Supervisory Technology as a New Tool for Banking Sector Supervision

• Autorzy: Tomasz Dziawgo
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

After last global financial crisis from a decade ago, financial market have been experiencing significant increase in number of regulations. This was especially visible in the banking sector, in which number of post-crisis new regulations amounted to thousands per year. It was not only challenging for banks, that have been spending increasingly more financial resources on compliance, but also for supervisory entities that have to keep track of compliance for every entity on financial market. Due to the fact that supervisory process relies mostly on manual process, it can be both time consuming and inefficient. This is why, not only banks have been exploring new technologies in compliance with regulations (Reg Tech), but also supervisory authorities have been doing the same with the aim of increasing their efficiency (Sup Tech). The research paper aims to test hypothesis, which is as follows: - Sup Tech is becoming an innovative tool for banking supervision and is expected to have increasingly larger role in banking supervision For the purpose of the paper, the following methods have been applied: critical analysis of literature and research papers as well as descriptive method and comparative analysis of presented data. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Supervision; Bank supervision; Banking sector

PL

Nadzór; Nadzór bankowy; Sektor bankowy

• Czasopismo: Journal of Banking and Financial Economics
• Rocznik: 2021
• Numer: nr 1(15)
• Strony: 5--13

Twórcy

autor

Tomasz Dziawgo

• SGH Warsaw School of Economic, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Bank Regulation and Supervision a Decade after the Global Financial Crisis, (2020), World Bank. (DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1447-1)
• 2. Banking Regulatory Outlook in 2020, (2020), Compliance.ai.
• 3. Boissay F. Claessens S., Villegas A. (2019) Economic impact of Basel III's capital and liquidity regulations, Bank for International Settlements.
• 4. Boissay F., Cantu C., Claessens S., Villegas A. (2019), Impact of financial regulations: insights from an online repository of studies, Bank for International Settlements.
• 5. Broeders D., Prenio J., (2018), Innovative technology in financial supervision (suptech) - the experience of early users, Bank for International Settlements.
• 6. Compliance 360 Benchmarking survey (2018), McKinsey.
• 7. Cost of Compliance 2020 report, (2020), Thomson Reuters.
• 8. Deloitte EMEA Financial Markets Regulatory Outlook, (2019), Deloitte.
• 9. Developments in RegTech and SupTech, (2018), European Securities and Markets Authority.
• 10. Di Castri S., Hohl S., Kulenkampff A., Prenio J. (2019), The suptech generations, Bank for International Settlements.
• 11. Dziawgo T. (2018), "Robo-advisory" redefiniuje doradztwo finansowe (eng. "Robo-advisory" redefines financial advisory), EFC Academy.
• 12. Future of Supervision 2025, (2019), Oliver Wyman.
• 13. Global Risk 2020: It's Time for Banks to Self-Disrupt, (2020), Boston Consulting Group.
• 14. GlobalData presents top 25 global banks by market capitalization in Q2 2019, (2019), GlobalData.
• 15. How banks can manage key risks in the next decade, (2019), EY
• 16. Kamali W., Randall D. (2017), Leveraging "Sup tech" for financial inclusion in Rwanda, World Bank Blogs.
• 17. Koleśnik J. (2018), Wymogi kapitałowe na ryzyko bankowe (eng. Capital requirements on risk for banks) in: Świat Bankowości (eng. World of Banking), Difin.
• 18. Koleśnik J., Zaleska M. (2018), Nadzór makroostrożnościowy (eng. Macro-prudential supervision), in: Świat Bankowości (eng. World of Banking), Difin.
• 19. Lux J., Piechocki M. (2015), Reforming regulatory reporting: are we headed toward real-time? BearingPoint Institute.
• 20. Niedziółka P. (2018), Pojęcie i rodzaje ryzyka bankowego (eng. Concept and types of risk for banks), in: Świat Bankowości (eng. World of Banking), Difin.
• 21. Patel B. (2018), The big Bang of FinTech, RegTech and SupTech, Finextra.
• 22. PWC's Financial RegTech insights, (2019), PwC
• 23. Randall D., Lopes L., (2018), From spreadsheets to suptech for financial sector market conduct supervision, WorldBank
• 24. RegTech Market by Component (Solutions and Services), Application (Risk and Compliance Management, Identity Management, Regulatory Reporting, AML and Fraud Management), Vertical, Deployment Type, Organization Size, and Region - Global Forecast to 2025, (2019), Markets and Markets.
• 25. Regulation 2030 - What lies ahead? (2018), KPMG.
• 26. Regulation and supervision of fintech (2019), KPMG.
• 27. Sancak I., Zeranski S. (2020), Digitalization of Financial Supervision with Supervisory Technology (SupTech), Journal of International Banking Law & Regulation, Issue 8, pp. 309-329. (http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3632053)
• 28. Staying the Course in Banking (2017), Boston Consulting Group.
• 29. Supervision in a digital world: how modern technology is driving change, (2019), European Central Bank.
• 30. Supervisory technology strategy, (2020), European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. (DOI: 10.2854/57441)
• 31. SupTech: Leveraging Technology for Better Supervision, Toronto Centre Notes, 2018.
• 32. Ślązak E., FinTech i jego znaczenie dla usług finansowych (2018) (eng. FinTech and its significance for financial services), Bank Spółdzielczy no 4/590.
• 33. The Use of Supervisory and Regulatory Technology by Authorities and Regulated Institutions: Market developments and financial stability implications, (2020), Financial Stability Board.
• 34. World Bank Group (2018), From Spreadsheets to Suptech - Technology Solutions for Market Conduct Supervision: Discussion Note.
• 35. Zaleska M., Stabilność sektora bankowego strefy euro - wyzwania i aktorzy zmian (eng. Stability of eurozone banking sector - challenges and authors of changes) (pp. 87-97) w: Współczesna gospodarka w sieci międzynarodowych powiązań - aktorzy, rynki, współzależności i zagrożenia (eng. in: Modern economy in international network - authors, markets, co-dependencies and threats), Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH, Warszawa 2020.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7172/2353-6845.jbfe.2021.1.1