PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2023 | z. 179 Współczesne zarządzanie = Contemporary Management | 35--49
Tytuł artykułu

Game-dev Socially Responsible. Is CSR in the Video Game Industry More Than Image-building Activities?

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The study's primary purpose was to identify CSR activities performed by key players in the game-dev sector in the context of the brand's overall activities and the consistency of their cases. The specific objectives were to define CSR areas and isolate activities in these areas of selected game-dev industry entities - and then compare them with each other to determine whether, in their case, corporate social responsibility is an image-building tool or actual activities that build the image of a responsible brand. Design/methodology/approach: The authors highlighted the CSR practices used by game developers and producers, their characteristics and their juxtaposition with other areas of these companies' operations. Then, using desk research analysis, the effects of such strategies on game-dev companies, such as Techland, Electronic Arts or Ubisoft, were studied, as well as the identified potential risks for gamers resulting from these practices - the problem of game jams and unclear copyright rules for ongoing projects, among others, was addressed. Findings: Game developers can implement CSR activities through their products (by addressing social issues in the game's content and mechanics) and around them - by undertaking various projects that demonstrate social responsibility. While necessary and often valuable, CSR activities build a positive brand image, drawing attention away from unethical or questionable business practices, such as micropayment mechanisms that use gambling patterns. Social implications: As a result of applying corporate social responsibility measures, game-dev companies are gaining trust from gamers, who view the gaming reality as more secure and comfortable, thus being more exposed to the risks of mechanisms such as lootboxes or vaguely designed game business models. Originality/value: The article is primarily addressed to researchers and scholars dealing with the field of CSR in the context of its consistency with the main objects of companies. The work may also interest students in marketing, psychology, culture, and game studies. In addition, the article is also valuable for parents and guardians of those particularly vulnerable to abuse by game developers and producers - minors. (original abstract)
Twórcy
  • Wroclaw University of Economics and Business
  • University of Lower Silesia, Wroclaw
Bibliografia
  • 1. Bae, J., Park, H.-H., Koo, D.-M. (2019). Perceived CSR initiatives and intention to purchase game items The motivational mechanism of self-esteem and compassion. Internet Research, 29(2), 329-348. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-11-2017-0469.
  • 2. Carroll, A.B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G.
  • 3. Clement, J. (2022). Net revenue generated by Electronic Arts (EA) from extra content sales for Ultimate Team mode form fiscal 2018 to 2021. Statista. https://www.statista.com/ statistics/217474/electronic-arts-ea-ultimate-team-revenue/.
  • 4. Corporate Social Responsibility (n.d.). Ubisoft. Retrieved from: https://www.ubisoft.com/ en-us/company/careers/our-jobs/talent-culture/corporate-social-responsibility, 6 July 2023.
  • 5. Electronic Arts (n.d.). Our Commitment to Social Impact. Retrieved from: https://www.ea.com/commitments/social-impact, 6 July 2023.
  • 6. Fowler, A., Khosmood, F., Arya, A., Lai, G. (2013). The Global Game Jam for Teaching and Learning. In M. Lopez & M. Verhaart (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of Computing and Information Technology Research and Education. New Zealand (CITRENZ2013).
  • 7. Griffin, R.W. (2022). Podstawy zarządzania organizacjami. PWN. https://ksiegarnia.pwn.pl/Podstawy-zarzadzania-organizacjami,729758539,p.html.
  • 8. Griffiths, M. (2014). Call of Duty (of Care): Social Responsibility and the Videogame Industry. https://www.gamedeveloper.com/business/call-of-duty-of-care-social-responsibility-and-the-videogame-industry.
  • 9. Jamali, D., Mirshak, R. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-006-9168-4/METRICS.
  • 10. Jones, P., Comfort, D., Hillier, D. (2013). Playing the game: Corporate social responsibility and the games industry. Journal of Public Affairs, 13(3), 335-344. https://doi.org/10.1002/PA.1457.
  • 11. Kamiński, J. (2019). Dynamiczny rozwój branży gier komputerowych. https://obserwatorgospodarczy.pl/2019/06/21/dynamiczny-rozwoj-branzy-gier-komputerowych/?fbclid=IwAR2uHQtmbiJ59nU-3zOfgjxGadWI2_oCJnJwl0Wb-pNTY-yMrfF0lM5-KE4.
  • 12. Kim, J. (Sunny), Lee, C.K. (2019). Effects of CSR, responsible gambling, and negative social impacts on perceived benefits and quality of life in gaming communities. Tourism Economics, 25(4), 500-519. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816618797199/ASSET/IMAGES/ LARGE/10.1177_1354816618797199-FIG1.JPEG.
  • 13. Krok, E. (2016). The video game market and its participants. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia Informatica, 40(2), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.18276/si.2016.40-05.
  • 14. Lin, S.-Y. (2022). Ready Player Green - A Case Study of Sustainability in The Swedish Games Industry [Masterthesis in Sustainable Development at Uppsala University]. Uppsala University.
  • 15. Luc-Lepianka, S. (2023, July 25). Techland w rękach Chin. Kolejne polskie studio gier przejęte przez giganta. INNPoland.Pl. https://innpoland.pl/196529,tencent-kupuje-techland-chiny-nabywaja-kolejne-polskie-studio.
  • 16. Luo, J.M., Huang, G.Q., Lam, C.F. (2019). Barriers to the Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility in Gaming Industry. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 20(5), 528-551. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2018.1563019.
  • 17. Madsen, H. (2021). Ubisoft's latest controversy highlights a disturbing gaming industry trend. Inverse.Com. https://www.inverse.com/gaming/ubisoft-axios-report-exodus-of-developers-assassins-creed.
  • 18. Meriläinen, M., Aurava, R., Kultima, A., Stenros, J. (2020). Game Jams for Learning and Teaching: A Review. International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL), 10(2), 54-71. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2020040104.
  • 19. Nowakowski, K.R. (2008). Raport z badania społecznej odpowiedzialności mediów w systemie gospodarki rynkowej.
  • 20. PolskiGamedev.pl. (2021). Regulamin - Game Jam. https://gamejam.polskigamedev.pl/ regulamin/.
  • 21. Preston, J.A., Chastine, J., O'Donnell, C., Tseng, T., MacIntyre, B. (2012). Game Jams: Community, Motivations, and Learning among Jammers. International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL), 2(3), 51-70. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2012070104.
  • 22. PwC (2017). Perspectives from the Global Entertainment and Media Outlook 2017-2021. Curtain up! User experience takes center stage. www.pwc.com/outlook.
  • 23. Sobociński, M., Strzelczyk, M. (2019). Przegląd rozwiązań z zakresu CSR w branży gier wideo. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 20(11), 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1287/ MNSC.2018.3043.
  • 24. Sosnowski, W. (2017). Dwa aspekty 'youtubifikacji' gier video - analiza wybranych przykładów nowego zjawiska w branży gier wideo. Homo Ludens, 1(10), 239-252.
  • 25. Sosnowski, W. (2023). Parlament Europejski o branży twórców gier video - główne kierunki zmian. https://www.parp.gov.pl/component/content/article/84409:parlament-europejski-o-branzy-tworcow-gier-video-glowne-kierunki-zmian?fbclid=IwAR31gJtbJP VO46f8wwGMLeJdixcvf-5uixBlYgocg2FspGtL-JHBDAeZ_hg.
  • 26. Staniszewski, M. (2022). Branża Gamedev i zakaz konkurencji. https://rpms.pl/branza-gamedev-i-zakaz-konkurencji/?fbclid=IwAR2OEMaqiQxfA0Gv8rv-DDi92dPQ3LvDjlrr PKR9zr91570ZFm0ZZRYhuMI.
  • 27. Techland (n.d.). About Techland. Retrieved from: https://techland.net/company/about-techland, 19 August 2023.
  • 28. Techland (2015). Regulamin - Techland Game Jam. http://techland.pl/gamejam/regulamin.
  • 29. Techland - milion złotych na rzecz Polskiej Akcji Humanitarnej (2022, March 2). ICAN Institute. https://www.ican.pl/b/techland---milion-zlotych-na-rzecz-polskiej-akcji-humanitarnej/PrjUko6yq.
  • 30. United States Chamber of Commerce Foundation (2019a). Corporate Social Responsibility in the Gaming Industry. https://www.uschamberfoundation.org/reports/corporate-social-responsibility-gaming-industry.
  • 31. United States Chamber of Commerce Foundation. (2019b). Corporate Social Responsibility in the Gaming Industry. https://www.uschamberfoundation.org/reports/corporate-social-responsibility-gaming-industry.
  • 32. Yin-Poole, W. (2023, July 18). EA's Message to People Upset Women Can Play With Men in FC 24 Ultimate Team: Kick Off Mode Is Right There. IGN.Com.
  • 33. Yousafzai, S., Hussain, Z., Griffiths, M. (2013). Social responsibility in online videogaming: What should the videogame industry do? Addiction Research and Theory, 22(3), 181-185. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2013.812203.
  • 34. Zendle, D., Cairns, P., Barnett, H., McCall, C. (2020). Paying for loot boxes is linked to problem gambling, regardless of specific features like cash-out and pay-to-win. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2019.07.003.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171681646

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.