 10.1093/erae/jbi027.
• Hennessy, D. A. (1998). The production effects of agricultural income support policies under uncertainty. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1), 46-57. doi: 10.2307/3180267.
• Hernández-Espallardo, M., Arcas-Lario, N., Sánchez-Navarro, J. L., & Marcos-Matás, G. (2022). Curbing members' opportunism in first-tier and federated agricultural marketing cooperatives. Agribusiness, 38(1), 195-219. doi: 10.1002/AGR.21718.
• Hoang, V. V. (2020). Investigating the agricultural competitiveness of ASEAN countries. Journal of Economic Studies, 47(2), 307-332. doi: 10.1108/JES-10-2018-0366.
• Howitt, R. E. (1995). Positive mathematical programming. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(2), 329-342. doi: 10.2307/1243543.
• Huffman, W. E., & Evenson, R. E. (2006). Do formula or competitive grant funds have greater impacts on state agricultural productivity? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(4), 783-798. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00898.x.
• Ionescu, R. V., Zlati, M. L., Antohi, V. L., & Stanciu, S. (2020). Modelling EU agricul- ture's regional disparities under the national accounting system's approach. The impact of the new economic and environmental challenges. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 34(1), 902-928. doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2020.1805347.
• Isik, M. (2002). Resource management under production and output price under production and output price uncertainty: Implications for environmental policy. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(3), 557-571. doi: 10.1111/1467-8276.00319.
• Istudor, N., Constantin, M., Ignat, R., Chiripuci, B. C., & Petrescu, I. E. (2022). The complexity of agricultural competitiveness: Going beyond the Balassa index. Journal of Competitiveness, 14(4), 61-77. doi: 10.7441/joc.2022.04.04.
• Khalid, M. W., Kayani, A. S., Alotaibi, J. M., Muddassir, M., Alotaibi, B. A., & Kassem, H. (2020). Regional trade and food security challenges: The case of saarc countries. Agricultural Economics-Czech Republic, 66(7), 335-344. doi: 10.17221/3/2020-AGRICECON.
• Khan, M. A. (2020). Cross sectoral linkages to explain structural transformation in nepal. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 52, 221-235. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2019.11.005.
• Kirwan, B. E. (2009). The incidence of U.S. agricultural subsidies on farmland rental rates. Journal of Political Economy, 117(1), 138-164. doi: 10.1086/598688.
• Kruijssen, F., Keizer, M., & Giuliani, A. (2009). Collective action for small-scale producers of agricultural biodiversity products. Food Policy 34, 46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.10.008.
• Kožar, M., Kempen, M., Britz, W., & Erjavec, E. (2012). Flattening and redistribution of the cap direct payments for the EU27 regions. Agricultural Economics, 58(10), 443-453. doi: 10.17221/144/2011-AGRICECON.
• Kumar, R., Kumar, P., Aljuhani, A., Islam, A. N., Jolfaei, A., & Garg, S. (2022). Deep learning and smart contract-assisted secure data sharing for IoT-based intelligent agriculture. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 38(4), 42-51. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2022.3201553.
• Latacz-Lohmann, U., & Van Der Hamsvoort, C. P. C. M. (1998). Auctions as a means of creating a market for public goods from agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49(3), 334-345. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1998.tb01276.x.
• Latruffe, L. (2010). Competitiveness, productivity and efficiency in the agricultural and agri-food sectors. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, 30. doi: 10.1787/5km91nkdt6d6-en.
• Lauri, P., Havlík, P., Kindermann, G., Forsell, N., Böttcher, H., & Obersteiner, M. (2014). Woody biomass energy potential in 2050. Energy Policy, 66, 19-31. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.033.
• Lloyd, T. (2017). Forty years of price transmission research in the food industry: Insights, challenges and prospects. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(1), 3-21. doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12205.
• Luo, J., Guo, H., & Jia, F. (2017). Technological innovation in agricultural cooperatives in china: Implications for agrofood innovation policies. Food Policy, 73, 19-33. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.09.001.
• Ma, S. (2022). Growth effects of economic integration: New evidence from the belt and road initiative. Economic Analysis and Policy, 73, 753-767. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2022.01.004.
• Matkovski, B., Lovre, K., & Zekic, S. (2017). The foreign trade liberalization and export of agri-food products of Serbia. Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic), 63(7), 331-345. doi: 10.17221/345/2015-AGRICECON.
• Miranda, F. J., García-Gallego, J. M., Chamorro-Mera, A., Valero-Amaro, V., & Rubio, S. (2023). A systematic review of the literature on agri-food business models: Critical review and research agenda. British Food Journal. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-12-2022-1102.
• Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213-228. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5.
• Moschini, G. C., Menapace, L., & Pick, D. (2008). Geographical indications and the competitive provision of quality in agricultural markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(3), 794-812. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01142.x.
• Moschini, G., & Lapan, H. (1997). Intellectual property rights and the welfare effects of agricultural R&D. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(4), 1229-1242. doi: 10.2307/1244280.
• Mukherjee, D., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research, 148, 101-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042.
• Munteanu, D. R., Vanderstraeten, J., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Cambré, B. (2022). A systematic literature review on SME internationalization: A personality lens. Management Review Quarterly, 73, 1457-1518. doi: 10.1007/s11301-022-00279-4.
• Murphy, R., Woods, J., Black, M., & Mcmanus, M. (2011). Global developments in the competition for land from biofuels. Food Policy, 36, 552-561. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.014.
• Nowak, A., & Kasztelan, A. (2022). Economic competitiveness vs. green competitiveness of agriculture in the European Union countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(2), 379-405. doi: 10.24136/OC.2022.012.
• Nowak, A., & Różańska-Boczula, M. (2022). The competitiveness of agriculture in EU member states according to the competitiveness pyramid model. Agriculture, 12, 28. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12010028.
• Nowak, A., & Różańska-Boczula, M. (2023). A comparative view of the level of agricultural sustainability-The case of European Union member states. Sustainable Development. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1002/sd.2804.
• Nugroho, A. D., Prasada, I. Y., & Lakner, Z. (2023). Comparing the effect of climate change on agricultural competitiveness in developing and developed countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 406, 137139. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137139.
• Ogutu, H., El Archi, Y., & Dénes Dávid, L. (2023). Current trends in sustainable organization management: A bibliometric analysis. Oeconomia Copernicana 14(1), 11-45. doi: 10.24136/OC.2023.001.
• Osborne, T. (2005). Imperfect competition in agricultural markets: Evidence from Ethiopia. Journal of Development Economics, 76, 405-428. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.02.002.
• Paul, C. M., Nehring, R., & Banker, D. (2004). Scale economies and efficiency in U.S. agriculture: Are traditional farms history? Journal of Productivity Analysis, 22, 185-205. doi: 10.1007/s11123-004-7573-1.
• Pegels, A., & Altenburg T. (2020). Latecomer development in a ''greening" world: Introduction to the special issue. World Development, 135, 105084. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105084.
• Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., & Reig-Martínez, E. (2006). Outsourcing and efficiency: The case of Spanish citrus farming. Agricultural Economics, 35(2), 213-222. doi: 10.1111/J.1574-0862.2006.00154.X.
• Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Bachrach, D. G., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2005). The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 473-488. doi: 10.1002/SMJ.454.
• Pope, R. D., & Just, R. E. (1991). On testing the structure of risk preferences in agricultural supply analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(3), 743-748. doi: 10.2307/1242826.
• Ribeiro, B., & Shapira, P. (2019). Anticipating governance challenges in synthetic biology: Insights from biosynthetic menthol. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139, 311-320. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.020.
• Rogers, G., Szomszor, M., & Adams, J. (2020). Sample size in bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 125, 777-794. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03647-7.
• Rumankova, L., Kuzmenko, E., Benesova, I., & Smutka, L. (2022). Selected EU countries crop trade competitiveness from the perspective of the Czech Republic. Agriculture, 12(2), 127. doi: 10.3390/AGRICULTURE12020127.
• Russo, C., Goodhue, R. E., & Sexton, R. J. (2011). Agricultural support policies in imperfectly competitive markets: Why market power matters in policy design. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93(5), 1328-1340. doi: 10.1093/AJAE/AAR050.
• Sarker, R., & Ratnasena, S. (2014). Revealed comparative advantage and half-a-century competitiveness of Canadian agriculture: A case study of wheat, beef, and pork sectors. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(4), 519-544. doi: 10.1111/cjag.12057.
• Sarris, A., Doucha, T., & Mathijs, E. (1999). Agricultural restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe: Implications for competitiveness and rural development. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 26(3), 305-329. doi: 10.1093/erae/26.3.305.
• Serra, T., Zilberman, D., Goodwin, B. K., & Featherstone, A. (2006). Effects of decoupling on the mean and variability of output. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 33(3), 269-288. doi: 10.1093/erae/jbl014.
• Sexton, R. J., Sheldon, I., McCorriston, S., & Wang, H. (2007). Agricultural trade liberalization and economic development: The role of downstream market power. Agricultural Economics, 36(2), 253-270. doi: 10.1111/J.1574-0862.2007.00203.X.
• Shaikh, T. A., Rasool, T., & Lone, F. R. (2022). Towards leveraging the role of machine learning and artificial intelligence in precision agriculture and smart farming. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 198, 107119. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.107119.
• Sharma, A., Georgi, M., Tregubenko, M., Tselykh, A., & Tselykh, A. (2022). Enabling smart agriculture by implementing artificial intelligence and embedded sensing. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 165, 107936. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.107936.
• Singh, N., Jain, S., & Sharma, P. (2015). Motivations for implementing environmen- tal management practices in Indian industries. Ecological Economics, 109, 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.003.
• Soregaroli, C., Sckokai, P., & Moro, D. (2011). Agricultural policy modelling under imperfect competition. Journal of Policy Modeling, 33, 195-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.12.001.
• Styles, D., & Jones, M. B. (2007). Current and future financial competitiveness of electricity and heat from energy crops: A case study from Ireland. Energy Policy, 35, 4355-4367. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.02.035.
• Sun, H., Li, P., & Ouyang, Y. (2023). Standardization and international competitiveness: Evidence from China´s agricultural products. Applied Economics Letters, 30(8), 1090-1096. doi: 10.1080/13504851.2022.2036677.
• The World Bank (2007). World development report 2008: Agriculture for development. The World Bank.
• The World Bank (2023). Agriculture and food. Retrieved from https://www.banco mundial.org/es/topic/agriculture/overview.
• Timmer, C. P. (1992). Agriculture and economic development revisited. Agricultural Systems, 40(1-3), 21-58. doi: 10.1016/0308-521X(92)90015-G.
• United Nations (2023). United Nations sustainable development. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainable-development/.
• United Nations (2008). International standard industrial classification of all activities. Statistical Papers, 4(4).
• Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
• Vijayakumar, A. N., & Bozward, D. (2021). International market integration and competitiveness of Indian sugar. Global Business Review. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0972150920988646.
• Vrabcová, P., & Urbancová, H. (2021a). Implementation of voluntary instruments by Czech enterprises to meet sustainability and competitive growth. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(3), 165-184. doi: 10.7441/joc.2021.03.10.
• Vrabcová, P., & Urbancová, H. (2021b). Approaches of selected organisations in the Czech Republic to promoting the concept of sustainable development and corporate social responsibility. Agricultural Economics, 67(7), 255-65. doi: 10.17221/8/2021-AGRICECON.
• Winchester, N., & Reilly, J. M. (2015). The feasibility, costs, and environmental im- plications of large-scale biomass energy. Energy Economics, 51, 188-203. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.06.016.
• Wright, B. (2014). Global Biofuels: Key to the puzzle of grain market behavior. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(1), 73-98. doi: 10.1257/jep.28.1.73.
• Zhang, Z., Du, J., Shen, Z., El Asraoui, H., & Song, M. (2024). Effects of modern agricultural demonstration zones on cropland utilization efficiency: An empirical study based on county pilot. Journal of Environmental Management, 349, 119530. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119530.
• Zhang, X. B., Yang, J., & Thomas, R. (2017). Mechanization outsourcing clusters and division of labor in Chinese agriculture. China Economic Review, 43, 184-195. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2017.01.012.
• Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. doi: 10.1177/1094428114562629.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24136/oc.2023.035