Zmierzyć ślad węglowy kultury. Przykład projektu teatralnego

• Autorzy: Małgorzata Ćwikła

Warianty tytułu

To Measure the Carbon Footprint of a Culture. A Case Study of a Theatrical Project

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The article presents the results of carbon footprint measurements of a theatre project. For the pur- pose of the research, data from a survey and in-depth interviews with representatives of Polish theatres were used. Based on this data, a "model" was created, encompassing different variations of theatrical performances, including production, promotion, as well as online and on-site oper- ations during guest performances. The analysis covers both direct emissions related to electricity consumption, transportation, and set design, as well as indirect emissions resulting from the sup- ply chain and possible audience behaviour. The results clearly indicate that the greatest challenge in terms of the carbon footprint of a theatre project faced by cultural managers is mobility and the use of air travel for transporting theatre ensembles and set designs over long distances. Moreover, the transportation needs of the theatre ensembles and set designs for long distance travels pose a chal- lenge. Additionally, the use of individual car transportation by audiences - even for short distanc- es, is problematic - which could be addressed through the implementation of local partnerships. Getting familiar with this analysis can help producers, cultural managers, artists, and those respon- sible for shaping cultural policies to identify aspects with the greatest environmental impact and take appropriate adaptive actions. Although most of these actions will involve a profound change in traditional project management practices in the theatre, paying attention to relevant indicators, consciously developing new habits, and sharing resources provides an opportunity to expedite ad- aptation based on knowledge and organizational learning. These types of activities are necessary due to the unrelenting projectification of the field of culture and beyond, which causes organiza- tions to operate in a kind of "projectocene". (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Kultura; Teatr; Ślad ekologiczny; Zarządzanie projektem

EN

Culture; Theater; Ecological footprint; Project management

• Czasopismo: Zarządzanie w Kulturze
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: 24
• Numer: z. 3 Czy kulturę da się zmierzyć, czy kulturę da się policzyć?
• Strony: 119--137

Twórcy

autor

Małgorzata Ćwikła

• Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Bibliografia

• Achten Wouter M.J., Almeida Joana, Muys Bart (2013). Carbon Footprint of Science: More than Flying. Ecological Indicators, 34, 352-355, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.05.025.
• Altıntaş Halil, Kassouri Yacouba (2020). The Impact of Energy Technology Innovations on Cleaner Energy Supply and Carbon Footprints in Europe: A Linear Versus Nonlinear Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 124140, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124140.
• Auslander Philip (1999). Liveness. Performance in a Mediatized Culture. London: Routledge.
• Beer Tanja, Hes Dominique (2017). Sustainability in Production: Exploring Eco-creativity within the Parameters of Conventional Theatre. Behind the Scenes: Journal of Theatre Production Practice, 1(1), [dok. elektr.] https://via.library.depaul.edu/bts_journal_of_theatre_production_practice/vol1/iss1/4. [odczyt: 7.07.2023].
• Bozak, Nadia (2012). The Cinematic Footprint. Lights, Cameras, Natural Resources. New Brunswick, New York, London: Rutgers University Press.
• Climate Crisis: The Unsustainable Use of Online Video (2019). The Shift Project. Carbon Transition Think Tank, [dok. elektr.] https://theshiftproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Press-kit_Climate-crisis_The-unsustainable-use-of-online-video.pdf. [odczyt: 29.05.2023].
• Dias Ana Cláudia, Arroja Luís (2012). Comparison of Methodologies for Estimating the Carbon Footprint - Case Study of Office Paper. Journal of Cleaner Production, 24, 30-35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.005.
• Dixson-Decleve Sandrine (2023). Beyond Growth 2023 Opening plenary: "Limits to Growth": Where Do We Stand and Where Do We Go from Here?
• Earth Overshoot Day. How Many Earths? How Many Countries? [dok. elektr.] https://www.overshootday.org/how-many-earths-or-countries-do-we-need/. [odczyt: 26.05.2023].
• Emission Factors for Greenhouse Gas Inventories (2018). Environmental Protection Agency, [dok. elektr.] https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2018-03/documents/emission-factors_mar_2018_0.pdf. [odczyt: 29.05.2023].
• Festival d'Avignion. A responsible and socially-conscious company, [dok. elektr.] https://festivalavignon.com/en/a-responsible-and-socially-conscious-company-15948. [odczyt: 23.07.2023].
• Fringe Society, Sustainability. Our Commitment, [dok. elektr.] https://www.edfringe.com/about/sustainability. [odczyt: 24.07.2023].
• Fuller Sara (2017). Configuring Climate Responsibility in the City: Carbon Footprints and Climate Justice in Hong Kong. Area, 49, 519-525, https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12341.
• Fuller Sara (2020). Towards a politics of urban climate responsibility: Insights from Hong Kong and Singapore. Urban Studies, 57(7), 1469-1484, https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019872347.
• Hochschorner Elisabeth, Dán,György, Moberg Asa (2015). Carbon Footprint of Movie Distribution Via the Internet: A Swedish Case Study, Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 197-207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.012.
• Interview with Eve Lombart, Director of Administration of the Festival d'Avignon (2020). Festival Avignon, [dok. elektr.] https://festival-avignon.com/en/interview-eve-lombart-17522. [odczyt: 30.05.2023].
• IPCC (2013). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, [dok. elektr.] https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/. [odczyt: 26.05.2023].
• IPCC (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.
• Jacobsson Mattias, Jałocha Beata (2021). Four Images of Projectification: An Integrative Review. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(7), 1583-1604.
• Jałocha Beata, Ćwikła Małgorzata (2019). Observing the Process of Culture Projectification and its Agents. A Case Study of Kraków, [w:] Damian Hodgson, Mats Fred, Simon Bailey, Patrik Hall (red.), The Projectification of the Public Sector, Routledge, New York-London, 209-228.
• Jones Meegan (2018). Sustainable Event Management A Practical Guide. 3rd Edition. Routledge. Kulczyńska Dominika (2022). Raport emisji CO2 wystawy "Jak najmniej śladów" 4 lutego - 30 kwietnia 2022 roku, galeria SiC! BWA Wrocław, [dok. elektr.] https://bwa.wroc.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Raport_CO2_Jak_Najmniej_Sladow-1.pdf. [odczyt: 26.05.2023].
• Lenzen Manfred, Sun Ya-Yen, Faturay Futu, Ting Yuan-Peng, Geschke, Arne Malik Arunima (2018). The carbon footprint of global tourism. Nature Clim Change, 8, 522-528, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0141-x.
• Maggs David, Robinson John (2020). Sustainability in an Imaginary World Art and the Question of Agency. Routledge. Małgorzata Ćwikła
• Mayers Kieren, Koomey Jonathan, Hall Rebecca, Bauer Maria, France Chris, Webb Amanda (2015). The Carbon Footprint of Games Distribution. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19, 402-415, https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12181.
• Miner Kimberley R., D'Andrilli Juliana, Mackelprang Rachel, Edwards Arwyn, Malaska Michael J., Waldrop Mark P., Miller Charles E. (2021). Emergent Biogeochemical Risks from Arctic Permafrost Degradation. Nature Climate Change, 11, 809-819, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01162-y.
• Open Letter to Jérôme Bel, Lázaro Gabino Rodríguez, [dok. elektr.] https://e-tcetera.be/open-letter-to-jerome-bel/. [odczyt: 30.05.2023].
• Packendorff Johann, Lindgren Monika (2014). Projectification and its Consequences: Narrow and Broad Conceptualisation. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 17, 7-21, https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v17i1.807.
• Pandey Divya, Agrawal Madhoolika, Pandey Jai Shanker (2011). Carbon Footprint: Current Methods of Estimation. Environ Monit Assess, 178, 135-160, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y.
• Po stronie natury. Polityka środowiskowa Teatru Zagłębia, [dok. elektr.] https://teatrzaglebia.pl/polityka-srodowiskowa-w-teatrze-zaglebia/. [odczyt: 19.05.2023].
• Reflector. The Green Guide for the Performing Arts, [dok. elektr.] https://reflector.eco/de /. [odczyt: 24.07.2023].
• Sharma Pawankumar, Dash Bibhu (2022). The Digital Carbon Footprint: Threat to An Environmentally Sustainable Future. International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology (IJCSIT), 14(3), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4335349.
• Su Bingtao, Martens Pim, Enders-Slegers Marie-José (2018). A neglected predictor of environmental damage: The ecological paw print and carbon emissions of food consumption by companion dogs and cats in China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 194, 1-11.
• Taxopoulou Iphigenia (2023). Sustainable Theatre. Theory, Context, Practice. Bloomsbury Publishing.
• The Loss of Nature, [dok. elektr.] https://buehnenbern.ch/spielplan/programm/the-loss-ofnature/. [odczyt: 7.07.23].
• Union of Concerned Scientist (2022). Each Country's Share of CO2 Emissions, [dok. elektr.] https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/each-countrys-share-co2-emissions. [odczyt: 26.05.2023].
• Wackernagel Mathis, Rees William E. (1996). Our Ecological Footprint. Reducing Human Inpact on the Earth. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.
• Wiedmann Thomas, Minx Jan (2008). A Definition of 'Carbon Footprint'. W: C.C. Pertsova (red.), Ecological Economics Research Trends. New York: Nova Science Publishers,. 1-11.
• Wskaźniki emisyjności CO2, SO2, NOx, CO i pyłu całkowitego dla energii elektrycznej (2020). Krajowy Ośrodek Bilansowania i Zarządzania Emisjami, [dok. elektr.] https://www.kobize.pl/uploads/materialy/materialy_do_pobrania/wskazniki_emisyjnosci/Wskazniki_emisyjnosci_grudzien_2020.pdf. [odczyt: 30.05.2023].

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.4467/20843976ZK.23.012.18657