PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2024 | 17 | nr 1 | 22--34
Tytuł artykułu

The Impact of Unprecedented Growth in Public Investment on Stimulating the Indian Economy

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The aim of the article is to compare the effects of public investment and public consumption in the Indian economy. This issue is particularly relevant in the context of the unprecedented increase in public investment in India, which is becoming one of the biggest economies globally. The empirical research is based on a New Keynesian model. The novelty of the applied methodology lies both in the inclusion of public capital as a factor of production, and the partial substitution between public and private consumption in the model. The results show that government gross capital formation in the short run is a slightly more effective method of stimulating the Indian economy than government final consumption expenditure. However, the biggest differences between the effects of public investment and public consumption are evident in the long term. The impact of public consumption on GDP fades out quickly, while public investment raises the level of output for a long period. Government gross capital formation also affects employment and consumption more strongly than government final consumption expenditure does. Thus, the main implication of the study is to recommend increasing public investment in emerging markets, to boost their economies. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
17
Numer
Strony
22--34
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • University of Lodz, Poland
  • University of Lodz, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Adolfson, M., Laseen, S., Linde, J., & Villani, M. (2007). Bayesian estimation of an open economy DSGE model with incomplete pass-through. Journal of International Economics, 72(2), 481-511, doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2007.01.003.
  • Afonso, A., Baxa, J., & Slavik, M. (2018). Fiscal Developments and Financial Stress: A Threshold VAR Analysis. Empirical Economics, 54(2), 395-423, doi: 10.1007/s00181-016-1210-5.
  • Ambler, S., Bouakez, H., & Cardia, E. (2017). Does the crowding-in effect of public spending on private consumption undermine neoclassical models? Research in Economics, 71(2), 39-410, doi: 10.1016/j.rie.2017.04.004.
  • Andrés, J., Boscá, J. E., Ferri, J., & Fuentes-Albero, C. (2022). Households' Balance Sheets and the Effect of Fiscal Policy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 54(2), 737-778, doi:10.1111/jmcb.12902.
  • Asimakopoulos, S., Lorusso, M., & Pieroni, L. (2021). Can public spending boost private consumption? Canadian Journal of Economics, 54(3), 1275-1313, doi: 10.1111/caje.12527.
  • Auclert, A., Bardóczy, B., & Rognlie, M. (2023). MPCs, MPEs, and Multipliers: A Trilemma for New Keynesian Models. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 105 (3), 700-712, doi: 10.1162/rest_a_01072.
  • Balcerzak, A. P., Rogalska, E. (2014)., Crowding Out and Crowding in within Keynesian Framework. Do We Need Any New Empirical Research Concerning Them?, Economics & Sociology, 7(2), 80-93. doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2014/7-2/7.
  • Becerra-Vicario, R., Alaminos, D., Cisneros-Ruiz, A., Solano, S., & Miguel, A. (2020). Estimating Optimal Military Spending Policy in DSGE Model: Empirical vs Theoretical Approach. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 79, 193-196, doi: 10.56042/jsir.v79i3.68635.
  • Bernardini, M., Schryder, S. D., & Peersman, G. (2020). Heterogeneous government spending multipliers in the era surrounding the great recession. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 102 (2), 304-322, doi: 10.1162/rest_a_00830.
  • Bom, P., Ligthart, J. E. (2014). Public infrastructure investment, output dynamics, and balanced budget fiscal rules. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 40(C), 334-354, doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2014.01.018.
  • Calvo, G. A. (1983). Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12(3), 383-398, doi: 10.1016/0304-3932(83)90060-0.
  • Cantore, C., Freund, L. B. (2021). Workers, capitalists, and the government: fiscal policy and income (re)distribution. Journal of Monetary Economics, 119, 58-74, doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2021.01.004.
  • Christiano, L. J., Eichenbaum, M. (1992). Current Real Business Cycle Theory and Aggregate Labor Market Fluctuations. American Economic Review, 82(3), 430-450, doi: jstor.org/stable/i337064.
  • Dixit, A., Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity. American Economic Review, 67(3), 297-308.
  • Erceg, C. J., Henderson, D. W., & Levin, A. T. (2000). Optimal monetary policy with staggered wage and price contracts. Journal of Monetary Economics, 46(2), 281-313, doi: 10.1016/S0304-3932(00)00028-3.
  • Ercolani, V., Azevedo, J. V. (2014). The effects of public spending externalities. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 46(C), 173-199, doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2014.06.016.
  • Gazda, J. (2010). Real Business Cycle Theory - Methodology and Tools, Economics & Sociology, 3(1), 42-48.
  • Guo, F., Kit-Ming Yan I., Chen, T., & Hu, C. (2023). Fiscal multipliers, monetary efficacy, and hand-to-mouth households. Journal of International Money and Finance, 130, 102743, doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102743.
  • Heijdra, B., Ligthart, J. E. (1997). Keynesian Multipliers, Direct, Crowding Out, and the Optimal Provision of Public Goods. Journal of Macroeconomics, 19(4), 803-826, doi: 10.1016/S0164-0704(97)00043-8.
  • Hulten, C., Schwab, R. (1993). Public capital formation and the Growth of Regional Manufacturing Industries. National Tax Journal, 46(3), 261-273.
  • Jones, C., Midrigan, V., & Philippon, T. (2022). Household leverage and the recession. Econometrica, 90(5), 2471-2505, doi: 10.3982/ECTA16455.
  • Kamps, C. (2004). The Dynamic Macroeconomic Effects of Public Capital: Theory and Evidence for OECD Countries, Springer, Berlin.
  • Karras, G. (1994). Government spending and private consumption: some international evidence, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 26(1), 9-22, doi: 10.2307/2078031.
  • Klein, M., Winkler, R. (2021), The government spending multiplier at the zero lower bound: International evidence from historical data. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 36(6), 744-759, doi: 10.1002/jae.2835.
  • Klein, M., Polattimur, H., & Winkler, R. (2022). Fiscal spending multipliers over the household leverage cycle. European Economic Review, 141, 103989, doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103989.
  • Kollmann, R. (2001). The exchange rate in a dynamic-optimizing business cycle model with nominal rigidities: a quantitative investigation. Journal of International Economics, 55(2), 243-262, doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(01)000873.
  • Kormilitsina, A., Zubairy, S. (2018). Propagation mechanisms for government spending shocks: A Bayesian comparison. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 50(7), 1571-616, doi: 10.1111/jmcb.12555.
  • Kwan, Y. K. (2006). The Direct Substitution Between Government and Private Consumption in East Asia. NBER Working Papers 12431, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
  • Leeper, E., Walker, T. B., & Yang, S.-C. (2010). Government investment and fiscal stimulus. Journal of Monetary Economics, 57(8), 1000-12, doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2010.09.002.
  • Ngo, P. V. (2021). Fiscal multipliers at the zero lower bound: the role of government spending persistence. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 25(4), 970-997, doi: 10.1017/S136510051900049X.
  • Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39(1), 195-214, doi: 10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-L
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171688698

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.