PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2023 | nr 5 (67) | 50--66
Tytuł artykułu

O zależności pomiędzy zdolnościami dynamicznymi i innowacyjnością oraz o moderującej roli luzów organizacyjnych

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
On the Interplay of the Dynamic Capabilities and Innovation with the moderating Role of Slack Resources
Języki publikacji
PL
Abstrakty
Celem niniejszego artykułu jest próba wyjaśnienia relacji pomiędzy zdolnościami dynamicznymi organizacji, poziomem luzów organizacyjnych oraz innowacyjności przedsiębiorstwa. Wykorzystując dane empiryczne z 422 polskich organizacji, zgromadzonych w 2021 roku, przeprowadzono analizy ilościowe dotyczące związków pomiędzy wskazanymi zależnościami. Przeprowadzone analizy statystyczne wykazały, że zdolności do dostrzegania, wykorzystywania i rekonfiguracji zasobów stanowią istotny czynnik determinujący poziom innowacyjności przedsiębiorstwa. Artykuł podejmuje tematykę związków pomiędzy zdolnościami dynamicznymi i innowacyjnością w kontekście luzów organizacyjnych. Zgodnie z wiedzą autorów jest to pierwsze tego typu ujęcie w literaturze krajowej i jedno z pierwszych w międzynarodowym stanie wiedzy. Wzbogaca tym samym stan wiedzy dotyczący problematyki innowacyjności w organizacji, wskazując jednoznacznie na jej uwarunkowania.(abstrakt oryginalny)
EN
This article explains the relationship between the organization's dynamic capabilities, the level of organizational slack, and the innovativeness of the enterprise. Using empirical data from 422 Polish organizations collected in 2021. Quantitative analyses, including correlation, factor, regression, variance inflation factors, structural equation modeling, and moderation analyses, reveal that the ability to perceive, utilize, and reconfigure resources significantly determines innovativeness.The article discusses the relationship between dynamic abilities and innovation in the context of organizational slack. According to the authors' knowledge, this is the first approach of this type in the national literature and one of the first in the international state of knowledge. Thus, it enriches the organization's knowledge of innovation issues, clearly pointing to its determinants.(original abstract)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
50--66
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
  • Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
  • Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
  • Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Bibliografia
  • Adomako, S. i Nguyen, N. P. (2020). Human Resource Slack, Sustainable Innovation, and Environmental Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in sub-Saharan Africa. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 2984-2994.
  • Agusti-Perez, M., Galan, J. L. i Acedo, F. J. (2020). Relationship between Slack Resources and Performance: Temporal Symmetry and Duration of Effects. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 29(3), 255-275.
  • Ang, S. i Straub, D. W. (1998). Production and Transaction Economies and IS Outsourcing: A Study of the US Banking Industry. MIS Quarterly, 22(4), 535-552.
  • Ashwin, A. S., Krishnan, R. T. i George, R. (2016). Board Characteristics, Financial Slack and R&D Investments: an Empirical Analysis of the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry. International Studies of Management & Organization, 46(1), 8-23.
  • Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the Capability-Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation. Journal of Marketing, (69), 61-83.
  • Baker, T. i Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.
  • Bansal, P. (2003). From Issues to Actions: The Importance of Individual Concerns and Organizational Values in Responding to Natural Environmental Issues. Organizations Science, 14(5), 510-527.
  • Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256-280.
  • Bollen, K. A. (2011). Evaluating Effect, Composite, and Causal Indicators in Structural Equation Models. MIS Quarterly, 35(2) 359-372.
  • Bourgeois, III, L. J. (1981). On the measurement of organizational Slack. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 29-39.
  • Bratnicki, M. (2003). Mitologia przedsiębiorczości organizacyjnej. Przegląd Organizacji, (5), 6-9.
  • Bratnicki, M. (2010). Przedsiębiorcze zdolności dynamiczne jako źródło trwałej, wysokiej efektywności przedsiębiorstwa. W: H. Jagoda i J. Lichtarski (red.), Kierunki i dylematy rozwoju nauki i praktyki zarządzania przedsiębiorstwem. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu.
  • Burzyńska, D. i Hajdys, D. (2021), Determinanty i źródła finansowania ekoinnowacji w polskich przedsiębiorstwach. Folia Oeconomica Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, 1(352), 63-86.
  • Busch, T. (2002). Slack in Public Administration: Conceptual and Methodological Issues. Managerial Auditing Journal, 17(3), 153-159.
  • Calabro, A., Vecchiarini, M., Gast, J., Campopiano, G., De Massis, A. i Kraus, S. (2019). Innovation in Family Firms: A Systematic Literature Review and Guidance for Future Research. International Journal of Management Reviews, (21), 317-355.
  • Cassia, L., De Massis, A. i Pizzurno, E. (2012). Strategic Innovation and New Product Development in Family Firms. An Empirically Grounded Theoretical Framework. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 18(2), 198-232.
  • Chen, Y. C., Li, P. C. i Lin, Y. H. (2013). How Inter- and Intra-Organisational Coordination Affect Product Development Performance: The Role of Slack Resources. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 28(2), 125-136.
  • Conz, E., Magnani, G., Zucchella, A. i De Massis, A. (2023). Responding to Unexpected Crises: The Roles of Slack Resources and Entrepreneurial Attitude to Build Resilience. Small Business Economics, 1-25.
  • Cyert, R. M. i March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice Hall.
  • Czakon, W. (2012). Sieci w zarządzaniu strategicznym. Wolters Kluwer.
  • Dalal, D. K. i Zickar, M. J. (2012). Some Common Myths about Centering Predictor Variables in Moderated Multiple Regression and Polynomial Regression. Organizational Research Methods, 15(3), 339-362.
  • Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
  • Daniel, F., Lohrke, F. T., Fornaciari, C. J. i Turner, R. A. (2004). Slack Resources and Firm Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 565-574.
  • de Jong, A., Zacharias, N. A. i Nijssen, E. J. (2021). How Young Companies Can Effectively Manage Their Slack Resources over Time to Ensure Sales Growth: The Contingent Role of Value-Based Selling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, (49), 304-326.
  • Deeds, D. L., DeCarolis, D. i Coombs, J. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities and New Product Development in High Technology Ventures: An Empirical Analysis of New Biotechnology Firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3), 211-229.
  • D'Este, P. (2002). The Distinctive Patterns of Capabilities Accumulation and Inter-Firm Heterogeneity: The Case of the Spanish Pharmaceutical Industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4), 847-874.
  • Du, Y., Kim, P. H., Fourne, S. P. i Wang, X. (2022). In Times of Plenty: Slack Resources, R&D Investment, and Entrepreneurial Firms in Challenging Institutional Environments. Journal of Business Research, (145), 360-376.
  • Easterby-Smith, M. i Prieto, I. M. (2008). Dynamic Capabilities and Knowledge Management: An Integrative Role for Learning? British Journal of Management, 19(3), 235-249.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. i Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
  • Evangelista, R. i Vezzani, A. (2010). The Economic Impact of Technological and Organizational Innovations. A Firm-Level Analysis. Research Policy, 39(10), 1253-1263.
  • Felin, T., Foss, N. J., Heimeriks, K. H. i Madsen, T. L. (2012). Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities: Individuals, Processes, and Structure. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1351-1374.
  • Ferrier, W. (2001). Navigating the Competitive Landscape: The Drivers and Consequences of Competitive Aggressiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 858-877.
  • Fleming, L. i Sorenson, O. (2004). Science as a Map in Technological Search. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9), 909-928.
  • Gabryś, B. J. i Bratnicki, M. (2015). Luz organizacyjny jako potencjał odnowy organizacyjnej. Management Forum, 3(1), 31-36.
  • García-Granero, A., Llopis, Ó., Fernández-Mesa, A. i Alegre, J. (2015). Unraveling the Link between Managerial Risk-Taking and Innovation: The Mediating Role of a Risk-Taking Climate. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1094-1104.
  • Gebauer, H. (2011). Exploring the Contribution of Management Innovation to the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), 1238-1250.
  • Geiger, S. W. i Makri, M. (2006). Exploration and Exploitation Innovation Processes: The Role of Organizational Slack in R & D Intensive Firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 17(1), 97-108.
  • George, G. (2005). Slack Resources and the Performance of Privately Held Firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 661-676.
  • Gronum, S., Verreynne M.-L. i Kastelle T. (2012). The Role of Networks in Small and Medium - Sized Enterprise Innovation and Firm Performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 257-282.
  • Helfat, C. E. (1997). Know-how and Asset Complementarity and Dynamic Capability Accumulation: The Case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 339-360.
  • Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D. i Winter, S. G. (2009). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Henderson, R. i Cockburn, I. (1994). Measuring Competence? Exploring Firm Effects in Pharmaceutical Research. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 63-84.
  • Herold, D. M., Jayaraman, N. i Narayanaswamy, C. R. (2006). What is the Relationship between Organizational Slack and Innovation? Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(3), 372-392.
  • Heubeck, T. (2023). Managing Innovation in a Globalized Digital Economy: An Empirical Inquiry Into Managerial-, Governance-, and Firm-Level Antecedents and Contingencies (Doctoral dissertation).
  • Hong, S. i Shin, H. D. (2021). Organizational Slack and Innovativeness: The Moderating Role of Institutional Transition in the Asian Financial Crisis. Asian Business & Management, (20), 370-389.
  • Iacobucci, D. (2010). Structural Equations Modeling: Fit Indices, Sample Size, and Advanced Topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 90-98.
  • Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. American Economic Review, (76), 323-329.
  • Jiang, Y., Ritchie, B. W. i Verreynne, M. L. (2019). Building Tourism Organizational Resilience to Crises and Disasters: A Dynamic Capabilities View. International Journal of Tourism Research, 21(6), 882-900.
  • Johnston, R., Jones, K. i Manley, D. (2018). Confounding and Collinearity in Regression Analysis: A Cautionary Tale and an Alternative Procedure, Illustrated by Studies Of British Voting Behaviour. Quality & Quantity, (52), 1957-1976.
  • Khan, S. J. i Mir, A. A. (2019). Ambidextrous Culture, Contextual Ambidexterity and New Product Innovations: The Role of Organizational Slack and Environmental Factors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(4), 652-663.
  • Kim, H., Kim, H. i Lee, P. M. (2008). Ownership Structure and the Relationship between Financial Slack and R&D Investments: Evidence from Korean Firms. Organization Science, 19(3), 404-418.
  • King, A. A. i Tucci, C. L. (2002). Incumbent Entry into New Market Niches: The Role of Experience and Managerial Choice in the Creation of Dynamic Capabilities. Management Science, 48(2), 171-186.
  • Kraśnicka, T. (2013). Innowacyjność przedsiębiorstw - uwarunkowania organizacyjne. Studia Ekonomiczne/Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach, (136), 165-179.
  • Krzakiewicz, K. i Cyfert, S. (2017). Dynamic Capabilities in Strategic Choice Processes within Organisations. Management, 21(1), 7-19.
  • Lee, C. L. i Wu, H. C. (2016). How do Slack Resources Affect the Relationship between R&D Expenditures and Firm Performance? R&D Management, 46(S3), 958-978.
  • Lee, H. i Kelley, D. (2008). Building Dynamic Capabilities for Innovation: An Exploratory Study of Key Management Practices. R&D Management, 38(2), 155-168.
  • Leibenstein, H. (1966). Allocative Efficiency vs. "X-efficiency". The American Economic Review, 56(3), 392-415.
  • Malerba, F. i McKelvey, M. (2020). Knowledge-intensive Innovative Entrepreneurship Integrating Schumpeter, Evolutionary Economics, and Innovation Systems. Small Business Economics, (54), 503-522.
  • Marín-Vinuesa, L. M., Scarpellini, S., Portillo-Tarragona, P. i Moneva, J. M. (2020). The Impact of Eco-Innovation on Performance Through the Measurement of Financial Resources and Green Patents. Organization & Environment, 33(2), 285-310.
  • Martinez, R. J. i Artz, K. (2006). An Examination of Firm Slack and Risk-Taking in Regulated and Deregulated Airlines. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(1), 11-31.
  • Mattingly, J. E. i Olsen, L. (2018). Performance Outcomes of Investing Slack Resources in Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(4), 481-498.
  • Miller, D. i Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Modes of Strategic Momentum. Strategic Management Journal, (3), 1-25.
  • Minola, T., Bau', M., Sieger, P., De Massis, A. i Chirico, F. (2021). Slack and Performance in Family Owned SMEs: An Agency Theory Perspective. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2021(1), 10298.
  • Mol, M. J. i Birkinshaw, J. (2009). The Sources of Management Innovation: When Firms Introduce New Management Practices. Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 1269-1280.
  • Mousa, F. T. i Chowdhury, J. (2014). Organizational Slack Effects on Innovation: The Moderating Roles of CEO Tenure and Compensation. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 15(2), 369-383.
  • Munjal, S., Requejo, I. i Kundu, S. K. (2019). Offshore Outsourcing and Firm Performance: Moderating Effects of Size, Growth and Slack Resources. Journal of Business Research, (103), 484-494.
  • Nohria, N. i Gulati, R. (1996). Is Slack Good or Bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245-1264.
  • Nohria, N. i Gulati, R. (1997). What is the Optimum Amount of Organizational Slack? A Study of the Relationship between Slack and Innovation in Multinational Firms. European Management Journal, 15(6), 603-611.
  • Nystrom, P. C., Ramamurthy, K. i Wilson, A. L. (2002). Organizational Context, Climate and Innovativeness: Adoption of Imaging Technology. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19(3-4), 221-247.
  • Oslo Manual. (2018). Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. 4th Edition. OECD, European Union.
  • Peteraf, M., Di Stefano, G. i Verona, G. (2013). The Elephant in the Room of Dynamic Capabilities: Bringing Two Diverging Conversations Together. Strategic Management Journal, 34(12), 1389-1410.
  • Piening, E. P. (2011). Insights into the Process Dynamics of Innovation Implementation: The Case of Public Hospitals in Germany. Public Management Review, 13(1), 127-157.
  • Piening, E. P. (2013). Dynamic Capabilities in Public Organizations: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. Public Management Review, 15(2), 209-245.
  • Piotrowska, A. (2019). Konkurencyjność przedsiębiorstw - główne aspekty i uwarunkowania. Przegląd Nauk Ekonomicznych, (32), 9-21.
  • Ridder, H.-G., Bruns, H.-J. i Spier, F. (2005) Analysis of Public Management Change Processes: The Case of Local Government Accounting Reforms in Germany. Public Administration, 83(2), 443-472.
  • Ridder, H.-G., Doege, V. i Martini, S. (2007) Differences in the Implementation of DRGs across Clinical Departments: A German Hospital Case Study. Health Services Research, 42(6), 2120-2139.
  • Robakiewicz, W. (2018). Wpływ innowacyjności na konkurencyjność przedsiębiorstw. W: M. Grabowska i K. Kluth (red.), Przedsiębiorczość i zarządzanie talentami. Wybrane zagadnienia (s. 83-94). Politechnika Warszawska, Kolegium Nauk Ekonomicznych i Społecznych.
  • Rosner, M. M. (1968). Economic Determinants of Organizational Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(4), 614-625.
  • Schoemaker, P. J., Heaton, S. i Teece, D. (2018). Innovation, Dynamic Capabilities, and Leadership. California Management Review, 61(1), 15-42.
  • Shahzad, A. M., Mousa, F. T. i Sharfman, M. P. (2016). The Implications of Slack Heterogeneity for the Slack-Resources and Corporate Social Performance Relationship. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5964-5971.
  • Shapiro, A. R. (2006). Measuring Innovation: Beyond Revenue from New Products. Research-Technology Management, 49(6), 42-51.
  • Siwek, M. (2021). Innovativeness as a Driving Force and an Opportunity for Economic Growth. Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne, (118), 303-320.
  • Teece, D. J. (2012). Dynamic Capabilities: Routines versus Entrepreneurial Action. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1395-1401.
  • Teece, D. J. i Pisano, G. (1994). The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537-556.
  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. i Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill.
  • Troilo, G., De Luca, L. M. i Atuahene-Gima, K. (2014). More Innovation with Less? A Strategic Contingency View of Slack Resources, Information Search, and Radical Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 259-277.
  • Troise, C., Corvello, V., Ghobadian, A. i O'Regan, N. (2022). How Can SMEs Successfully Navigate VUCA Environment: The Role of Agility in the Digital Transformation Era. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (174), 121227.
  • Vaccaro, I. G., Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A. i Volberda, H. W. (2012). Management Innovation and Leadership: The Moderating Role of Organizational Size. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 28-51.
  • Vanacker, T., Collewaert, V. i Zahra, S. A. (2017). Slack Resources, Firm Performance, and the Institutional Context: Evidence From Privately Held European Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 38(6), 1305-1326.
  • Wang, C. L. i Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31-51.
  • Wilden, R., Gudergan, S. P., Nielsen, B. B. i Lings, I. (2013). Dynamic Capabilities and Performance: Strategy, Structure and Environment. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 72-96.
  • Williamson, O. E. (1963). Managerial Discretion and Business Behavior. The American Economic Review, 53(5), 1032-1057.
  • Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding Dynamic Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991-995.
  • Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J. i Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917-955.
  • Zollo, M. i Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171682188

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.