Czasopismo
Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Licencjonowanie moralne : przyczyny i konsekwencje w administracji publicznej
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Purpose: Voluntary deviation from self-controlling which is known as moral licensing, individuals justify their immoral and counterproductive behavior depending on past creditable behaviors, without worrying about the loss of their reputation and esteem. The aim of the study is to identify the causes and consequences of moral licensing.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The paradigm of the study is interpretive; its approach is qualitative and its strategy is grounded theory with emergent approach. In this regard, indepth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with managers and employees of public administration in northeastern Iran.
Findings: The result of analysis of 17 interviews showed 119 codes, 63 concepts, 14 classes and 6 categories which finally obtained the final research model which has contributed to an extension of literature on moral licensing.
Research limitations/Implications: The study is limited by the context, as well as the research method to qualitative method. Due to structural differences between the private sector and the sector government, conducting the research in the private sector, can provide a broader understanding of this phenomenon, as well as using quantitative methods can let examine the accuracy of the relationships between the various categories.
Originality/Value: The study is developing the theory on moral licensing by comprehensive understanding of moral licensing and the discovery of the causes, factors and consequences of moral license in public administration.
(original abstract)
Cel: dobrowolne odstępstwo od samokontroli, znane jako licencjonowanie moralne, zachodzi wtedy, gdy jednostki usprawiedliwiają swoje niemoralne i nieproduktywne zachowanie w zależności od wcześniejszych poprawnych zachowań, nie zwracając uwagi na konsekwencje w postaci utraty reputacji i szacunku. Celem badania jest identyfikacja przyczyn i konsekwencji licencjonowania moralnego.
Projekt/metodologia/podejście: paradygmat badania jest interpretacyjny; jego podejście jest jakościowe, a jego strategią jest teoria ugruntowana z podejściem emergentnym. W związku z tym przeprowadzono pogłębione, częściowo ustrukturyzowane wywiady z menedżerami i pracownikami administracji publicznej w północno-wschodnim Iranie.
Wyniki: wynik analizy 17 wywiadów wykazał 119 kodów, 63 koncepcje, 14 klas i 6 kategorii układających się na ostateczny model badawczy, który przyczynił się do rozszerzenia literatury na temat licencjonowania moralnego.
Ograniczenia/wnioski z badań: badanie jest ograniczone przez kontekst, a także metodę badawczą do metody jakościowej. Ze względu na różnice strukturalne między sektorem prywatnym a sektorem rządowym, przeprowadzenie badań w sektorze prywatnym może zapewnić szersze zrozumienie tego zjawiska, a zastosowanie metod ilościowych może pozwolić na zbadanie dokładności relacji między różnymi kategoriami.
Oryginalność/wartość: badanie rozwija teorię na temat moralnego licencjonowania poprzez kompleksowe zrozumienie moralnego licencjonowania oraz odkrycie przyczyn, czynników i konsekwencji moralnego licencjonowania w administracji publicznej.
(abstrakt oryginalny)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
70--81
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
- Warsaw University, student; Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
Bibliografia
- Baumeister, R.F., & Juola Exline, J. (1999). Virtue, personality, and social relations: Self-control as the moral muscle. Journal of Personality, 67(6), 1165-1194. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00086
- Bem, D.J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 1-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60024-6
- Bibi, Z., Karim, J., & ud Din, S. (2013). Workplace incivility and counterproductive work behavior: Moderating role of emotional intelligence, Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 28(2), 317-334.
- Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616037
- Blanken, I., van de Ven, N., & Zeelenberg, M. (2015). A meta-analytic review of moral licensing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 540-558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215572134
- Bolino, M.C., & Klotz, A.C. (2015). The paradox of the unethical organizational citizen: The link between organizational citizenship behavior and unethical behavior at work. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 45-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.026
- Bradley-Geist, J.C., King, E.B., Skorinko, J., Hebl, M.R., & McKenna, C. (2010). Moral Credentialing by Association: The Importance of Choice and Relationship Closeness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1564-1575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210385920
- Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L.L. (2019). Thinking about data with grounded theory. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(8), 743-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418809455
- Clot, S., Grolleau, G., & Ibanez, L. (2013b). Antisocial behavior and self-licensing: Experimental evidence from a gangster game. Presented at 30. Journées de Micraoeconomie Appliquée, Nice, FRA (2012-06-06-2013-06-07). http://prodinra.inra.fr/record/264362.
- Cornelissen, G., Bashshur, M.R., Rode, J., & Le Menestrel, M. (2013). Rules or consequences: The role of ethical mindsets in moral dynamics. Psychological Science, 24, 482-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457376
- Duffy, M.K., Ganster, D.C., Shaw, J.D., Johnson, J.L., & Pagon, M. (2006). The social context of undermining behavior at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101(1), 105-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.005
- Fiske, S.E., Cuddy, A.C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
- Fragale, A.R., Overbeck, J.R., & Neale, M.A. (2011). Resources versus respect: Social judgments based on targets> power and status positions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 767-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.006
- Freedman, J.L., & Fraser, S.C. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 195-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023552
- Glaser, B.G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. The Sociology Press.
- Glaser, B.G. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100203
- Glaser, D., van Gils, S., & Van Quaquebeke, N. (2017). Pay-for-Performance and interpersonal deviance. Journal of Personnel Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000181
- Goldman, M., Seever, M., & Seever, M. (1982). Social labeling and the foot-in-the-door effect. The Journal of Social Psychology, 117(1), 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1982.9713402
- Haselton, M.G., Nettle, D., & Andrews, P.W. (2005). The handbook of evolutionary psychology. The Evolution of Cognitive Bias, 724-746. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939376.ch25
- Hsi, E. (2017). An Examination of Predictors of Counterproductive Work Behaviors: Personality Traits and Transformational Leadership. Masterís Theses, 4850. https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.35df-r76x. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/4850
- Kan, M.M., & Parry, K.W. (2004). Identifying paradox: A grounded theory of leadership in overcoming resistance to change. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(4), 467-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.05.003
- Klotz, A.C., & Bolino, M.C. (2013). Citizenship and counterproductive work behavior: A moral licensing view. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 292-306. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0109
- Kuran, T. (1997). Private truths, public lies. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvt1sgqt
- Lasarov, W., & Hoffmann, S. (2018). Social Moral Licensing. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4083-z
- Lin, S.H.J., Ma, J., & Johnson, R.E. (2016). When ethical leader behavior breaks bad: How ethical leader behavior can turn abusive via ego depletion and moral licensing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(6), 815. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000098
- Magee, J.C., & Galinsky, A.D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351-398. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211628
- Miller, D.T., & Effron, D.A. (2010). Psychological license: When it is needed and how it functions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 115-155. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43003-8
- Miller, D.T., & Prentice, D.A. (1994). Collective errors and errors about the collective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulltetin, 20, 541-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205011
- Monin, B., & Miller, D.T. (2001a). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.33
- Mumtaz, A.M., Rohani, S., & Mohamed, N.R. (2015). Linking person-job fit, person-organization fit, employee engagement and turnover intention: A three-step conceptual model. Asian Social Science, 11(2), 313-320. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n2p313
- Polman, E., Pettit, N.C., & Wiesenfeld, B.M. (2013). Effects of wrongdoer status on moral licensing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 614-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.012
- Simbrunner, P., & Schlegelmilch, B.B. (2017). Moral licensing: a culture-moderated meta-analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 67(4), 201-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-017-0128-0
- Skyvington, S. (2014). License to misbehave: Organizational citizenship behavior as a moral license for deviant reactions to abusive supervision [Master's thesis, University of Waterloo].
- Spector, P.E., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 269-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00049-9
- Spector, P.E., & Fox, S. (2005). The Stressor-Emotion Model of Counterproductive Work Behavior. In S. Fox, P.E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 151-174). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10893-007
- Stangl, W. (2020). Stichwort: Moral Licensing. Online Lexikon für Psychologie und Pädagogik. https://lexikon.stangl.eu/16141/moral-licensing/ (2020-05-01).
- Tenbrunsel, A.E., Diekmann, K.A., Wade-Benzoni, K.A., & Bazerman, M.H. (2010). The ethical mirage: A temporal explanation as to why we are not as ethical as we think we are. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 153-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.08.004
- Tuzun, I.K., & Kalemci, R.A. (2018). Workplace deviance and human resource management relations: A case study of Turkish hotel employees. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 17(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332845.2017.1340740
- Vincent, L.C., & Polman, E. (2016). 10 When being creative frees us to be bad. Cheating, corruption, and concealment: The roots of dishonesty, 166. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316225608.011
- Yam, K.C., Klotz, A.C., He, W., & Reynolds, S.J. (2017). From good soldiers to psychologically entitled: Examining when and why citizenship behavior leads to deviance. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 373-396. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0234
- Yen T.Q., Tian Y., Sankoh, F.P. (2013) The impact of prevalent destructive leadership behaviors on subordinate employees in a firm, American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 3(7), 595-600. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2013.37069
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171682334