Entrepreneurial Agility and Organizational Performance of IT Firms: A Mediated Moderation Model

• Autorzy: Leul GirmStephena Haylemariam , Stephen Oduro , Zewdu Lake Tegegne
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

PURPOSE: The Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector is playing an important role in the growth of the world`s economy. However, limited knowledge exists concerning the underlying mechanisms and boundary-spanning conditions under which entrepreneurial agility (EA) affects the organizational performance (OP) of IT firms. This study draws on the Dynamic Capability Theory (DCT) to examine the effect of entrepreneurial agility (EA) on the organizational performance (OP) of Italian IT firms with the mediating role of open innovation (OI) and the moderating role of environmental dynamism (ED). METHODOLOGY: Employing an explanatory research design and convenience sampling technique via an online survey to gather data from a sample of 411 Italian IT firms, the study tested the formulated hypotheses using the structural equation modeling technique in AMOS statistical software. FINDINGS: The results revealed that EA, directly and indirectly, influences OP of IT firms. Moreover, the mediation analysis unveils that OI plays a complementary, partial mediation role in the EA-OP nexus. Finally, ED moderates this focal relationship, such that in the presence of high environmental dynamism, the relationship between EA and OP gets stronger compared to low environmental dynamism. IMPLICATIONS: The findings imply that IT firms should emphasize adopting agile procedures and structures that allow them to react to new problems and opportunities swiftly by building a culture of innovation through the adoption of OI strategies (inbound, outbound, and coupled) to tap into the broader range of expertise and resources in the business environment. To improve the link between OI and OP, managers should prioritize building relationships with external partners, such as customers, suppliers, and academic institutions. IT firms should also prioritize building a diverse and inclusive workforce that can bring diverse perspectives and experiences to the innovation process to enhance their innovation capabilities and create products and services that better meet the needs of customers. ORIGINALITY AND VALUE: The study´s value lies in extending the ongoing scholarly discussion on the nexus between EA and OP by exploring OI as an intermediary mechanism that connects EA, OP, and ED as a boundary-spanning condition that moderates the focal relationship. This research highlights the interplay between EA, OI, ED, and OP, using the DCT as a theoretical foundation. It is the first to examine such interrelationships in the IT sector. In addition, the study provides new insight for researchers focusing on the information technology (IT) sector. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Entrepreneurship; IT enterprises; Innovative character; Open innovation; Structural Equation Modeling; Innovation management

PL

Przedsiębiorczość; Przedsiębiorstwo informatyczne; Innowacyjność; Otwarte innowacje; Modelowanie równań strukturalnych; Zarządzanie innowacjami

• Czasopismo: Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation (JEMI)
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: 20
• Numer: nr 2 Entrepreneurial Strategies for Value Creation in Times of Uncertainty
• Strony: 75--92

Twórcy

autor

Leul GirmStephena Haylemariam

• University of International Studies of Rome, Italy

autor

Stephen Oduro

• Free University of Bolzano, Italy

autor

Zewdu Lake Tegegne

• Bahir Dar University-Ethiopia

Bibliografia

• Arvaniti, E. N., Dima, A., Stylios, C. D., & Papadakis, V. G. (2021). A new step-by-step model for implementing open innovation. Sustainability, 14(10), 6017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106017
• Aujirapongpan, S., Ru-Zhe, J., & Jutidharabongse, J. (2020). Strategic intuition capability toward performance of entrepreneurs: Evidence from Thailand. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 465-473. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.465
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988a). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02723327
• Khan, S., & Rehman, S. (2023). Entrepreneurial Agility: A key to notch 'Sustainable Business Performance' in IT-enterprises of Pakistan. International Journal of Management Research and Emerging Sciences, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.56536/ijmres.v13i3.514
• Bianchi, M., Croce, A., Dell'Era, C., Di Benedetto, C. A., & Frattini, F. (2015). Organizing for inbound open innovation: How external consultants and a dedicated R&D unit influence product innovation performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(4), 492-510. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12302
• Bigliardi, B., Ferraro, G., Filippelli, S., & Galati, F. (2020). The influence of open innovation on firm performance. International Journal of Engineering Business Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979020969545
• Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., Heaton, S., & Teece, D. J. (2019b). Strategic management of open innovation: A dynamic capabilities perspective. California Management Review, 62(1), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619885150
• Bold Data, (2021, Jan 07). Bold data. Retrieved from https://www.eu-startups. com/category/italy-startups/
• Brown, T., Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). An operationalization of Stevenson's conceptualization of entrepreneurship as opportunity-based firm behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10), 953-968. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.190
• Calof, J., Meissner, D., & Ражева, А. (2017). Overcoming open innovation challenges: A contribution from foresight and foresight networks. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(6), 718-733. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1351609
• Caputo, M., Lamberti, E., Cammarano, A., & Michelino, F. (2016). Exploring the impact of open innovation on firm performances. Management Decision, 54(7), 1788-1812. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-02-2015-0052
• Carayannis, E. G., & Grigoroudis, E. (2012). Linking innovation, productivity, and competitiveness: Implications for policy and practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9295-2
• Chakravarty, A., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2013). Information technology competencies, organizational agility, and firm performance: Enabling and facilitating roles. Information Systems Research, 24(4), 976-997. https://doi.org/ 10.1287/isre.2013.0500
• Cheng, C. C., & Huizingh, E. (2014). When is open innovation beneficial? The role of strategic orientation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(6), 1235-1253. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12148
• Chesbrough, H. (2014, April 15). Explicating Open Innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2427233
• Chesbrough, H.W., (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
• Chiang, Y. H., & Hung, K. (2010). Exploring open search strategies and perceived innovation performance from the perspective of inter-organizational knowledge flows. R&D Management, 40(3), 292-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00588.x
• Čirjevskis, A. (2022). Exploring coupled open innovation for digital servitization in grocery retail: From digital dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(9), 411. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15090411
• Corno, F., Lal, R., & Colombo, S. (2014). Entrepreneurship and new venture creation in Italy: Key issues and policy directions. Cham: Springer. https://d oi.org/10 .1007/978-3-319-11412-5_8
• Dabić, M., Stojčić, N., Šimić, M., Potočan, V., Slavković, M., & Nedelko, Z. (2021). Intellectual agility and innovation in micro and small businesses: The mediating role of entrepreneurial leadership. Journal of Business Research, 123, 683-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.013
• Davoudi, S. M. M., Fartash, K., Zakirova, V. G., Belyalova, A. M., Kurbanov, R. A., Boiarchuk, A. V., & Sizova, Z. M. (2018). Testing the mediating role of open innovation on the relationship between intellectual property rights and organizational performance: A case of science and technology park. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83651
• DeGroote, S. E., & Marx, T. G. (2013). The impact of IT on supply chain agility and firm performance: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Information Management, 33(6), 909-916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.09.001
• Dibrell, C., Craig, J. B., & Neubaum, D. O. (2014). Linking the formal strategic planning process, planning flexibility, and innovativeness to firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 2000-2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.011
• Doz, Y. (2020). Fostering strategic agility: How individual executives and human resource practices contribute. Human Resource Management Review, 30(1), 100693.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100693
• Drnevich, P. L., & Kriauciunas, A. (2011). Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 32(3), 254-279. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.882
• Edelbroek, R., Peters, P., & Blomme, R. J. (2019). Engaging in open innovation: The mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and the quality of the open innovation process as perceived by employees. Journal of General Management, 45(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306307019844633
• Etemad, H. (2015). Entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship in the international context. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-015-0150-z
• Florek-Paszkowska, A., Ujwary-Gil, A., & Godlewska-Dzioboń, B. (2021). Business innovation and critical success factors in the era of digital transformation and turbulent times. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 17(4), 7-28. https://doi.org/10.7341/20211741
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
• Fu, L., Liu, Z., & Zhou, Z. (2018). Can open innovation improve firm performance? An investigation of financial information in the biopharmaceutical industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(7), 776-790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1554205
• Gölgeci, İ., Arslan, A., Kentosová, V., Callaghan, D., & Pereira, V. (2023). The role of marketing agility and risk propensity in resilience and survival of eastern European immigrant entrepreneurs in Denmark. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-03-2022-0214
• Gonçalves, D., Bergquist, M., Bunk, R., & Alänge, S. (2020). Cultural aspects of organizational agility affecting digital innovation. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 16(4), 13-46. https://doi.org/10.7341/20201641
• Grembowski, D. (1985). Survey questionnaire salience. American Journal of Public Health, 75(11), 1350. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.75.11.1350
• Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=1841396
• Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. and Tatham, R.L. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis. Retrieved from https://scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2123550
• Hajizadeh, A., & Valliere, D. (2022). Entrepreneurial foresight: Discovery of future opportunities. Futures, 135, 102876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102876
• Harif, M.A.A.M, Nawaz, M., & Hameed, W. U. (2022). The role of open innovation, hotel service quality and marketing strategy in hotel business performance. Heliyon, 8(9), e10441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10441
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014b). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
• Hindrawati, G., Dhewanto, W., & Dellyana, D. (2022). Does innovative millennial entrepreneurship have a role in fostering cyber learning on business performance? A perspective of entrepreneurial agility. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1177/14657503211066011
• Horton, J., Macve, R., & Struyven, G. (2004). Qualitative research: Experiences in using semistructured interviews. In C. Humphrey & B. Lee (Eds.), The Real Life Guide to Accounting Research: A Behind-the-Scenes View of Using Qualitative Research Methods (pp. 339-357). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-008043972-3/50022-0
• Hosseini, A., Alizadeh Sani, M. & Abedi, H., (2019). The relationship between entrepreneurial agility and human resource practices in active manufacturing companies in Beshel industrial town with respect to organization size. The Journal of Productivity Management, 13(49), 19-39. https://10.30495/QJOPM.2019.666862
• Hu, Y., McNamara, P., & McLoughlin, D. (2015). Outbound open innovation in bio-pharmaceutical out-licensing. Technovation, 35, 46-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.004
• Huizingh, E. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002
• Hung, K., & Chou, C. (2013). The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence. Technovation, 33(10-11), 368-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.06.006
• Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963-989. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063(03)00086-2
• Jucevicius, G., Juceviciene, R., Gaidelys, V. & Kalman, A., (2016). The emerging innovation ecosystems and "valley of death:" Towards the combination of entrepreneurial and institutional approaches. Engineering Economics, 27(4), 30-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.27.4.14403
• Kafetzopoulos, D., Margariti, S., Stylios, C., Arvaniti, E., & Kafetzopoulos, P. (2023). Managing the traceability system for food supply chain performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-12-2021-0690
• Kang, K. H. K. &. J. (2009). Does partner type matter in R&D collaboration for product innovation? Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/snv/dp2009/200906.html
• Karimi, J., & Walter, Z. (2016). Corporate entrepreneurship, disruptive business model innovation adoption, and its performance: The case of the newspaper industry. Long Range Planning, 49(3), 342-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.09.004
• Karimi, J., & Walter, Z. (2021). The role of entrepreneurial agility in digital entrepreneurship and creating value in response to digital disruption in the newspaper industry. Sustainability, 13(5), 2741. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052741
• Khan, H. (2020). Is marketing agility important for emerging market firms in advanced markets? International Business Review, 29(5), 101733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101733
• Khouroh, U., Sudiro, A., Rahayu, M., & Indrawati, N. K. (2020). The mediating effect of entrepreneurial marketing in the relationship between environmental turbulence and dynamic capability with sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical study in Indonesian MSMEs. Management Science Letters, 709-720. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.9.007
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
• Kohtamäki, M., Heimonen, J., Sjödin, D., & Heikkilä, V. (2020). Strategic agility in innovation: Unpacking the interaction between entrepreneurial orientation and absorptive capacity by using practice theory. Journal of Business Research, 118, 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.029
• Kuratko, D. F., & Audretsch, D. B. (2013). Clarifying the domains of corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(3), 323-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0257-4
• Li, D., & Liu, J. (2014). Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2793-2799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.007
• Li, H., Wu, Y., Cao, D., & Wang, Y. (2021). Organizational mindfulness towards digital transformation as a prerequisite of information processing capability to achieve market agility. Journal of Business Research, 122, 700-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.036
• Lin, C. Y., & Chen, M. Y. (2007). Does innovation lead to performance? An empirical study of SMEs in Taiwan. Management Research News, 30(2), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170710722955
• Mantas, V. & Soderquist, K.E., (2010) Open innovation: Activating the entrepreneurial mindset. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (p. 387).
• Marek, M. (2016). Role of technology entrepreneurship in the development of innovativeness of small and medium-sized enterprises. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/manmen/v20y2016i1p167-183n12.html
• Maryška, M., Doucek, P., & Kunstova, R. (2012). The importance of ICT sector and ICT university education for the economic development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 1060-1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.598
• McPhillips, M. (2020). Innovation by proxy - clusters as ecosystems facilitating open innovation. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 16(3), 101-128. https://doi.org/10.7341/20201634
• Morgan, N., Vorhies, D. W., & Mason, C. H. (2009). Market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8), 909-920. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.764
• Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., & Walmsley, A. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 16(2), 277-299. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0026
• Naqshbandi, M. M., Kaur, S., & Ma, P. (2015). What organizational culture types enable and retard open innovation?. Quality & Quantity, 49, 2123-2144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0097-5
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Ober, J. (2022). Open innovation in the ICT industry: Substantiation from Poland. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030158
• Oduro, S., Vincenzo, S., Manfo, C. S. N., & Nguar, K. D. A. (2021). Are we happy together? A meta-analytic review of the impact of open innovation on firm performance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 25(09). https://doi.org/10.1142/s136391962130004x
• Páez, L. C. C., Pinho, J. C., & Prange, C. (2022). Dynamic capabilities configurations: The firm lifecycle and the interplay of DC dimensions. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 28(4), 910-934. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-05-2021-0322
• Panwar, R., Ober, H. K., & Pinkse, J. (2022). The uncomfortable relationship between business and biodiversity: Advancing research on business strategies for biodiversity protection. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(5), 2554-2566. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3139
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
• Popa, S., Soto-Acosta, P., & Martinez-Conesa, I. (2017). Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: An empirical study in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 134-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.014
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.40.3.879
• Rass, M., Dumbach, M., Danzinger, F., Bullinger, A. C., & Möslein, K. M. (2013). Open innovation and firm performance: The mediating role of social capital. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 177-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12028
• Rego, A., Sousa, M., Marques, C. S., & Cunha, M. P. E. (2012). Authentic leadership promotes employees' psychological capital and creativity. Journal of Business Research, 65 (3), 429-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.003
• Robbins, J. (2003). Dreaming and the defeat of charisma. Disconnecting dreams from leadership among the Urapmin of Papua New Guinea In R.I Lohmann (Ed.), Dream Travelers Sleep Experiences and Culture in the Western Pacific (pp. 19-42). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Sahid, A., Maleh, Y., & Belaïssaoui, M. (2020). Strategic agility for IT service management: A case study. In Strategic Information System Agility: From Theory to Practices (pp. 93-116). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-810-120211006
• Saracco, R. (2022). Perspectives on AI adoption in Italy, the role of the Italian AI strategy. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00025-5
• Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
• Seo, E., Kim, C., & Kim, K. (2019). A study on the mechanisms linking environmental dynamism to innovation performance. Sustainability, 12(23), 9999. https://doi.org/10.339 0/su12239999
• Peng, S., Song, M., & Ju, X. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation and performance: Is innovation speed a missing link? Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 683-690. https://doi.o rg/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.032
• Sharmelly, R. (2017). Crafting a winning innovation strategy. Strategic Direction, 33(3), 8-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/sd-11-2016-0151
• Solesvik, M., Westhead, P., Matlay, H., & Parsyak, V. N. (2013). Entrepreneurial assets and mindsets. Journal of Education and Training, 55(8/9), 748-762. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-06-2013-0075
• Spaniol, M. J., Bidmon, C., Holm, A. B., & Rohrbeck, R. (2019). Five strategic foresight tools to enhance business model innovation teaching. Journal of Business Models, 7(3), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jbm.v7i3.2637
• Strand, C. (2011). Kill Bill! Ugandan human rights organizations' attempts to influence the media's coverage of the anti-homosexuality bill. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 13(8), 917-931. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2011.589080
• Tahmasebifard, H., Zangoueinezhad, A. & Jafari, P., (2017). The role of entrepreneurial orientation in achieving agility capability. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, 7(2), 137-156.
• Tajeddini, K., & Mueller, S. L. (2018). Moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the relationship between a firm's entrepreneurial orientation and financial performance. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2018-0283
• Tajeddini, K., Altınay, L., & Ratten, V. (2017). Service innovativeness and the structuring of organizations: The moderating roles of learning orientation and inter-functional coordination. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 65, 100-114. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.06.010
• Teece, D. J., Peteraf, M. A., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
• Teece, D. J., & Linden, G. (2017). Business models, value capture, and the digital enterprise. Journal of Organization Design, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-017-0018-x
• Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
• Teece, D. (2020). Hand in glove: Open innovation and the dynamic capabilities framework. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Hand-in-Glove%3A-Open-Inn ovation-and-the-Dynamic-Teece/d929df97e85093731dd7b707eb77f20e727255df
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
• Trinh-Phuong, T. (n.d.). Enterprise system-enabled organizational agility capability: A construct and measurement instrument. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1092&context=pacis2012
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
• Valliere, D. (2013). Towards a schematic theory of entrepreneurial alertness. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3), 430-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.08.004
• Van De Vrande, V. V., De Jong, J. P., Vanhaverbeke, W., & De Rochemont, M. M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6-7), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
• Velu, C. (2017). A systems perspective on business model evolution: The case of an agricultural information service provider in India. Long Range Planning, 50(5), 603-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.10.003
• Wairimu, J., Liao, Q., & Lin, Z. (2021). Digital investments in organizational learning and entrepreneurial agility. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 62(6), 1169-1181. htt ps://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2021.1995913
• Wanasida, A. S., Bernarto, I., Sudibjo, N., & Purwanto, A. (2021). The role of business capabilities in supporting organization agility and performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical study in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(5), 897-911. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no5.0897
• Wang, T., Wu, J., Gu, J., & Hu, L. (2020). Impact of open innovation on organizational performance in different conflict management styles: Based on resource dependence theory. International Journal of Conflict Management, 32(2), 199-222. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-09-2019-0165
• Wang, Z., & Kim, H. G. (2017). Can social media marketing improve customer relationship capabilities and firm performance? Dynamic capability perspective. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 39, 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.02.004
• Warner, K., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001
• Weissenberger-Eibl, M. A., & Hampel, T. (2021). Bridging the gap: integrating external knowledge from open innovation platforms. SN Business & Economics, 1(7). https://doi.org /10.1007/s43546-021-00101-5
• Werder, K., Richter, J., Hennel, P., Dreesen, T., Fischer, M., & Weingarth, J. (2021). A Three-Pronged view on organizational agility. IT Professional, 23(2), 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1109/mitp.2020.3016488
• Yusuf, Y., Sarhadi, M., & Gunasekaran, A. (1999). Agile manufacturing: International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1-2), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-5273(98) 00219-9
• Zhang, F., & Zhu, L. (2021). Social media strategic capability, organizational unlearning, and disruptive innovation of SMEs: The moderating roles of TMT heterogeneity and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Research, 133, 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.071
• Zhou, J., Mavondo, F. T., & Saunders, S. G. (2019). The relationship between marketing agility and financial performance under different levels of market turbulence. Industrial Marketing Management, 83, 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.11.008
• Zulganef, Z., Pratminingsih, S. A., & Rianawati, A. (2022). Leveraging strategic intuition to reach firm performance: The role of entrepreneurial agility and environmental dynamism. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 49-60. https://doi.org/10.20885/jsb.vol27.iss1.art4
• Zupic, I., (2014). The knowledge base of technology entrepreneurship. In Handbook of Research on Techno-Entrepreneurship, Second Edition (pp. 1-16). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781951828.00006

Identyfikatory

DOI

doi.org/10.7341/20242024