PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2023 | z. 181 Nowoczesność przemysłu i usług = Modernity of industry and services | 519--530
Tytuł artykułu

The Importance of Digitalization in the Organization of Cyber-Physical Production Networks of Polish Smes in Industry 4.0

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The paper aims to explore the impact of the digitization of SME sector enterprises on cooperation in cyber-physical networks in the Industry 4.0 environment.

Design/methodology/approach: The literature analysis method and survey of SME sector enterprises were used in the research. 206 manufacturing enterprises took part in the study, including 35 micro, 87 small and 84 medium-sized enterprises. The selection of the sample was purposeful. A statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS v. 28 statistical package in the empirical study. The analysis included the use of, among others, frequency analysis, one-way analysis of variance and linear regression analysis.

Findings: The survey revealed a positive correlation between company size and digitalization level. Larger enterprises report higher levels of digitization. Enterprises declaring a higher level of digitization also expect a correspondingly high level of digitization from their network partner. Moreover, a higher level of digitization of the enterprise is a factor that influences the willingness of the examined enterprise to join a cyber-physical cooperation network. The research also shows that an enterprise's digitization level is associated with the enterprise's declaration of connecting its intelligent resources with an external digital platform that guarantees the security of transmitted digital data and organizes the cyber-physical network in an automated manner.

Research limitations/implications: The research was conducted among selected Polish micro, small and medium-sized production enterprises. Due to the issue of networking and international cooperation of enterprises operating in the Industry 4.0 environment, research should also cover other European countries in the future.

Originality/value: Original achievements obtained during the research include demonstrating the relationship between the level of digitization of enterprises and the tendency to establish cooperation within cyber-physical production networks. Moreover, the survey results proved that investing in digital technologies is an additional motivating factor for enterprises wanting to cooperate within networks in the Industry 4.0 environment.(original abstract)
Twórcy
  • University of Zielona Gora, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Adamik, A., Grabowska, S., Saniuk, S. (2023). Model biznesu w środowisku Smart World. Warszawa: PWE, p. 304.
  • 2. Baraldi, E., Gressetvold, E., Harrison, D. (2012). Resource interaction in inter- organizational networks: Foundations, comparison, and a research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 65(2), 266-276.
  • 3. Birkel, H.S., Veile, J.W., Müller, J.M., Hartmann, E., Voigt, K.I. (2019). Development of a risk framework for Industry 4.0 in the context of sustainability for established manufacturers. Sustainability, 11(2), 384.
  • 4. Cotrino, A., Sebastián, M.A., González-Gaya, C. (2020). Industry 4.0 roadmap: Implementation for small and medium-sized enterprises. Applied sciences, 10(23), 8566.
  • 5. Culot, G., Fattori, F., Podrecca, M., Sartor, M. (2019). Addressing industry 4.0 cybersecurity challenges. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 47(3), 79-86.
  • 6. Czakon, W. (2015). Sieci międzyorganizacyjne w naukach o zarządzaniu - w kierunku sieciowych modeli biznesu, Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, No. 217.
  • 7. Grabowska, S., Saniuk, S. (2023). Business Models for Industry 4.0: Concepts and Challenges in SME Organizations. London: Routledge - Taylor & Francis Group, p. 176.
  • 8. Hyrynsalmi, S.M. (2022). Definition of the Enterprise Integration Platforms as a Service- Towards a Common Understanding. International Conference on Software Business. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 167-181.
  • 9. Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., Helbig, J. (Eds.) (2011). Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative Industrie 4.0: Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. Industriellen Revolution. Frankfurt, Germany: VDINachrichten.
  • 10. Lachiewicz, S., Zakrzewska-Bielawska, A. (2012). Sieć przedsiębiorstw jako skuteczna forma organizacyjna w warunkach kryzysu gospodarczego. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 20(4), 34-45.
  • 11. Lee, J., Bagheri, B., Kao, H. (2015). Research Letters: A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett., 3, 18-23.
  • 12. Mahmood, K., Lanz, M., Toivonen, V., Otto, T. (2018). A performance evaluation concept for production systems in an SME network. Procedia CIRP, 72, 603-608.
  • 13. Meyers, L.S., Gamst, G.C., Guarino, A.J. (2013). Performing data analysis using IBM SPSS. John Wiley & Sons.
  • 14. Młody, M. (2018). Product personalization and Industry 4.0 - assessment of the rightness of the implementation of modern technologies in the manufacturing industry from the consumers' perspective. Ekonomika i Organizacja Przedsiębiorstwa.
  • 15. Napoleone, A., Macchi, M., Pozzetti, A. (2020). A review on the characteristics of cyber- physical systems for the future smart factories. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 54, 305-335.
  • 16. Perechuda, K., Sobińska, M. (2015). Challenges for knowledge management in the context of it global sourcing models implementation. In: Artificial Intelligence for Knowledge Management: Second IFIP WG 12.6 International Workshop, AI4KM 2014. Warsaw, Poland, September 7-10, 2014, Revised Selected Papers, no. 2 (pp. 58-74). Springer International Publishing.
  • 17. Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości (2022) Raport o stanie sektora małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw w Polsce, https://www.parp.gov.pl/storage/publications/pdf/ Raport-o-stanie-sektora-maych-i-rednich-przedsibiorstw_13_10_2022.pdf, 10.06.2023.
  • 18. Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Engel, P., Harnisch, M., Justus, J., (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consulting Group (BCG), pp. 1-14. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2015/ engineered_products_project_business_industry_4_future_productivity_growth_manufact uring_industries, 2.09.2023.
  • 19. Saniuk, S. (2020). The concept of utilizing SMES network e-business platforms for customized production in the industry 4.0 perspective. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, No. 136, 523-533, ISSN: 1641-3466.
  • 20. Schröder, C. (2016). The challenges of industry 4.0 for small and medium-sized enterprises. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung: Bonn, Germany, 7, 1-28.
  • 21. Wolniak, R. (2023). Innovations in industry 4.0 conditions. Silesian University of Technology Scientific Papers. Organization and Management Series, 169, 725-742.
  • 22. Xu, H., Yu, W., Griffith, D., Golmie, N. (2018). A survey on industrial Internet of Things: A cyber-physical systems perspective. IEEE, 6, 78238-78259.
  • 23. Xu, L.D., Duan, L. (2019). Big data for cyber physical systems in industry 4.0: a survey. Enterprise Information Systems, 13(2), 148-169.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171685692

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.