PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2023 | z. 184 Współczesne zarządzanie = Contemporary Management | 45--59
Tytuł artykułu

Unethical Pro-organisational Behaviour Aimed at Undermining Quality

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The primary purpose of this article is to identify the manifestations and causes of unethical pro-organisational behaviour related to the lowering of quality, as well as to propose measures that could prevent such behaviour. Design/methodology/approach: The main research method used was a literature review. The applied procedure was in line with the general methodology for conducting research in management sciences (Easterby-Smith et al., 2015). Exemplification was used as an ancillary research tool. Findings: Manifestations of unethical pro-organisational behaviour aimed at the lowering of quality include falsifying system documentation, hiding quality errors that occur in individual processes, deliberately impairing product quality by reducing the quantity of particular components or replacing them with lower-quality substitutes, providing customers with a completely different product under the organisation's own name and reducing quality objectives. Paradoxically, the occurrence of such behaviour is fostered by excessive identification, affective commitment, organisational support resulting in a sense of indebtedness to the organisation, pressure for results and even satisfaction with one's job. The possible measures that could prevent unethical pro-organisational behaviour include the following: applying the principle of positive discipline, entering into transparent psychological contracts, abandoning annual employee appraisals, employee rankings and bonus systems whose results depend on employee cooperation, as well as the variable part of managers' remuneration. Research limitations/implications: A literature review is not a perfect way to obtain information. The article does not discuss all causes and manifestations of unethical pro-organisational behaviour that may occur in organisations oriented towards quality. Practical implications: Based on the conclusions formulated on the basis of the conducted research, managers can significantly reduce the development of unethical behaviour (mainly by following the recommendations of E. Deming). Originality/value: While there is a large body of literature on the causes of unethical pro-organisational behaviour, very little is known about their causes and manifestations in organisations focused on quality. (original abstract)
Twórcy
autor
  • Jagiellonian University
  • University of Rzeszow
Bibliografia
  • 1. Balachander, S., Stock, A. (2009). Limited edition products: When and when not to offer them. Marketing Science, 28(2), 336-355.
  • 2. Bryant, W., Merritt, S.M. (2021). Unethical pro-organizational behavior and positive leader-employee relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(4), 777-793. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04211-x.
  • 3. Bugdol, M. (2007). Etyczne problemy zarządzania jakością. Problemy Jakości, 2, 10-13.
  • 4. Bugdol, M., Jedynak, P. (2020). Bonus for quality of products and services in the TQM concept. The problems of reality and justice. International Journal for Quality Research, 4(2), 717-738. DOI: 10.24874/IJQR14.03-05.
  • 5. Bugdol, M., Jedynak, P. (2022). Quality objectives in management systems - their attributes, establishment and motivational function. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 39(1), 115-136. DOI: 10.1108/IJQRM-05-2020-0173.
  • 6. Chen, H., Kwan, H.K., Xin, J. (2022). Is behaving unethically for organizations a mixed blessing? A dual-pathway model for the work-to-family spillover effects of unethical pro-organizational behaviour. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39(4), 1535-1560. DOI: 10.1007/s10490-021-09776-8.
  • 7. Chen, M., Chen, C., (2023). The moral dark side of performance pressure: how and when it affects unethical pro-organizational behaviour. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(7), 1359-1389. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2021.1991434.
  • 8. Chen, M., Chen, C., Schminke, M. (2023). Feeling Guilty and Entitled: Paradoxical Consequences of Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(3), 865-883. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-022-05109-x.
  • 9. Cheng, K., Wei, F., Lin, Y. (2019). The trickle-down effect of responsible leadership on unethical pro-organizational behavior: The moderating role of leader-follower value congruence. Journal of Business Research, 102, 34-43. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres. 2019.04.044.
  • 10. Clugston, M., Howell, J.P., Dorfman, P.W. (2000). Does cultural socialization predict multiple bases and foci of commitment? Journal of Management, 26(1), 5-30. DOI:10.1016/S0149-2063(99)00034-3.
  • 11. Cohen, N. (2005). The Bank borrows an idea - from Enron. New Statesman, 134(4763), 14-15.
  • 12. Deming, W.E. (1994). The New Economics for Industry, Education, Government. Cambridge: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
  • 13. Ding, H., Liu, J. (2022). The dark side of strengths-based approach in the workplace: Perceived strengths-based human resource system spurs unethical pro-organizational behaviour. Current Psychology, 42(25), 1-10. DOI:10.1007/s12144-022-03249-x.
  • 14. Dou, K., Chen, Y., Lu, J., Li, J., Wang, Y. (2019). Why and when does job satisfaction promote unethical pro-organizational behaviours? Testing a moderated mediation model. International Journal of Psychology, 54(6), 766-774. DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12528.
  • 15. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorne, R., Jackson, P.R. (2015). Management and Business Research. Los Angeles-Singapore: Sage.
  • 16. Effelsberg, D., Solga, M. (2015). Transformational leaders' in-group versus out-group orientation: Testing the link between leaders' organizational identification, their willingness to engage in unethical pro-organizational behavior, and follower-perceived transformational leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(4), 581-590. DOI:10.1007/ s10551-013-1972-z.
  • 17. Farasat, M., Azam, A. (2020). Supervisor bottom-line mentality and subordinates' unethical pro-organizational behavior. Personnel Review, 51(1), 353-376. DOI: 10.1108/PR-03-2020-0129.
  • 18. Fehr, R., Welsh, D., Yam, K.C., Baer, M., Wei, W., Vaulont, M. (2019). The role of moral decoupling in the causes and consequences of unethical pro-organizational behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 153, 27-40. DOI:10.1016/ j.obhdp.2019.05.007.
  • 19. Ghosh, S.K. (2017). The direct and interactive effects of job insecurity and job embeddedness on unethical pro-organizational behavior: An empirical examination. Personnel Review, 46(6), 1182-1198. DOI:10.1108/PR-05-2015-0126.
  • 20. Graham, K. Resick, C., Margolis, J., Shao, P., Hargis, M., Kiker, J. (2020). Egoistic Norms, Organizational Identification, and the Perceived Ethicality of Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior: A Moral Maturation Perspective. Human Relations. 73(9), 1249-1277. DOI: 10.1177/0018726719862851.
  • 21. Graham, K., Ziegert, J., Capitano, J. (2015). The Effect of Leadership Style, Framing, and Promotion Regulatory Focus on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 423-436. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1952-3.
  • 22. Griep, Y., Kraak, J.M., Fenneman, J., Jiménez, A., Lub, X.D. (2023). You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours: Unethical pro-organizational behavior and deviance in response to different psychological contract states. Journal of Business Research, 156. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113537.
  • 23. Guajardo, J.A., Cohen, M.A., Netessine, S. (2016). Service competition and product quality in the US automobile industry. Management Science, 62(7), 1860-1877.
  • 24. Hardy, S.A., Carlo, G. (2011). Moral identity: What is it, how does it develop, and is it linked to moral action? Child Development Perspectives, 5(3), 212-218.
  • 25. Holmes, P.E., Howard, M.C. (2023). The duplicitous effect of organizational identification: applying social identity theory to identify joint relations with workplace social courage and unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Journal of Positive Psychology, 18(5), 784-797. DOI:10.1080/17439760.2022.2109199.
  • 26. Inam, A., Ho, J.A., Ng, S.I., Mohamed, R. (2021). Inhibiting unethical pro-organizational behavior: harnessing the effects of responsible leadership and leader-member exchange. International Journal of Manpower, 42(7), 1183-1201. DOI:10.1108/IJM-05-2020-0252.
  • 27. Jiang, W., Liang, B., Wang, L. (2023). The Double-Edged Sword Effect of Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior: The Relationship Between Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Work Effort. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(4), 1159-1172. DOI:10.1007/s10551-021-05034-5.
  • 28. Johnson, H., Umphress, E.E. (2019). To help my supervisor: Identification, moral identity, and unethical pro-supervisor behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 519-534.
  • 29. Kazmierska, K. (2018). Doing biographical research - ethical concerns in changing social contexts. Polish Sociological Review, 3(203), 393-411. DOI: 10.26412/psr203.06.
  • 30. Kelebek, E.E., Alniacik, E. (2022). Effects of Leader-Member Exchange, Organizational Identification and Leadership Communication on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: A Study on Bank Employees in Turkey. Sustainability, 14(3), 1055. DOI:10.3390/ su14031055.
  • 31. Kim, C., Lee, C., Lee, G. (2023). Impact of Superiors' Ethical Leadership on Subordinates' Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: Mediating Effects of Followership. Behavioral Sciences, 13(6), 454. DOI:10.3390/bs13060454.
  • 32. Kong, D.T. (2016). The pathway to unethical pro-organizational behavior: Organizational identification as a joint function of work passion and trait mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 86-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.035.
  • 33. Lee, H.W., Bradburn, J., Johnson, R.E., Lin, S.H.J., Chang, C.H.D. (2019). The benefits of receiving gratitude for helpers: a daily investigation of proactive and reactive helping at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104, 197-214. DOI:10.1037/apl0000346.
  • 34. Lee, J., Oh, S.H., Park, S. (2022). Effects of organizational embeddedness on unethical pro-organizational behavior: Roles of perceived status and ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 176(1), 111-125. DOI:10.1007/s10551-020-04661-8.
  • 35. Leffer, K.B. (1982). Ambiguous changes in product quality. The American Economic Review, 72(5), 956-967.
  • 36. Li, C. (2023). Organizational identification and unethical pro-organizational behavior: A culture-moderated meta-analysis. Ethics & Behavior, 1-21. DOI: 10.1080/10508422. 2023.2219356.
  • 37. Li, T., Tang, N. (2022). Inclusive Leadership and Innovative Performance: A Multi-Level Mediation Model of Psychological Safety. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 934831. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.934831.
  • 38. Liu, J., Cao, Y., Lin, C.Y., Huang, Y., Zhou, M. (2007). Low- quality product review detection in opinion summarization. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 334-342.
  • 39. Liu, X.L., Lu, J.G., Zhang, H., Cai, Y. (2021). Helping the organization but hurting yourself: How employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior predicts work-to-life conflict. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 167, 88-100. DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.05.002
  • 40. Matherne, III C.F., Litchfield, S.R. (2012). Investigating the Relationship Between Affective Commitment and Unethical Pro-Organizational Behaviors: The Role of Moral Identity. Journal of Leadership, Accountability & Ethics, 9(5), 35-46.
  • 41. McCorvey, K., Woehr, D.J. (2022). Perceived Ethical Climate and Unethical Behavior: The Moderating Role of Moral Identity. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 19(4), 98-120. DOI:10.33423/jlae.v19i4.5761.
  • 42. Miao, Q., Newman, A., Yu, J., Xu, L. (2013). The Relationship Between Ethical Leadership and Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: Linear or Curvilinear Effects? Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 641-653.
  • 43. Mussa, M., Rosen, S. (1978). Monopoly and product quality. Journal of Economic Theory, 18(2), 301-317.
  • 44. Naseer, S., Bouckenooghe, D., Syed, F., Khan, A., Qazi, S. (2020). The malevolent side of organizational identification: unraveling the impact of psychological entitlement and manipulative personality on unethical work behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35, 333-346. DOI:10.1007/s10869-019-09623-0.
  • 45. Nguyen, C.M., Zhang, L., Morand, D. (2021). Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior: A Moderated Mediational Model of Its Transmission From Managers to Employees. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 28(3), 379-393. DOI: 10.1177/ 15480518211005464.
  • 46. Pennerstorfer, D., Weiss, C.R. (2013). Product quality in the agri-food chain: Do cooperatives offer high-quality wine? European Review of Agricultural Economics, 40(1), 143-162.
  • 47. Qureshi, A.R., Ahmed, A. (2021). The mediating role of reflective moral attentiveness between organizational identification, perceived insider status and unethical pro- organizational behaviors. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 15(3), 522-544.
  • 48. Schuh, S.C., Cai, Y., Kaluza, A.J., Steffens, N.K., David, E.M., Haslam, S.A. (2021). Do leaders condone unethical pro-organizational employee behaviors? The complex interplay between leader organizational identification and moral disengagement. Human Resource Management, 60(6), 969-989. DOI:10.1002/hrm.22060.
  • 49. Schumpeter (2023). Top dogs and babies' bottoms. How companies are coping with inflation. The Economist, 30.04.2023, 56.
  • 50. Shah, M., Sarfraz, M., Khawaja, K.F., Tariq J. (2020). Does narcissism encourage unethical pro-organizational behavior in the service sector? A case study in Pakistan. Global Business & Organizational Excellence, 40(1), 44-57. DOI:10.1002/joe.22062.
  • 51. Sharma, V., Mishra, V., Uppal, N. (2023). Support to sin: a moderated mediation model of perceived organizational support's effect on unethical pro-organizational behavior among Indian nationals. International Journal of Manpower, 44(3), 484-502.
  • 52. Shetty, Y.K. (1988). Managing product quality for profitability. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 53(4), 33-38.
  • 53. Shu, X. (2015). Contagion Effect of Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior among Members within Organization. Metallurgical and Mining Industry, 5, 235-242.
  • 54. Stanisławska, M. (2019). Kreatywna rachunkowość a manipulacja danymi. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Drugie.
  • 55. Tacke, F., Knockaert, M., Patzelt, H., Breugst, N. (2023). When Do Greedy Entrepreneurs Exhibit Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior? The Role of New Venture Team Trust. Journal of Management, 49(3), 974-1004. DOI: 10.1177/01492063211067517.
  • 56. Tamimi, N., Gershon, M. (1995). A tool for assessing industry TQM practice versus the Deming philosophy. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 36(1), 27-32.
  • 57. Tian, Q. Peterson, D.K. (2016). The effects of ethical pressure and power distance orientation on unethical pro-organizational behavior: the case of earnings management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25(2), 159-171. DOI:10.1111/beer.12109.
  • 58. Umphress, E.E., Bingham, J.B. (2011). When Employees Do Bad Things for Good Reasons: Examining Unethical Pro-Organizational Behaviors. Organization Science, 22(3), 621-640. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1100.0559.
  • 59. Umphress, E.E., Bingham, J.B., Mitchell, M.S. (2010). Unethical Behavior in the Name of the Company: The Moderating Effect of Organizational Identification and Positive Reciprocity Beliefs on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 769-780. DOI: 10.1037/a0019214.
  • 60. Uymaz, A., Arslan, S. (2022). Unethical pro-organizational behavior as an outcome of servant leadership. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(1), 33-57. DOI:10.1017/jmo.2021.49.
  • 61. Vem, L.J., Cheah J.-H., Ng, S.I., Ho, J.A. (2023). Unethical pro-organizational behavior: how employee ethical ideology and unethical organizational culture contribute. International Journal of Manpower, 44(4), 577-598. DOI:10.1108/IJM-11-2021-0635.
  • 62. Xiong, G., Huang, H., Ma, Y., Liang, C., Wang, H. (2021). Abusive Supervision and Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: The Mediating Role of Status Challenge and the Moderating Role of Leader-Member Exchange. SAGE Open, 11(3). DOI: 10.1177/21582440211033560.
  • 63. Xu, T., Lv, Z. (2018). HPWS and unethical pro-organizational behavior: a moderated mediation model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(3), 265-278. DOI:10.1108/JMP-12-2017-0457.
  • 64. Xu, X. (2009). Optimal price and product quality decisions in a distribution channel. Management Science, 55(8), 1347-1352.
  • 65. Yang, J., Wei, H., Wu, Y. (2021). Influence of Self-Sacrificial Leadership on the Pro-Organizational Unethical Behavior of Employees: A Moderated Mediating Model. Psychology Research & Behavior Management, 14, 2245-2255. DOI:10.2147/ PRBM.S339718.
  • 66. Yao, Z., Luo, J., Fu, N., Zhang, X., Wan, Q. (2022). Rational Counterattack: The Impact of Workplace Bullying on Unethical Pro-organizational and Pro-family Behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 181(3), 661-682. DOI:10.1007/s10551-021-04918-w.
  • 67. Zhan, X., Liu, Y. (2022). Impact of employee pro-organizational unethical behavior on performance evaluation rated by supervisor: a moderated mediation model of supervisor bottom-line mentality. Chinese Management Studies, 16(1), 102-118. DOI:10.1108/CMS-07-2020-0299.
  • 68. Zhang, S. (2020). Workplace Spirituality and Unethical Pro-organisational Behavior: The Mediating Effect of Job Satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(3), 687-705. DOI:10.1007/s10551-018-3966-3.
  • 69. Zhang, Y. et al. (2020). Effects of supervisor bottom-line mentality on subordinate unethical pro-organizational behaviour. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35(5), pp. 419-434. doi:10.1108/JMP-11-2018-0492.
  • 70. Zhang, Y., Du, S. (2022). Moral cleansing or moral licensing? A study of unethical pro-organizational behavior's differentiating Effects. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 40(3), 1075-1092, DOI:10.1007/s10490-022-09807-y.
  • 71. Zonghua, L., Junyun, L., Yulang, G., Ming, Z., Xu, W. (2022). The effect of corporate social responsibility on unethical pro-organizational behavior: the mediation of moral identity and moderation of supervisor-employee value congruence. Current Psychology, 42(5), 1-14. DOI:10.1007/s12144-022-02722-x.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171688746

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.