PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2023 | z. 181 Nowoczesność przemysłu i usług = Modernity of industry and services | 151--162
Tytuł artykułu

Organizational Learning and Organizational Effectiveness in Family and Non-Family Firms

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The aim of this article is to attempt to answer the question of how organizational learning affects organizational effectiveness and whether there exists a mediating role of organizational slack in this relationship. Additionally, an effort was made to identify differences that may occur between family-owned and non-family-owned firms in the studied research area.

Design/methodology/approach: Survey research was conducted in a group of 363 firms (197 family businesses and 184 non-family businesses). In the analysis of the results, the first step involved assessing the reliability of the questionnaire used, and subsequently, the PLS-SEM method was employed to verify the hypotheses proposed in the study.

Findings: The conducted research has revealed the existence of a significant relationship between organizational learning and organizational effectiveness, with the presence of organizational slack playing a mediating role to some extent. Importantly, no differences were observed in this regard between family businesses and non-family businesses.

Research limitations/implications: The utilization of survey research is associated with the presence of subjectivity in assessments by respondents.

Originality/value: This article is intended for researchers specializing in family-owned businesses and scholars interested in organizational learning and organizational slack, as well as their interrelationship. For management practitioners, the positive correlation between organizational learning and effectiveness may be of particular significance.(original abstract)
Twórcy
  • University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
  • University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
  • University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Błach, J., Gorczyńska, M. (2017). Behawioralne podejście do formułowania celów przedsiębiorstwa. Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie, No. 4, pp. 55-67.
  • 2. Bontis, N., Crossan, M., Hulland, J. (2002) Managing An Organizational Learning System By Aligning Stocks and Flows. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 39, p. 437-469. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00299.
  • 3. Bratnicka-Myślwiec, K., Ingram, T. (2022). Demystifyinh the Role of Slack Resources and Paradox Mindset for Organizactional Creativity in Family and Non-Family Firms. Problemy Zarządzania (Management Issues), Vol. 20, No. 2(96), pp. 176-196.
  • 4. Chiu, Y., Liaw, Y., (2009). Organizational Slack: Is More or Less Better? Journal of Organizational Change, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 321-342.
  • 5. Cyert, R., March, J. (1960 w 2006). Behavior Theory of the Firm. In: J. Miner (Ed.), Organizational Behavior 2 Essential Theories of Process and Structure (pp. 66-70). New York: M.E. Shape,
  • 6. Ćwiklicki, M., Wodecka-Hyjek, A. (2014). Luz organizacyjny a innowacyjność organizacji. Marketing i Rynek, 5(CD), pp. 773-778.
  • 7. Dijkstra, T.K. (2014). PLS' Janus face-response to professor Rigdon's 'rethinking partial least squares modeling: In praise of simple methods. Long Range Planning, 47(3), 146-153.
  • 8. Farooq, R. (2019). Developing a conceptual framework of knowledge management. International Journal of Innovation Science, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 139-160.
  • 9. Gabryś, B.J. (2015). Luz organziacyjny w optyce resource based view: operacjonalizacja konstruktu., Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, No. 229, pp. 48-56.
  • 10. Gabryś, B.J., Bratnicki, M. (2015). Luz organizacyjny jako potencjał odnowy organizacyjnej. Management Forum, Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 31-36.
  • 11. Głód, G., Raczyńska, E. (2022). Wpływ luzów organizacyjnych na konkurencyjność przedsiębiorstw z uwzględnieniem moderacji otoczenia. Przegląd Organizacji, vol. 10(993), pp. 3-10.
  • 12. Gonzalez-Padron, T., Chabowski, B., Hult, G.T.M., Ketchen, D. (2010). Knowledge Management and Balanced Scorecard Outcomes: Exploring the Importance of Interpretation, Learning and Internationality. British Journal of Management, Vol. 21, pp. 967-982. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00634.x.
  • 13. Hadi, P. (2023). The impact of exploitative and organizational learnings on SMEs' performance: The role of environmental dynamism. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 31-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.20525/ ijrbs.v12i3.2522
  • 14. Hair, Jr J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N.P., Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer Nature, p. 197.
  • 15. Hussain, A., Khan, M., Rakhmonov, D.A., Mamadiyarov, Z.T., Kurbonbekova, M.T., Muxlisa Qodirjon, K.M. (2023). Nexus of training and development, organizational learning capability, and organizational performance in the service sector. Sustainability, Vol. 15, No. 4. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043246
  • 16. Ingram, T., Bratnicka-Myśliwiec, K. Kraśnicka, T., Steinerowska-Streb, I. (2022). Entrepreneurial orientation as a determinant of sustainable performance in polish family and non-family organizations. Sustainability, Vol. 14, No. 24, 16393. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416393
  • 17. Jaskanis, A. (2016). Organizacyjne uczenie się i zarządzanie wiedzą. In.: K. Klincewicz (Ed.), Zarządzanie, organizacje i organizowanie - przegląd teoretyczny (pp. 491-501). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwerystetu Warszawskiego.
  • 18. Jerez-Gomez, P., Céspedes-Lorente, J., Valle-Cabrera, R. (2005). Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 715-725.
  • 19. Jin, X., Wang, J., Chen, S., Wang, T. (2015). A study of the relationship between the knowledge base and the innovation performance under the organizational slack regulating. Management Decision, vol. 53, No. 10, pp. 2202-2225.
  • 20. Jöreskog, K.G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36(4), 409-426.
  • 21. Khan, S.J., Mir, A.A. (2019). Ambidextrous culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovations: The role of organizational slack and environmental factors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(4), 652-663.
  • 22. Lenart-Gansiniec, R. (2019). Organizational Learning in Industry 4.0. Problemy Zarządzania - Management Issues, Vol. 17, No, 2(82), pp. 96-108.
  • 23. Lien, T.P., Ha, V.H. (2019). The relationship between organizational learning capability and business performance: The case of vietnam firms [Organizational learning capability]. Journal of Economics and Development, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 259-269. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-10-2019-0041
  • 24. Mai, N.K., Do, T.T., Nguyen, D.T.H. (2023). Leadership competencies, organizational learning and organizational performance of tourism firms: evidence from a developing country. Tourism and Hospitality Management, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.29.1.1
  • 25. Noruzy, A., Dalfard, V.M., Azhdari, B., Nazari-Shirkouhi, S., Rezazadeh, A. (2013). Relations between transformational leadership, organizational learning, knowledge management, organizational innovation, and organizational performance: an empirical investigation of manufacturing firms. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 64, pp. 1073-1085.
  • 26. Olejniczak, K., Rok, J., Płoszaj, A. (2012). Organizacyjne uczenie się i zarządzanie wiedzą - przegląd koncepcji. In: K. Olejniczak (Ed.), Organizacje uczące się. Model dla administracji publicznej (pp. 61-107). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  • 27. Qian, Ch., Yu, K., Chen, N., Shen, W., Hou, S., Lei, Y. (2023). When to adopt a new process management standard? An organizational learning perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 263, pp. 1-11.
  • 28. Schilke, O. (2014). 'On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The non-linear moderating effect of environmental dynamism'. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 179-203.
  • 29. Suzuki, O. (2013). Organizational Slack, Structure, and Learning: A Review of Prior Literature. Kawansei Gakuin University Social Sciences Rewiew, Vol. 18, pp. 81-99.
  • 30. Vanacker, T., Collewaert, V., Zahra, SA. (2019). Slack resources, firm performance, and the institutional context: Evidence from privately held European firms. Strategic Management Journal, 38(6), pp. 1305-1326.
  • 31. Wang, Y., Guo, B., Yin, Y. (2017). Open innovation search in manufacturing firms: the role of organizational slack and absorptive capacity. Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 656-674.
  • 32. Wiśniewska, S., Wiśniewski, K. (2020). Organizacyjne uczenie się jako determinanta zatrudnialności pracowników. Przegląd Organizacji, Vol. 7(966), pp. 20-27.
  • 33. Zahra, S.A. (2012). Organizational learning and entrepreneurship in family firms: exploring the moderating effect of ownership and cohesion. Small Business Economics, Vol. 38, pp. 51-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9266-7
  • 34. Zhao, Z., Yan, Y. (2023). The role of organizational unlearning in manufacturing firms' sustainable digital innovation: The mechanism of strategic flexibility and organizational slack. Sustainability, 15(13), 10371. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310371.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171684208

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.