Industry 5.0 as the Upgrade of Industry 4.0: Towards One Common Concept of Industrial Transformation

• Autorzy: Bożena Gajdzik
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: Ten years after the introduction of Industry 4.0, politicians and scientists have started to promote the new concept of Industry 5.0. In this new concept, Industry 4.0 technologies are supposed to help companies achieve sustainability and resilience, and put people at the centre of technological change. This publication is based on a literature review. The topic of the analysis was Industry 5.0. The aim of the analysis was to present the research fields of researchers about Industry 5.0

Design/methodology/approach: Literature review was realized based on papers in data base Web of Science (WoS). The first paper was identified in 2016. After the year, there were more and more papers in the WoS data base. In the analysis, the method of SLR was used.

Findings: Based on realized analysis, the key research fields was identified. On the research fields, the discussion of Industry 5.0 was realized. The discussion was conducted in line with the three strategic directions for industrial transformation, which are written in the January 2021 EC document. These directions are: human at the centre of transformation, sustainability and resilience.

Originality/value: The key element of the paper is the matrix with research fields. In conclusion, the author states that due to the short period of industrial transformation, both concepts are industry changing. The concepts are difficult to separate from each other, so the author suggests using the term: Industry 4.0/5.0.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Industry 4.0; Industry development; Sustainable development

PL

Przemysł 4.0; Rozwój przemysłu; Rozwój zrównoważony

• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2023
• Numer: z. 181 Nowoczesność przemysłu i usług = Modernity of industry and services
• Strony: 131--150

Twórcy

autor

Bożena Gajdzik

• Silesian University of Technology

Bibliografia

• 1. Adana, S., Cevikparmak, S., Celik, H., Uvet, H., Idug, Y. (2023). Connecting Decision- Making to Resilience: The Importance of Decentralization and Supply Chain Orientation in a Post-COVID World. Supply Chain Management, 21, 133-149.
• 2. Adel, A. (2022). Future of Industry 5.0 in society: human-centric solutions, challenges and prospective research areas. Journal of Cloud Computing, 11(1), 40.
• 3. Agarwal, N., Chauhan, S. (2022). Amplifying Employability Skills to Create Co-Working Space for Human and Cobots in the E-Commerce Industry. Procedia Computer Science, 214(C), pp. 1040-1048.
• 4. Ahmed Zaki, A.M., Mohamed Fathy, A.M., Carnevale, M., Giberti, H. (2022). Application of Realtime Robotics platform to execute unstructured industrial tasks involving industrial robots, cobots, and human operators. Procedia Computer Science, 200, pp. 1359-1367.
• 5. Akundi, A., Euresti, D., Luna, S., Ankobiah, W., Lopes, A., Edinbarough, I. (2022). State of Industry 5.0-Analysis and Identification of Current Research Trends. Applied System Innovation, 5(1), doi: 10.3390/asi5010027.
• 6. Alves, J., Lima, T.M., Gaspar, P.D. (2023). Is Industry 5.0 a Human-Centred Approach? A Systematic Review. Processes, 11, 193, https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11010193.
• 7. Alzoubi, I., Almaliki, S., Mirzaei, F. (2019). Prediction of environmental indicators in land leveling using artificial intelligence techniques. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric., 6, 4.
• 8. Aquilani, B., Piccarozzi, M., Abbate, T., Codini, A. (2020). The Role of Open Innovation and Value Co-creation in the Challenging Transition from Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0: Toward a Theoretical Framework. Sustainability, 12/21.
• 9. Aslam, F., Wang, A.M., Li, M.Z., Rehman, K.U. (2020). Innovation in the Era of IoT and Industry 5.0: Absolute Innovation Management (AIM) Framework. Information, 11(2). doi:10.3390/info11020124.
• 10. Batra, S., Klingner, J., Correll, N. (2022). Augmented reality for human-swarm interaction in a swarm-robotic chemistry simulation. Artificial Life and Robotics, 27(2), pp. 407-415.
• 11. Bello, M.O., Ch'ng, K.S. (2022). On the sustainability of growth from energy consumption: Empirical evidence from a dynamic autoregressive distributed lag simulation. Energy Reports, 810219-10229.
• 12. Blumenthal, J., Diamond, M.L. (2022). Sustainability of the Internet of Things Requires Understanding of Mineral Demands and Supplies. Environmental Science and Technology, 56(14), 9835-9837.
• 13. Broo, D.G., Kaynak, O., Sait, S.M. (2021). Rethinking engineering education at the age of industry 5.0. J. Ind. Inf. Integr., 25, doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2021.100311.
• 14. Carayannis, E.G., Dezi, L., Gregori, G., Calo, E. (2022) Smart Environments and Techno- centric and Human-Centric Innovations for Industry and Society 5.0: A Quintuple Helix Innovation System View Towards Smart, Sustainable, and Inclusive Solutions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(2), 926-955.
• 15. Carayannis, E.G., Draper, J., Bhaneja, B. (2021). Towards Fusion Energy in the Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0 Context: Call for a Global Commission for Urgent Action on Fusion Energy. J. Knowl. Econ., 12/4, doi: 10.1007/s13132-020-00695-5.
• 16. Carayannis, E.G., Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2022). The Futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 as Driving Forces of Future Universities. J. Knowl. Econ. 13/4. doi: 10.1007/s13132-021-00854-2.
• 17. Cillo, V., Gregori, G.L., Daniele, L.M., Caputo, F., Bitbol-Saba, N. (2022). Rethinking companies' culture through knowledge management lens during Industry 5.0 transition. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(10), 2485-2498.
• 18. Cuvero, M., Pilkington, A., Barnes, D. (2021). Supply Chain Management and Resilience during Disruption. Evaluation of the Covid-19 Pandemic on the Supply of Personal Protective Equipment. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 233-237.
• 19. D'adamo, I., González-Sánchez, R., Medina-Salgado, M.S., Settembre-Blundo, D. (2021). Methodological perspective for assessing European consumers' awareness of cybersecurity and sustainability in e-commerce. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(20), 11343.
• 20. Di Nardo, M., Yu, H.X. (2021). Industry 5.0: Ethereum blockchain technology based DApp smart contract. Apply. Syst. In. 4/3, doi: 10.3390/asi4030045.
• 21. El Baz, J., Ruel, S. (2021). Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains' resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era. International Journal of Production Economics, 233, 107972.
• 22. ElFar, O.A., Chang, C.K., Leong, H.Y., Peter, A.P., Chew, K.W., Show, P.L. (2021). Prospects of Industry 5.0 in algae: Customization of production and new advance technology for clean bioenergy generation. Energy Conv. Manag., X, 10.
• 23. Fitzgerald, R., Wang, E., Karanassios, V. (2019). Smartphone-enabled data acquisition and digital signal processing: From current-output or voltage-output sensors for use on-site, to their use in IoT, in Industry 4.0 and (potentially) in Society 5.0. In: R.A. Crocombe, L.T.M. Profeta, A.K. Azad (eds.), Next-Generation Spectroscopic Technologies XII. APR 15-17, 2019 Proceedings of SPIE, Baltimore, MD.
• 24. Fraga-Lamas, P., Lopes, S.I., Fernandez-Carames, T.M. (2021). Green IoT and Edge AI as Key Technological Enablers for a Sustainable Digital Transition towards a Smart Circular Economy: An Industry 5.0 Use Case. Sensors, 21/17, doi: 10.3390/s21175745.
• 25. Gajdzik, B. (2022). Diagnoza kierunków transformacji przemysłu stalowego w Przemyśle 4.0. Monografia, 945. Gliwice: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej. ISBN 978-83-7880-850-3.
• 26. Gajdzik, B. (2022). Frameworks of the Maturity Model for Industry 4.0 with Assessment of Maturity Levels on the Example of the Segment of Steel Enterprises in Poland. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 8, 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8020077.
• 27. Gajdzik, B. (2023). Industry 5.0 as a new concept of development within high volatility environment: about the Industry 5.0 based on political and scientific studies. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, vol. 169, pp. 255-279. doi:10.29119/1641-3466.2023.169.15.
• 28. Gajdzik, B., Grabowska, S., Saniuk, S., Wieczorek, T. (2020). Sustainable Development and Industry 4.0: A Bibliometric Analysis Identifying Key Scientific Problems of the Sustainable Industry 4.0. Energies, vol. 13, iss. 16, (art. no. 4254), pp. 1-27, doi:10.3390/en13164254.
• 29. Gajdzik, B., Wolniak, R. (2021). Transitioning of Steel Producers to the Steelworks 4.0- Literature Review with Case Studies. Energies, vol. 14, (art. no. 4109). doi: 10.3390/en14144109, e-ISSN 1996-1073.
• 30. Gajdzik, B., Grzybowska, K. (2012). Example models of building trust in supply chains of metallurgical enterprises. Metalurgija, 51, 563-566.
• 31. Gorodetsky, V., Larukchin, V., Skobelev, P. (2020). Conceptual Model of Digital Platform for Enterprises of Industry 5.0 In: I. Kotenko, C. Badica, V. Desnitsky, D. ElBaz, M. Ivanovic (eds.), Intelligent Distributed Computing XIII. Springer.
• 32. Grabowska, S., Saniuk, S., Gajdzik, B. (2022). Industry 5.0: Improving humanization and sustainability of Industry 4.0. Scientometrics, 127, 3117-3144.
• 33. Hamdani, N.A., Herlianti, A.O., Amin, A.S. (2019). Society 5.0: Feasibilities and challenges of the implementation of fintech in small and medium industries. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1402, art. No. 77053. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1402/7/077053.
• 34. Harborth, D. (2022). Human Autonomy in the Era of Augmented Reality-A Roadmap for Future Work. Information (Switzerland), 13(6), 289.
• 35. Hermann, M., Pentek, T., Otto, B. (2015). Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios: A Literature Review. Working Paper, No. 1. Retrieved from: http://www.snom.mb.tu- dortmund.de/cms/de/forschung/Arbeitsberichte/Design-Principles-for-Industrie-4_0- Scenarios.pdf.
• 36. Industry 5.0 -ec.europa.eu, EC, Brussel, Jan. 2021.
• 37. Ivanov, D. (2022). The Industry 5.0 framework: viability-based integration of the resilience, sustainability, and human-centricity perspectives. International Journal of Production Research.
• 38. Javaid, M., Haleem, A. (2020). Critical Components of Industry 5.0 Towards a Successful Adoption in the Field of Manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management-Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 327-348. doi: 10.1142/ S2424862220500141.
• 39. Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R.P., Haq, M.I.U., Raina, A., Suman, R. (2020). Industry 5.0: Potential Applications in COVID-19. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management-Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(4), 507-530. doi:10.1142/ S2424862220500220.
• 40. John, K.K., Adarsh, S.N., Pattali, V. (2020). Workers to Super Workers: A Brief Discussion on Important Technologies for Industry 5.0 Manufacturing Systems. In: T. Sasipraba, P. Subramaniam, J. Jayaprabakar, N. Joy, M. Anish, S. Ganesan, K.R. Kavitha (eds.). 3rd International Conference on Frontiers in Atomobile and Mechanical Engineering (FAME 2020). Amer. Inst. Physics.
• 41. Johri, P., Singh, J.N., Sharma, A., Rastogi, D. (2021). Sustainability of Coexistence of Humans and Machines: An Evolution of Industry 5.0 from Industry 4.0. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2021, pp. 410-414.
• 42. Juan, S.-J., Li, E.Y. (2023). Financial performance of firms with supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic: the roles of dynamic capability and supply chain resilience. International Journal of Operations and Production Management.
• 43. Kagermann, H. (2015) Change Through Digitization-Value Creation in the Age of Industry 4.0. In: H. Albach, H. Meffert, A. Pinkwart, R. Reichwald (eds.), Management of Permanent Change. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien, pp. 23-45.
• 44. Kang, J. (2018). Change: From Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0-Taking the comparison of related development strategies between Germany and Japan as an example. Book series: Advances in Social Science Education and Humanities Research, 213, 569-573. Proceedings Paper. In 4th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR), APR 25-27, 2018, Jiangnan Univ, Int Acad Exchange Ctr, Wuxi, PEOPLES R China (Book editor: Du, X, Huang, C, Zhong, Y.).
• 45. Kaur, M., Jadhav, A., Akter, F. (2022). Resource Selection from Edge-Cloud for IIoT and Blockchain-Based Applications in Industry 4.0/5.0. Secur. Commun. Netw. doi 10.1155/2022/9314052.
• 46. Khan, W.U., Ihsan, A., Nguyen, T.N., Ali, Z., Javed, M.A. (2022). NOMA-Enabled Backscatter Communications for Green Transportation in Automotive-Industry 5.0. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., 18/11, doi 10.1109/TII.2022.3161029.
• 47. Komol, A. (2020). Industry 5.0 - przyszłość, która już istnieje. Retrieved from: https://www.production-manager.pl/2020/02/03/industry-5-0-przyszlosc-ktora-juz- istnieje/.
• 48. Komolka, A. (Oct./Nov. 2019) Industry 5.0 - przyszłość, która już istnieje. Czas rzeczywistej integracji systemów. Production Manager, 5(23).
• 49. Kwiek, D. (2022). Przemysł 5.0. Retrieved from: https://przemyslprzyszlosci.gov.pl/ author/damian-kwiek/, 12 May 2022.
• 50. Longo, F., Padovano, A., Umbrello, S. (2020). Value-Oriented and Ethical Technology Engineering in Industry 5.0: A Human-Centric Perspective for the Design of the Factory of the Future. Applied Sciences-BASEL, 10(12). doi: 10.3390/app10124182.
• 51. Lorenz, M., Rüßmann, M., Strack, R., Lueth, K., Bolle, M. (2015). Man and Machine in Industry 4.0. How Will Technology Transform the Industrial Workforce Through 2025? Retrieved from: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2015/technology-business transformation-engineered-products-infrastructure-man-machineindustry-4.aspx.
• 52. Lu, Y.Q., Zheng, H., Chand, S., Xia, W.Q., Liu, Z.K., Xu, X., Wang, L.H., Qin, Z.J., Bao, J.S. (2022). Outlook on human-centric manufacturing towards Industry 5.0. J. Manuf. Syst., 62, doi; 10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.02.001.
• 53. Maddikunta, P.K.R., Pham, Q.V., Prabadevi Deepa, N,. Dev, K., Gadekallu, T.R., Ruby, R., Liyanage, M. (2022). Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential application. Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257.
• 54. Maqbool, R., Saiba, M.R., Ashfaq, S. (2023). Emerging Industry 4.0 and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies in the Ghanaian construction industry: sustainability, implementation challenges, and benefits. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30, 37076-37091.
• 55. Matthews, K. (2018). What is manufacturing 5.0. Jun 28. Retrieved from: https://www.manufacturing.net/software/article/13123438/what-is-manufacturing-50.
• 56. Matuszak, J. (17 March 2022). Czy twoja firma jest gotowa na przemysł 5.0? Retrieved from: https://knowhow.distrelec.com/pl/produkcja/czy-twoja-firma-jest-gotowa- na-przemysl-5-0/.
• 57. Miyake, D. (2022). Strategic Planning Vs. Operational Planning: 7 Main Differences. Retrieved from: https://www.clearpointstrategy.com/strategic-planning-vs-operational- planning/, 23 January 2023.
• 58. Monteiro, A.C.B., Franca, R.P., Estrela, V.V., Fernandes, S.R., Khelassi, A., Aroma, R.J., Raimond, K., Iano, Y., Arshaghi, A. (2020). UAV-CPSs as a test bed for new technologies and a primer to Industry 5.0. Imaging and Sensing for Unmanned Aircraft Systems, vol. 2. In: V.V. Estrela, J. Hemanth, O. Saotome, G. Nikolakopoulos, R. Sabatini, R. (eds.), Deployment and Applications. IET Control Robotics and Sensors Series. Inst. Engineering Tech-Iet.
• 59. Moran, T., MacDonald, R., Zhang, H. (2023). A Dynamic Simulation Model for Understanding Sustainability of Machining Operation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(1), 152.
• 60. Mustonen, J. (2021). Sustainability in IoT - is it environmentally sound? https://haltian.com/resource/sustainability-in-iot/, 23 January 2023.
• 61. Nahavandi, S. (2019). Industry 5.0-A Human-Centric Solution. Sustainability, 11, 4371. doi:10.3390/su1116437.
• 62. Nirmala, J. (2016). Super Smart Society: Society 5.0. Robotics Tomorrow. Retrieved from: https://www.roboticstomorrow.com/article/2016/09/super-smart-society-society-50/8739.
• 63. Nwogugu, M.I.C. (2020). Industry 5.0/6.0: some public health, inequality, environmental pollution and inefficient resource-allocation implications. Earnings Management, Fintech- Driven Incentives and Sustainable Growth: on Complex Systems, Legal and Mechanism Design Factors. Routledge.
• 64. Ozdemir, V., Hekim, N. (2018). Birth of Industry 5.0: Making Sense of Big Data with Artificial Intelligence. The Internet of Things and Next-Generation Technology Policy. OMICS-A Journal of Integrative Biology, 22(1), 65-76. doi: 10.1089/omi.2017.0194.
• 65. Pawlicka, A., Pawlicki, M., Kozik, R., Choraś, M. (2022). Human-driven and human- centred cybersecurity: policy-making implications. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 16(4), 478-487.
• 66. Piątek, Z. (23 Feb. 2023). Industry 5.0? Na kolejną rewolucję jest raczej zbyt wcześnie. Gospodarka Artykuły. Automatyka B2B. Retrieved from: https://automatykab2b.pl/ gospodarka/49085-industry-5.0-na-kolejna-rewolucje-jest-raczej-zbyt-wczesnie.
• 67. Pollini, A., Callari, T.C., Tedeschi, A., Chiarugi, F., Guerri, D. (2022). Leveraging human factors in cybersecurity: an integrated methodological approach. Cognition, Technology and Work, 24(2), 371-390.
• 68. Potocan, V., Mulej, M., Nedelko, Z. (2021). Society 5.0: balancing of Industry 4.0, economic advancement and social problems. Kybernetes, 50(3), 794-811. doi: 10.1108/ K-12-2019-0858.
• 69. Rada, M. Industry 5.0 definition. Available online: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ industrial-upcycling-definitionmichael-rada/.
• 70. Rupa, C., Midhunchakkaravarthy, D., Hasan, M.K., Alhumyani, H., Saeed, R.A. (2021). Industry 5.0: Ethereum blockchain technology based DApp smart contract. Math. Biosci. Eng., 18(5). doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021349.
• 71. Sachsenmeier, P. (2016). Industry 5.0-The Relevance and Implications of Bionics and Synthetic Biology. Engineering, 2(2), 225-229. doi: 10.1016/J.ENG.2016.02.015.
• 72. Salam, A. (2020). Internet of things for sustainability: Perspectives in privacy, cybersecurity, and future trends. Internet of Things, 299-327.
• 73. Salimova, T., Guskova, N., Krakovskaya, I., Sirota E. (2019). From Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0: Challenges for sustainable competitiveness of Russian industry. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 497(1), 012090.
• 74. Salimova, T., Vukovic, N., Guskova, N. (2020) Towards sustainability through Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0. International Review, 3-4.
• 75. Saniuk, S., Grabowska, S., Straka, M. (2022). Identification of Social and Economic Expectations: Contextual Reasons for the Transformation Process of Industry 4.0 into the Industry 5.0 Concept. Sustainability, 14, 1391.
• 76. Sherburne, C. (2020). Textile Industry 5.0? Fiber Computing Coming Soon to a Fabric Near You. AATCC Review 20(6), 25-30, doi: 10.14504/ar.20.6.2. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencegate.app/document/10.14504/ar.20.6.2.
• 77. Skobelev, P.O., Borovik, S.Yu. (2017). On the way from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: from digital manufacturing to digital society. International Scientific Journal "Industry 4.0", 2(6), 307-311.
• 78. Society 5.0: Japan's digitization. Retrieved from: http://www.cebit.de/en/news- trends/news/society-5-0-japans-digitization-779.
• 79. Soltysik-Piorunkiewicz, A., Zdonek, I. (2021). How Society 5.0 and Industry 4.0 Ideas Shape the Open Data Performance Expectancy. Sustainability, 13/2. Doi: 10.3390/su13020917.
• 80. Sorell, T. (2022). Cobots, "co-operation" and the replacement of human skill. Ethics and Information Technology, 24(4), 44.
• 81. Spatz, J., Langstrof, A. (2022). Cobots: How safe human-machine interaction works out. Technische Sicherheit, 12(9-10), 11-15.
• 82. Sultan, S., Acharya, Y., Hynes, N. (2021). Commentary: When Promising Innovators Lack Strategic Vision: The Concept of Flow Modulation in Aortic Dissection. Journal of Endovascular Therapy, 28(1), 32-35.
• 83. Taverner, C., Trojan, L., Simion, O., Szkudlarek, E. (2021). Design culture in the era of industry 5.0: A review of skills and needs. Cultural Management: Science and Education, 5(1), 41-58.
• 84. Ullah, M., Zahid, M., All-e-Raza Rizvi, S.M., Qureshi, Q.G.M., Ali, F. (2022). Do green supply chain management practices improve organizational resilience during the COVID-19 crisis? A survival analysis of global firms. Economics Letters, 219, 110802.
• 85. Upadhyay, R.K., Singh, A., Singh, B.M. (2022). Human side of cybersecurity: an empirical study. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 41(3), 408-422.
• 86. Visual Components (2022). The role of simulation in sustainability: Exploring the five core areas. Retrieved from: https://www.visualcomponents.com/resources/blog/the-role-of- simulation-in-sustainability-exploring-the-five-core-areas/, 23 January 2023.
• 87. Wang, J., Li, W., Fu, Y., Wu, L. (2022). Research Progress on Human Factor Adaptability in Augmented Reality Assisted Assembly, Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 58(18), 16-30.
• 88. Weiss, A., Wortmeier, A.-K., Kubicek, B. (2021). Cobots in Industry 4.0: A Roadmap for Future Practice Studies on Human-Robot Collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Human- Machine Systems, 51(4), 9490032, 335-345.
• 89. Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., Wang, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0- Inception, conception and perception. J. Manuf. Syst., 61, 530-535.
• 90. Xu, X., Lu, Y.Q., Wang, L.H. et al. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0-Inception, conception and perception. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61, 530-535.
• 91. Yin, S., Yu, Y.Y. (2022). An adoption-implementation framework of digital green knowledge to improve the performance of digital green innovation practices for Industry 5.0. J. Clean Prod., 363. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132608.
• 92. Zegzhda, D.P., Pavlenko, E., Shtyrkina, A. (2021). Cybersecurity and Control Sustainability in Digital Economy and Advanced Production. Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics, pp. 173-185.
• 93. Zengin, Y., Naktiyok, S., Kaygin, E., Kavak, O., Topcuoglu, E. (2021). An Investigation upon Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0 within the Context of Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 13, 5. doi: 10.3390/su13052682.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2023.181.9