PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2023 | 14 | nr 4 | 1341--1366
Tytuł artykułu

How Empathy and Social Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy Interact to Affect Social Entrepreneurial Intention : A Polynomial Regression with Response Surface Analysis

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Research background: Previous studies have argued that empathy (EMP) is an important factor that enhances individuals' intention to engage in social business. However, the effect o this factor on social entrepreneurial intention (SEI) is unclear (Ukil et al., 2023). Also, although numerous studies have explored the individual impacts of EMP and social entrepreneurial self-efficacy (SES) on SEI, there is a notable scarcity of research that delves into the combined influence of these two predictor variables on the intention to engage in social business.
Purpose of the article: This study proposes that EMP does not only individually affect, but also interacts with other factors to influence the intention to start a social business. Therefore, this study aims to investigate how EMP and SES interact to promote SEI.
Methods: Based on a survey dataset of 409 respondents in Vietnam, this study employed polynomial regression with response surface analysis to examine the complementary, balance, and imbalance effects of EMP and SES on SEI.
Findings & value added: This study's results suggest complementary effects between EMP and SES on SEI. Specifically, this study finds that when EMP and SES are balanced at higher levels, SEI is higher, and when their imbalance increases in either direction, SEI is lower. In addition, this study finds that the degree of SEI is higher when individuals have high SES with low EMP compared to the other way round. The findings of this study enhance our understanding of the complexity of motivation and how it affects SEIs, revealing the complex interaction between EMP and SES in shaping these intentions within a multidimensional motivational framework. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
14
Numer
Strony
1341--1366
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
  • Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Vietnam
  • National Economics University, Vietnam
  • Thuongmai University, Vietnam
Bibliografia
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
  • Aloulou, W. J., & Algarni, E. A. (2022). Determinants of social entrepreneurial intention: Empirical evidence from the Saudi context. Social Enterprise Journal, 18(4), 605-625. doi: 10.1108/sej-11-2021-0086.
  • Ashraf, M. A. (2020). "Is old gold?" the role of prior experience in exploring the determinants of islamic social entrepreneurial intentions: Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 12(2), 265-290. doi: 10.1080/19420676.2019.1702580.
  • Bacq, S., & Alt, E. (2018). Feeling capable and valued: A prosocial perspective on the link between empathy and social entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(3), 333-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.01.004.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freemann & Co.
  • Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442-453. doi: 10.2307/258091.
  • Bui, D. T., Nghia Vu, T., Tran, T. V. H., Duong, C. D., & Loan Le, T. (2023). Impact of institutional environment on social entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(3), 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100120.
  • Canestrino, R., Ćwiklicki, M., Magliocca, P., & Pawełek, B. (2020). Understanding social entrepreneurship: A cultural perspective in business research. Journal of Business Research, 110, 132-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.006.
  • Chiengkul, W., Tantipanichkul, T., Boonchom, W., Phuangpornpitak, W., & Suphan, K. (2023). Social entrepreneurship of small and medium-sized entrepreneurs in Thailand: Influence of institutional environment, entrepreneurial passions, and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Social Enterprise Journal, 19(4), 370-389. doi: 10.1108/sej-01-2023-0005.
  • Cui, J., & Bell, R. (2022). Behavioural entrepreneurial mindset: How entrepreneurial education activity impacts entrepreneurial intention and behaviour. International Journal of Management Education, 20(2), 1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100639.
  • Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71-100. doi: 10.1177/1534582304267187.
  • Do, M. N. (2022). The key for success in the value chain of a social entrepreneur in Vietnam. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1108/JEC-01-2022-0019.
  • Duong, C. D. (2023a). Applying the stimulus-organism-response theory to investigate determinants of students' social entrepreneurship: Moderation role of perceived university support. Social Enterprise Journal, 19(2), 167-192. doi: 10.1108/sej-10-2022-0091.
  • Duong, C. D. (2023b). Karmic beliefs and social entrepreneurial intentions: A moderated mediation model of environmental complexity and empathy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1), 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jo itmc.2023.100022.
  • Edwards, J. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(1), 51-100. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1994.1029.
  • Ennen, E., & Richter, A. (2010). The whole is more than the sum of its parts -or is it? A review of the empirical literature on complementarities in organisations. Journal of Management, 36(1), 207-233. doi: 10.1177/0149206309350083.
  • Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., Veiga, P. M., & Hughes, M. (2021). Prevailing theoretical approaches predicting sustainable business models: A systematic review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(3), 790-813. doi: 10.1108/ijppm-12-2020-0653.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
  • Hassan, H. M. K. (2020). Intention towards social entrepreneurship of university students in an emerging economy: The influence of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurship education. On the Horizon, 28(3), 133-151. doi: 10.1108/oth-04-2020-0012.
  • Hoang, G., Luu, T. T., Le, T. T. T., & Tran, A. K. T. (2022). Dark Triad traits affecting entrepreneurial intentions: The roles of opportunity recognition and locus of control. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 17, 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00310.
  • Hockerts, K. (2017). Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 105-130. doi: 10.1111/etap.12171.
  • Ip, C. Y., Zhuge, T., Chang, Y. S., Huang, T. H., & Chen, Y. L. (2022). Exploring the determinants of nascent social entrepreneurial Behaviour. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3556. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063556.
  • Ko, E.-J., & Kang, J. (2022). How gender moderates the mediating mechanism across social experience, self-referent beliefs and social entrepreneurship intentions. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 37(8), 1045-1063. doi: 10.1108/gm-06-2021-0175.
  • Ko, E.-J., & Kim, K. (2020). Connecting founder social identity with social entrepreneurial intentions. Social Enterprise Journal, 16(4), 403-429. doi: 10.1108/sej-02-2020-0012.
  • Krueger, J. N. F., & Carsrud, A. L. (1993). Entrepreneurial intentions: Applying the theory of planned behaviour. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 5(4), 315-330. doi: 10.1080/08985629300000020.
  • Lacap, J. P. G., Mulyaningsih, H. D., & Ramadani, V. (2018). The mediating effects of social entrepreneurial antecedents on the relationship between prior experience and social entrepreneurial intent. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 9(3), 329-346. doi: 10.1108/jstpm-03-2018-0028.
  • Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593-617. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00318.x.
  • Loan, L. T., Doanh, D. C., Thang, H. N., Viet Nga, N. T., Van, P. T., & Hoa, P. T. (2021). Entrepreneurial behaviour: The effects of the fear and anxiety of Covid-19 and business opportunity recognition. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(3), 7-23. doi: 10.15678/eber.2021.090301.
  • Maheshwari, G., & Kha, K. L. (2022). Investigating the relationship between educational support and entrepreneurial intention in Vietnam: The mediating role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy in the theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Management Education, 20(2) 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100553.
  • Mair, J. & Noboa, E. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: How intentions to create a social venture are formed. In J. Mair, J. Robinson & K. Hockerts (Eds). Social entrepreneurship (pp. 121-135). London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230625655_8.
  • Meoli, A., Fini, R., Sobrero, M., & Wiklund, J. (2020). How entrepreneurial intentions influence entrepreneurial career choices: The moderating influence of social context. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(3), 1-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105982.
  • Muldoon, J., Davis, P. E., Bendickson, J. S., McDowell, W. C., & Liguori, E. W. (2022). Paved with good intentions: Moral disengagement and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100237.
  • Mykolenko, O., Ippolitova, I., Doroshenko, H., & Strapchuk, S. (2021). The impact of entrepreneurship education and cultural context on entrepreneurial intentions of Ukrainian students: The mediating role of attitudes and perceived control. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 12(3), 519-536. doi: 10.1108/heswbl-08-2020-0190.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
  • Packard, M. D., & Burnham, T. A. (2021). Do we understand each other? Toward a simulated empathy theory for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(1), 1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106076.
  • Qiu, S., Dooley, L. M., & Xie, L. (2020). How servant leadership and self-efficacy interact to affect service quality in the hospitality industry: A polynomial regression with response surface analysis. Tourism Management, 78, 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104051.
  • Rey-Martí, A., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1651-1655. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.033.
  • Sahasranamam, S., & Nandakumar, M. K. (2020). Individual capital and social entrepreneurship: Role of formal institutions. Journal of Business Research, 107, 104-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.09.005.
  • Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 543-554. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4.
  • Shepherd, D. A., Seyb, S., & Williams, T. A. (2023). Empathy-driven entrepreneurial action: Well-being outcomes for entrepreneurs and target beneficiaries. Journal of Business Venturing, 38(2), 1-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106290.
  • Shirokova, G., Osiyevskyy, O., & Bogatyreva, K. (2016). Exploring the intention-behavior link in student entrepreneurship: Moderating effects of individual and environmental characteristics. European Management Journal, 34(4), 386-399. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2015.12.007.
  • Sousa-Filho, J. M. d., Matos, S., da Silva Trajano, S., & de Souza Lessa, B. (2020). Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions in a developing country context. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 14, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00207.
  • Thi Tuyet Mai, N. (2019). An investigation into the relationship between materialism and green purchase behavior in Vietnam and Taiwan. Journal of Economics and Development, 21(2), 247-258. doi: 10.1108/jed-10-2019-0044.
  • Tsai, C.-Y., Kim, J., Jin, F., Jun, M., Cheong, M., & Yammarino, F. J. (2022). Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology in leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 33(1), 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101592.
  • Ukil, M. I., Almashayekhi, A., & Ullah, M. S. (2023). Feeling compassion and responsible but not starting a social venture: Role of empathy and moral obligation in social entrepreneurial intention. Society and Business Review. Advance online publicaton. doi: 10.1108/sbr-09-2022-0227.
  • Usman, S., Masood, F., Khan, M. A., & Khan, N. u. R. (2021). Impact of empathy, perceived social impact, social worth and social network on the social entrepreneurial intention in socio-economic projects. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 14(1), 65-92. doi: 10.1108/jeee-10-2020-0355.
  • Younis, A., Xiaobao, P., Nadeem, M. A., Kanwal, S., Pitafi, A. H., Qiong, G., & Yuzhen, D. (2020). Impact of positivity and empathy on social entrepreneurial intention: The moderating role of perceived social support. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(1), e2124. doi: 10.1002/pa.2124.
  • Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519-532. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007.
  • Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Ahrari, S., Krauss, S. E., Samah, A. A., Meng, L. K., & Ariffin, Z. (2019). Predicting social entrepreneurial intention: A meta-analytic path analysis based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Research, 96, 264-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.030.
  • Zhang, Y., Trusty, J., Goroshnikova, T., Kelly, L., Kwong, K. K., McGuire, S. J. J., Perusquia, J., Prabhu, V.P., Shen, M. and Tang, R. (2021). Millennial social entrepreneurial intent and social entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A comparative entrepreneurship study. Social Enterprise Journal, 17(1), 20-43. doi: 10.1108/sej-07-2020-0054.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171682232

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.