PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2023 | z. 184 Współczesne zarządzanie = Contemporary Management | 21--43
Tytuł artykułu

Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Psychosocial Working Conditions Examined Through the Prism of for-profit, Public and Nonprofit Organizations

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The aim of the article is to determine the relationship between OCBs and psychosocial working conditions. Design/methodology/approach: The survey was conducted using the OCB scale developed by Spector and the COPSOQ tool. Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistica software. Findings: The research demonstrates that the manifestation of OCB-O by respondents correlated with more aspects of psychosocial working conditions than in the case of OCB-P. When analyzing OCB-O, strong correlations were reported with the following variables: possibilities for development, job satisfaction, and meaning of work. In the case of OCB-P, these correlations were moderate. In addition, in the case of OCB-O, a weak relationship was also identified with the following variables: quality of leadership, social support, and influence at work. These correlations were negligible for OCB-P. The obtained results demonstrate that quantitative demands do not correlate with either OCB-O or OCB-P. However, in what concerns influence at work variable, a weak correlation was identified for OCB-O as well as a negligible correlation for OCB-P. Research limitations: The study was only quantitative and not qualitative, while the research relied solely on respondents' statements. The sample was selected purposively, which means the findings cannot be generalized, and the study involved only Polish organizations, meaning it was embedded in a specific cultural context. Additionally, the research was not a longitudinal study. The data was lagged, which does not allow for strong causal inference. The use of questionnaire-based research may have triggered a common method bias. Practical implications: managers of any type of organization should do their best to encourage employees to display OCBs. This may be facilitated by appropriate psychosocial working conditions, especially in the areas of: possibilities for development, meaning of work, job satisfaction. Originality/value: According to our findings, at the moment of writing this paper there are also no comparative studies examining the relationship existing between OCBs and working conditions covering the three types of organizations: for-profit, public, and nonprofit. Besides, in the course of reviewing the literature, we found no studies examining the relationship between OCBs and influence at work and quantitative demands. (original abstract)
Twórcy
  • University of Zielona Góra
  • University of Zielona Góra
Bibliografia
  • 1. Alshaabani, A., Naz, F., Magda, R., Rudnák, I. (2021). Impact of perceived organizational support on OCB in the time of COVID-19 pandemic in Hungary: employee engagement and affective commitment as mediators. Sustainability, Vol. 13(14), p. 7800. doi: 10.3390/su13147800.
  • 2. Babcock-Roberson, M.E., Strickland, O.J. (2010). The relationship between charismatic leadership, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Journal of Psychology, Vol. 144, 3, pp. 313-326, doi: 10.1080/00223981003648336.
  • 3. Baka, Ł. (2019). Kopenhaski Kwestionariusz Psychospołeczny (COPSOQ II). Podręcznik do polskiej wersji narzędzia. Warsaw: CIOP-PIB.
  • 4. Baka, Ł., Łuczak, A., Najmiec, A. (2019). Kopenhaski Kwestionariusz Psychospołeczny jako narzędzie do oceny psychospołecznych warunków pracy. Warsaw: CIOP-PIB.
  • 5. Baranik, L. Eby, L. (2016). Organizational citizenship behaviors and employee depressed mood, burnout, and satisfaction with health and life: The mediating role of positive affect. Personnel Review, Vol. 45, pp. 626-642, doi: 10.1108/PR-03-2014-0066.
  • 6. Bateman, T.S., Organ, D.W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 587-595, doi: 10.2307/255908.
  • 7. Berthelsen, H., Lönnblad, A., Hakanen, J., Søndergård Kristensen, T., Axtelius, B., Bjørner, J.B., Westerlund, H. (2014). Cognitive interviewing used in the development and validation of Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire in Sweden. In: T. Isidorsson, K. Håkansson, M. Oudhuis, B. Schiller (Eds.), Nordic Working Life Conference (pp. 232-233). Conference paper presented at the 7th Nordic working life conference. Stream 26: methodological challenges for working life and labour market studies. Göteborg: University of Gothenburg.
  • 8. Blakely, G.L, Srivastava, A., Moorman, R.H. (2005). The effects of nationality, work role centrality, and work locus of control, on role definitions of OCB. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, Vol. 12(1), pp. 103-117, doi: 10.1177/107179190501200109.
  • 9. Blakely, G.L., Andrews, M.C., Moorman, R.H. (2005). The moderating effects of equity sensitivity on the relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 20(2), pp. 259-273, doi: 10.1007/s10869-005-8263-3.
  • 10. Borman, W.C., Motowidlo, S.J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, Vol. 10(2), pp. 99-109, doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup10023.
  • 11. Borman, W.C., Penner, L.A., Allen, T.D., Motowidlo, S.J. (2001). Personality predictors of citizenship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol. 9(1/2), pp. 52-69, doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00163.
  • 12. Brzeziński, J. (1999; 2011). Metodologia badań psychologicznych. Warsaw: PWN.
  • 13. Burr, H., Berthelsen, H., Lluís, S., Nübling, M., Dupret, E., Demiral, Y., Oudyk, J., Kristensen, T., Llorens, S.C., Navarro, A., Lincke, H.-J., Bocéréan, Ch., Sahan, C., Smith, P., Pohrt, A. (2018). The third version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Retrieved from: https://www.copsoq-network.org/assets/Uploads/The-Third-Version-of-the-Copenhagen-Psychosocial-Questionnaire.pdf, 4.07.2022.
  • 14. Chandra, S., Srivastava, S.C., Joseph, D. (2017). Meaning of work and organizational citizenship behavior for IT employees: the mediating role of affective commitment. ICIS 2017 Proceedings, No. 14. Retrieved from: https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2017/ HumanBehavior/Presentations/14, 5.07.2022.
  • 15. Cheung, M.F.Y. (2013). The mediating role of perceived organizational support in the effects of interpersonal and informational justice on organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 34(6), pp. 551-572, doi:10.1108/LODJ-11-2011-0114.
  • 16. Chiang, C.F., Hsieh, T.S. (2012). The impacts of perceived organizational support and psychological empowerment on job performance: The mediating effects of organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 31(1), pp. 180-190, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.04.011.
  • 17. Chuang, Y., Chiang, H., Lin, A. (2019). Helping behaviors convert negative affect into job satisfaction and creative performance: The moderating role of work competence. Personnel Review, Vol. 48(6), pp. 1530-1547, doi:10.1108/PR-01-2018-0038.
  • 18. Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ). Retrieved from: http://www.mentalhealthpromotion.net/resources/english_copsoq_2_ed_2003-pdf.pdf, 20.05.2022.
  • 19. COPSOQ International Network. COPSOQ International Network for scientific research and risk assessment with the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ). Retrieved from: http://www.copsoq-network.org/, 5.07.2022.
  • 20. Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the interval structure of tests. Psychometrika, Vol. 16, pp. 297-334, doi: 10.1007/BF02310555.
  • 21. Dancey, C., Reidy, J. (2004). Statistics without maths for psychology: using SPSS for Windows. London: Prentice-Hall.
  • 22. Dartey-Baah, K., Addo, S.A. (2019). Psychological identification with job: a leadership-OCB mediator. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 27(3), pp. 548-565, doi: 10.1108/IJOA-10-2017-1262.
  • 23. Das, S.C. (2021). Influence of organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) on organisational effectiveness (OE): experiences of banks in India. Journal of Strategic Human Resource Management, Vol. 9, pp. 1-10.
  • 24. Dudley, R. (2012). The Shapiro-Wilk test for normality. Retrieved from: https://math.mit.edu/~rmd/46512/shapiro.pdf, 4.01.2023.
  • 25. Dupret, E., Bocéréan, C., Teherani, M., Feltrin, M., Pejtersen, J.H. (2012). Psychosocial risk assessment: French validation of the Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire (COPSOQ). Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 40(5), pp. 482-90, doi:10.1177/1403494812453888.
  • 26. Erks, R.L., Allen, J.A., Harland, L.K., Prange, K. (2021). Do volunteers volunteer to do more at work? The relationship between volunteering, engagement, and OCBs. Voluntas, Vol. 32, pp. 1285-1298, doi: 10.1007/s11266-020-00232-7.
  • 27. Farh, J.L., Podsakoff, P.M., Organ, D.W. (1990). Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction. Journal of Management, Vol. 16(4), pp. 705-721, doi: 10.1177/014920639001600404.
  • 28. Finkelstein, M.A., Penner, L.A. (2004). Predicting organizational citizenship behavior: Integrating the functional and role identity approaches. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, Vol. 32(4), pp. 383-398, doi: 10.2224/sbp.2004.32.4.383.
  • 29. Finkelstein, M.A. (2006). Dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior: Motives, motive fulfilment, and role identity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, Vol. 34(6), pp. 603-616, doi: 10.2224/sbp.2006.34.6.603.
  • 30. Fox, S., Spector, P.E., Goh, A., Bruursema, K., Kessler, S.R. (2009). The deviant citizen: clarifying the measurement of Organizational citizenship behavior and its relation to counterproductive work behaviour. Chicago: Loyola University.
  • 31. Fox, S., Spector, P.E., Goh, A., Bruursema, K., Kessler, S.R. (2012). The deviant citizen: Measuring potential positive relations between counterproductive work behaviour and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 85, pp. 199-220, doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02032.x.
  • 32. Fu, B., Peng, J., Wang, T. (2022). The health cost of organizational citizenship behavior: does health-promoting leadership matter? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 19(10), p. 6343, doi:10.3390/ijerph19106343.
  • 33. Glińska-Neweś, A., Szostek, D. (2018). Organizational citizenship behaviors in public and private sector. International Journal of Contemporary Management, Vol. 17, pp. 45-58, doi: 10.4467/24498939IJCM.18.003.8382.
  • 34. Graham, J.W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behaviour. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, Vol. 4(4), pp. 249-270, doi: 10.1007/BF01385031.
  • 35. Gupta, V., Singh, S., (2010). Developing a set of high performance HRM practices and exploring its relationship with OCB and organizational justice. Proceedings of the 2010 Meeting of the Southern Management Association, doi: 10.13140/2.1.1022.7528.
  • 36. Halbesleben, J.R., Wheeler, A.R. (2015). To invest or not? The role of coworker support and trust in daily reciprocal gain spirals of helping behavior. Journal of Management, Vol. 41(6), pp. 1628-1650, doi: 10.1177/0149206312455246.
  • 37. Han, S.J. (2010). The effect of the perception of self-efficacy and social support on organizational citizenship behavior among nurses in hospital. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, Vol. 22(6), pp. 606-614.
  • 38. Hardin, H., Azizu, A.M., Sari, W.O.D.P. (2020). the influence of competence, organizational culture, spiritual leadership on organizational behavior and its impact on lecturer performance at higher education in Baubau city. International Journal of Management Progress, Vol. 1(2), pp. 50-72, doi: 10.35326/ijmp.v1i2.784.
  • 39. Harris, T.B., Li, N., Kirkman, B.L. (2014). Leader-member exchange (LMX) in context: how LMX differentiation and LMX relational separation attenuate LMX's influence on OCB and turnover intention. The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 25(2), pp. 314-328, doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.09.001.
  • 40. Htun, N.W. (2022). The effect of internal CSR and organizational culture on OCB and job performance of Pun Hlaing hospital (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from: https://meral.edu.mm/record/8224/files/Nyein%20Wai%20Wai%20Htun,EMBAII-22,%2017th.%20Bt.pdf, 14.03.2023.
  • 41. Im, S., Chung, Y.W. (2018). Employee volunteering meaningfulness and organizational citizenship behavior: Exploring the effects of organizational support, pride, and trust. Sustainability, Vol. 10(12), p. 4835, doi: 10.3390/su10124835.
  • 42. Jain, A.K. (2009). Organizational citizenship behavior as a predictor of personal effectiveness and general health. Academy of Taiwan Business Management Review, Vol. 5(3), pp. 51-61.
  • 43. Jeon, S.H., Park, M., Choi, K., Kim, M.K. (2018). An ethical leadership program for nursing unit managers. Nurse Education Today, Vol. 62, pp. 30-35, doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.017.
  • 44. Jiao, C., Richards, D.A., Zhang, K. (2011). Leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: OCB-specific meanings as mediators. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 26, pp. 11-25, doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9168-3.
  • 45. Kim, Y.J., Van Dyne, L., Kamdar, D., Johnson, R.E. (2013). Why and when do motives matter? An integrative model of motives, role cognitions, and social support as predictors of OCB. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 121(2), pp. 231-245, doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.03.004.
  • 46. Konovsky, M.A., Organ, D.W. (1996). Dispositional and contextual determinants of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior. Vol. 17(3), pp. 253-266. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199605)17:3<253:AID-JOB747>3.0.CO; 2-Q.
  • 47. Kosenkranius, M.K., Rink, F.A., de Bloom, J., van den Heuvel, M. (2020). The design and development of a hybrid off-job crafting intervention to enhance needs satisfaction, well-being and performance: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health, Vol. 20, p. 115, doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8224-9.
  • 48. Kristensen, T.S., Hannerz, H., Høgh, A., Borg, V. (2005). The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire-a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, Vol. 31(6), pp. 438-449, doi: 10.5271/sjweh.948.
  • 49. Lee, K., Allen, N.J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87(1), pp. 131-142, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.131.
  • 50. LePine, J.A., Erez, A., Johnson, D.E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: a critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87(1), pp. 52-65, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.52.
  • 51. Llorens, S.C., Pérez-Franco, J., Oudyk, J., Berthelsen, H., Dupret, E., Nübling, M., Burr, H. Moncada, S. (2019). COPSOQ III. Guidelines and questionnaire. Retrieved from: https://www.copsoqnetwork.org/guidelines and questionnaire/, 13.11.2019.
  • 52. MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M., Podsakoff, N.P. (2011). Challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors and organizational effectiveness: do challenge-oriented behaviors really have an impact on the organization's bottom line? Personnel Psychology, Vol. 64(3), pp. 559-592, doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01219.x.
  • 53. MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M., Fetter, R. (1993). The impact of Organizational Citizenship Behavior on evaluations of salesperson performance. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57(1), pp. 70-80, doi: 10.2307/1252058.
  • 54. Maharaj, I., Schlechter, A.F. (2007). Meaning in life and meaning of work: Relationships with organisational citizenship behaviour, commitment and job satisfaction. Management Dynamics: Journal of the Southern African Institute for Management Scientists, Vol. 16(3), pp. 24-41.
  • 55. Moncada, S., Utzet, M., Molinero, E., Llorens, C., Moreno, N., Galtés, A., Navarro, A. (2014). The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) in Spain - A tool for psychosocial risk assessment at the workplace. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Vol. 57(1), pp. 97-107, doi:10.1002/ajim.22238.
  • 56. Moore, M.H. (2000). Managing for value: Organizational strategy in for-profit, nonprofit, and governmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 29(1), pp. 183-204, doi: 10.1177/0899764000291S.
  • 57. Moorman, R.H., Blakely, G.L., Niehoff, B.P. (1998). Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior? Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 41(3), pp. 351-357, doi: 10.2307/256913.
  • 58. Moorman, R.H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76(6), pp. 845-855, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.845.
  • 59. Moorman, R.H., Blakely, G.L. (1995). Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 16, pp. 127-142, doi: 10.1002/job.4030160204.
  • 60. Moorman, R.H., Niehoff, B.P., Organ, D.W. (1993). Treating employees fairly and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Sorting the effects of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and procedural justice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, Vol. 6(3), pp. 209-225, doi: 10.1007/BF01419445.
  • 61. Moos, R. (1986). Work Environment Scale: Manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • 62. Morrison, E.W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: the importance of the employee's perspective. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37(6), pp. 1543-1567, doi: 10.2307/256798.
  • 63. Nadeem, K., Riaz, A., Danish, R.Q. (2019). Influence of high-performance work system on employee service performance and OCB: the mediating role of resilience. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Vol. 9, pp. 1-13, doi: 10.1186/s40497-018-0142-2.
  • 64. Naz, S., Kousir, T., Khawaja, A.O. (2021). Leadership styles as predictors of employee general health and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Asian Social Studies and Applied Research, Vol. 2(3), pp. 417-446.
  • 65. Niehoff, B.P., Moorman, R.H. (1993). Justice as mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behaviour. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36(3), pp. 527-556, doi: 10.2307/256591.
  • 66. Nübling, M., Stößel, U., Hasselhorn, H.-M., Michaelis, M., Hofmann, F. (2006). Measuring psychological stress and strain at work - Evaluation of the COPSOQ Questionnaire in Germany. Psycho-Social-Medicine, Vol. 3, pp. 1-14.
  • 67. Organ, D.W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington: D.C. Heath and Company.
  • 68. Organ, D.W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its construct clean-up time. Human Performance, Vol. 10, pp. 85-97, doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2.
  • 69. Organ, D.W., Lingl, A. (1995). Personality, satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 135(3), pp. 339-350, doi: 10.1080/00224545.1995.9713963.
  • 70. Organ, D.W., Konovsky, M. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 74(1), pp. 157-164, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.157.
  • 71. Organ, D.W., Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, Vol. 48, pp. 775-802, doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x.
  • 72. Organizational Citizenship Behavior Checklist. Retrieved from: http://shell.cas.usf.edu/ ~pspector/scales/ocbcpage.html, 26.01.2018.
  • 73. Owor, J.J. (2015). HR practices and OCB: mediating role of employee engagement in soft drink firms in Uganda. International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 6(9)(1), pp. 159-170.
  • 74. Paliga, M. (2021). Satysfakcja z pracy i wydajność pracowników: relacja (nie)oczekiwana. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
  • 75. Podsakoff, N.P., Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Maynes, T.D., Spoelma, T.M. (2013). Consequences of unit-level organizational citizenship behaviors: A review and recommendations for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 35, pp. 87-119, doi: 10.1002/job.1911.
  • 76. Podsakoff, N.P., Podsakoff, P.M., Whiting, S.W., Mishra, P. (2011). Effects of organizational citizenship behaviors on selection decisions in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 96(2), pp. 310-326, doi: 10.1037/a0020948.
  • 77. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, J.B., Bachrach, D.G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, Vol. 26(3), pp. 513-563, doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00047-7.
  • 78. Podsakoff, P.M., Ahearne, M., MacKenzie, S.B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82(2), pp. 262-270, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.262.
  • 79. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: a review and suggestion for future research. Human Performance, Vol. 10(2), pp. 133-151, doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1002_5.
  • 80. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Bommer, W. (1996a). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, Vol. 22, pp. 259-298, doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063(96)90049-5.
  • 81. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Bommer, W.H. (1996b), Meta-analysis of the relationship between Kerr and Jermier's substitutes for leadership and employee job attitudes, role perceptions, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 81(4), pp. 380-399, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.380.
  • 82. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Moorman, R., Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 1, pp. 107-142, doi: 10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7.
  • 83. Rioux, S.M., Penner, L.A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86(6), pp. 1306-1314, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1306.
  • 84. Rosário, S., Azevedo, L.F., Fonseca, J.A., Nienhaus, A., Nübling, M., da Costa, J.T. (2017). The Portuguese long version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) - a validation study. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, Vol. 12(24), pp. 1-17, doi: 10.1186/s12995-017-0170-9.
  • 85. Rothschild, J., Milofsky, C. (2006). The centrality of values, passions, and ethics in nonprofit sector. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, Vol. 17(2), pp. 137-143, doi:10.1002/nml.139.
  • 86. Schepman, S.B., Zarate, M.A. (2008). The relationship between burnout, negative affectivity and organizational citizenship behavior for human services employees. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 2(4), pp. 242-247.
  • 87. Shanock, L.R., Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: relationships with subordinates' perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied psychology, Vol. 91(3), pp. 689-95, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.689.
  • 88. Shapiro, S.S., Wilk, M.B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, Vol. 52, pp. 591-611, doi: 10.2307/2333709.
  • 89. Sharma, A. (2019). Meaningfulness of work and perceived organizational prestige as precursors of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, Vol. 7(1), pp. 316-323, doi: 10.18510/hssr.2019.7136.
  • 90. Smith, C.A., Organ, D.W., Near, J.P. (1983), Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 68, pp. 653-663, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653.
  • 91. Snape, E., Redman, T. (2010). HRM practices, organizational citizenship behaviour, and performance: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 47(7), pp. 1219-1247, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00911.x.
  • 92. Spector, P.E., Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior. Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 12, pp. 1-24, doi: 10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00049-9.
  • 93. Spector, P.E., Fox, S. (2010). Counterproductive work behavior and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Are they opposite forms of active behavior? Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 59(1), pp. 21-39, doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00414.x.
  • 94. Spector, P.E., Bauer, J.A., Fox, S. (2010). Measurement artifacts in the assessment of counterproductive work behaviour and organizational citizenship behavior: Do we know what we think we know? Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 95(4), pp. 781-790, doi: 10.1037/a0019477.
  • 95. Suárez-Mendoza, M., Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P. (2008). The impact of work alienation on organizational citizenship behavior in the Canary Islands. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 15, pp. 56-76, doi: 10.1108/19348830710860156.
  • 96. Sumarsi, S., Rizal, A. (2022). The effect of competence and quality of work life on organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) with organizational commitment mediation. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, Vol. 2(6), pp. 69-88.
  • 97. Sun, L.Y., Aryee, S., Law, K.S. (2007), High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: a relational perspective. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50(3), pp. 558-577, jstor.org/stable/20159873.
  • 98. Turnipseed, D. (2017). Emotional Intelligence and OCB: The Moderating Role of Work Locus of Control. The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 158, pp. 322-336, doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1346582.
  • 99. Turnipseed, D., Murkison, G. (1996). Organization citizenship behaviour: an examination of the influence of the workplace. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 17(2), pp. 42-47, doi: 10.1108/01437739610111222.
  • 100. Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L.L., Parks, J.M. (1995), Extra-role behaviors: in pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters). Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 17, pp. 215-285.
  • 101. Van Dyne, L., Graham, J.W., Dienesch, R.M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management, Vol. 37(4), pp. 765-802, doi: 10.2307/256600.
  • 102. Wang, L., Dong, X., An, Y., Chen, C., Eckert, M., Sharplin, G., Fish, J., Fan, X. (2022). Relationships between job burnout, ethical climate and organizational citizenship behaviour among registered nurses: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Practice, doi:10.1111/ijn.13115.
  • 103. Wayne, S.J., Shore, L.M., Liden, R.C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, pp. 82-111, doi: 10.2307/257021.
  • 104. Wei, Y.C., Han, T.S., Hsu, I.C. (2010). High-performance HR practices and OCB: A cross-level investigation of a causal path. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 21(10), pp. 1631-1648, doi: 10.1080/09585192.2010.500487.
  • 105. Wemken, G., Janurek, J., Junker, N.M., Häusser, J.A. (2021). The impact of social comparisons of job demands and job control on well-being. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, Vol. 13, pp. 419-436, doi: 10.1111/aphw.12257.
  • 106. Widerszal-Bazyl, M. (2017). Kopenhaski Kwestionariusz Psychospołeczny (COPSOQ) - właściwości psychometryczne wybranych skal w polskiej wersji. Medycyna Pracy, No. 68(3), pp. 329-348, doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00443.
  • 107. Williams, L.J., Anderson, S.E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, Vol. 17(3), pp. 601-617, doi: 10.1177/014920639101700305.
  • 108. Wortler, B., Van Yperen, N.W., Barelds, D.P.H. (2019). Do individual differences in need strength moderate the relations between basic psychological need satisfaction and Organizational Citizenship Behavior? Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 44, pp. 315-328, doi: 10.1007/s11031-019-09775-9.
  • 109. Yang, F., Zhang, Y. (2022). Beyond formal exchange: An informal perspective on the role of leader humor on employee OCB. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 151, pp. 118-125, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.054.
  • 110. Youn, H., Kim, J.-H. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility and hotel employees' Organizational Citizenship Behavior: the roles of organizational pride and meaningfulness of work. Sustainability, Vol. 14, p. 2428, doi: 10.3390/su14042428.
  • 111. Yurcu, G., Colakglu, U., Atay, H. (2015). The effect of organizational citizenship behavior on subjective well-being. International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 6(1), pp. 120-130.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171688744

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.