Supply Chain 4.0: What the Supply Chains of the Future Might Look Like

• Autorzy: Maciej Bielecki , Zbigniew Wisniewski , Goran Dukic , Davor Dujak
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article mainly aims to try and create a new concept for developing logistics and supply chains in the era of Industry 4.0. Analyses of development trends in logistics and production management were used to create the new logistics and supply chain concept. Conclusions were used from the analyses of how the modern concepts of Industry 4.0, Logistics 4.0, Supply Chain 4.0, and 5.0 work. Analyses of the benefits of applying modern management concepts in these areas were carried out and criticised because of their inadequacies, which became apparent during the recent crises in the world. Although the sources of the crises were different, they could be eliminated by reconfiguring logistics systems and supply chains. The results aim to answer three questions: (1) Has the time come to change the current way of looking at logistics and supply chains? (2) What could Supply Chain 4.0 look like using Industry 4.0 tools? (3) How should Supply Chain 4.0 address the logistics and supply chain challenges? The presented answers do not exhaust the topic but rather open up a discussion on logistics and supply chains of the future. The presented concept allows for a completely new global and local view of logistics chains. The structure of the presented model can be subjected to scenario analysis using agent-based simulation modelling due to the structure's emergent nature. The new approach can significantly benefit the development of local production centres and global supply networks. The benefits mainly come from reducing the environmental impact of manufacturing and logistics processes from the moment the new product idea is conceived. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Supply chain; Industry 4.0; Multi-agent based simulation

PL

Łańcuch dostaw; Przemysł 4.0; Symulacja wieloagentowa

• Czasopismo: Engineering Management in Production and Services
• Rocznik: 2024
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 77--92

Twórcy

autor

Maciej Bielecki

• University of Lodz

autor

Zbigniew Wisniewski

• Lodz University of Technology

autor

Goran Dukic

• University of Zagreb, Croatia

autor

Davor Dujak

• University of Osijek, Croatia

Bibliografia

• Alicke, K., Rexhausen, D., & Seyfert, A. (2017). Supply Chain 4.0 in consumer goods. McKinsey & Company, 1(11).
• Bielecki, M. (2022). Total Logistics Management. Logistyka i Łańcuchy Dostaw 4.0. Łódź: University Press.
• Bielecki, M., Galińska, B., & Polak-Sopińska, A. (2021). Perfect Product in Perfect Industry - Design for Logistics. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Łódzkiej.
• Cañas, H., Mula, J., & Campuzano-Bolarin, F. (2020). A General Outline of a Sustainable Supply Chain 4.0. Sustainability, 12(19), 1-17.
• Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M.S. (2004). Managing Risk to Avoid Supply-Chain Breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 53-61.
• Dujak, D., & Sajter, D. (2019). Blockchain Applications in Supply Chain. In A. Kawa & A. Maryniak (Eds.), SMART Supply Network. EcoProduction. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-91668-2_2
• Eggers, W., Flynn, M., O'Leary, J., & Chew, B. (2020). Government's response to COVID-19: from pandemic crisis to a better future. A report from the Deloitte Centre for Government Insights. New York: Deloitte Insights.
• Ehrhart, C.E. (2012). Delivering tomorrow. Logistics 2050. A Scenario Study. Bonn, Germany: Deutsche Post Ag. Frederico, G.F. (2021). From Supply Chain 4.0 to Supply
• Chain 5.0: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review and Research Directions. Logistics, 5(3), 49. doi: 10.3390/LOGISTICS5030049
• Ghadge, A., Wurtmann, H., & Seuring, S. (2019). Managing climate change risks in global supply chains: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 58(1), 44-64. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1629670
• Golroudbary, S.R., Zahraee, S.M., Awan, U., & Kraslawski, A. (2019). Sustainable Operations Management in Logistics Using Simulations and Modelling: A Framework for Decision Making in Delivery Management. Procedia Manufacturing, 30, 627-634. doi: 10.1016/J.PROMFG.2019.02.088
• Golsby, T., & Martichenko, R. (2005). Lean Six Sigma Logistics. Strategic Development to Operational Success. USA: J.Ross Publishing.
• Hofmann, E., & Rüsch, M. (2017). Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Computers in Industry, 89, 23-34. doi: 10.1016/J. COMPIND.2017.04.002
• Hopkins, M. (2014). What is CSR all about? ASPIRARE, 1, 1-21.
• Hu, W., Dong, J., Yuan, J., Ren, R., Chen, Z., & Cheng, H. (2022). Agent-based modeling approach for evaluating underground logistics system benefits and long-term development in megacities. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 7(2), 266-286. doi: 10.1016/J.JMSE.2021.10.002
• Humphrey, J. (2003). Globalization and supply chain networks: the auto industry in Brazil and India. Global Networks, 3(2), 121-141. doi: 10.1111/1471-0374.00053
• Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (Eds.). (2013). Securing the future of German manufacturing industry, Recommendation for implementing the strategic initiative Industry 4.0., Final report of the Industrie 4.0. Working Group. Franfurkt/Main: German Academy of Science and Engineering.
• Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221-232. doi: 10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2017.09.005
• Kotler, P., & Caslione, J.A. (2009). Chaotics: the business of managing and marketing in the age of turbulence. Amacom Books.
• Lange, K.P.H., Korevaar, G., Oskam, I.F., Nikolic, I., & Herder, P.M. (2021). Agent-based modelling and simulation for circular business model experimentation. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 12. doi: 10.1016/j.rcradv.2021.200055
• Lucke, D., Constantinescu, C., & Westkämper, E. (2008). Smart Factory - A Step towards the Next Generation of Manufacturing. In M. Mitsuishi, K. Ueda, & F. Kimura (Eds.), Manufacturing Systems and Technologies for the New Frontier (pp. 115-118). London: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-84800-267-8_23
• Magruk, A. (2016). Uncertainty in the sphere of the industry 4.0-potential areas to research. Business, Management and Education, 14(2), 275-291.
• Pereira, A.G., Lima, T.M., & Charrua-Santos, F. (2020). Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0: Opportunities and Threats. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(5), 3305-3308. doi: 10.35940/IJRTE.D8764.018520
• Perkumienė, D., Pranskūnienė, R., Vienažindienė, M., & Grigienė, J. (2020). The right to a clean environment: Considering green logistics and sustainable tourism. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3254.
• Raju, G., Sarkar, P., Singla, E., Singh, H., & Sharma, R.K. (2016). Comparison of environmental sustainability of pharmaceutical packaging. Perspectives in Science, 8, 683-685. doi: 10.1016/j.pisc.2016.06.058
• Rojko, A. (2017). Industry 4.0 concept: Background and overview. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 11(5).
• Ruiz, N., Giret, A., Botti, V., & Feria, V. (2011). Agent-supported simulation environment for intelligent manufacturing and warehouse management systems. International Journal of Production Research, 49(5), 1469-1482. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2010.522304
• Shi, V.G., Koh, S.C.L., Baldwin, J., & Cucchiella, F. (2012). Natural resource based green supply chain management. Supply Chain Management, 17(1), 54-67. doi: 10.1108/13598541211212203/FULL/XML
• Skobelev, P.O., & Borovik, S.Y. (2017). On the way from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: From digital manufacturing to digital society. Industry 4.0, 2(6), 307-311.
• Tang, C.S. (2007). Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 9(1), 33-45. doi: 10.1080/13675560500405584
• Towill, D., & Christopher, M. (2010). The Supply Chain Strategy Conundrum: To be Lean Or Agile or To be Lean And Agile? International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 5(3), 299-309. doi: 10.1080/1367556021000026736
• Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. (2015). Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf
• Twenge, J.M. (2017). iGen: Why today's super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy-and completely unprepared for adulthood. Atria Books.
• Wiedmann, T., & Minx, J. (2008). A definition of 'carbon footprint.' In C. C. Pertsova (Ed.), Ecological economics research trends (pp. 1-11). Hauppauge NY, USA: Nova Science Publishers.
• Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world. New York: Rawson Associates.

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2024-0006