PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2024 | 17 | nr 1 | 182--195
Tytuł artykułu

Social Expenditure Multiplier: Assessment of Economic Effect and Optimal Values

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The main aim of the study is to test the hypothesis that social expenditures are not only a source of social support and budgeting of the social sphere, but can be a significant lever of economic development, provided proper planning of their share and volume. In this regard, the authors have adapted the open-economy multiplier to assess the economic effect of social expenditures. Based on the correlation analysis of the relationship between the share of social expenditures (% of GDP) and the multiplier of social expenditures, conducted on the example of EU countries, two groups of countries are identified depending on the impact of social expenditure multiplier on GDP: the first one embraces those countries that are characterized by a growing economic return from social expenditures; the second one is where the return is declining. To determine the optimal levels of social expenditures, which can be expected to have a positive economic effect in the form of GDP growth, we have identified critical limits of the multiplier of social expenditures according to the principle: the maximum value is seen in the group of countries with positive impact; the minimal one is experienced in countries with inverse dependence of the share of social expenditures and their multiplier. As a result, the experience of financing social expenditures in the EU leads to the conclusion that the optimal share of social expenditures in GDP ranges from 28% to 30% - within these limits multiplier values exceed 1.0, i.e. there is a positive impact of social expenditures on GDP in the form of the growth of economic results over the resources consumed. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
17
Numer
Strony
182--195
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Rivne, Ukraine
  • Széchenyi Istvàn University, Győr, Hungary
  • Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland
  • Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, Croatia
Bibliografia
  • Abbasov, J., Gulaliyev, E., Ahmadov, F., & Mammadov, I. (2021). Does the COVID19 pandemic change the relationship between government expenditures and economic growth in Azerbaijan?. Economics and Sociology, 14(3), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2021/14-3/10
  • Ahuja, D., & Pandit, D. (2020). Public expenditure and economic growth: Evidence from the developing countries. FIIB Business Review, 9(3), 228-236.
  • Baranowski, M., & Jabkowski, P. (2021). Basic income support in Europe: A cross-national analysis based on the European Social Survey Round 8. Economics and Sociology, 14(2), 167-183. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2021/14-2/9
  • Béland, D., Morgan, K. J., Obinger, H., & Pierson, C. (Eds.). (2021). The Oxford handbook of the welfare state. Oxford University Press.
  • Cammeraat, E. (2020). The relationship between different social expenditure schemes and poverty, inequality and economic growth. International Social Security Review, 73(2), 101-123.
  • Eurostat (2023). Eurostat Database. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
  • Gallardo-Vázquez, D., & Lizcano-Álvarez, J. L. (2020). CSR-related competitiveness and legitimacy in MSMEs. Economics & Sociology, 13(1), 52-73.
  • Garg, A., & Gupta, P. K. (2020). Mandatory CSR expenditure and firm performance: Evidence from India. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 9(2), 235-249.
  • Keynes, J. M. (1954). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money: By John Maynard Keynes. Macmillan.
  • Kim, S. W., & Ahn, S. H. (2020). Social investment effects of public education, health care, and welfare service expenditures on economic growth. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 14(1), 34-44.
  • Kim, H. M. (2022). How corporate entrepreneurship affects the performance of small and medium-sized enterprises in Korea: The mediating and moderating role of vision, strategy, and employee compensation. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 10(2), 131-146.
  • Kutasi, G., & Marton, Á. (2020). The long-term impact of public expenditures on GDP growth. Society and Economy, 42(4), 403-419.
  • Lessa Kerstenetzky, C., & Pereira Guedes, G. (2021). Great Recession, great regression? The welfare state in the twenty-first century. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 45(1), 151-194.
  • Li, Z., Zou, F., & Mo, B. (2021). Does mandatory CSR disclosure affect enterprise total factor productivity?. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1-20.
  • Meyer, D. F. (2018). Predictors of good governance and effective government management: the case of Poland. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(1), 206-217. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2018.18.1.16
  • Mishchuk, H., Bilan Y., Androniceanu, A., & Krol, V. (2023). Social capital: Evaluating its roles in competitiveness and ensuring human development. Journal of Competitiveness, 15(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2023.02.01
  • Mishchuk, H., Yurchyk, H., & Bilan, Y. (2018). Shadow incomes and real inequality within the framework of leadership and social change. In Leadership for the Future Sustainable Development of Business and Education (pp. 89-101). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74216-8_10
  • Nelson, K., Fredriksson, D., Korpi, T., Korpi, W., Palme, J., & Sjöberg, O. (2020). The social policy indicators (SPIN) database. International Journal of Social Welfare, 29(3), 285-289.
  • Oliinyk, O.O. (2017). Corporate social responsibility in the field of occupational safety and health. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (2), 128-133.
  • Sabyrzhan, A., Andarova, R., Kanatbek, A., & Lisova, N. (2021). Keynesian and Monetarist Approaches to Regulation of the Labor Market in the Transition Economies of EECCA Countries. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 17(4), 75-83.
  • Samuelson, P. A., Nordhaus, W. D. (2010). Economics - 19th ed. The McGraw-Hill series economics.
  • Samuelson, P. A. (1939). Interactions between the multiplier analysis and the principles of acceleration. Review of Economic Statistics, 21, 75-78.
  • Setiawan, B., Saleem, A., Nathan, R. J., Zeman, Z., Magda, R., & Barczi, J. (2021). Financial market development and economic growth: evidence from ASEAN and CEE Region. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(2), 481-494. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2021.23.2.29
  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2018). The Welfare State in the Twenty-First Century. In The Welfare State Revisited (pp. 3-37). Columbia University Press.
  • Stuckler, D., Reeves, A., & Mckee, M. (2017). Social and economic multipliers: What they are and why they are important for health policy in Europe. Scandinavian journal of public health, 45(18_suppl), 17-21.
  • Szymańska, A. (2022). Analysis of the effects of fiscal policy shocks in the Baltic region. Journal of International Studies, 15(2), 226-247. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2022/15-2/15
  • Thomas, A. (2020). Full Employment, Unconditional Basic Income and the Keynesian Critique of Rentier Capitalism. Basic Income Studies, 15(1).
  • Todorova, T., Kutrolli, M. (2019). An expanded multiplier-accelerator model. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/107480/7/MPRA_paper_107480.pdf
  • Virak, K., & Bilan, Y. (2022). The role of formal and informal remittances as the determinants of formal and informal financial services. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 17(3), 727-746. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.025
  • Wilson, T., & Wilson, D. J. (2021). The political economy of the welfare state. Routledge.
  • Yurchyk, H., Mishchuk, H., & Bilan, Y. (2023). Government assistance programs for internally displaced persons: assessing the impact on economic growth and labour market. Administratie si Management Public, 41, 201-218. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/ 2023.41-1
  • Tvrdon, M., & Verner, T. (2022). Government Support of Science and the Impact of the Crisis: The Case of the EU Countries. Amfiteatru Economic, 24(Special Issue No. 16), 989-1000. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2022/S16/989.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171688300

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.