Theoretical Study of "Science": History, Perspectives and Facts

• Autorzy: Ihor Riabchenko
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The nature and essence of scientific theories have long been debated among scholars and scientists. In this article, we analyze the subjective and objective elements that influence the formation of scientific theories and their interplay. We also examine the relationship between student persistence and the development of science and the role of diversity in scientific approaches and perspectives. Our conclusion emphasizes the importance of recognizing the complexity and diversity of the scientific method and the need to appreciate different scientific perspectives. Moreover, the article highlights the importance of critical thinking in overcoming obstacles such as political propaganda, ideologies, and religious lies in pursuing scientific truth. We also emphasize the importance of conducting scientific discussions to resolve any conflicts. Finally, we argue that complexity science and abstract thinking can provide valuable insights into various fields and phenomena, making science a powerful tool for understanding the world around us. Purpose. This scientific article aims to explore the nature of scientific theories and the practice of science. The article will critically analyze the current state of scientific methodologies and perspectives and consider the influence of social, cultural, and historical factors on the scientific process. The article will also address the challenges faced by the scientific community in pursuing truth, including political propaganda, ideologies, and religious lies. The goal is to provide valuable insights into the scientific approach to life and to encourage the critical examination of scientific theories and practices. Research methods. Literature review, monographic method, analysis and synthesis. Results. The results of the scientific article suggest that scientists' subjective experiences and perspectives influence scientific theories and that the distinction between subjectivity and objectivism is not always clear-cut. Additionally, the practice of science is impacted by various social, cultural, and historical factors, and no single universal scientific method can be applied to all scientific disciplines. The study highlights the need to recognize and appreciate the diversity of scientific approaches and perspectives and to conduct research to investigate the relationship between student persistence and the development of science. The conclusion stresses the importance of critical thinking and overcoming obstacles such as political propaganda, ideologies, or religious lies in pursuing scientific truth. Conclusions. This scientific article highlights the importance of considering subjectivity and various social, cultural, and historical factors in forming scientific theories. It also emphasizes the need to recognize the diversity of scientific approaches and perspectives and the importance of incorporating critical thinking in pursuing scientific truth. This article underscores that science is a light in a world of darkness, illuminating the path to knowledge and understanding, but political propaganda, ideologies, or religious lies often hinder its pursuit. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Science; Critical thinking; Objectivism

PL

Nauka; Myślenie krytyczne; Obiektywizm

• Czasopismo: Nauki Ekonomiczne
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: 37
• Strony: 103--116

Twórcy

autor

Ihor Riabchenko

• Fil. Dr. Jan-U. Sandal Institute, Norway

Bibliografia

• Chatterjee, S. G. (2012). The nature of scientific theory. Current Science, 102(3), 386- 388. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24083882.
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). Historical Structure of Scientific Discovery. Science, 136(3518), 760-764. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1708511.
• Roberts, L. J. (2000). Thomas Kuhn's "The structure of scientific revolutions." ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 57(1), 59-75. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42582097.
• Swabey, M. C. (1927). Science and subjectivity. The Monist, 37(2), 309-316. http:// www.jstor.org/stable/27901115
• Dupré, J. (1990). Scientific Pluralism and the Plurality of the Sciences: Comments on David Hull's "Science as a Process." Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 60(1/2), 61-76. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4320147
• Walstad, A. (2002). Science as a Market Process. The Independent Review, 7(1), 5-45. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24562525
• Kirsch, J. A. W. (1990). Science as a Process [Review of An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, by D. L. Hull]. American Scientist, 78(2), 161-162. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29773946
• Cooper, K.M., Gin L.E., Akeeh B., Clar,k C.E., Hunter, J.S., Roderick ,T.B., et al. (2019). Factors that predict life sciences student persistence in undergraduate research experiences. PLoS ONE 14(8): e0220186. doi: /10.1371/journal.pone.0220186.
• Bucchi, M., Lone,r E., Fattorini, E. (2019) Give science and peace a chance: Speeches by Nobel laureates in the sciences, 1901-2018. PLoS ONE 14(10): e0223505. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0223505.
• Holme, P. (2022). What complexity science is, and why. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.03762. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2201.03762.
• Bas, H., Vivek, V. Munoz-Najar Galvez, K. S. et al. (2020). The Diversity-Innovation Paradox in Science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915378117
• Macallum, A. B. (1916). Scientific Truth and the Scientific Spirit. Science, 43(1109), 439-447. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1639673
• Herron, M. D. (1971). The Nature of Scientific Enquiry. The School Review, 79(2), 171- 212. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1084259.
• Ghimire, R. P. (2021). Role of independent science for innovation. Nauki Ekonomiczne, nr 33, pp. 37-47. doi: 10.19251/ne/2021.33(3)

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.19251/ne/2023.37(6)