Przyczyny i skutki naruszenia kontraktu psychologicznego w czasie nowej rzeczywistości - systematyczny przegląd literatury

• Autorzy: Anna Rogozińska-Pawełczyk

Warianty tytułu

Causes and Consequences of Psychological Contract Breach in the New Reality : A Systematic Literature Review

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Główne cele artykułu to identyfikacja i nakreślenie kierunków dalszych badań nad zjawiskiem naruszenia kontraktu psychologicznego za pomocą systematycznego przeglądu literatury. Wybór takiej metody był podyktowany wypełnieniem luki, jaką spowodował brak uogólnienia informacji zawartych w wynikach badań ostatniego dziesięciolecia na temat czynników determinujących poczucie naruszenia kontraktu psychologicznego oraz aspektów behawioralnych powstałych wskutek niedotrzymania założeń kontraktowych. Systematyczny przegląd literatury został przeprowadzony przy użyciu techniki PRISMA, w ramach której do przeglądu zakwalifikowało się 38 artykułów powstałych w latach 2010-2022 w kontekście nowej rzeczywistości. W tym opracowaniu opisano dostępne badania empiryczne na temat naruszeń kontraktów psychologicznych oraz podsumowano dowody przeprowadzonych na ten temat metaanaliz, a także roli potencjalnych zmiennych moderujących. Skutkiem dokonanego systematycznego przeglądu literatury jest nakreślenie aktualnych ram percepcji naruszenia kontraktu psychologicznego wraz ze wskazaniem konkretnych tego przyczyn oraz skutków, jakie niesie za sobą. Przegląd wskazuje różne aspekty literatury na temat naruszania kontraktu psychologicznego oraz daje zarówno naukowcom, jak i praktykom HR, możliwość lepszego zrozumienia roli czynników leżących u podstaw naruszeń kontraktowych wraz z ich orientacją na skutki zmiany postaw i zachowań pracowniczych podejmowanych na podstawie postrzeganego naruszenia kontraktu psychologicznego w kontekście nowej rzeczywistości. W rezultacie systematyczny przegląd literatury daje szeroką wiedzę i wskazuje obszary do prowadzenia przyszłych badań. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The main purpose of the article is to identify and outline directions for further research into the phenomenon of psychological contract violation through a systematic literature review. The choice of a systematic review of the literature was dictated by the need to fill the gap caused by a lack of generalized information-information as contained in the results of research from the last decade on the determinants of the feeling of a breach of psychological contract as well as behavioral aspects arising from such a breach of contract assumptions. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the PRISMA technique, where 38 articles written between 2010 and 2022-specific to the time of the new reality-were eligible for review. The paper describes the available empirical research on psychological contract breaches and summarizes the evidence of meta-analyses conducted on the topic and the role of potential moderating variables. The intended effect of the systematic review of the literature is to outline the current framework for the perception of psychological contract breach, along with an indication of the specific causes triggering the breach and the effects it has. The review as performed identifies various aspects of the literature on psychological contract breach. It provides both researchers and HR practitioners with an opportunity to better understand the role of factors underlying contract breaches with their orientation with respect to the effects of changing employee attitudes and behaviors undertaken based on perceived psychological contract breach in the context of the new reality. As a result, a systematic review of the literature provides extensive knowledge and points to areas for future research. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Kontrakt psychologiczny; Systematyczny przegląd literatury

EN

Psychological contract; Systematic literature review

• Czasopismo: Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: 156
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 13--42

Twórcy

autor

Anna Rogozińska-Pawełczyk

• Uniwersytet Łódzki

Bibliografia

• Achnak, S., Schippers, A., Vantilborgh, T. (2021). To deny, to justify, or to apologize: Do social accounts influence stress levels in the aftermath of psychological contract breach? BMC Psychology, 9, 5. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-020-00505-2.
• Ahmad, I., Zafar, M. A. (2018). Impact of psychological contract fulfillment on organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(2), 1001-1015. DOI: 10.1108/IJCHM-12-2016-0659.
• Ahmad, I., Donia, M. B., Khan, A., Waris, M. (2018). Do as I say and do as I do? The mediating role of psychological contract fulfillment in the relationship between ethical leadership and employee extra-role performance. Personnel Review, 48(1), 98-117. DOI: 10.1108/PR-12-2016-0325.
• Akhtar, M. S., Salleh, L. M., Ghafar, N. H., Khurro, M. A., Mehmood, S. A. (2018). Conceptualizing the impact of perceived organizational support and psychological contract fulfillment on employees' paradoxical intentions of stay and leave. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE),7(5), 9-14. DOI:10.14419/ ijet.v7i2.5.10045.
• Alcover, C.-M., Rico, R., Turnley, W. H., Bolino, M. C. (2017). Understanding the changing nature of psychological contracts in 21st century organizations: A mul tiple-foci exchange relationships approach and proposed framework. Organizational Psychology Review, 7(1), 4-35. DOI: 10.1177/2041386616628333.
• Aranda, M., Hurtado, M.D., Topa, G. (2018). Breach of Psychological Contract and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors in Volunteerism: The Mediator Role of Affect and the Moderation of Volunteers' Age. Voluntas, 29, 59-70. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-017-9923-4.
• Bal, P. M., Chiaburu, D. S., Diaz, I. (2011). Does psychological contractbreach decrease proactive behaviors? The moderating effect of emotion regulation. Group & Organization Management, 36(6), 722-758. DOI: 10.1177/105960111142353.
• Bal, P. M., de Lange, A.H., Jansen, P. G., Van Der Velde, M. E. (2010). Leeftijd, het psychologisch contract enwerkattitudes: Een metaanalyse. Gedrag &Organisatie, 23(1). DOI: 10.5117/2010.023.001.004.
• Banks, G .C., Batchelor, J. H., Seers, A., O'Boyle, E. H., Pollack, J. M., Gower, K. (2014). What does team-member exchange bring to the party? A meta-analytic review of team and leader social exchange: team and leader exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(2), 273-295.
• Bordia, P., Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, S., Tang, R. L. (2010). Breach begets breach: trickle-down effects of psychological contract breach on customer service. Journal of Management, 36(6), 1578-1607.
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., Rothstein, H. R. (2021). Introduction to Meta-Analysis (II wyd.). Wiley.
• Cassar, V., Briner, R. B. (2011). The relationship between psychological contract breach and organizational commitment: Exchange imbalance as a moderator of the mediating role of violation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(2), 283-289. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.09.007.
• Chaudhary, A., Islam, T. (2022). How workplace bullying affects knowledge hiding? The roles of psychological contract breach and learning goal orientation. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems (w druku). DOI: 10.1108/ VJIKMS-06-2022-0201.
• Conway, N., Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M. (2012). The reciprocal relationship between psychological contract fulfilment and employee performance and the moderating role of perceived organizational support and tenure. Journal of occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(2), 277-299. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02033.x.n.
• Conway, N., Guest, D., Trenberth, L. (2011). Testing the differential effects of changes in psychological contract breach and fulfillment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1), 267-276. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.01.003.
• Costa, S. P., Neves, P. (2017). Forgiving is good for health and performance: How forgiveness helps individuals cope with the psychological contract breach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 124-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2017.03.005.
• Coyle-Shapiro, J.A. M., Pereira Costa, S., Doden, W., Chang, C. (2019). Psychological contracts: Past, present, and future. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 145-169. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgp-sych-012218-015212.
• Dawson, G. S., Karahanna, E., Buchholtz, A. (2014). A study of psycho-logical contract breach spillover in multiple-agency relationships inconsulting professional service firms. Organization Science, 25(1), 149-170. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2013.0834.
• Delegach, M., Klein, G., Katz-Navon, T. (2022). Furlough and its effects on employees after returning to work: The roles of psychological contract breach and violation, and perceived organizational support. Journal of Management & Organization, 1-18. DOI: 10.1017/jmo.2022.71.
• Epitropaki, O. (2013). A multi-level investigation of psychological contract breach and organizational identification through the lens of perceived organizational membership: Testing a moderated-mediated model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 65-86. DOI: 10.1002/job.1793.
• Gervasi, D., Faldetta, G., Pellegrini, M. M., Maley, J. (2021). Reciprocity in organizational behavior studies: A systematic literature review of contents, types, and directions. European Management Journal, 40(3), 441-457. DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2021.07.008.
• Gong T., Wang Ch. -Y. (2022). The effects of a psychological contract breach on customer-directed deviance. Journal of Business Research, 138, 374-386. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.040.
• Greco, L. M., Whitson, J. A., O'Boyle, E. H., Wang, C. S., Kim, J. (2019). An eye for an eye? A metaanalysis of negative reciprocity in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(9), 1117-1143.
• Griep, Y., Cooper, C. (2019). Introduction to the Handbook of Research on the Psychological Contract at Work. W: Handbook of Research on the Psychological Contract at Work. Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781788115681.00007.
• Griep, Y., Vantilborgh, T. (2018). Reciprocal effects of psychological contract breach on counterproductive and organizational citizenship behaviors: The role of time. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 104(April 2017), 141-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb. 2017.10.013.
• Henderson, K., O'Leary-Kelly, A. (2021). Unraveling the psychological contract breach and violation relationship: better evidence for why broken promises matter. Journal of Managerial Issues, 33(2), 140-156.
• Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Dichotomization of continuous variables: The implications for meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(3), 334-349.
• Jain, N., Le Sante, D., Viswesvaran, C., Belwal, R. (2022). Incongruent influences: joint effects on the job attitudes of employees with psychological contract breach in the MENA region. Review of International Business and Strategy, 32(3), 387-404. DOI: 10.1108/RIBS-01-2021-0021.
• Jayaweera, A. T., Bal, M., Chudzikowski, K., de Jong, S. (2021a). Moderating effects of national culture on the psychological contract breach and outcome relationship: A meta-analysis. Cross Cultural and Strategic Management, 28, 574-599. DOI: 10.1108/CCSM-07-2020-0137.
• Jayaweera, T., Bal, M., Chudzikowski, K., de Jong, S. (2021b). The impact of economic factors on the relationships between psychological contract breach and work outcomes: a meta-analysis. Employee Relations, 43(3), 667-686. DOI: 10.1108/ER- 03-2020-0095.
• Johns, G. (2018). Advances in the treatment of context in organisational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 21-46. DOI: 10.1146/annurevorgpsych-032117-104406.
• Karani, A., Jayswal, M., Panda, R., Trivedi, P. (2021). If you fulfill your promise, I will be an asset for you": exploring the relationship between psychological contract fulfillment and individual ambidexterity. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 42(9/10), 831-851. DOI: 10.1108/IJSSP-06-2021-0164.
• Kiazad, K., Kraimer, M. L., Seibert, S. E. (2019). More than grateful: How employee embeddedness explains the link between psychological contract fulfillment and employee extra-role behavior. Human Relations, 72(8), 1315-1340. DOI: 10.1177/ 0018726718806352.
• Kiazad, K., Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L. (2014). Psychological contract breach and employee innovation: A conservation of resources perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 535-556. DOI: 10.1111/joop.12062.
• Kutaula, S., Gillani, A., Budhwar, P. S. (2020). An analysis of employment relation- ships in Asia using psychological contract theory: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 30, 100707. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100707.
• Lapointe, É., Vandenberghe, C., Boudrias, J. S. (2013). Psychological contract breach, affective commitment to organization and supervisor, and newcomer adjustment: A three-wave moderated mediation model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83, 528-538. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2013.07.008.
• Lauli´e, L., Tekleab, A. G. (2016). A multi-level theory of psychological contract fulfillment in teams. Group & Organization Management, 41(5), 658-698, DOI: 10.1177/1059601116668972.
• Lee, J., Chiang, F. F., van Esch, E., Cai, Z. (2018). Why and when organizational culture fosters affective commitment among knowledge workers: The mediating role of perceived psychological contract fulfilment and moderating role of organizational tenure. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(6), 1178-1207. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2016.1194870.
• Liang H.-L. (2022). Façade creation as a mediator of the influence of psychological contract breach on employee behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 30(4), 614-624. DOI: 10.1111/ijsa.12379.
• Magano, K. D., Thomas, A. (2017). Organisational change and the psychological contract at a pharmaceutical company. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(1), 1-10.
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4). DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.
• Page, M. J., Moher, D. (2017). Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review. Systematic Review, 6, 263. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8.
• Piccoli, B., De Witte, H. (2015). Job insecurity and emotional exhaustion: Testing psychological contract breach versus distributive injustice as indicators of lack of reciprocity. Work & Stress, 29, 246-263. DOI: 10.1080/02678373.2015.1075624.
• Ruiter, M., de, Schalk, R., Schaveling, J., Blomme, R. (2017). Psychological contract breach in the anticipatory stage of change: Employee responses and the moderating role of supervisory informational justice. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 53(1), 66-88. DOI: 10.1177/0021886316672724.
• Quratulain, S., Khan, A. K., Crawshaw, J. R., Arain, G. A., Hameed, I. (2018). A study of employee affective organizational commitment and retention in Pakistan: the roles of psychological contract breach and norms of reciprocity. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(17), 2552-2579.
• Raeder, S., Knorr, U., Hilb, M. (2012). Human resource management practices and psychological contracts in Swiss firms: An employer perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(15), 3178-3195. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2011.637066.
• Reimann, M., Guzy, J. (2017). Psychological contract breach and employee health: The relevance of unmet obligations for mental and physical health. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 33(1), 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpto.2016.11.001.
• Rethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., Koffel, J. B. (2021). PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10, 1-19.
• Robinson, S. L., Morrison, E. W. (2000). The development of psychological contract breach and violation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 526-546. DOI: 0.1002/1099-1379(200008)21:5<525::AID-JOB40>3.0.CO;2-T.
• Rogozińska-Pawełczyk, A. (2011). Od relacyjnego do transakcyjnego kontraktu psy- chologicznego -zmieniający się paradygmat. Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, 3(4), 61-77.
• Rogozińska-Pawełczyk, A. (2018). Verbalization of the psychological contract in Polish enterprises. Journal of East European Management Studies, 23(2), 277-294. Pobrane z: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26617422.
• Rogozińska-Pawełczyk, A. (2022). The Effect of HR Practices on the Fulfillment of a Psychological Contract in the Context of the Polish Organizational Culture. W: Eurasian Business and Economics Perspectives: Proceedings of the 34th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference (3-19). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Rousseau, D. M. (2011). The individual-organization relationship: The psychological contract. W: APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 3. Washington, DC: Maintaining, Expanding, and Contracting the Organization; American Psychological Association.
• Sandeepanie, M. H. R., Gamage, P., Perera, G. D. N., Sajeewani, T. L. (2022). The role of talent management and employee psychological contract on employer branding: a pragmatic conceptual model. Management Research Review, 46(2), 196-222. DOI: 10.1108/MRR-02-2021-0136.
• Sarkis-Onofre, R., Catalá-López, F., Aromataris, E., Lockwood, C. (2021). How to properly use the PRISMA Statement. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 1-3.
• Schalk, R.; Rousseau, D. M. (2000). Psychological Contracts in Employment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Selçuk, A. A. (2019). A guide for systematic reviews: PRISMA. Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 57(1), 57.
• Shea, B. J., Hamel, C., Wells, G. A., Bouter, L. M., Kristjansson, E., Grimshaw, J., Henry, D. A., Boers, M. (2009). AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinic Epidemiology, 62, 1013-1020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009.
• Shen, Y, Schaubroeck, J. M., Zhao, L., Wu, L. (2019). Work Group Climate and Behavioral Responses to Psychological Contract Breach. Frontiers in Psychology, Feb. 1, 10, 67. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00067. PMID: 30778308; PMCID: PMC6369362.
• Shih, C. T., Chuang, C. H. (2013). Individual differences, psychological contract breach, and organizational citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation study. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(1), 191-210. DOI: 10.1007/s10490-012-9294-8.
• Sobaih, A. E. E., Ibrahim, Y., Gabry, G. (2019). Unlocking the black box: Psychological contract fulfillment as a mediator between HRM practices and job performance. Tourism Management Perspectives, 30, 171-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.tmp.2019.03.001.
• Solinger, O. N., Hofmans, J., Bal, P. M., Jansen, P. G. (2016). Bouncing back from psychological contract breach: How commitment recovers over time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 494-514. DOI: 10.1002/job.2047.
• Suazo, M. M., Turnley, W. H. (2010). Perceived organizational support as a mediator of the relations between individual differences and psychological contract breach. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(6), 620-648. DOI: 10.1108/0268394101105 6969.
• Topa, G., Aranda-Carmena, M., De-Maria, B. (2022). Psychological contract breach and outcomes: a systematic review of reviews. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(23), 15527. DOI:10.3390/ijerph192315527.
• Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-473.
• Vantilborgh, T., Bidee, J., Pepermans, R., Griep, Y., Hofmans, J. (2016). Antecedents of psychological contract breach: The role of job demands, job resources, and affect. PLoS One, 11(5), 1-22. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154696.
• Wei, F., Si, S. (2013). Psychological contract breach, negative reciprocity, and abusive supervision: the mediated effect of organizational identification. Management and Organization Review, 9(3), 541-561.
• Weißmüller, K. S., De Waele, L., van Witteloostuijn, A. (2020). Public service motivation and prosocial rule-breaking: An international vignettes study in Belgium, Germany, and the Netherlands. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 1-61. DOI: 0.1177/0734371X20973441.
• Wortman, P. M. (1994). Judging research quality. W: H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges (red.), The handbook of research synthesis (97-109). Russell Sage Foundation.
• Yang, Y., Brans, I., Vantilborgh, T. (2022). Going above and beyond for your Beliefs: the Effects of Ideological Psychological Contract Breach and Fulfillment on pro-Social Rule Breaking. Employ Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 34, 515-538. DOI: 10.1007/s10672-021-09400-3.
• Zhang, L. (2022). Impact of psychological contract breach on firm's innovative performance: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psycholology. 13, 1-16. 970622. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.970622.
• Zhong, M., Wayne, S. J., Michel, E. J. (2021). When the Past and the Present Collide: Contrast Effect of Sequential Psychological Contract Breaches on Employee Outcomes. Journal of Management, 49(3), 913-943. DOI: 10.1177/01492063211061255.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0054.4553