PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2023 | 8 | nr 2 | 27--48
Tytuł artykułu

Conformité des pratiques de reporting en matière de développement durable avec le cadre de la global reporting initiative : une analyse du secteur mondial de la santé

Warianty tytułu
Sustainability reporting compliance with the Global Reporting Initiative framework: An analysis of the worldwide healthcare sector
Języki publikacji
FR
Abstrakty
L'Objectif : Le but de cet article est d'étudier la conformité des pratiques de reporting en matière de développement durable pour le secteur de la santé avec le cadre de la Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). Conception/méthodologie/approche : 2440 rapports de développement durable publiés entre 1999 et 2019 par 632 organisations de santé dans le monde entier ont été examinés à l'aide d'une analyse de contenu. Une méthodologie de recherche descriptive, comprenant une revue de la littérature, a été appliquée afin d'atteindre l'objectif déclaré. Résultats : Les résultats indiquent que (1) la tendance croissante des organisations de santé à publier des rapports de développement durable conformément aux lignes directrices GRI ou aux standards GRI est remarquée chaque année ; et que (2) 68% des 2440 rapports publiés par les organisations de santé (services et produits) sont conformes au cadre GRI. Les tendances observées concernant la conformité des rapports avec le cadre GRI pourraient fournir une image complète des pratiques de divulgation des informations non financières dans le secteur mondial de la santé. L'article offre une étude intéressante sur les rapports de développement durable qui sont les instruments les plus couramment utilisés par les organisations pour rendre compte de leurs performances économiques, environnementales et sociales. Originalité/valeur : Cette recherche contribue à une littérature croissante sur la standarisation des rapports de développement durable dans le secteur mondial de la santé en fournissant une vision empirique de l'utilisation réelle du cadre GRI. L'article comble une lacune en matière de recherche dans le domaine des pratiques de reporting extra-financier des organisations de santé du monde entier.(abstrakt oryginalny)
EN
Purpose : The purpose of the paper is to investigate the compliance with the GRI Framework of sustainability reporting practices in the worldwide healthcare sector. Design/methodology/approach : 2,440 sustainability reports published in 1999-2019 by 632 healthcare organisations worldwide were examined using a content analysis. A descriptive research methodology, including a literature review, was applied in order to address the stated purpose. Findings : The results indicate that (1) the growing tendency of healthcare organisations to publish sustainability reports in line with the GRI Guidelines or the GRI Standards is noticed every year; (2) 68% of all 2,440 reports published by healthcare services and products organisations comply with the GRI Framework. Noticed trends concerning sustainability reporting compliance with the GRI Framework might provide a complete picture of non-financial disclosure practices in the worldwide healthcare sector. The paper offers interesting insights on sustainability reports that are the most common instruments used by organisations to provide accountability about the economic, environmental and social performance. Originality/value : This research contributes to a growing literature on the standardization of sustainability reporting in the worldwide healthcare sector by providing an empirical view on the actual use of the GRI Framework. Research fills a research gap in the field of non-financial reporting practices of healthcare organisations from all over the world.(original abstract)
Twórcy
  • Poznań University of Economics and Business
Bibliografia
  • About GRI. (n.d.). Retrieved November 5, 2023 from https://www.globalreporting.org/ about-gri/mission-history
  • Bebbington, J., & Larrinaga, C. (2014), Accounting and sustainable development : An exploration. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 395-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. aos.2014.01.003
  • Block, D. J. (2016). Managing natural resources in value-based care. Physician Leadership Journal, 3(3), 18-21.
  • Boerner, H. (2013). New GRI's G4 sustainability reporting guidelines. Corporate Finance Review, 18(2), 25-29.
  • Boesso, G., Kumar, K., & Michelson, G. (2013), Descriptive, instrumental and strategic approaches to corporate social responsibility. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(3), 399-422.
  • Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1036-1071. https://doi. org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2012-00998
  • Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., & Levy, D. L. (2009). Building institutions based on information disclosure: Lessons from GRI's sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(6), 571-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.12.009
  • Carn, C. (2021). Ce que la comptabilité socio-environnementale dit de notre rapport au monde. Entreprise & Société, 9(1), 215-236. https//doi.org/10.48611/isbn.978-2-406- 12203-6.p.0215
  • Churet, C., & Eccles, R. G. (2014). Integrated reporting, quality of management, and financial performance. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 26(1), 56-64. https://doi. org/10.1111/jacf.12054
  • Commission des Communautés Européennes. (2001). Livre vert. Bruxelles 18.07.2001, COM(2001) 366 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/ PDF/?uri=CELEX:52001DC0366
  • Directive 2014/95/UE du Parlement Européen et du Conseil du 22 octobre 2014 modifiant la directive 2013/34/UE en ce qui concerne la publication d'informations non financières et d'informations relatives à la diversité par certaines grandes entreprises et certains groups.
  • Directive (UE) 2022/2464 du Parlement Européen et du Conseil du 14 décembre 2022 modifiant le règlement (UE) no 537/2014 et les directives 2004/109/CE, 2006/43/CE et 2013/34/UE en ce qui concerne la publication d'informations en matière de durabilité par les entreprises.
  • Enquist, B., Johnson, M., & Skålén, P. (2006), Adoption of corporate social responsibility-incorporating a stakeholder perspective. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 3(3), 188-207. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766090610705399
  • Epstein, M. J., & Birchard, B. (2000). Counting what counts: Turning corporate accountability to competitive advantage. Perseus Books.
  • Erkens, M., Paugam, L., & Stolowy, H. (2015). Non-financial information: State of the art and research perspectives based on a bibliometric study. Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit, 21(3), 15-92. https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.213.0015
  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
  • Gillet-Monjarret, C., & Lafont, A. J. (2020). Analyse discursive des rapports RSE des entreprises familiales vs non familiales. Finance Contrôle Stratégie, 23(1), 1-33. https://doi. org/10.4000/fcs.4709
  • Global Reporting Initiative. (2006). Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. GRI.
  • Gray, R., & Laughlin, R. (2012). It was 20 years ago today: Sgt Pepper, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, green accounting and the Blue Meanies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(2), 228-255. https://doi-1org-1lm4i5vlb0040.han3.ue.poznan. pl/10.1108/09513571211198755
  • GRI. (2005). Sector supplement for public agencies, Pilot Version 1, incorporating an abridged version of the 2002 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, March. Global Reporting Initiative.
  • GRI. (2022). The GRI standards: Enabling transparency on organizational impacts. https:// www.globalreporting.org/media/wmxlklns/about-gri-brochure-2022.pdf
  • GRI's Sustainability Disclosure Database. (n.d.). Data legend. https://www.globalreporting. org/media/m22dl3o0/gri-data-legend-sustainability-disclosure-database-profiling.pdf
  • Ho, L. J., & Taylor, M. E. (2007). An empirical analysis of triple bottom-line reporting and its determinants: Evidence from the Unites States and Japan. Journal of International Financial and Accounting, 18(2), 123-150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-646X.2007.01010.x
  • Hopwood, A. (1983). On trying to study accounting in the contexts in which it operates. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8(2-3), 287-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361- 3682(83)90035-1
  • Hussey, D. M., Kirsop, P. L., & Meissen, R. E. (2001). Global Reporting Initiative guidelines: An evaluation of sustainable development metrics for industry. Environmental Quality Management, 11(1), 1-20.
  • Isaksson, R., & Steimle, U. (2009). What does GRI-reporting tell us about corporate sustainability? TQM Journal, 21(2), 61-74.
  • Ivan, O. R. (2009). Sustainability in accounting - basis: A conceptual framework. Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 11(1), 1-10.
  • Knebel, S., & Seele, P. (2015). Quo vadis GRI? A (critical) assessment of GRI 3.1 A+ non-financial reports and implications for credibility and standardization. Corporate Communications, 20(2), 196-212. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-11-2013-0101
  • Krištofík, P., Lament, M., & Musa, H. (2016). The reporting of non-financial information and the rationale for its standardisation, Business Administration and Management, 19(2), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2016-2-011
  • Levy, D. L., Szejnwald Brown, H., de Jong, M., & Brown, H. (2010). The contested politics of corporate governance: The case of the global reporting initiative. Business and Society, 49(1), 88-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650309345420
  • Marinescu, A. O. (2020). Analysis on the compliance of sustainability reports of Romanian companies with GRI conceptual framework. Audit Financiar, 2(158), 361-375. https:// revista.cafr.ro/temp/Abstract_EN_9639.pdf
  • Massie, R. K. (2001). Reporting on sustainability: A global initiative. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The OECD Observer, 226, 60-61. link.gale. com/apps/doc/A76285709/AONE?
  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13-29.
  • Ramirez, B., West, D. J., & Costell, M. M. (2013). Development of a culture of sustainability in health care organizations. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 27(5), 665-672. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-11-2012-0226
  • Rapport du Comité International de Bioéthique de L'UNESCO (CIB) sur la Responsabilité Sociale et la Santé. (2010). UNESCO.
  • Sasse-Werhahn, L. (2019). The practical wisdom behind the GRI. Humanistic Management Journal, 4(1), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-019-00054-w
  • Simmons, J. M., Jr, Crittenden, V. L., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2018). The Global Reporting Initiative: Do application levels matter? Social Responsibility Journal, 14(3), 527-541. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2016-0218
  • Tehemar, S. Z. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility in healthcare. Health Works Collective. https://www.healthworkscollective.com/drtehemar/43791/corporate-social-responsibility-healthcare-sectors
  • Torre, M. L., Sabelfeld, S., Blomkvist, M., Tarquinio, L., & Dumay J. (2018). Harmonising non-financial reporting regulation in Europe. Meditari Accountancy Research, 26(4), 598-621. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2018-0290
  • Tschopp, D., & Huefner, R. J. (2015). Comparing the evolution of CSR reporting to that of financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 565-577.
  • Vigneau, L., Humphreys, M., & Moon, J. (2015). How do firms comply with international sustainability standards? Processes and consequences of adopting the Global Reporting Initiative. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(2), 469-486. https://www.jstor.org/ stable/24703515
  • Willis, A. (1999). Guidelines for sustainability reporting: CA. CA Magazine, 132(9), 14-15.
  • Zinenko, A., Rovira, M. R., & Montiel, I. (2015). The fit of the social responsibility standard ISO 26000 within other CSR instruments: Redundant or complementary?. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(4), 498-526. https//doi.org/10.1108/ SAMPJ-05-2014-0032
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171686726

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.