The Value of Artefacts Created from the Dynamic Production Function

• Autorzy: Nadina Helen Bakos
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of the article is to analyze the value of artefacts created from the dynamic production function. The article relies on secondary source material, and is a work of synthesis and comparative science. The procedure has been to present thoughts and theories from outstanding scientists, authors and individuals who engage in topics related to economic history, museology, innovation, entrepreneurship and ethics. The understanding of value dates back to Aristotle and thoughts from classical economic theories on value have been presented. Value may be of personal, scientific, political, moral, economic and cultural nature. In modern economic theories value is determined by factors in the production function; land, labor and capital. The entrepreneur's impact on the creation of artefacts from the dynamic production function is significant. As an artefact, the object changes its value. Archeological artefacts and artefacts created from the dynamic production function have different kinds of value. The value of artefacts will not only be to display the work and life of entrepreneurs, but also to educate scientists and increase their understanding of the dynamic production function. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Value and ethical norms; Museums; Economic history; Innovative character; Entrepreneurship

PL

Wartości i normy etyczne; Muzea; Historia gospodarcza; Innowacyjność; Przedsiębiorczość

• Czasopismo: Nauki Ekonomiczne
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: 37
• Strony: 5--16

Twórcy

autor

Nadina Helen Bakos

• Fil. Dr. Jan-U. Sandal Institute, Norway

Bibliografia

• Alexander, E. P; Alexander, M. (2008). Museums in Motion: An Introduction to the History and Functions of Museums. AltaMira Press, Lanham.
• Anderson, E. (1993). Value in Ethics and Economics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• Franklin, B. (1791/2003). The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin. Yale University Press, Connecticut.
• Günay, B. (2012). Museum Concept From Past To Present And Importance Of Museums As Centres Of Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 55(1). doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.622
• Locke, J. (1663-64/1965). Essays on the Law of Nature. Oxford University Press, Northamptonshire.
• Maroevic, I. (1997). Museology as a discipline of information sciences. Nordisk Museologi, 2. doi: 10.5617/nm.3648
• Marx, K. (1867/1977). Capital. Progress Publisher, Moscow.
• Mill, J. S. (1885). Principles of political economy. D. Appleton and Company, New York.
• Sandal, J.-U. (2019). Museum science and Sandal private museum. Sandal Institute, Finstadjordet.
• Schumpeter, A. J. (1908). On the concept of social value. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 23(2). doi: 10.2307/1882798
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934/1978). The theory of economic development. Oxford University Press, New York.
• Smith, A. (1776/2007). An inquiry into the cause of the wealth of nations. Harriman House, Hampshire.
• Van Mensch, P; Meijer van Mensch, L. (2011). New trends in museology. Museum of Recent History, Celje.
• Weil, S. E. (1990). Rethinking the Museum and Other Meditations. Smithsonian Books, Washington.

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.19251/ne/2023.37(1)